BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-40100High confidence

btrfs: do not assert we found block group item when creating free space tree

Linux · Linux

…UnscoredAssess manually
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

No CVSS base score is available from the CNA, CISA ADP or NIST. Absence of a score is not evidence of low risk; review the vendor advisory, affected exposure and exploit evidence. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityUnscoredOperational priority:Needs assessment, manual assessment needed.unscored

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.20% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Manual assessmentRemediation target: Manual assessment

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.57-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.158-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-40100 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 55 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-40100
371 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: do not assert we found block group item when creating free space tree Currently, when building a free space tree at populate_free_space_tree(), if we are not using the block group tree feature, we always expect to find block group items (either extent items or a block group item with key type BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY) when we search the extent tree with btrfs_search_slot_for_read(), so we assert that we found an item. However this expectation is wrong since we can have a new block group created in the current transaction which is still empty and for which we still have not added the block group's item to the extent tree, in which case we do not have any items in the extent tree associated to the block group. The insertion of a new block group's block group item in the extent tree happens at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() when it calls the helper insert_block_group_item(). This typically is done when a transaction handle is released, committed or when running delayed refs (either as part of a transaction commit or when serving tickets for space reservation if we are low on free space). So remove the assertion at populate_free_space_tree() even when the block group tree feature is not enabled and update the comment to mention this case. Syzbot reported this with the following stack trace: BTRFS info (device loop3 state M): rebuilding free space tree assertion failed: ret == 0 :: 0, in fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1115 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1115! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6352 Comm: syz.3.25 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/18/2025 RIP: 0010:populate_free_space_tree+0x700/0x710 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1115 Code: ff ff e8 d3 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffc9000430f780 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000043 RBX: ffff88805b709630 RCX: fea61d0e2e79d000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc9000430f8b0 R08: ffffc9000430f4a7 R09: 1ffff92000861e94 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52000861e95 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 1ffff92000861f00 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f424d9fe6c0(0000) GS:ffff888125afc000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fd78ad212c0 CR3: 0000000076d68000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 Call Trace: btrfs_rebuild_free_space_tree+0x1ba/0x6d0 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1364 btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x128f/0x1bf0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3062 btrfs_remount_rw fs/btrfs/super.c:1334 [inline] btrfs_reconfigure+0xaed/0x2160 fs/btrfs/super.c:1559 reconfigure_super+0x227/0x890 fs/super.c:1076 do_remount fs/namespace.c:3279 [inline] path_mount+0xd1a/0xfe0 fs/namespace.c:4027 do_mount fs/namespace.c:4048 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4236 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x313/0x410 fs/namespace.c:4213 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f424e39066a Code: d8 64 89 02 (...) RSP: 002b:00007f424d9fde68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f424d9fdef0 RCX: 00007f424e39066a RDX: 0000200000000180 RSI: 0000200000000380 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000200000000180 R08: 00007f424d9fdef0 R09: 0000000000000020 R10: 0000000000000020 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000200000000380 R13: 00007f424d9fdeb0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00002000000002c0 Modules linked in: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-36978

