BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-39844High confidence

mm: move page table sync declarations to linux/pgtable.h

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-032379 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 12 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.15% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.48-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.153-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-032379 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC CN 4100
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: move page table sync declarations to linux/pgtable.h During our internal testing, we started observing intermittent boot failures when the machine uses 4-level paging and has a large amount of persistent memory: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffe70000000034 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI RIP: 0010:__init_single_page+0x9/0x6d Call Trace: __init_zone_device_page+0x17/0x5d memmap_init_zone_device+0x154/0x1bb pagemap_range+0x2e0/0x40f memremap_pages+0x10b/0x2f0 devm_memremap_pages+0x1e/0x60 dev_dax_probe+0xce/0x2ec [device_dax] dax_bus_probe+0x6d/0xc9 [... snip ...] It turns out that the kernel panics while initializing vmemmap (struct page array) when the vmemmap region spans two PGD entries, because the new PGD entry is only installed in init_mm.pgd, but not in the page tables of other tasks. And looking at __populate_section_memmap(): if (vmemmap_can_optimize(altmap, pgmap)) // does not sync top level page tables r = vmemmap_populate_compound_pages(pfn, start, end, nid, pgmap); else // sync top level page tables in x86 r = vmemmap_populate(start, end, nid, altmap); In the normal path, vmemmap_populate() in arch/x86/mm/init_64.c synchronizes the top level page table (See commit 9b861528a801 ("x86-64, mem: Update all PGDs for direct mapping and vmemmap mapping changes")) so that all tasks in the system can see the new vmemmap area. However, when vmemmap_can_optimize() returns true, the optimized path skips synchronization of top-level page tables. This is because vmemmap_populate_compound_pages() is implemented in core MM code, which does not handle synchronization of the top-level page tables. Instead, the core MM has historically relied on each architecture to perform this synchronization manually. We're not the first party to encounter a crash caused by not-sync'd top level page tables: earlier this year, Gwan-gyeong Mun attempted to address the issue [1] [2] after hitting a kernel panic when x86 code accessed the vmemmap area before the corresponding top-level entries were synced. At that time, the issue was believed to be triggered only when struct page was enlarged for debugging purposes, and the patch did not get further updates. It turns out that current approach of relying on each arch to handle the page table sync manually is fragile because 1) it's easy to forget to sync the top level page table, and 2) it's also easy to overlook that the kernel should not access the vmemmap and direct mapping areas before the sync. # The solution: Make page table sync more code robust and harder to miss To address this, Dave Hansen suggested [3] [4] introducing {pgd,p4d}_populate_kernel() for updating kernel portion of the page tables and allow each architecture to explicitly perform synchronization when installing top-level entries. With this approach, we no longer need to worry about missing the sync step, reducing the risk of future regressions. The new interface reuses existing ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK, PGTBL_P*D_MODIFIED and arch_sync_kernel_mappings() facility used by vmalloc and ioremap to synchronize page tables. pgd_populate_kernel() looks like this: static inline void pgd_populate_kernel(unsigned long addr, pgd_t *pgd, p4d_t *p4d) { pgd_populate(&init_mm, pgd, p4d); if (ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK & PGTBL_PGD_MODIFIED) arch_sync_kernel_mappings(addr, addr); } It is worth noting that vmalloc() and apply_to_range() carefully synchronizes page tables by calling p*d_alloc_track() and arch_sync_kernel_mappings(), and thus they are not affected by ---truncated---
Remediation
Update to V5.0 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-30356

