BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-40038High confidence

KVM: SVM: Skip fastpath emulation on VM-Exit if next RIP isn't valid

Linux · Linux

7.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.57-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-36490

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SVM: Skip fastpath emulation on VM-Exit if next RIP isn't valid Skip the WRMSR and HLT fastpaths in SVM's VM-Exit handler if the next RIP isn't valid, e.g. because KVM is running with nrips=false. SVM must decode and emulate to skip the instruction if the CPU doesn't provide the next RIP, and getting the instruction bytes to decode requires reading guest memory. Reading guest memory through the emulator can fault, i.e. can sleep, which is disallowed since the fastpath handlers run with IRQs disabled. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:106 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 32611, name: qemu preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. irq event stamp: 30580 hardirqs last enabled at (30579): [<ffffffffc08b2527>] vcpu_run+0x1787/0x1db0 [kvm] hardirqs last disabled at (30580): [<ffffffffb4f62e32>] __schedule+0x1e2/0xed0 softirqs last enabled at (30570): [<ffffffffb4247a64>] fpu_swap_kvm_fpstate+0x44/0x210 softirqs last disabled at (30568): [<ffffffffb4247a64>] fpu_swap_kvm_fpstate+0x44/0x210 CPU: 298 UID: 0 PID: 32611 Comm: qemu Tainted: G U 6.16.0-smp--e6c618b51cfe-sleep #782 NONE Tainted: [U]=USER Hardware name: Google Astoria-Turin/astoria, BIOS 0.20241223.2-0 01/17/2025 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x7d/0xb0 __might_resched+0x271/0x290 __might_fault+0x28/0x80 kvm_vcpu_read_guest_page+0x8d/0xc0 [kvm] kvm_fetch_guest_virt+0x92/0xc0 [kvm] __do_insn_fetch_bytes+0xf3/0x1e0 [kvm] x86_decode_insn+0xd1/0x1010 [kvm] x86_emulate_instruction+0x105/0x810 [kvm] __svm_skip_emulated_instruction+0xc4/0x140 [kvm_amd] handle_fastpath_invd+0xc4/0x1a0 [kvm] vcpu_run+0x11a1/0x1db0 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x5cc/0x730 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x578/0x6a0 [kvm] __se_sys_ioctl+0x6d/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x8a/0x2c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f479d57a94b </TASK> Note, this is essentially a reapply of commit 5c30e8101e8d ("KVM: SVM: Skip WRMSR fastpath on VM-Exit if next RIP isn't valid"), but with different justification (KVM now grabs SRCU when skipping the instruction for other reasons).

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SVM: Skip fastpath emulation on VM-Exit if next RIP isn't valid Skip the WRMSR and HLT fastpaths in SVM's VM-Exit handler if the next RIP isn't valid, e.g. because KVM is running with nrips=false. SVM must decode and emulate to skip the instruction if the CPU doesn't provide the next RIP, and getting the instruction bytes to decode requires reading guest memory. Reading guest memory through the emulator can fault, i.e. can sleep, which is disallowed since the fastpath handlers run with IRQs disabled. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:106 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 32611, name: qemu preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. irq event stamp: 30580 hardirqs last enabled at (30579): [<ffffffffc08b2527>] vcpu_run+0x1787/0x1db0 [kvm] hardirqs last disabled at (30580): [<ffffffffb4f62e32>] __schedule+0x1e2/0xed0 softirqs last enabled at (30570): [<ffffffffb4247a64>] fpu_swap_kvm_fpstate+0x44/0x210 softirqs last disabled at (30568): [<ffffffffb4247a64>] fpu_swap_kvm_fpstate+0x44/0x210 CPU: 298 UID: 0 PID: 32611 Comm: qemu Tainted: G U 6.16.0-smp--e6c618b51cfe-sleep #782 NONE Tainted: [U]=USER Hardware name: Google Astoria-Turin/astoria, BIOS 0.20241223.2-0 01/17/2025 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x7d/0xb0 __might_resched+0x271/0x290 __might_fault+0x28/0x80 kvm_vcpu_read_guest_page+0x8d/0xc0 [kvm] kvm_fetch_guest_virt+0x92/0xc0 [kvm] __do_insn_fetch_bytes+0xf3/0x1e0 [kvm] x86_decode_insn+0xd1/0x1010 [kvm] x86_emulate_instruction+0x105/0x810 [kvm] __svm_skip_emulated_instruction+0xc4/0x140 [kvm_amd] handle_fastpath_invd+0xc4/0x1a0 [kvm] vcpu_run+0x11a1/0x1db0 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x5cc/0x730 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x578/0x6a0 [kvm] __se_sys_ioctl+0x6d/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x8a/0x2c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f479d57a94b </TASK> Note, this is essentially a reapply of commit 5c30e8101e8d ("KVM: SVM: Skip WRMSR fastpath on VM-Exit if next RIP isn't valid"), but with different justification (KVM now grabs SRCU when skipping the instruction for other reasons).

