BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-40147High confidence

blk-throttle: fix access race during throttle policy activation

Linux · Linux

UnscoredAssess manually
Recommended action
Needs assessment

No CVSS base score is available from the CNA, CISA ADP or NIST. Absence of a score is not evidence of low risk; review the vendor advisory, affected exposure and exploit evidence.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

13 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-124936

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionNeeds assessment

No CVSS base score is available from the CNA, CISA ADP or NIST. Absence of a score is not evidence of low risk; review the vendor advisory, affected exposure and exploit evidence.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: blk-throttle: fix access race during throttle policy activation On repeated cold boots we occasionally hit a NULL pointer crash in blk_should_throtl() when throttling is consulted before the throttle policy is fully enabled for the queue. Checking only q->td != NULL is insufficient during early initialization, so blkg_to_pd() for the throttle policy can still return NULL and blkg_to_tg() becomes NULL, which later gets dereferenced. Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000156 ... pc : submit_bio_noacct+0x14c/0x4c8 lr : submit_bio_noacct+0x48/0x4c8 sp : ffff800087f0b690 x29: ffff800087f0b690 x28: 0000000000005f90 x27: ffff00068af393c0 x26: 0000000000080000 x25: 000000000002fbc0 x24: ffff000684ddcc70 x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000080000 x19: ffff000684ddcd08 x18: ffffffffffffffff x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff80008132a550 x15: 0000ffff98020fff x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 1fffe000d11d7021 x12: ffff000688eb810c x11: ffff00077ec4bb80 x10: ffff000688dcb720 x9 : ffff80008068ef60 x8 : 00000a6fb8a86e85 x7 : 000000000000111e x6 : 0000000000000002 x5 : 0000000000000246 x4 : 0000000000015cff x3 : 0000000000394500 x2 : ffff000682e35e40 x1 : 0000000000364940 x0 : 000000000000001a Call trace: submit_bio_noacct+0x14c/0x4c8 verity_map+0x178/0x2c8 __map_bio+0x228/0x250 dm_submit_bio+0x1c4/0x678 __submit_bio+0x170/0x230 submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x16c/0x388 submit_bio_noacct+0x16c/0x4c8 submit_bio+0xb4/0x210 f2fs_submit_read_bio+0x4c/0xf0 f2fs_mpage_readpages+0x3b0/0x5f0 f2fs_readahead+0x90/0xe8 Tighten blk_throtl_activated() to also require that the throttle policy bit is set on the queue: return q->td != NULL && test_bit(blkcg_policy_throtl.plid, q->blkcg_pols); This prevents blk_should_throtl() from accessing throttle group state until policy data has been attached to blkgs.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: blk-throttle: fix access race during throttle policy activation On repeated cold boots we occasionally hit a NULL pointer crash in blk_should_throtl() when throttling is consulted before the throttle policy is fully enabled for the queue. Checking only q->td != NULL is insufficient during early initialization, so blkg_to_pd() for the throttle policy can still return NULL and blkg_to_tg() becomes NULL, which later gets dereferenced. Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000156 ... pc : submit_bio_noacct+0x14c/0x4c8 lr : submit_bio_noacct+0x48/0x4c8 sp : ffff800087f0b690 x29: ffff800087f0b690 x28: 0000000000005f90 x27: ffff00068af393c0 x26: 0000000000080000 x25: 000000000002fbc0 x24: ffff000684ddcc70 x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000080000 x19: ffff000684ddcd08 x18: ffffffffffffffff x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff80008132a550 x15: 0000ffff98020fff x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 1fffe000d11d7021 x12: ffff000688eb810c x11: ffff00077ec4bb80 x10: ffff000688dcb720 x9 : ffff80008068ef60 x8 : 00000a6fb8a86e85 x7 : 000000000000111e x6 : 0000000000000002 x5 : 0000000000000246 x4 : 0000000000015cff x3 : 0000000000394500 x2 : ffff000682e35e40 x1 : 0000000000364940 x0 : 000000000000001a Call trace: submit_bio_noacct+0x14c/0x4c8 verity_map+0x178/0x2c8 __map_bio+0x228/0x250 dm_submit_bio+0x1c4/0x678 __submit_bio+0x170/0x230 submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x16c/0x388 submit_bio_noacct+0x16c/0x4c8 submit_bio+0xb4/0x210 f2fs_submit_read_bio+0x4c/0xf0 f2fs_mpage_readpages+0x3b0/0x5f0 f2fs_readahead+0x90/0xe8 Tighten blk_throtl_activated() to also require that the throttle policy bit is set on the queue: return q->td != NULL && test_bit(blkcg_policy_throtl.plid, q->blkcg_pols); This prevents blk_should_throtl() from accessing throttle group state until policy data has been attached to blkgs.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: blk-throttle: fix access race during throttle policy activation On repeated cold boots we occasionally hit a NULL pointer crash in blk_should_throtl() when throttling is consulted before the throttle policy is fully enabled for the queue. Checking only q->td != NULL is insufficient during early initialization, so blkg_to_pd() for the throttle policy can still return NULL and blkg_to_tg() becomes NULL, which later gets dereferenced. Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000156 ... pc : submit_bio_noacct+0x14c/0x4c8 lr : submit_bio_noacct+0x48/0x4c8 sp : ffff800087f0b690 x29: ffff800087f0b690 x28: 0000000000005f90 x27: ffff00068af393c0 x26: 0000000000080000 x25: 000000000002fbc0 x24: ffff000684ddcc70 x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000080000 x19: ffff000684ddcd08 x18: ffffffffffffffff x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff80008132a550 x15: 0000ffff98020fff x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 1fffe000d11d7021 x12: ffff000688eb810c x11: ffff00077ec4bb80 x10: ffff000688dcb720 x9 : ffff80008068ef60 x8 : 00000a6fb8a86e85 x7 : 000000000000111e x6 : 0000000000000002 x5 : 0000000000000246 x4 : 0000000000015cff x3 : 0000000000394500 x2 : ffff000682e35e40 x1 : 0000000000364940 x0 : 000000000000001a Call trace: submit_bio_noacct+0x14c/0x4c8 verity_map+0x178/0x2c8 __map_bio+0x228/0x250 dm_submit_bio+0x1c4/0x678 __submit_bio+0x170/0x230 submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x16c/0x388 submit_bio_noacct+0x16c/0x4c8 submit_bio+0xb4/0x210 f2fs_submit_read_bio+0x4c/0xf0 f2fs_mpage_readpages+0x3b0/0x5f0 f2fs_readahead+0x90/0xe8 Tighten blk_throtl_activated() to also require that the throttle policy bit is set on the queue: return q->td != NULL && test_bit(blkcg_policy_throtl.plid, q->blkcg_pols); This prevents blk_should_throtl() from accessing throttle group state until policy data has been attached to blkgs.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
the affected interface → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Unspecified
Privileges required
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
User interaction
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Attack complexity
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Security boundary
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
Not available from the selected scoring authority.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
Denial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-2579Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38627 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38659 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68175 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
a3166c51702bb00b8f8b84022090cbab8f37be1a < 7b4bfd02c934dbbb18814ed012ecb90b58db6935; a3166c51702bb00b8f8b84022090cbab8f37be1a < 6a0c394300a7b0c05504596685de8a46707171fc; a3166c51702bb00b8f8b84022090cbab8f37be1a < bd9fd5be6bc0836820500f68fff144609fbd85a9; 6.10
Fixed
< 6.10; 6.12.78 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.17.3 ≤ 6.17.*; 6.18 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 12 Nov 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:43 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceUnavailable
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-124936
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CVSS base score, CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-40147 · cve.blacktree.nl