Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
- EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE IntelligenceSAP SE · SAP HANA JDBC Client
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Fix not verifiedDue to insufficient validation of connection property values, the SAP HANA JDBC Client allows a high-privilege locally authenticated user to supply crafted parameters that lead to unauthorized code loading, resulting in low impact on confidentiality and integrity and high impact on availability of the application.
Due to insufficient validation of connection property values, the SAP HANA JDBC Client allows a high-privilege locally authenticated user to supply crafted parameters that lead to unauthorized code loading, resulting in low impact on confidentiality and integrity and high impact on availability of the application.
Untrusted data can cross into a code-evaluation path and be interpreted as executable instructions.
An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
Due to insufficient validation of connection property values, the SAP HANA JDBC Client allows a high-privilege locally authenticated user to supply crafted parameters that lead to unauthorized code loading, resulting in low impact on confidentiality and integrity and high impact on availability of the application.
Untrusted data can cross into a code-evaluation path and be interpreted as executable instructions.
An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection'). The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:HCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 11 Nov 2025 · Last source change 12 Nov 2025, 20:10 UTC · CWE-94 · Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.
No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.