BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-40254High confidence

net: openvswitch: remove never-working support for setting nsh fields

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-253495 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

…UnscoredAssess manually
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

No CVSS base score is available from the CNA, CISA ADP or NIST. Absence of a score is not evidence of low risk; review the vendor advisory, affected exposure and exploit evidence. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityUnscoredOperational priority:Needs assessment, manual assessment needed.unscored

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Manual assessmentRemediation target: Manual assessment

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.63-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.159-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-253495 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-253495: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SINEC OS before V4.0
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: openvswitch: remove never-working support for setting nsh fields The validation of the set(nsh(...)) action is completely wrong. It runs through the nsh_key_put_from_nlattr() function that is the same function that validates NSH keys for the flow match and the push_nsh() action. However, the set(nsh(...)) has a very different memory layout. Nested attributes in there are doubled in size in case of the masked set(). That makes proper validation impossible. There is also confusion in the code between the 'masked' flag, that says that the nested attributes are doubled in size containing both the value and the mask, and the 'is_mask' that says that the value we're parsing is the mask. This is causing kernel crash on trying to write into mask part of the match with SW_FLOW_KEY_PUT() during validation, while validate_nsh() doesn't allocate any memory for it: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 1c2383067 P4D 1c2383067 PUD 20b703067 PMD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 8 UID: 0 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.17.0-rc4+ #107 PREEMPT(voluntary) RIP: 0010:nsh_key_put_from_nlattr+0x19d/0x610 [openvswitch] Call Trace: validate_nsh+0x60/0x90 [openvswitch] validate_set.constprop.0+0x270/0x3c0 [openvswitch] __ovs_nla_copy_actions+0x477/0x860 [openvswitch] ovs_nla_copy_actions+0x8d/0x100 [openvswitch] ovs_packet_cmd_execute+0x1cc/0x310 [openvswitch] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xdb/0x130 genl_family_rcv_msg+0x14b/0x220 genl_rcv_msg+0x47/0xa0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x53/0x100 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x280/0x3b0 netlink_sendmsg+0x1f7/0x430 ____sys_sendmsg+0x36b/0x3a0 ___sys_sendmsg+0x87/0xd0 __sys_sendmsg+0x6d/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x2c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The third issue with this process is that while trying to convert the non-masked set into masked one, validate_set() copies and doubles the size of the OVS_KEY_ATTR_NSH as if it didn't have any nested attributes. It should be copying each nested attribute and doubling them in size independently. And the process must be properly reversed during the conversion back from masked to a non-masked variant during the flow dump. In the end, the only two outcomes of trying to use this action are either validation failure or a kernel crash. And if somehow someone manages to install a flow with such an action, it will most definitely not do what it is supposed to, since all the keys and the masks are mixed up. Fixing all the issues is a complex task as it requires re-writing most of the validation code. Given that and the fact that this functionality never worked since introduction, let's just remove it altogether. It's better to re-introduce it later with a proper implementation instead of trying to fix it in stable releases.
Remediation
Update to V4.0 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-201203

