BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-40054High confidence

f2fs: fix UAF issue in f2fs_merge_page_bio()

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 23 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.105-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.187-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinux-6.12Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.107-1~deb12u1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-36474

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix UAF issue in f2fs_merge_page_bio() As JY reported in bugzilla [1], Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 pc : [0xffffffe51d249484] f2fs_is_cp_guaranteed+0x70/0x98 lr : [0xffffffe51d24adbc] f2fs_merge_page_bio+0x520/0x6d4 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 6790 Comm: kworker/u16:3 Tainted: P B W OE 6.12.30-android16-5-maybe-dirty-4k #1 5f7701c9cbf727d1eebe77c89bbbeb3371e895e5 Tainted: [P]=PROPRIETARY_MODULE, [B]=BAD_PAGE, [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-254:49) Call trace: f2fs_is_cp_guaranteed+0x70/0x98 f2fs_inplace_write_data+0x174/0x2f4 f2fs_do_write_data_page+0x214/0x81c f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x28c/0x764 f2fs_write_data_pages+0x78c/0xce4 do_writepages+0xe8/0x2fc __writeback_single_inode+0x4c/0x4b4 writeback_sb_inodes+0x314/0x540 __writeback_inodes_wb+0xa4/0xf4 wb_writeback+0x160/0x448 wb_workfn+0x2f0/0x5dc process_scheduled_works+0x1c8/0x458 worker_thread+0x334/0x3f0 kthread+0x118/0x1ac ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220575 The panic was caused by UAF issue w/ below race condition: kworker - writepages - f2fs_write_cache_pages - f2fs_write_single_data_page - f2fs_do_write_data_page - f2fs_inplace_write_data - f2fs_merge_page_bio - add_inu_page : cache page #1 into bio & cache bio in io->bio_list - f2fs_write_single_data_page - f2fs_do_write_data_page - f2fs_inplace_write_data - f2fs_merge_page_bio - add_inu_page : cache page #2 into bio which is linked in io->bio_list write - f2fs_write_begin : write page #1 - f2fs_folio_wait_writeback - f2fs_submit_merged_ipu_write - f2fs_submit_write_bio : submit bio which inclues page #1 and #2 software IRQ - f2fs_write_end_io - fscrypt_free_bounce_page : freed bounced page which belongs to page #2 - inc_page_count( , WB_DATA_TYPE(data_folio), false) : data_folio points to fio->encrypted_page the bounced page can be freed before accessing it in f2fs_is_cp_guarantee() It can reproduce w/ below testcase: Run below script in shell #1: for ((i=1;i>0;i++)) do xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/enc/file \ -c "pwrite 0 32k" -c "fdatasync" Run below script in shell #2: for ((i=1;i>0;i++)) do xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/enc/file \ -c "pwrite 0 32k" -c "fdatasync" So, in f2fs_merge_page_bio(), let's avoid using fio->encrypted_page after commit page into internal ipu cache.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix UAF issue in f2fs_merge_page_bio() As JY reported in bugzilla [1], Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 pc : [0xffffffe51d249484] f2fs_is_cp_guaranteed+0x70/0x98 lr : [0xffffffe51d24adbc] f2fs_merge_page_bio+0x520/0x6d4 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 6790 Comm: kworker/u16:3 Tainted: P B W OE 6.12.30-android16-5-maybe-dirty-4k #1 5f7701c9cbf727d1eebe77c89bbbeb3371e895e5 Tainted: [P]=PROPRIETARY_MODULE, [B]=BAD_PAGE, [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-254:49) Call trace: f2fs_is_cp_guaranteed+0x70/0x98 f2fs_inplace_write_data+0x174/0x2f4 f2fs_do_write_data_page+0x214/0x81c f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x28c/0x764 f2fs_write_data_pages+0x78c/0xce4 do_writepages+0xe8/0x2fc __writeback_single_inode+0x4c/0x4b4 writeback_sb_inodes+0x314/0x540 __writeback_inodes_wb+0xa4/0xf4 wb_writeback+0x160/0x448 wb_workfn+0x2f0/0x5dc process_scheduled_works+0x1c8/0x458 worker_thread+0x334/0x3f0 kthread+0x118/0x1ac ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220575 The panic was caused by UAF issue w/ below race condition: kworker - writepages - f2fs_write_cache_pages - f2fs_write_single_data_page - f2fs_do_write_data_page - f2fs_inplace_write_data - f2fs_merge_page_bio - add_inu_page : cache page #1 into bio & cache bio in io->bio_list - f2fs_write_single_data_page - f2fs_do_write_data_page - f2fs_inplace_write_data - f2fs_merge_page_bio - add_inu_page : cache page #2 into bio which is linked in io->bio_list write - f2fs_write_begin : write page #1 - f2fs_folio_wait_writeback - f2fs_submit_merged_ipu_write - f2fs_submit_write_bio : submit bio which inclues page #1 and #2 software IRQ - f2fs_write_end_io - fscrypt_free_bounce_page : freed bounced page which belongs to page #2 - inc_page_count( , WB_DATA_TYPE(data_folio), false) : data_folio points to fio->encrypted_page the bounced page can be freed before accessing it in f2fs_is_cp_guarantee() It can reproduce w/ below testcase: Run below script in shell #1: for ((i=1;i>0;i++)) do xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/enc/file \ -c "pwrite 0 32k" -c "fdatasync" Run below script in shell #2: for ((i=1;i>0;i++)) do xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/enc/file \ -c "pwrite 0 32k" -c "fdatasync" So, in f2fs_merge_page_bio(), let's avoid using fio->encrypted_page after commit page into internal ipu cache.