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SVM: Skip fastpath emulation on VM-Exit if next RIP isn't valid Skip the WRMSR and HLT fastpaths in SVM's VM-Exit handler if the next RIP isn't valid, e.g. because KVM is running with nrips=false. SVM must decode and emulate to skip the instruction if the CPU doesn't provide the next RIP, and getting the instruction bytes to decode requires reading guest memory. Reading guest memory through the emulator can fault, i.e. can sleep, which is disallowed since the fastpath handlers run with IRQs disabled. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:106 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 32611, name: qemu preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. irq event stamp: 30580 hardirqs last enabled at (30579): [<ffffffffc08b2527>] vcpu_run+0x1787/0x1db0 [kvm] hardirqs last disabled at (30580): [<ffffffffb4f62e32>] __schedule+0x1e2/0xed0 softirqs last enabled at (30570): [<ffffffffb4247a64>] fpu_swap_kvm_fpstate+0x44/0x210 softirqs last disabled at (30568): [<ffffffffb4247a64>] fpu_swap_kvm_fpstate+0x44/0x210 CPU: 298 UID: 0 PID: 32611 Comm: qemu Tainted: G U 6.16.0-smp--e6c618b51cfe-sleep #782 NONE Tainted: [U]=USER Hardware name: Google Astoria-Turin/astoria, BIOS 0.20241223.2-0 01/17/2025 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x7d/0xb0 __might_resched+0x271/0x290 __might_fault+0x28/0x80 kvm_vcpu_read_guest_page+0x8d/0xc0 [kvm] kvm_fetch_guest_virt+0x92/0xc0 [kvm] __do_insn_fetch_bytes+0xf3/0x1e0 [kvm] x86_decode_insn+0xd1/0x1010 [kvm] x86_emulate_instruction+0x105/0x810 [kvm] __svm_skip_emulated_instruction+0xc4/0x140 [kvm_amd] handle_fastpath_invd+0xc4/0x1a0 [kvm] vcpu_run+0x11a1/0x1db0 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x5cc/0x730 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x578/0x6a0 [kvm] __se_sys_ioctl+0x6d/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x8a/0x2c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f479d57a94b </TASK> Note, this is essentially a reapply of commit 5c30e8101e8d ("KVM: SVM: Skip WRMSR fastpath on VM-Exit if next RIP isn't valid"), but with different justification (KVM now grabs SRCU when skipping the instruction for other reasons).

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Unauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2431Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, privilegierten Zugriff zu erlangen, sensible Informationen zu stehlen oder betroffene Systeme funktionsunfähig zu machen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251029Security Bulletin 29 Oct 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Oct 2025, published on 29 October 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40029 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40029 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40029 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40029 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40029 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39977 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40059 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40019 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40059 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40029 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40046 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40029 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40029 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40046 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0059Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40003 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40059 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1140Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40059 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40070 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1133Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40059 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40070 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0941Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

CVE-2025-11840 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40025 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40026 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40027 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40029 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40030 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40032 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40033 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40035 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40036 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40038 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40039 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40040 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40042 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40043 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40044 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40048 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40049 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40051 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40052 du 29 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40053

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: b439eb8ab578557263815ba8581d02c1b730e348 < cd3efb93677c4b0cf76348882fb429165fee33fd, b439eb8ab578557263815ba8581d02c1b730e348 < f994e9c790ce97d3cf01af4d0a1b9add0c955aee, b439eb8ab578557263815ba8581d02c1b730e348 < da2a3c231f7f2a5ac146d972b8c1d7d84aff6d70, b439eb8ab578557263815ba8581d02c1b730e348 < 0910dd7c9ad45a2605c45fd2bf3d1bcac087687c, 6.5
Fixed
Linux: < 6.5, 6.6.113 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.53 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.17.3 ≤ 6.17.*, 6.18 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 28 Oct 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-36490
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-40038 · cve.blacktree.nl