BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-39944High confidence

octeontx2-pf: Fix use-after-free bugs in otx2_sync_tstamp()

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.15% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.57-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.158-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-32396

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: octeontx2-pf: Fix use-after-free bugs in otx2_sync_tstamp() The original code relies on cancel_delayed_work() in otx2_ptp_destroy(), which does not ensure that the delayed work item synctstamp_work has fully completed if it was already running. This leads to use-after-free scenarios where otx2_ptp is deallocated by otx2_ptp_destroy(), while synctstamp_work remains active and attempts to dereference otx2_ptp in otx2_sync_tstamp(). Furthermore, the synctstamp_work is cyclic, the likelihood of triggering the bug is nonnegligible. A typical race condition is illustrated below: CPU 0 (cleanup) | CPU 1 (delayed work callback) otx2_remove() | otx2_ptp_destroy() | otx2_sync_tstamp() cancel_delayed_work() | kfree(ptp) | | ptp = container_of(...); //UAF | ptp-> //UAF This is confirmed by a KASAN report: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __run_timer_base.part.0+0x7d7/0x8c0 Write of size 8 at addr ffff88800aa09a18 by task bash/136 ... Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 print_report+0xcf/0x610 ? __run_timer_base.part.0+0x7d7/0x8c0 kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0 ? __run_timer_base.part.0+0x7d7/0x8c0 __run_timer_base.part.0+0x7d7/0x8c0 ? __pfx___run_timer_base.part.0+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_read_tsc+0x10/0x10 ? ktime_get+0x60/0x140 ? lapic_next_event+0x11/0x20 ? clockevents_program_event+0x1d4/0x2a0 run_timer_softirq+0xd1/0x190 handle_softirqs+0x16a/0x550 irq_exit_rcu+0xaf/0xe0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x70/0x80 </IRQ> ... Allocated by task 1: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0x7f/0x90 otx2_ptp_init+0xb1/0x860 otx2_probe+0x4eb/0xc30 local_pci_probe+0xdc/0x190 pci_device_probe+0x2fe/0x470 really_probe+0x1ca/0x5c0 __driver_probe_device+0x248/0x310 driver_probe_device+0x44/0x120 __driver_attach+0xd2/0x310 bus_for_each_dev+0xed/0x170 bus_add_driver+0x208/0x500 driver_register+0x132/0x460 do_one_initcall+0x89/0x300 kernel_init_freeable+0x40d/0x720 kernel_init+0x1a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x10c/0x1a0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 Freed by task 136: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3a/0x60 __kasan_slab_free+0x3f/0x50 kfree+0x137/0x370 otx2_ptp_destroy+0x38/0x80 otx2_remove+0x10d/0x4c0 pci_device_remove+0xa6/0x1d0 device_release_driver_internal+0xf8/0x210 pci_stop_bus_device+0x105/0x150 pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device_locked+0x15/0x30 remove_store+0xcc/0xe0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2c3/0x440 vfs_write+0x871/0xd70 ksys_write+0xee/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0xac/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f ... Replace cancel_delayed_work() with cancel_delayed_work_sync() to ensure that the delayed work item is properly canceled before the otx2_ptp is deallocated. This bug was initially identified through static analysis. To reproduce and test it, I simulated the OcteonTX2 PCI device in QEMU and introduced artificial delays within the otx2_sync_tstamp() function to increase the likelihood of triggering the bug.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: octeontx2-pf: Fix use-after-free bugs in otx2_sync_tstamp() The original code relies on cancel_delayed_work() in otx2_ptp_destroy(), which does not ensure that the delayed work item synctstamp_work has fully completed if it was already running. This leads to use-after-free scenarios where otx2_ptp is deallocated by otx2_ptp_destroy(), while synctstamp_work remains active and attempts to dereference otx2_ptp in otx2_sync_tstamp(). Furthermore, the synctstamp_work is cyclic, the likelihood of triggering the bug is nonnegligible. A typical race condition is illustrated below: CPU 0 (cleanup) | CPU 1 (delayed work callback) otx2_remove() | otx2_ptp_destroy() | otx2_sync_tstamp() cancel_delayed_work() | kfree(ptp) | | ptp = container_of(...); //UAF | ptp-> //UAF This is confirmed by a KASAN report: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __run_timer_base.part.0+0x7d7/0x8c0 Write of size 8 at addr ffff88800aa09a18 by task bash/136 ... Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 print_report+0xcf/0x610 ? __run_timer_base.part.0+0x7d7/0x8c0 kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0 ? __run_timer_base.part.0+0x7d7/0x8c0 __run_timer_base.part.0+0x7d7/0x8c0 ? __pfx___run_timer_base.part.0+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_read_tsc+0x10/0x10 ? ktime_get+0x60/0x140 ? lapic_next_event+0x11/0x20 ? clockevents_program_event+0x1d4/0x2a0 run_timer_softirq+0xd1/0x190 handle_softirqs+0x16a/0x550 irq_exit_rcu+0xaf/0xe0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x70/0x80 </IRQ> ... Allocated by task 1: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0x7f/0x90 otx2_ptp_init+0xb1/0x860 otx2_probe+0x4eb/0xc30 local_pci_probe+0xdc/0x190 pci_device_probe+0x2fe/0x470 really_probe+0x1ca/0x5c0 __driver_probe_device+0x248/0x310 driver_probe_device+0x44/0x120 __driver_attach+0xd2/0x310 bus_for_each_dev+0xed/0x170 bus_add_driver+0x208/0x500 