BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-39948High confidence

ice: fix Rx page leak on multi-buffer frames

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.29% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.57-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-32395

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ice: fix Rx page leak on multi-buffer frames The ice_put_rx_mbuf() function handles calling ice_put_rx_buf() for each buffer in the current frame. This function was introduced as part of handling multi-buffer XDP support in the ice driver. It works by iterating over the buffers from first_desc up to 1 plus the total number of fragments in the frame, cached from before the XDP program was executed. If the hardware posts a descriptor with a size of 0, the logic used in ice_put_rx_mbuf() breaks. Such descriptors get skipped and don't get added as fragments in ice_add_xdp_frag. Since the buffer isn't counted as a fragment, we do not iterate over it in ice_put_rx_mbuf(), and thus we don't call ice_put_rx_buf(). Because we don't call ice_put_rx_buf(), we don't attempt to re-use the page or free it. This leaves a stale page in the ring, as we don't increment next_to_alloc. The ice_reuse_rx_page() assumes that the next_to_alloc has been incremented properly, and that it always points to a buffer with a NULL page. Since this function doesn't check, it will happily recycle a page over the top of the next_to_alloc buffer, losing track of the old page. Note that this leak only occurs for multi-buffer frames. The ice_put_rx_mbuf() function always handles at least one buffer, so a single-buffer frame will always get handled correctly. It is not clear precisely why the hardware hands us descriptors with a size of 0 sometimes, but it happens somewhat regularly with "jumbo frames" used by 9K MTU. To fix ice_put_rx_mbuf(), we need to make sure to call ice_put_rx_buf() on all buffers between first_desc and next_to_clean. Borrow the logic of a similar function in i40e used for this same purpose. Use the same logic also in ice_get_pgcnts(). Instead of iterating over just the number of fragments, use a loop which iterates until the current index reaches to the next_to_clean element just past the current frame. Unlike i40e, the ice_put_rx_mbuf() function does call ice_put_rx_buf() on the last buffer of the frame indicating the end of packet. For non-linear (multi-buffer) frames, we need to take care when adjusting the pagecnt_bias. An XDP program might release fragments from the tail of the frame, in which case that fragment page is already released. Only update the pagecnt_bias for the first descriptor and fragments still remaining post-XDP program. Take care to only access the shared info for fragmented buffers, as this avoids a significant cache miss. The xdp_xmit value only needs to be updated if an XDP program is run, and only once per packet. Drop the xdp_xmit pointer argument from ice_put_rx_mbuf(). Instead, set xdp_xmit in the ice_clean_rx_irq() function directly. This avoids needing to pass the argument and avoids an extra bit-wise OR for each buffer in the frame. Move the increment of the ntc local variable to ensure its updated *before* all calls to ice_get_pgcnts() or ice_put_rx_mbuf(), as the loop logic requires the index of the element just after the current frame. Now that we use an index pointer in the ring to identify the packet, we no longer need to track or cache the number of fragments in the rx_ring.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ice: fix Rx page leak on multi-buffer frames The ice_put_rx_mbuf() function handles calling ice_put_rx_buf() for each buffer in the current frame. This function was introduced as part of handling multi-buffer XDP support in the ice driver. It works by iterating over the buffers from first_desc up to 1 plus the total number of fragments in the frame, cached from before the XDP program was executed. If the hardware posts a descriptor with a size of 0, the logic used in ice_put_rx_mbuf() breaks. Such descriptors get skipped and don't get added as fragments in ice_add_xdp_frag. Since the buffer isn't counted as a fragment, we do not iterate over it in ice_put_rx_mbuf(), and thus we don't call ice_put_rx_buf(). Because we don't call ice_put_rx_buf(), we don't attempt to re-use the page or free