BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-40935High confidence

Siemens RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X — Improper Input Validation

Siemens · RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X

5.3MediumCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-763474 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-763474: Denial of Service Vulnerability in Ruggedcom ROS devices before V5.10.1
21 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X
  • RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X
  • RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X
  • RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X
  • RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X
  • RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X
  • RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X
  • RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X
  • RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X
  • RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X
  • RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X
  • RUGGEDCOM RSG907R
Summary
Affected devices do not properly validate input during the TLS certificate upload process of the web service. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to trigger a device crash and reboot, leading to a temporary Denial of Service on the device.
Remediation
Update to V5.10.1 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-201920

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG907R (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG908C (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG909R (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG910C (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSL910 (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RST916C (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RST916P (All versions < V5.10.1). Affected devices do not properly validate input during the TLS certificate upload process of the web service. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to trigger a device crash and reboot, leading to a temporary Denial of Service on the device.

What

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG907R (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG908C (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG909R (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG910C (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSL910 (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RST916C (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RST916P (All versions < V5.10.1). Affected devices do not properly validate input during the TLS certificate upload process of the web service. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to trigger a device crash and reboot, leading to a temporary Denial of Service on the device.

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG907R (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG908C (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG909R (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG910C (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RSL910 (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RST916C (All versions < V5.10.1), RUGGEDCOM RST916P (All versions < V5.10.1). Affected devices do not properly validate input during the TLS certificate upload process of the web service. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to trigger a device crash and reboot, leading to a temporary Denial of Service on the device.

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Input Validation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-20 ↗

CWE-20: Improper Input Validation. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATNoneAttack requirements: No additional deployment or execution condition is required.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCNoneVulnerable-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VINoneVulnerable-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VALowVulnerable-system availability: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkDenial of serviceCWE-20
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0382Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens producten

A vulnerability in RUGGEDCOM devices (versions below V5.10.1) allows authenticated remote attackers to exploit improper input validation during TLS certificate uploads, potentially leading to device crashes and Denial of Service.

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X; RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X; RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X; RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X; RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X; RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X; RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X; RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X; RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X; RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X; RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X; RUGGEDCOM RSG907R; RUGGEDCOM RSG908C; RUGGEDCOM RSG909R; RUGGEDCOM RSG910C; RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X; RUGGEDCOM RSL910; RUGGEDCOM RST2228; RUGGEDCOM RST2228P; RUGGEDCOM RST916C; RUGGEDCOM RST916P
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
Update to V5.10.1 or later version
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 9 Dec 2025 · Last source change 9 Dec 2025, 15:35 UTC · CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-201920
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-201920↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-40935 · cve.blacktree.nl