driver_register+0x132/0x460 do_one_initcall+0x89/0x300 kernel_init_freeable+0x40d/0x720 kernel_init+0x1a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x10c/0x1a0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 Freed by task 136: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3a/0x60 __kasan_slab_free+0x3f/0x50 kfree+0x137/0x370 otx2_ptp_destroy+0x38/0x80 otx2_remove+0x10d/0x4c0 pci_device_remove+0xa6/0x1d0 device_release_driver_internal+0xf8/0x210 pci_stop_bus_device+0x105/0x150 pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device_locked+0x15/0x30 remove_store+0xcc/0xe0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2c3/0x440 vfs_write+0x871/0xd70 ksys_write+0xee/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0xac/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f ... Replace cancel_delayed_work() with cancel_delayed_work_sync() to ensure that the delayed work item is properly canceled before the otx2_ptp is deallocated. This bug was initially identified through static analysis. To reproduce and test it, I simulated the OcteonTX2 PCI device in QEMU and introduced artificial delays within the otx2_sync_tstamp() function to increase the likelihood of triggering the bug.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: octeontx2-pf: Fix use-after-free bugs in otx2_sync_tstamp() The original code relies on cancel_delayed_work() in otx2_ptp_destroy(), which does not ensure that the delayed work item synctstamp_work has fully completed if it was already running. This leads to use-after-free scenarios where otx2_ptp is deallocated by otx2_ptp_destroy(), while synctstamp_work remains active and attempts to dereference otx2_ptp in otx2_sync_tstamp(). Furthermore, the synctstamp_work is cyclic, the likelihood of triggering the bug is nonnegligible. A typical race condition is illustrated below: CPU 0 (cleanup) | CPU 1 (delayed work callback) otx2_remove() | otx2_ptp_destroy() | otx2_sync_tstamp() cancel_delayed_work() | kfree(ptp) | | ptp = container_of(...); //UAF | ptp-> //UAF This is confirmed by a KASAN report: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __run_timer_base.part.0+0x7d7/0x8c0 Write of size 8 at addr ffff88800aa09a18 by task bash/136 ... Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 print_report+0xcf/0x610 ? __run_timer_base.part.0+0x7d7/0x8c0 kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0 ? __run_timer_base.part.0+0x7d7/0x8c0 __run_timer_base.part.0+0x7d7/0x8c0 ? __pfx___run_timer_base.part.0+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_read_tsc+0x10/0x10 ? ktime_get+0x60/0x140 ? lapic_next_event+0x11/0x20 ? clockevents_program_event+0x1d4/0x2a0 run_timer_softirq+0xd1/0x190 handle_softirqs+0x16a/0x550 irq_exit_rcu+0xaf/0xe0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x70/0x80 </IRQ> ... Allocated by task 1: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0x7f/0x90 otx2_ptp_init+0xb1/0x860 otx2_probe+0x4eb/0xc30 local_pci_probe+0xdc/0x190 pci_device_probe+0x2fe/0x470 really_probe+0x1ca/0x5c0 __driver_probe_device+0x248/0x310 driver_probe_device+0x44/0x120 __driver_attach+0xd2/0x310 bus_for_each_dev+0xed/0x170 bus_add_driver+0x208/0x500 driver_register+0x132/0x460 do_one_initcall+0x89/0x300 kernel_init_freeable+0x40d/0x720 kernel_init+0x1a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x10c/0x1a0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 Freed by task 136: kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3a/0x60 __kasan_slab_free+0x3f/0x50 kfree+0x137/0x370 otx2_ptp_destroy+0x38/0x80 otx2_remove+0x10d/0x4c0 pci_device_remove+0xa6/0x1d0 device_release_driver_internal+0xf8/0x210 pci_stop_bus_device+0x105/0x150 pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device_locked+0x15/0x30 remove_store+0xcc/0xe0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2c3/0x440 vfs_write+0x871/0xd70 ksys_write+0xee/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0xac/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f ... Replace cancel_delayed_work() with cancel_delayed_work_sync() to ensure that the delayed work item is properly canceled before the otx2_ptp is deallocated. This bug was initially identified through static analysis. To reproduce and test it, I simulated the OcteonTX2 PCI device in QEMU and introduced artificial delays within the otx2_sync_tstamp() function to increase the likelihood of triggering the bug.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2194Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251008Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025, published on 8 October 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39880 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39913 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39927 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39880 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39913 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40019 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0059Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39897 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39917 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39990 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40003 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1140Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1133Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37916 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1048Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