it. This leaves a stale page in the ring, as we don't increment next_to_alloc. The ice_reuse_rx_page() assumes that the next_to_alloc has been incremented properly, and that it always points to a buffer with a NULL page. Since this function doesn't check, it will happily recycle a page over the top of the next_to_alloc buffer, losing track of the old page. Note that this leak only occurs for multi-buffer frames. The ice_put_rx_mbuf() function always handles at least one buffer, so a single-buffer frame will always get handled correctly. It is not clear precisely why the hardware hands us descriptors with a size of 0 sometimes, but it happens somewhat regularly with "jumbo frames" used by 9K MTU. To fix ice_put_rx_mbuf(), we need to make sure to call ice_put_rx_buf() on all buffers between first_desc and next_to_clean. Borrow the logic of a similar function in i40e used for this same purpose. Use the same logic also in ice_get_pgcnts(). Instead of iterating over just the number of fragments, use a loop which iterates until the current index reaches to the next_to_clean element just past the current frame. Unlike i40e, the ice_put_rx_mbuf() function does call ice_put_rx_buf() on the last buffer of the frame indicating the end of packet. For non-linear (multi-buffer) frames, we need to take care when adjusting the pagecnt_bias. An XDP program might release fragments from the tail of the frame, in which case that fragment page is already released. Only update the pagecnt_bias for the first descriptor and fragments still remaining post-XDP program. Take care to only access the shared info for fragmented buffers, as this avoids a significant cache miss. The xdp_xmit value only needs to be updated if an XDP program is run, and only once per packet. Drop the xdp_xmit pointer argument from ice_put_rx_mbuf(). Instead, set xdp_xmit in the ice_clean_rx_irq() function directly. This avoids needing to pass the argument and avoids an extra bit-wise OR for each buffer in the frame. Move the increment of the ntc local variable to ensure its updated *before* all calls to ice_get_pgcnts() or ice_put_rx_mbuf(), as the loop logic requires the index of the element just after the current frame. Now that we use an index pointer in the ring to identify the packet, we no longer need to track or cache the number of fragments in the rx_ring.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ice: fix Rx page leak on multi-buffer frames The ice_put_rx_mbuf() function handles calling ice_put_rx_buf() for each buffer in the current frame. This function was introduced as part of handling multi-buffer XDP support in the ice driver. It works by iterating over the buffers from first_desc up to 1 plus the total number of fragments in the frame, cached from before the XDP program was executed. If the hardware posts a descriptor with a size of 0, the logic used in ice_put_rx_mbuf() breaks. Such descriptors get skipped and don't get added as fragments in ice_add_xdp_frag. Since the buffer isn't counted as a fragment, we do not iterate over it in ice_put_rx_mbuf(), and thus we don't call ice_put_rx_buf(). Because we don't call ice_put_rx_buf(), we don't attempt to re-use the page or free it. This leaves a stale page in the ring, as we don't increment next_to_alloc. The ice_reuse_rx_page() assumes that the next_to_alloc has been incremented properly, and that it always points to a buffer with a NULL page. Since this function doesn't check, it will happily recycle a page over the top of the next_to_alloc buffer, losing track of the old page. Note that this leak only occurs for multi-buffer frames. The ice_put_rx_mbuf() function always handles at least one buffer, so a single-buffer frame will always get handled correctly. It is not clear precisely why the hardware hands us descriptors with a size of 0 sometimes, but it happens somewhat regularly with "jumbo frames" used by 9K MTU. To fix ice_put_rx_mbuf(), we need to make sure to call ice_put_rx_buf() on all buffers between first_desc and next_to_clean. Borrow the logic of a similar function in i40e used for this same purpose. Use the same logic also in ice_get_pgcnts(). Instead of iterating over just the number of fragments, use a loop which iterates until the current index reaches to the next_to_clean element just past the current frame. Unlike i40e, the ice_put_rx_mbuf() function