BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-39965High confidence

xfrm: xfrm_alloc_spi shouldn't use 0 as SPI

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 291 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.20% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 291 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

21 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 17 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.57-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-39965 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: xfrm: xfrm_alloc_spi shouldn't use 0 as SPI
274 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Summary
A use-after-free flaw was found in the Linux kernel IPsec subsystem in the way Security Parameter Indexes (SPI) are allocated and tracked. States created with an SPI value of 0 were added to the per-SPI list, and later deletion paths did not remove them from that list. A local user with the ability to configure IPsec could use this flaw to crash the system, resulting in a denial of service.
Remediation
To mitigate this issue, prevent module xfrm_user from being loaded. Please see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/41278 for how to blacklist a kernel module to prevent it from loading automatically.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-34067

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 291 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: xfrm_alloc_spi shouldn't use 0 as SPI x->id.spi == 0 means "no SPI assigned", but since commit 94f39804d891 ("xfrm: Duplicate SPI Handling"), we now create states and add them to the byspi list with this value. __xfrm_state_delete doesn't remove those states from the byspi list, since they shouldn't be there, and this shows up as a UAF the next time we go through the byspi list.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: xfrm_alloc_spi shouldn't use 0 as SPI x->id.spi == 0 means "no SPI assigned", but since commit 94f39804d891 ("xfrm: Duplicate SPI Handling"), we now create states and add them to the byspi list with this value. __xfrm_state_delete doesn't remove those states from the byspi list, since they shouldn't be there, and this shows up as a UAF the next time we go through the byspi list.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: xfrm_alloc_spi shouldn't use 0 as SPI x->id.spi == 0 means "no SPI assigned", but since commit 94f39804d891 ("xfrm: Duplicate SPI Handling"), we now create states and add them to the byspi list with this value. __xfrm_state_delete doesn't remove those states from the byspi list, since they shouldn't be there, and this shows up as a UAF the next time we go through the byspi list.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2268Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Daten zu manipulieren oder einen Denial of Service herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251015Security Bulletin 15 Oct 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 15 Oct 2025, published on 15 October 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1047Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0899Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

CVE-2024-42321 du 11 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2024-46717 du 11 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-11412 du 11 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-11413 du 11 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-11414 du 11 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-11495 du 11 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-37727 du 11 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39961 du 11 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2020-8130 du 12 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39964 du 15 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39965 du 15 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-49069 du 16 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39967 du 16 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39968 du 16 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39969 du 16 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39970 du 16 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39971 du 16 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39972 du 16 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39973 du 16 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39977 du 16 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39980

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-025714LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。xfrm: xfrm_alloc_spiはSPIとして0を使用すべきではありません。x-id.spi == 0は「SPI未割当」を意味しますが、コミット94f39804d891("xfrm: Duplicate SPI Handling")以降、私たちはこの値で状態を作成しbyspiリストに追加しています。__xfrm_state_deleteはbyspiリストからこれらの状態を削除しません。なぜなら、それらがそこにあってはならないためであり、この状態は次にbyspiリストを通る際にUAF(Use After Free)として現れます。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
To mitigate this issue, prevent module xfrm_user from being loaded. Please see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/41278 for how to blacklist a kernel module to prevent it from loading automatically.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 13 Oct 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-34067
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-39965 · cve.blacktree.nl