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix UAF issue in f2fs_merge_page_bio() As JY reported in bugzilla [1], Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 pc : [0xffffffe51d249484] f2fs_is_cp_guaranteed+0x70/0x98 lr : [0xffffffe51d24adbc] f2fs_merge_page_bio+0x520/0x6d4 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 6790 Comm: kworker/u16:3 Tainted: P B W OE 6.12.30-android16-5-maybe-dirty-4k #1 5f7701c9cbf727d1eebe77c89bbbeb3371e895e5 Tainted: [P]=PROPRIETARY_MODULE, [B]=BAD_PAGE, [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-254:49) Call trace: f2fs_is_cp_guaranteed+0x70/0x98 f2fs_inplace_write_data+0x174/0x2f4 f2fs_do_write_data_page+0x214/0x81c f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x28c/0x764 f2fs_write_data_pages+0x78c/0xce4 do_writepages+0xe8/0x2fc __writeback_single_inode+0x4c/0x4b4 writeback_sb_inodes+0x314/0x540 __writeback_inodes_wb+0xa4/0xf4 wb_writeback+0x160/0x448 wb_workfn+0x2f0/0x5dc process_scheduled_works+0x1c8/0x458 worker_thread+0x334/0x3f0 kthread+0x118/0x1ac ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220575 The panic was caused by UAF issue w/ below race condition: kworker - writepages - f2fs_write_cache_pages - f2fs_write_single_data_page - f2fs_do_write_data_page - f2fs_inplace_write_data - f2fs_merge_page_bio - add_inu_page : cache page #1 into bio & cache bio in io->bio_list - f2fs_write_single_data_page - f2fs_do_write_data_page - f2fs_inplace_write_data - f2fs_merge_page_bio - add_inu_page : cache page #2 into bio which is linked in io->bio_list write - f2fs_write_begin : write page #1 - f2fs_folio_wait_writeback - f2fs_submit_merged_ipu_write - f2fs_submit_write_bio : submit bio which inclues page #1 and #2 software IRQ - f2fs_write_end_io - fscrypt_free_bounce_page : freed bounced page which belongs to page #2 - inc_page_count( , WB_DATA_TYPE(data_folio), false) : data_folio points to fio->encrypted_page the bounced page can be freed before accessing it in f2fs_is_cp_guarantee() It can reproduce w/ below testcase: Run below script in shell #1: for ((i=1;i>0;i++)) do xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/enc/file \ -c "pwrite 0 32k" -c "fdatasync" Run below script in shell #2: for ((i=1;i>0;i++)) do xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/enc/file \ -c "pwrite 0 32k" -c "fdatasync" So, in f2fs_merge_page_bio(), let's avoid using fio->encrypted_page after commit page into internal ipu cache.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix UAF issue in f2fs_merge_page_bio() As JY reported in bugzilla [1], Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 pc : [0xffffffe51d249484] f2fs_is_cp_guaranteed+0x70/0x98 lr : [0xffffffe51d24adbc] f2fs_merge_page_bio+0x520/0x6d4 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 6790 Comm: kworker/u16:3 Tainted: P B W OE 6.12.30-android16-5-maybe-dirty-4k #1 5f7701c9cbf727d1eebe77c89bbbeb3371e895e5 Tainted: [P]=PROPRIETARY_MODULE, [B]=BAD_PAGE, [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-254:49) Call trace: f2fs_is_cp_guaranteed+0x70/0x98 f2fs_inplace_write_data+0x174/0x2f4 f2fs_do_write_data_page+0x214/0x81c f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x28c/0x764 f2fs_write_data_pages+0x78c/0xce4 do_writepages+0xe8/0x2fc __writeback_single_inode+0x4c/0x4b4 writeback_sb_inodes+0x314/0x540 __writeback_inodes_wb+0xa4/0xf4 wb_writeback+0x160/0x448 wb_workfn+0x2f0/0x5dc process_scheduled_works+0x1c8/0x458 worker_thread+0x334/0x3f0 kthread+0x118/0x1ac ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220575 The panic was caused by UAF issue w/ below race condition: kworker - writepages - f2fs_write_cache_pages - f2fs_write_single_data_page - f2fs_do_write_data_page - f2fs_inplace_write_data - f2fs_merge_page_bio - add_inu_page : cache page #1 into bio & cache bio in io->bio_list - f2fs_write_single_data_page - f2fs_do_write_data_page - f2fs_inplace_write_data - f2fs_merge_page_bio - add_inu_page : cache page #2 into bio which is linked in io->bio_list write - f2fs_write_begin : write page #1 - f2fs_folio_wait_writeback - f2fs_submit_merged_ipu_write - f2fs_submit_write_bio : submit bio which inclues page #1 and #2 software IRQ - f2fs_write_end_io - fscrypt_free_bounce_page : freed bounced page which belongs to page #2 - inc_page_count( , WB_DATA_TYPE(data_folio), false) : data_folio points to fio->encrypted_page the bounced page can be freed before accessing it in f2fs_is_cp_guarantee() It can reproduce w/ below testcase: Run below script in shell #1: for ((i=1;i>0;i++)) do xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/enc/file \ -c "pwrite 0 32k" -c "fdatasync" Run below script in shell #2: for ((i=1;i>0;i++)) do xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/enc/file \ -c "pwrite 0 32k" -c "fdatasync" So, in f2fs_merge_page_bio(), let's avoid using fio->encrypted_page after commit page into internal ipu cache.