does call ice_put_rx_buf() on the last buffer of the frame indicating the end of packet. For non-linear (multi-buffer) frames, we need to take care when adjusting the pagecnt_bias. An XDP program might release fragments from the tail of the frame, in which case that fragment page is already released. Only update the pagecnt_bias for the first descriptor and fragments still remaining post-XDP program. Take care to only access the shared info for fragmented buffers, as this avoids a significant cache miss. The xdp_xmit value only needs to be updated if an XDP program is run, and only once per packet. Drop the xdp_xmit pointer argument from ice_put_rx_mbuf(). Instead, set xdp_xmit in the ice_clean_rx_irq() function directly. This avoids needing to pass the argument and avoids an extra bit-wise OR for each buffer in the frame. Move the increment of the ntc local variable to ensure its updated *before* all calls to ice_get_pgcnts() or ice_put_rx_mbuf(), as the loop logic requires the index of the element just after the current frame. Now that we use an index pointer in the ring to identify the packet, we no longer need to track or cache the number of fragments in the rx_ring.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401 ↗

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2194Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251008Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025, published on 8 October 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39925 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39926 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1047Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39923 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39923 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39925 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39923 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39925 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-025501LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。ice:マルチバッファフレームでのRxページリークの問題を修正しました。ice_put_rx_mbuf()関数は、現在のフレーム内の各バッファに対してice_put_rx_buf()を呼び出す処理を担当しています。この関数は、iceドライバでのマルチバッファXDPサポートを扱う一環として導入されました。動作は、XDPプログラム実行前にキャッシュされたフレーム内の断片総数に1を加えた数まで、first_descからバッファを繰り返し処理します。ハードウェアがサイズ0のディスクリプタを投稿すると、ice_put_rx_mbuf()内のロジックは破綻します。そのようなディスクリプタはスキップされ、ice_add_xdp_fragに断片として追加されません。バッファが断片にカウントされないため、ice_put_rx_mbuf()で反復処理されず、結果としてice_put_rx_buf()も呼ばれません。ice_put_rx_buf()を呼ばないため、ページの再利用や解放が試みられず、next_to_allocがインクリメントされないままリング内に古いページが残ります。ice_reuse_rx_page()はnext_to_allocが適切にインクリメントされており、必ずNULLページのバッファを指していることを前提としています。この関数はチェックしないため、next_to_allocバッファの上にページを上書きし、古いページの追跡を失います。このリークはマルチバッファフレームにのみ発生します。ice_put_rx_mbuf()は常に少なくとも1つのバッファを処理するため、シングルバッファフレームは正しく処理されます。ハードウェアが時折サイズ0のディスクリプタを渡す理由は明確ではありませんが、9K MTUの「ジャンボフレーム」で頻繁に発生することが確認されています。ice_put_rx_mbuf()の修正には、first_descからnext_to_cleanまでの全バッファに対してice_put_rx_buf()を呼び出す必要があります。同じ目的でi40eにある類似関数のロジックを利用し、ice_get_pgcnts()でも同様のロジックを使用します。断片数だけを反復する代わりに、現在のフレームのすぐ後ろにあるnext_to_clean要素に達するまでループで処理します。i40eとは異なり、ice_put_rx_mbuf()はフレーム末尾の最後のバッファにice_put_rx_buf()を呼び出し、パケットの終端を示します。非線形(マルチバッファ)フレームの場合、pagecnt_biasの調整に注意が必要です。XDPプログラムがフレーム末尾の断片を解放する場合、その断片のページはすでに解放済みです。pagecnt_biasの更新は最初のディスクリプタとXDPプログラム実行後も残っている断片に限定されます。共有情報は断片バッファのみにアクセスし、キャッシュミスを大幅に回避します。xdp_xmit値はXDPプログラムが実行された場合のみ、パケット毎に1回だけ更新すれば十分です。ice_put_rx_mbuf()からxdp_xmitポインタ引数を削除し、代わりにice_clean_rx_irq()内で直接設定します。これにより引数の伝播や各フレーム内バッファ毎のビット単位のOR操作が不要になります。ntcローカル変数のインクリメントを移動し、ice_get_pgcnts()やice_put_rx_mbuf()の全呼び出しの*前に*更新するようにしました。ループロジックは現在のフレーム直後の要素のインデックスを必要とするためです。パケット識別にインデックスポインタをリング内で使用することで、rx_ring内の断片数の追跡やキャッシュは不要になりました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 311813ed013c016d4b0b0985a9ee41f778489077 < 80555adb5c892f0e21d243ae96ed997ee520aea9, 743bbd93cf29f653fae0e1416a31f03231689911 < fcb5718ebfe7fd64144e3399280440cce361a3ae, 743bbd93cf29f653fae0e1416a31f03231689911 < 84bf1ac85af84d354c7a2fdbdc0d4efc8aaec34b, ac1728cf370bec2e74fe6a2adf05b4629980d2b3, d445b59d30415bb56f4803f622d566bca06e0abc, 6.12.14 < 6.12.49, 6.6.78 < 6.7, 6.13.3 < 6.14, 6.14
Fixed
Linux: < 6.14, 6.12.49 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.16.9 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Oct 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-32395
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-39948 · cve.blacktree.nl