25/11/msg00022.html Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1010Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

/2025/msg00219.html Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-025504LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。octeontx2-pfのotx2_sync_tstamp()におけるuse-after-freeバグを修正しました。元のコードはotx2_ptp_destroy()内のcancel_delayed_work()に依存していましたが、これは遅延作業項目であるsynctstamp_workが既に実行中であった場合に完全に終了したことを保証しません。そのため、otx2_ptp_destroy()でotx2_ptpが解放される一方で、synctstamp_workが依然としてアクティブであり、otx2_sync_tstamp()内でotx2_ptpを参照しようとするuse-after-freeの状況が発生していました。加えて、synctstamp_workは周期的に動作するため、このバグが発生する確率は無視できません。典型的な競合状態は以下の通りです。CPU 0(クリーンアップ)ではotx2_remove()が呼ばれ、その中でotx2_ptp_destroy()がcancel_delayed_work()とkfree(ptp)を実行します。一方、CPU 1(遅延作業コールバック)ではotx2_sync_tstamp()がptp = container_of(...)でuse-after-freeを起こし、ptp-にアクセスしようとします。これはKASANレポートにより確認されています。バグはcancel_delayed_work()をcancel_delayed_work_sync()に置き換えることで、遅延作業項目が正しくキャンセルされた後にotx2_ptpが解放されることを保証し、修正されました。このバグは最初に静的解析で特定されました。再現とテストのため、QEMUでOcteonTX2 PCIデバイスをシミュレートし、otx2_sync_tstamp()関数内に人工的な遅延を導入してバグの発生率を高めました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 2958d17a898416c6193431676f6130b68a2cb9fc < 2786879aebf363806a13d41e8d5f99202ddd23d9, 2958d17a898416c6193431676f6130b68a2cb9fc < d2cfefa14ce8137b17f99683f968bebf134b6a48, 2958d17a898416c6193431676f6130b68a2cb9fc < ff27e23b311fed4d25e3852e27ba693416d4c7b3, 2958d17a898416c6193431676f6130b68a2cb9fc < 5ca20bb7b4bde72110c3ae78423cbfdd0157aa36, 2958d17a898416c6193431676f6130b68a2cb9fc < f8b4687151021db61841af983f1cb7be6915d4ef, 6.1
Fixed
Linux: < 6.1, 6.1.154 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.108 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.49 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.16.9 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Oct 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-32396
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-39944 · cve.blacktree.nl