BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-40256High confidence

xfrm: also call xfrm_state_delete_tunnel at destroy time for states that were never added

Linux · Linux

UnscoredAssess manually
Recommended action
Needs assessment

No CVSS base score is available from the CNA, CISA ADP or NIST. Absence of a score is not evidence of low risk; review the vendor advisory, affected exposure and exploit evidence.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

11 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.17Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.17Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-201201

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionNeeds assessment

No CVSS base score is available from the CNA, CISA ADP or NIST. Absence of a score is not evidence of low risk; review the vendor advisory, affected exposure and exploit evidence.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: also call xfrm_state_delete_tunnel at destroy time for states that were never added In commit b441cf3f8c4b ("xfrm: delete x->tunnel as we delete x"), I missed the case where state creation fails between full initialization (->init_state has been called) and being inserted on the lists. In this situation, ->init_state has been called, so for IPcomp tunnels, the fallback tunnel has been created and added onto the lists, but the user state never gets added, because we fail before that. The user state doesn't go through __xfrm_state_delete, so we don't call xfrm_state_delete_tunnel for those states, and we end up leaking the FB tunnel. There are several codepaths affected by this: the add/update paths, in both net/key and xfrm, and the migrate code (xfrm_migrate, xfrm_state_migrate). A "proper" rollback of the init_state work would probably be doable in the add/update code, but for migrate it gets more complicated as multiple states may be involved. At some point, the new (not-inserted) state will be destroyed, so call xfrm_state_delete_tunnel during xfrm_state_gc_destroy. Most states will have their fallback tunnel cleaned up during __xfrm_state_delete, which solves the issue that b441cf3f8c4b (and other patches before it) aimed at. All states (including FB tunnels) will be removed from the lists once xfrm_state_fini has called flush_work(&xfrm_state_gc_work).

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: also call xfrm_state_delete_tunnel at destroy time for states that were never added In commit b441cf3f8c4b ("xfrm: delete x->tunnel as we delete x"), I missed the case where state creation fails between full initialization (->init_state has been called) and being inserted on the lists. In this situation, ->init_state has been called, so for IPcomp tunnels, the fallback tunnel has been created and added onto the lists, but the user state never gets added, because we fail before that. The user state doesn't go through __xfrm_state_delete, so we don't call xfrm_state_delete_tunnel for those states, and we end up leaking the FB tunnel. There are several codepaths affected by this: the add/update paths, in both net/key and xfrm, and the migrate code (xfrm_migrate, xfrm_state_migrate). A "proper" rollback of the init_state work would probably be doable in the add/update code, but for migrate it gets more complicated as multiple states may be involved. At some point, the new (not-inserted) state will be destroyed, so call xfrm_state_delete_tunnel during xfrm_state_gc_destroy. Most states will have their fallback tunnel cleaned up during __xfrm_state_delete, which solves the issue that b441cf3f8c4b (and other patches before it) aimed at. All states (including FB tunnels) will be removed from the lists once xfrm_state_fini has called flush_work(&xfrm_state_gc_work).

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: also call xfrm_state_delete_tunnel at destroy time for states that were never added In commit b441cf3f8c4b ("xfrm: delete x->tunnel as we delete x"), I missed the case where state creation fails between full initialization (->init_state has been called) and being inserted on the lists. In this situation, ->init_state has been called, so for IPcomp tunnels, the fallback tunnel has been created and added onto the lists, but the user state never gets added, because we fail before that. The user state doesn't go through __xfrm_state_delete, so we don't call xfrm_state_delete_tunnel for those states, and we end up leaking the FB tunnel. There are several codepaths affected by this: the add/update paths, in both net/key and xfrm, and the migrate code (xfrm_migrate, xfrm_state_migrate). A "proper" rollback of the init_state work would probably be doable in the add/update code, but for migrate it gets more complicated as multiple states may be involved. At some point, the new (not-inserted) state will be destroyed, so call xfrm_state_delete_tunnel during xfrm_state_gc_destroy. Most states will have their fallback tunnel cleaned up during __xfrm_state_delete, which solves the issue that b441cf3f8c4b (and other patches before it) aimed at. All states (including FB tunnels) will be removed from the lists once xfrm_state_fini has called flush_work(&xfrm_state_gc_work).

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
the affected interface → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Unspecified
Privileges required
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
User interaction
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Attack complexity
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Security boundary
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
Not available from the selected scoring authority.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-2747Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder weitere, nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erlangen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40243 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40267 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40270 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40273 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40243 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40267 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40270 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40273 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0170Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40177 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40181 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40198 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40202 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40243 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40267 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40270 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40273 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0128Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0108Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
1b28a7fae0128fa140a7dccd995182ff6cd1c67b < 57b72d74d4651dc19d046308a8304eb9abfe66ac; 4b2c17d0f9be8b58bb30468bc81a4b61c985b04e < 1dad653643f28ccc89be93f9440b8804cded85b2; 0da961fa46da1b37ef868d9b603bd202136f8f8e < 64441724387b4ac92f67ef51caaaeffe99c950d1; d0e0d1097118461463b76562c7ebaabaa5b90b13 < 763e5c351206c1e4d910db4a1159053f6263689c; dc3636912d41770466543623cb76e7b88fdb42c7 < f7d879c19d306512c2e260f37e8a3e5c85e37c50; b441cf3f8c4b8576639d20c8eb4aa32917602ecd < d6fe5c740c573af10943b8353992e1325cdb2715; b441cf3f8c4b8576639d20c8eb4aa32917602ecd < 10deb69864840ccf96b00ac2ab3a2055c0c04721; 6.16
Fixed
< 6.16; 6.17.10 ≤ 6.17.*; 6.18 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Dec 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:45 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceUnavailable
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-201201
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CVSS base score, CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-40256 · cve.blacktree.nl