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-36474Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix UAF issue in f2fs_merge_page_bio() As JY reported in bugzilla [1], Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 pc : [0xffffffe51d249484] f2fs_is_cp_guaranteed+0x70/0x98 lr : [0xffffffe51d24adbc] f2fs_merge_page_bio+0x520/0x6d4 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 6790 Comm: kworker/u16:3 Tainted: P B W OE 6.12.30-android16-5-maybe-dirty-4k #1 5f7701c9cbf727d1eebe77c89bbbeb3371e895e5 Tainted: [P]=PROPRIETARY_MODULE, [B]=BAD_PAGE, [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-254:49) Call trace: f2fs_is_cp_guaranteed+0x70/0x98 f2fs_inplace_write_data+0x174/0x2f4 f2fs_do_write_data_page+0x214/0x81c f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x28c/0x764 f2fs_write_data_pages+0x78c/0xce4 do_writepages+0xe8/0x2fc __writeback_single_inode+0x4c/0x4b4 writeback_sb_inodes+0x314/0x540 __writeback_inodes_wb+0xa4/0xf4 wb_writeback+0x160/0x448 wb_workfn+0x2f0/0x5dc process_scheduled_works+0x1c8/0x458 worker_thread+0x334/0x3f0 kthread+0x118/0x1ac ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220575 The panic was caused by UAF issue w/ below race condition: kworker - writepages - f2fs_write_cache_pages - f2fs_write_single_data_page - f2fs_do_write_data_page - f2fs_inplace_write_data - f2fs_merge_page_bio - add_inu_page : cache page #1 into bio & cache bio in io->bio_list - f2fs_write_single_data_page - f2fs_do_write_data_page - f2fs_inplace_write_data - f2fs_merge_page_bio - add_inu_page : cache page #2 into bio which is linked in io->bio_list write - f2fs_write_begin : write page #1 - f2fs_folio_wait_writeback - f2fs_submit_merged_ipu_write - f2fs_submit_write_bio : submit bio which inclues page #1 and #2 software IRQ - f2fs_write_end_io - fscrypt_free_bounce_page : freed bounced page which belongs to page #2 - inc_page_count( , WB_DATA_TYPE(data_folio), false) : data_folio points to fio->encrypted_page the bounced page can be freed before accessing it in f2fs_is_cp_guarantee() It can reproduce w/ below testcase: Run below script in shell #1: for ((i=1;i>0;i++)) do xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/enc/file \ -c "pwrite 0 32k" -c "fdatasync" Run below script in shell #2: for ((i=1;i>0;i++)) do xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/enc/file \ -c "pwrite 0 32k" -c "fdatasync" So, in f2fs_merge_page_bio(), let's avoid using fio->encrypted_page after commit page into internal ipu cache.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2431Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, privilegierten Zugriff zu erlangen, sensible Informationen zu stehlen oder betroffene Systeme funktionsunfähig zu machen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251029Security Bulletin 29 Oct 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Oct 2025, published on 29 October 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1232Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

orm versions antérieures à 6.12.107-1~deb12u1 Résumé De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un déni de service. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Debian LTS msg00023 du 19 septembre 2026 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2026/09/msg00023.html Référence CVE CVE-2025-38525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38525 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40054 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64017 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64581 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64586 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39896 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39933 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39958 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39990 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40054 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40074 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40170 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1163Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38203 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38616 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39901 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39925 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40054 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40307 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68794 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1090Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