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

No CVSS base score is available from the CNA, CISA ADP or NIST. Absence of a score is not evidence of low risk; review the vendor advisory, affected exposure and exploit evidence. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: do not assert we found block group item when creating free space tree Currently, when building a free space tree at populate_free_space_tree(), if we are not using the block group tree feature, we always expect to find block group items (either extent items or a block group item with key type BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY) when we search the extent tree with btrfs_search_slot_for_read(), so we assert that we found an item. However this expectation is wrong since we can have a new block group created in the current transaction which is still empty and for which we still have not added the block group's item to the extent tree, in which case we do not have any items in the extent tree associated to the block group. The insertion of a new block group's block group item in the extent tree happens at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() when it calls the helper insert_block_group_item(). This typically is done when a transaction handle is released, committed or when running delayed refs (either as part of a transaction commit or when serving tickets for space reservation if we are low on free space). So remove the assertion at populate_free_space_tree() even when the block group tree feature is not enabled and update the comment to mention this case. Syzbot reported this with the following stack trace: BTRFS info (device loop3 state M): rebuilding free space tree assertion failed: ret == 0 :: 0, in fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1115 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1115! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6352 Comm: syz.3.25 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/18/2025 RIP: 0010:populate_free_space_tree+0x700/0x710 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1115 Code: ff ff e8 d3 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffc9000430f780 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000043 RBX: ffff88805b709630 RCX: fea61d0e2e79d000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc9000430f8b0 R08: ffffc9000430f4a7 R09: 1ffff92000861e94 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52000861e95 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 1ffff92000861f00 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f424d9fe6c0(0000) GS:ffff888125afc000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fd78ad212c0 CR3: 0000000076d68000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 Call Trace: <TASK> btrfs_rebuild_free_space_tree+0x1ba/0x6d0 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1364 btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x128f/0x1bf0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3062 btrfs_remount_rw fs/btrfs/super.c:1334 [inline] btrfs_reconfigure+0xaed/0x2160 fs/btrfs/super.c:1559 reconfigure_super+0x227/0x890 fs/super.c:1076 do_remount fs/namespace.c:3279 [inline] path_mount+0xd1a/0xfe0 fs/namespace.c:4027 do_mount fs/namespace.c:4048 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4236 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x313/0x410 fs/namespace.c:4213 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f424e39066a Code: d8 64 89 02 (...) RSP: 002b:00007f424d9fde68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f424d9fdef0 RCX: 00007f424e39066a RDX: 0000200000000180 RSI: 0000200000000380 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000200000000180 R08: 00007f424d9fdef0 R09: 0000000000000020 R10: 0000000000000020 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000200000000380 R13: 00007f424d9fdeb0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00002000000002c0 </TASK> Modules linked in: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: do not assert we found block group item when creating free space tree Currently, when building a free space tree at populate_free_space_tree(), if we are not using the block group tree feature, we always expect to find block group items (either extent items or a block group item with key type BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY) when we search the extent tree with btrfs_search_slot_for_read(), so we assert that we found an item. However this expectation is wrong since we can have a new block group created in the current transaction which is still empty and for which we still have not added the block group's item to the extent tree, in which case we do not have any items in the extent tree associated to the block group. The insertion of a new block group's block group item in the extent tree happens at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() when it calls the helper insert_block_group_item(). This typically is done when a transaction handle is released, committed or when running delayed refs (either as part of a transaction commit or when serving tickets for space reservation if we are low on free space). So remove the assertion at populate_free_space_tree() even when the block group tree feature is not enabled and update the comment to mention this case. Syzbot reported this with the following stack trace: BTRFS info (device loop3 state M): rebuilding free space tree assertion failed: ret == 0 :: 0, in fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1115 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1115! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6352 Comm: syz.3.25 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/18/2025 RIP: 0010:populate_free_space_tree+0x700/0x710 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1115 Code: ff ff e8 d3 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffc9000430f780 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000043 RBX: ffff88805b709630 RCX: fea61d0e2e79d000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc9000430f8b0 R08: ffffc9000430f4a7 R09: 1ffff92000861e94 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52000861e95 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 1ffff92000861f00 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f424d9fe6c0(0000) GS:ffff888125afc000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fd78ad212c0 CR3: 0000000076d68000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 Call Trace: <TASK> btrfs_rebuild_free_space_tree+0x1ba/0x6d0 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1364 btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x128f/0x1bf0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3062 btrfs_remount_rw fs/btrfs/super.c:1334 [inline] btrfs_reconfigure+0xaed/0x2160 fs/btrfs/super.c:1559 reconfigure_super+0x227/0x890 fs/super.c:1076 do_remount fs/namespace.c:3279 [inline] path_mount+0xd1a/0xfe0 fs/namespace.c:4027 do_mount fs/namespace.c:4048 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4236 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x313/0x410 fs/namespace.c:4213 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f424e39066a Code: d8 64 89 02 (...) RSP: 002b:00007f424d9fde68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f424d9fdef0 RCX: 00007f424e39066a RDX: 0000200000000180 RSI: 0000200000000380 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000200000000180 R08: 00007f424d9fdef0 R09: 0000000000000020 R10: 0000000000000020 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000200000000380 R13: 00007f424d9fdeb0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00002000000002c0 </TASK> Modules linked in: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: