BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-40350High confidence

net/mlx5e: RX, Fix generating skb from non-linear xdp_buff for striding RQ

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 218 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.55% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 218 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.57-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-40350 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: net/mlx5e: RX, Fix generating skb from non-linear xdp_buff for striding RQ
198 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Summary
A flaw was identified in the mlx5e network driver in the Linux kernel relating to handling of multi-buffer XDP operations. The driver historically assumed that the layout of the XDP bufferremained unchanged by XDP programs. When these programs modify the buffer layout, the driver may construct a socket bufferincorrectly,ignoring linear data or mis-pulling fragments,which can lead to an invalid skb or trigger a BUG_ON() in the kernel.
Remediation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options don't meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-203637

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 218 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: RX, Fix generating skb from non-linear xdp_buff for striding RQ XDP programs can change the layout of an xdp_buff through bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() and bpf_xdp_adjust_head(). Therefore, the driver cannot assume the size of the linear data area nor fragments. Fix the bug in mlx5 by generating skb according to xdp_buff after XDP programs run. Currently, when handling multi-buf XDP, the mlx5 driver assumes the layout of an xdp_buff to be unchanged. That is, the linear data area continues to be empty and fragments remain the same. This may cause the driver to generate erroneous skb or triggering a kernel warning. When an XDP program added linear data through bpf_xdp_adjust_head(), the linear data will be ignored as mlx5e_build_linear_skb() builds an skb without linear data and then pull data from fragments to fill the linear data area. When an XDP program has shrunk the non-linear data through bpf_xdp_adjust_tail(), the delta passed to __pskb_pull_tail() may exceed the actual nonlinear data size and trigger the BUG_ON in it. To fix the issue, first record the original number of fragments. If the number of fragments changes after the XDP program runs, rewind the end fragment pointer by the difference and recalculate the truesize. Then, build the skb with the linear data area matching the xdp_buff. Finally, only pull data in if there is non-linear data and fill the linear part up to 256 bytes.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: RX, Fix generating skb from non-linear xdp_buff for striding RQ XDP programs can change the layout of an xdp_buff through bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() and bpf_xdp_adjust_head(). Therefore, the driver cannot assume the size of the linear data area nor fragments. Fix the bug in mlx5 by generating skb according to xdp_buff after XDP programs run. Currently, when handling multi-buf XDP, the mlx5 driver assumes the layout of an xdp_buff to be unchanged. That is, the linear data area continues to be empty and fragments remain the same. This may cause the driver to generate erroneous skb or triggering a kernel warning. When an XDP program added linear data through bpf_xdp_adjust_head(), the linear data will be ignored as mlx5e_build_linear_skb() builds an skb without linear data and then pull data from fragments to fill the linear data area. When an XDP program has shrunk the non-linear data through bpf_xdp_adjust_tail(), the delta passed to __pskb_pull_tail() may exceed the actual nonlinear data size and trigger the BUG_ON in it. To fix the issue, first record the original number of fragments. If the number of fragments changes after the XDP program runs, rewind the end fragment pointer by the difference and recalculate the truesize. Then, build the skb with the linear data area matching the xdp_buff. Finally, only pull data in if there is non-linear data and fill the linear part up to 256 bytes.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: RX, Fix generating skb from non-linear xdp_buff for striding RQ XDP programs can change the layout of an xdp_buff through bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() and bpf_xdp_adjust_head(). Therefore, the driver cannot assume the size of the linear data area nor fragments. Fix the bug in mlx5 by generating skb according to xdp_buff after XDP programs run. Currently, when handling multi-buf XDP, the mlx5 driver assumes the layout of an xdp_buff to be unchanged. That is, the linear data area continues to be empty and fragments remain the same. This may cause the driver to generate erroneous skb or triggering a kernel warning. When an XDP program added linear data through bpf_xdp_adjust_head(), the linear data will be ignored as mlx5e_build_linear_skb() builds an skb without linear data and then pull data from fragments to fill the linear data area. When an XDP program has shrunk the non-linear data through bpf_xdp_adjust_tail(), the delta passed to __pskb_pull_tail() may exceed the actual nonlinear data size and trigger the BUG_ON in it. To fix the issue, first record the original number of fragments. If the number of fragments changes after the XDP program runs, rewind the end fragment pointer by the difference and recalculate the truesize. Then, build the skb with the linear data area matching the xdp_buff. Finally, only pull data in if there is non-linear data and fill the linear part up to 256 bytes.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2868Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68172 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68172 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68172 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40357 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40357 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0170Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40271 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40280 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40300 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68174 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68178 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68183 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68188 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40357 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0128Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40357 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.4, 6.6.115 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.56 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.17.6 ≤ 6.17.*, 6.18 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options don't meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Dec 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-203637
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-40350 · cve.blacktree.nl