BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-39946High confidence

tls: make sure to abort the stream if headers are bogus

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 9.57% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.57-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.158-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-39946 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 54 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-39946
89 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: make sure to abort the stream if headers are bogus Normally we wait for the socket to buffer up the whole record before we service it. If the socket has a tiny buffer, however, we read out the data sooner, to prevent connection stalls. Make sure that we abort the connection when we find out late that the record is actually invalid. Retrying the parsing is fine in itself but since we copy some more data each time before we parse we can overflow the allocated skb space. Constructing a scenario in which we're under pressure without enough data in the socket to parse the length upfront is quite hard. syzbot figured out a way to do this by serving us the header in small OOB sends, and then filling in the recvbuf with a large normal send. Make sure that tls_rx_msg_size() aborts strp, if we reach an invalid record there's really no way to recover.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-32393

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: make sure to abort the stream if headers are bogus Normally we wait for the socket to buffer up the whole record before we service it. If the socket has a tiny buffer, however, we read out the data sooner, to prevent connection stalls. Make sure that we abort the connection when we find out late that the record is actually invalid. Retrying the parsing is fine in itself but since we copy some more data each time before we parse we can overflow the allocated skb space. Constructing a scenario in which we're under pressure without enough data in the socket to parse the length upfront is quite hard. syzbot figured out a way to do this by serving us the header in small OOB sends, and then filling in the recvbuf with a large normal send. Make sure that tls_rx_msg_size() aborts strp, if we reach an invalid record there's really no way to recover.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: make sure to abort the stream if headers are bogus Normally we wait for the socket to buffer up the whole record before we service it. If the socket has a tiny buffer, however, we read out the data sooner, to prevent connection stalls. Make sure that we abort the connection when we find out late that the record is actually invalid. Retrying the parsing is fine in itself but since we copy some more data each time before we parse we can overflow the allocated skb space. Constructing a scenario in which we're under pressure without enough data in the socket to parse the length upfront is quite hard. syzbot figured out a way to do this by serving us the header in small OOB sends, and then filling in the recvbuf with a large normal send. Make sure that tls_rx_msg_size() aborts strp, if we reach an invalid record there's really no way to recover.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: make sure to abort the stream if headers are bogus Normally we wait for the socket to buffer up the whole record before we service it. If the socket has a tiny buffer, however, we read out the data sooner, to prevent connection stalls. Make sure that we abort the connection when we find out late that the record is actually invalid. Retrying the parsing is fine in itself but since we copy some more data each time before we parse we can overflow the allocated skb space. Constructing a scenario in which we're under pressure without enough data in the socket to parse the length upfront is quite hard. syzbot figured out a way to do this by serving us the header in small OOB sends, and then filling in the recvbuf with a large normal send. Make sure that tls_rx_msg_size() aborts strp, if we reach an invalid record there's really no way to recover.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0569Google Android: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Google Android ausnutzen, um sich erweiterte Berechtigungen zu verschaffen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2194Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251008Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025, published on 8 October 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39889 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40019 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40297 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68750 Gestion détaillée du document le 06 mars 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0231Multiples vulnérabilités dans Google Android

ord?id=CVE-2025-20762 Référence CVE CVE-2025-20793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-20793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-20794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-20794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-20795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-20795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-2879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2879 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32313 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38616 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38618 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47366 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47378 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47385 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39889 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40002 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40003 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40019 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40029 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-39890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39907 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39911 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39913 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39923 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39907 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39911 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39913 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39923 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39907 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39911 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39913 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39923 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1139Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39891 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39894 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39902 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39920 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39993 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40172 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40177 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1106Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37958 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38616 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38666 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39993 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40028 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39922 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39923 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39925 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39926 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1048Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-39929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1047Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39902 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39911 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39923 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39911 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39920 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39923 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39925 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1033Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2025-39718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39751 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39903 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39982 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39983 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40300 Gestion détaillée du document le 21 novembre 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.go

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1010Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-39929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39911 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39920 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39923 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39925 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0899Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

CVE-2024-39508 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39929 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39931 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39932 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39934 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39937 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39938 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39940 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39942 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39945 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39946 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39947 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39949 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39953 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-55551 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-55552 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-55554 du 05 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-50502 du 06 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-10729 du 07 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-11234 du 07 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-48816

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-025503LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、TLSの不正なヘッダーを検出した際にストリームを確実に中断する問題が修正されました。不正なレコードは回復不可能であり、特にソケットバッファが小さい場合にデータを早期に読み取って処理を行う際に、パース前のデータコピーによってバッファオーバーフローが発生する可能性がありました。ソケット内に十分なデータがない状態での処理圧力により、不正なTLSレコードが脆弱性を引き起こす可能性がありましたが、この問題は修正されています。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6747Linux 제품 보안 업데이트 권고

Linux Kernel의 TLS 구현에서 발생하는 Heap-based Buffer Overflow 취약점(CVE-2025-39946) [1]

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0074Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Google Android en Samsung Mobile

SUSE Linux Enterprise kernels (15 SP6, SP7, and Azure) were updated to address multiple security vulnerabilities, including race conditions and memory management issues, alongside non-security improvements in ACPI and KVM.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.0, 6.1.154 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.108 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.49 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.16.9 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Oct 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-32393
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-39946 · cve.blacktree.nl