do not assert we found block group item when creating free space tree Currently, when building a free space tree at populate_free_space_tree(), if we are not using the block group tree feature, we always expect to find block group items (either extent items or a block group item with key type BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY) when we search the extent tree with btrfs_search_slot_for_read(), so we assert that we found an item. However this expectation is wrong since we can have a new block group created in the current transaction which is still empty and for which we still have not added the block group's item to the extent tree, in which case we do not have any items in the extent tree associated to the block group. The insertion of a new block group's block group item in the extent tree happens at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() when it calls the helper insert_block_group_item(). This typically is done when a transaction handle is released, committed or when running delayed refs (either as part of a transaction commit or when serving tickets for space reservation if we are low on free space). So remove the assertion at populate_free_space_tree() even when the block group tree feature is not enabled and update the comment to mention this case. Syzbot reported this with the following stack trace: BTRFS info (device loop3 state M): rebuilding free space tree assertion failed: ret == 0 :: 0, in fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1115 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1115! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6352 Comm: syz.3.25 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/18/2025 RIP: 0010:populate_free_space_tree+0x700/0x710 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1115 Code: ff ff e8 d3 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffc9000430f780 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000043 RBX: ffff88805b709630 RCX: fea61d0e2e79d000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc9000430f8b0 R08: ffffc9000430f4a7 R09: 1ffff92000861e94 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52000861e95 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 1ffff92000861f00 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f424d9fe6c0(0000) GS:ffff888125afc000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fd78ad212c0 CR3: 0000000076d68000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 Call Trace: <TASK> btrfs_rebuild_free_space_tree+0x1ba/0x6d0 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1364 btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x128f/0x1bf0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3062 btrfs_remount_rw fs/btrfs/super.c:1334 [inline] btrfs_reconfigure+0xaed/0x2160 fs/btrfs/super.c:1559 reconfigure_super+0x227/0x890 fs/super.c:1076 do_remount fs/namespace.c:3279 [inline] path_mount+0xd1a/0xfe0 fs/namespace.c:4027 do_mount fs/namespace.c:4048 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4236 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x313/0x410 fs/namespace.c:4213 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f424e39066a Code: d8 64 89 02 (...) RSP: 002b:00007f424d9fde68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f424d9fdef0 RCX: 00007f424e39066a RDX: 0000200000000180 RSI: 0000200000000380 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000200000000180 R08: 00007f424d9fdef0 R09: 0000000000000020 R10: 0000000000000020 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000200000000380 R13: 00007f424d9fdeb0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00002000000002c0 </TASK> Modules linked in: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
the affected interface → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Unspecified
Privileges required
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
User interaction
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Attack complexity
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Security boundary
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
Not available from the selected scoring authority.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2450Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service-Situation führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251105Security Bulletin 05 Nov 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 05 Nov 2025, published on 5 November 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-40077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-40077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40300 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40364 Référence CVE CVE-2026-38264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-38264 Gestion détaillée du document le 05 décembre 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général d

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1048Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-40085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1047Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40062 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Gestion détaillée du document le 28 novembre 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104 Gestion détaillée du document le 21 novembre 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1010Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-40085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109 Gestion détaillée du document le 14 novembre 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générale

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40062 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104 Gestion détaillée du document le 14 novembre 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0966Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

CVE-2025-40084 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40085 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40087 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40088 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40092 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40094 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40095 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40096 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40097 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40099 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40100 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40102 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40103 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40104 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40105 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-47912 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-58183 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-58185 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-58186 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-58187 du 31 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-58188

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.5, 6.1.158 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.114 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.55 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.17.5 ≤ 6.17.*, 6.18 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 30 Oct 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:42 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceUnavailable
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-36978
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CVSS base score, CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-40100 · cve.blacktree.nl