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

No CVSS base score is available from the CNA, CISA ADP or NIST. Absence of a score is not evidence of low risk; review the vendor advisory, affected exposure and exploit evidence. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: openvswitch: remove never-working support for setting nsh fields The validation of the set(nsh(...)) action is completely wrong. It runs through the nsh_key_put_from_nlattr() function that is the same function that validates NSH keys for the flow match and the push_nsh() action. However, the set(nsh(...)) has a very different memory layout. Nested attributes in there are doubled in size in case of the masked set(). That makes proper validation impossible. There is also confusion in the code between the 'masked' flag, that says that the nested attributes are doubled in size containing both the value and the mask, and the 'is_mask' that says that the value we're parsing is the mask. This is causing kernel crash on trying to write into mask part of the match with SW_FLOW_KEY_PUT() during validation, while validate_nsh() doesn't allocate any memory for it: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 1c2383067 P4D 1c2383067 PUD 20b703067 PMD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 8 UID: 0 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.17.0-rc4+ #107 PREEMPT(voluntary) RIP: 0010:nsh_key_put_from_nlattr+0x19d/0x610 [openvswitch] Call Trace: <TASK> validate_nsh+0x60/0x90 [openvswitch] validate_set.constprop.0+0x270/0x3c0 [openvswitch] __ovs_nla_copy_actions+0x477/0x860 [openvswitch] ovs_nla_copy_actions+0x8d/0x100 [openvswitch] ovs_packet_cmd_execute+0x1cc/0x310 [openvswitch] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xdb/0x130 genl_family_rcv_msg+0x14b/0x220 genl_rcv_msg+0x47/0xa0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x53/0x100 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x280/0x3b0 netlink_sendmsg+0x1f7/0x430 ____sys_sendmsg+0x36b/0x3a0 ___sys_sendmsg+0x87/0xd0 __sys_sendmsg+0x6d/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x2c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The third issue with this process is that while trying to convert the non-masked set into masked one, validate_set() copies and doubles the size of the OVS_KEY_ATTR_NSH as if it didn't have any nested attributes. It should be copying each nested attribute and doubling them in size independently. And the process must be properly reversed during the conversion back from masked to a non-masked variant during the flow dump. In the end, the only two outcomes of trying to use this action are either validation failure or a kernel crash. And if somehow someone manages to install a flow with such an action, it will most definitely not do what it is supposed to, since all the keys and the masks are mixed up. Fixing all the issues is a complex task as it requires re-writing most of the validation code. Given that and the fact that this functionality never worked since introduction, let's just remove it altogether. It's better to re-introduce it later with a proper implementation instead of trying to fix it in stable releases.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: openvswitch: remove never-working support for setting nsh fields The validation of the set(nsh(...)) action is completely wrong. It runs through the nsh_key_put_from_nlattr() function that is the same function that validates NSH keys for the flow match and the push_nsh() action. However, the set(nsh(...)) has a very different memory layout. Nested attributes in there are doubled in size in case of the masked set(). That makes proper validation impossible. There is also confusion in the code between the 'masked' flag, that says that the nested attributes are doubled in size containing both the value and the mask, and the 'is_mask' that says that the value we're parsing is the mask. This is causing kernel crash on trying to write into mask part of the match with SW_FLOW_KEY_PUT() during validation, while validate_nsh() doesn't allocate any memory for it: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 1c2383067 P4D 1c2383067 PUD 20b703067 PMD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 8 UID: 0 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.17.0-rc4+ #107 PREEMPT(voluntary) RIP: 0010:nsh_key_put_from_nlattr+0x19d/0x610 [openvswitch] Call Trace: <TASK> validate_nsh+0x60/0x90 [openvswitch] validate_set.constprop.0+0x270/0x3c0 [openvswitch] __ovs_nla_copy_actions+0x477/0x860 [openvswitch] ovs_nla_copy_actions+0x8d/0x100 [openvswitch] ovs_packet_cmd_execute+0x1cc/0x310 [openvswitch] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xdb/0x130 genl_family_rcv_msg+0x14b/0x220 genl_rcv_msg+0x47/0xa0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x53/0x100 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x280/0x3b0 netlink_sendmsg+0x1f7/0x430 ____sys_sendmsg+0x36b/0x3a0 ___sys_sendmsg+0x87/0xd0 __sys_sendmsg+0x6d/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x2c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The third issue with this process is that while trying to convert the non-masked set into masked one, validate_set() copies and doubles the size of the OVS_KEY_ATTR_NSH as if it didn't have any nested attributes. It should be copying each nested attribute and doubling them in size independently. And the process must be properly reversed during the conversion back from masked to a non-masked variant during the flow dump. In the end, the only two outcomes of trying to use this action are either validation failure or a kernel crash. And if somehow someone manages to install a flow with such an action, it will most definitely not do what it is supposed to, since all the keys and the masks are mixed up. Fixing all the issues is a complex task as it requires re-writing most of the validation code. Given that and the fact that this functionality never worked since introduction, let's just remove it altogether. It's better to re-introduce it later with a proper implementation instead of trying to fix it in stable releases.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: openvswitch: remove never-working support for setting nsh fields The validation of the set(nsh(...)) action is completely wrong. It runs through the nsh_key_put_from_nlattr() function that is the same function that validates NSH keys for the flow match and the push_nsh() action. However, the set(nsh(...)) has a very different memory layout. Nested attributes in there are doubled in size in case of the masked set(). That makes proper validation impossible. There is also confusion in the code between the 'masked' flag, that says that the nested attributes are doubled in size containing both the value and the mask, and the 'is_mask' that says that the value we're parsing is the mask. This is causing kernel crash on trying to write into mask part of the match with SW_FLOW_KEY_PUT() during validation, while validate_nsh() doesn't allocate any memory for it: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 1c2383067 P4D 1c2383067 PUD 20b703067 PMD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 8 UID: 0 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.17.0-rc4+ #107 PREEMPT(voluntary) RIP: 0010:nsh_key_put_from_nlattr+0x19d/0x610 [openvswitch] Call Trace: <TASK> validate_nsh+0x60/0x90 [openvswitch] validate_set.constprop.0+0x270/0x3c0 [openvswitch] __ovs_nla_copy_actions+0x477/0x860 [openvswitch] ovs_nla_copy_actions+0x8d/0x100 [openvswitch] ovs_packet_cmd_execute+0x1cc/0x310 [openvswitch] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xdb/0x130 genl_family_rcv_msg+0x14b/0x220 genl_rcv_msg+0x47/0xa0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x53/0x100 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x280/0x3b0 netlink_sendmsg+0x1f7/0x430 ____sys_sendmsg+0x36b/0x3a0 ___sys_sendmsg+0x87/0xd0 __sys_sendmsg+0x6d/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x2c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The third issue with this process is that while trying to convert the non-masked set into masked one, validate_set() copies and doubles the size of the OVS_KEY_ATTR_NSH as if it didn't have any nested attributes. It should be copying each nested attribute and doubling them in size independently. And the process must be properly reversed during the conversion back from masked to a non-masked variant during the flow dump. In the end, the only two outcomes of trying to use this action are either validation failure or a kernel crash. And if somehow someone manages to install a flow with such an action, it will most definitely not do what it is supposed to, since all the keys and the masks are mixed up. Fixing all the issues is a complex task as it requires re-writing most of the validation code. Given that and the fact that this functionality never worked since introduction, let's just remove it altogether. It's better to re-introduce it later with a proper implementation instead of trying to fix it in stable releases.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
the affected interface → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Unspecified
Privileges required
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
User interaction
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Attack complexity
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Security boundary
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
Not available from the selected scoring authority.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
Denial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2747Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder weitere, nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erlangen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251210Security Bulletin 10 Dec 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 Dec 2025, published on 10 December 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40243 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40243 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40243 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40247 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40260 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40247 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40260 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40247 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40260 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40247 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40260 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-40222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40247 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-40222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40247 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0170Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40166 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40177 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40181 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40198 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40202 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0128Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0057Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38593 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1136Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-40219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40243 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1078Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