ivilèges Systèmes affectés Debian trixie versions antérieures à 6.12.105-1 Résumé De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un déni de service. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Debian msg00377 du 25 août 2026 https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2026/msg00377.html Référence CVE CVE-2025-38525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38525 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64017 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64586 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68132 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-40003 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40012 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40054 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40074 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-40003 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40012 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40054 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40074 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40046 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40050 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40054 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40056 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40059 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40061 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40046 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40050 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40054 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40056 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40059 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40061 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40046 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40050 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40054 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40056 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40059 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40061 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < 1f7b44b4a2b2939f08b279cbb9e6b5dcb8ffea32, 0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < e193d8953647c8b575830852aa5ea0995b98d2b1, 0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < 410337c2301ae78a081e1b5ebbe8ec374fef4cb6, 0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < 68e094232dfe5027c4fd2dcded93d2d6800bae04, 0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < 7dd611131d82d7fc4212b555eb1103160bdad302, 0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < 01118321e0c8a5f3ece57d0d377bfc92d83cd210, 0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < edf7e9040fc52c922db947f9c6c36f07377c52ea, 5.5
Fixed
Linux: < 5.5, 5.10.266 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.217 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.184 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.153 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.105 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.17.3 ≤ 6.17.*, 6.18 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 28 Oct 2025 · Last source change 23 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-36474
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added remediation: git.kernel.org/1f7b44b4a2b2939f08b279cbb9e6b5dcb8ffea32; removed remediation: git.kernel.org/01118321e0c8a5f3ece57d0d377bfc92d83cd210.
    Before
    remediation: git.kernel.org/01118321e0c8a5f3ece57d0d377bfc92d83cd210
    After
    remediation: git.kernel.org/1f7b44b4a2b2939f08b279cbb9e6b5dcb8ffea32
    CNA ↗
  2. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < 01118321e0c8a5f3ece57d0d377bfc92d83cd210; 0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < edf7e9040fc52c922db947f9c6c36f07377c52ea; 5.5 · Fixed: < 5.5; 6.17.3 ≤ 6.17.*; 6.18 ≤ *
    After
    0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < 1f7b44b4a2b2939f08b279cbb9e6b5dcb8ffea32; 0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < e193d8953647c8b575830852aa5ea0995b98d2b1; 0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < 410337c2301ae78a081e1b5ebbe8ec374fef4cb6; 0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < 68e094232dfe5027c4fd2dcded93d2d6800bae04; 0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < 7dd611131d82d7fc4212b555eb1103160bdad302; 0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < 01118321e0c8a5f3ece57d0d377bfc92d83cd210; 0b20fcec8651569935a10afe03fedc0b812d044e < edf7e9040fc52c922db947f9c6c36f07377c52ea; 5.5 · Fixed: < 5.5; 5.10.266 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.217 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.184 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.153 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.105 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.17.3 ≤ 6.17.*; 6.18 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-40054 · cve.blacktree.nl