BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-39851High confidence

vxlan: Fix NPD when refreshing an FDB entry with a nexthop object

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.29% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 22 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.48-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-30349

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vxlan: Fix NPD when refreshing an FDB entry with a nexthop object VXLAN FDB entries can point to either a remote destination or an FDB nexthop group. The latter is usually used in EVPN deployments where learning is disabled. However, when learning is enabled, an incoming packet might try to refresh an FDB entry that points to an FDB nexthop group and therefore does not have a remote. Such packets should be dropped, but they are only dropped after dereferencing the non-existent remote, resulting in a NPD [1] which can be reproduced using [2]. Fix by dropping such packets earlier. Remove the misleading comment from first_remote_rcu(). [1] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [...] CPU: 13 UID: 0 PID: 361 Comm: mausezahn Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-virtme-g9f6b606b6b37 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-4.fc41 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:vxlan_snoop+0x98/0x1e0 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> vxlan_encap_bypass+0x209/0x240 encap_bypass_if_local+0xb1/0x100 vxlan_xmit_one+0x1375/0x17e0 vxlan_xmit+0x6b4/0x15f0 dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5d/0x1c0 __dev_queue_xmit+0x246/0xfd0 packet_sendmsg+0x113a/0x1850 __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x70 __sys_sendto+0x126/0x180 __x64_sys_sendto+0x24/0x30 do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x260 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 [2] #!/bin/bash ip address add 192.0.2.1/32 dev lo ip address add 192.0.2.2/32 dev lo ip nexthop add id 1 via 192.0.2.3 fdb ip nexthop add id 10 group 1 fdb ip link add name vx0 up type vxlan id 10010 local 192.0.2.1 dstport 12345 localbypass ip link add name vx1 up type vxlan id 10020 local 192.0.2.2 dstport 54321 learning bridge fdb add 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev vx0 self static dst 192.0.2.2 port 54321 vni 10020 bridge fdb add 00:aa:bb:cc:dd:ee dev vx1 self static nhid 10 mausezahn vx0 -a 00:aa:bb:cc:dd:ee -b 00:11:22:33:44:55 -c 1 -q

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vxlan: Fix NPD when refreshing an FDB entry with a nexthop object VXLAN FDB entries can point to either a remote destination or an FDB nexthop group. The latter is usually used in EVPN deployments where learning is disabled. However, when learning is enabled, an incoming packet might try to refresh an FDB entry that points to an FDB nexthop group and therefore does not have a remote. Such packets should be dropped, but they are only dropped after dereferencing the non-existent remote, resulting in a NPD [1] which can be reproduced using [2]. Fix by dropping such packets earlier. Remove the misleading comment from first_remote_rcu(). [1] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [...] CPU: 13 UID: 0 PID: 361 Comm: mausezahn Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-virtme-g9f6b606b6b37 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-4.fc41 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:vxlan_snoop+0x98/0x1e0 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> vxlan_encap_bypass+0x209/0x240 encap_bypass_if_local+0xb1/0x100 vxlan_xmit_one+0x1375/0x17e0 vxlan_xmit+0x6b4/0x15f0 dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5d/0x1c0 __dev_queue_xmit+0x246/0xfd0 packet_sendmsg+0x113a/0x1850 __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x70 __sys_sendto+0x126/0x180 __x64_sys_sendto+0x24/0x30 do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x260 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 [2] #!/bin/bash ip address add 192.0.2.1/32 dev lo ip address add 192.0.2.2/32 dev lo ip nexthop add id 1 via 192.0.2.3 fdb ip nexthop add id 10 group 1 fdb ip link add name vx0 up type vxlan id 10010 local 192.0.2.1 dstport 12345 localbypass ip link add name vx1 up type vxlan id 10020 local 192.0.2.2 dstport 54321 learning bridge fdb add 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev vx0 self static dst 192.0.2.2 port 54321 vni 10020 bridge fdb add 00:aa:bb:cc:dd:ee dev vx1 self static nhid 10 mausezahn vx0 -a 00:aa:bb:cc:dd:ee -b 00:11:22:33:44:55 -c 1 -q

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vxlan: Fix NPD when refreshing an FDB entry with a nexthop object VXLAN FDB entries can point to either a remote destination or an FDB nexthop group. The latter is usually used in EVPN deployments where learning is disabled. However, when learning is enabled, an incoming packet might try to refresh an FDB entry that points to an FDB nexthop group and therefore does not have a remote. Such packets should be dropped, but they are only dropped after dereferencing the non-existent remote, resulting in a NPD [1] which can be reproduced using [2]. Fix by dropping such packets earlier. Remove the misleading comment from first_remote_rcu(). [1] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [...] CPU: 13 UID: 0 PID: 361 Comm: mausezahn Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-virtme-g9f6b606b6b37 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-4.fc41 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:vxlan_snoop+0x98/0x1e0 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> vxlan_encap_bypass+0x209/0x240 encap_bypass_if_local+0xb1/0x100 vxlan_xmit_one+0x1375/0x17e0 vxlan_xmit+0x6b4/0x15f0 dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5d/0x1c0 __dev_queue_xmit+0x246/0xfd0 packet_sendmsg+0x113a/0x1850 __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x70 __sys_sendto+0x126/0x180 __x64_sys_sendto+0x24/0x30 do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x260 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 [2] #!/bin/bash ip address add 192.0.2.1/32 dev lo ip address add 192.0.2.2/32 dev lo ip nexthop add id 1 via 192.0.2.3 fdb ip nexthop add id 10 group 1 fdb ip link add name vx0 up type vxlan id 10010 local 192.0.2.1 dstport 12345 localbypass ip link add name vx1 up type vxlan id 10020 local 192.0.2.2 dstport 54321 learning bridge fdb add 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev vx0 self static dst 192.0.2.2 port 54321 vni 10020 bridge fdb add 00:aa:bb:cc:dd:ee dev vx1 self static nhid 10 mausezahn vx0 -a 00:aa:bb:cc:dd:ee -b 00:11:22:33:44:55 -c 1 -q

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2099Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher beschriebene Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250924Security Bulletin 24 Sep 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 24 Sep 2025, published on 24 September 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-39810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39877 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39886 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39901 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-39810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39877 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39886 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39901 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1047Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39812 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39876 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39895 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39898 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39902 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39911 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-022124Linux の Linux Kernel における NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 1274e1cc42264d4e629841e4f182795cb0becfd2 < 4ff4f3104da6507e0f118c63c4560dfdeb59dce3, 1274e1cc42264d4e629841e4f182795cb0becfd2 < 0e8630f24c14d9c655d19eabe2e52a9e9f713307, 1274e1cc42264d4e629841e4f182795cb0becfd2 < 6ead38147ebb813f08be6ea8ef547a0e4c09559a, 5.8
Fixed
Linux: < 5.8, 6.12.46 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.16.6 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Sept 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-30349
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-39851 · cve.blacktree.nl