0242 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40243 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40244 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40245 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40247 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40248 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40250 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40251 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40252 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40253 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40254 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40257 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40258 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40259 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40261 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40262 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40263 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40264 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40266 du 06 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-61727 du 06 décembre 2025 Une gestion de version détaillée se

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6641MS 12월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

| KVM: arm64: Check the untrusted offset in FF-A memory share | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40264 | be2net: pass wrb_params in case of OS2BMC | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40263 | Input: cros_ec_keyb - fix an invalid memory access | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40262 | Input: imx_sc_key - fix memory corruption on unload | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40261 | nvme: nvme-fc: Ensure ->ioerr_work is cancelled in nvme_fc_delete_ctrl() | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40259 | scsi: sg: Do not sleep in atomic context | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40258 | mptcp: fix race condition in mptcp_schedule_work() | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40257 | mptcp: fix a race in mptcp_pm_del_add_timer() | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40254 | net: openvswitch: remove never-working support for setting nsh fields | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40253 | s390/ctcm: Fix double-kfree | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40252 | net: qlogic/qede: fix potential out-of-bounds read in qede_tpa_cont() and qede_tpa_end() | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40251 | devlink: rate: Unset parent pointer in devl_rate_nodes_destroy | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40250 | net/mlx5: Clean up only new IRQ glue on request_irq() failure | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40248 | vsock: Ignore signal/timeout on connect() if already established | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40247 | drm/msm: Fix pgtable prealloc error path | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40245 | nios2: ensur

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
Fixed
Linux: < 4.15, 5.4.302 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.247 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.197 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.159 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.118 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.60 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.17.10 ≤ 6.17.*, 6.18 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Dec 2025 · Last source change 16 Jun 2026, 19:43 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceUnavailable
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-201203
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CVSS base score, CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-40254 · cve.blacktree.nl