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: move page table sync declarations to linux/pgtable.h During our internal testing, we started observing intermittent boot failures when the machine uses 4-level paging and has a large amount of persistent memory: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffe70000000034 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI RIP: 0010:__init_single_page+0x9/0x6d Call Trace: <TASK> __init_zone_device_page+0x17/0x5d memmap_init_zone_device+0x154/0x1bb pagemap_range+0x2e0/0x40f memremap_pages+0x10b/0x2f0 devm_memremap_pages+0x1e/0x60 dev_dax_probe+0xce/0x2ec [device_dax] dax_bus_probe+0x6d/0xc9 [... snip ...] </TASK> It turns out that the kernel panics while initializing vmemmap (struct page array) when the vmemmap region spans two PGD entries, because the new PGD entry is only installed in init_mm.pgd, but not in the page tables of other tasks. And looking at __populate_section_memmap(): if (vmemmap_can_optimize(altmap, pgmap)) // does not sync top level page tables r = vmemmap_populate_compound_pages(pfn, start, end, nid, pgmap); else // sync top level page tables in x86 r = vmemmap_populate(start, end, nid, altmap); In the normal path, vmemmap_populate() in arch/x86/mm/init_64.c synchronizes the top level page table (See commit 9b861528a801 ("x86-64, mem: Update all PGDs for direct mapping and vmemmap mapping changes")) so that all tasks in the system can see the new vmemmap area. However, when vmemmap_can_optimize() returns true, the optimized path skips synchronization of top-level page tables. This is because vmemmap_populate_compound_pages() is implemented in core MM code, which does not handle synchronization of the top-level page tables. Instead, the core MM has historically relied on each architecture to perform this synchronization manually. We're not the first party to encounter a crash caused by not-sync'd top level page tables: earlier this year, Gwan-gyeong Mun attempted to address the issue [1] [2] after hitting a kernel panic when x86 code accessed the vmemmap area before the corresponding top-level entries were synced. At that time, the issue was believed to be triggered only when struct page was enlarged for debugging purposes, and the patch did not get further updates. It turns out that current approach of relying on each arch to handle the page table sync manually is fragile because 1) it's easy to forget to sync the top level page table, and 2) it's also easy to overlook that the kernel should not access the vmemmap and direct mapping areas before the sync. # The solution: Make page table sync more code robust and harder to miss To address this, Dave Hansen suggested [3] [4] introducing {pgd,p4d}_populate_kernel() for updating kernel portion of the page tables and allow each architecture to explicitly perform synchronization when installing top-level entries. With this approach, we no longer need to worry about missing the sync step, reducing the risk of future regressions. The new interface reuses existing ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK, PGTBL_P*D_MODIFIED and arch_sync_kernel_mappings() facility used by vmalloc and ioremap to synchronize page tables. pgd_populate_kernel() looks like this: static inline void pgd_populate_kernel(unsigned long addr, pgd_t *pgd, p4d_t *p4d) { pgd_populate(&init_mm, pgd, p4d); if (ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK & PGTBL_PGD_MODIFIED) arch_sync_kernel_mappings(addr, addr); } It is worth noting that vmalloc() and apply_to_range() carefully synchronizes page tables by calling p*d_alloc_track() and arch_sync_kernel_mappings(), and thus they are not affected by ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: move page table sync declarations to linux/pgtable.h During our internal testing, we started observing intermittent boot failures when the machine uses 4-level paging and has a large amount of persistent memory: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffe70000000034 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI RIP: 0010:__init_single_page+0x9/0x6d Call Trace: <TASK> __init_zone_device_page+0x17/0x5d memmap_init_zone_device+0x154/0x1bb pagemap_range+0x2e0/0x40f memremap_pages+0x10b/0x2f0 devm_memremap_pages+0x1e/0x60 dev_dax_probe+0xce/0x2ec [device_dax] dax_bus_probe+0x6d/0xc9 [... snip ...] </TASK> It turns out that the kernel panics while initializing vmemmap (struct page array) when the vmemmap region spans two PGD entries, because the new PGD entry is only installed in init_mm.pgd, but not in the page tables of other tasks. And looking at __populate_section_memmap(): if (vmemmap_can_optimize(altmap, pgmap)) // does not sync top level page tables r = vmemmap_populate_compound_pages(pfn, start, end, nid, pgmap); else // sync top level page tables in x86 r = vmemmap_populate(start, end, nid, altmap); In the normal path, vmemmap_populate() in arch/x86/mm/init_64.c synchronizes the top level page table (See commit 9b861528a801 ("x86-64, mem: Update all PGDs for direct mapping and vmemmap mapping changes")) so that all tasks in the system can see the new vmemmap area. However, when vmemmap_can_optimize() returns true, the optimized path skips synchronization of top-level page tables. This is because vmemmap_populate_compound_pages() is implemented in core MM code, which does not handle synchronization of the top-level page tables. Instead, the core MM has historically relied on each architecture to perform this synchronization manually. We're not the first party to encounter a crash caused by not-sync'd top level page tables: earlier this year, Gwan-gyeong Mun attempted to address the issue [1] [2] after hitting a kernel panic when x86 code accessed the vmemmap area before the corresponding top-level entries were synced. At that time, the issue was believed to be triggered only when struct page was enlarged for debugging purposes, and the patch did not get further updates. It turns out that current approach of relying on each arch to handle the page table sync manually is fragile because 1) it's easy to forget to sync the top level page table, and 2) it's also easy to overlook that the kernel should not access the vmemmap and direct mapping areas before the sync. # The solution: Make page table sync more code robust and harder to miss To address this, Dave Hansen suggested [3] [4] introducing {pgd,p4d}_populate_kernel() for updating kernel portion of the page tables and allow each architecture to explicitly perform synchronization when installing top-level entries. With this approach, we no longer need to worry about missing the sync step, reducing the risk of future regressions. The new interface reuses existing ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK, PGTBL_P*D_MODIFIED and arch_sync_kernel_mappings() facility used by vmalloc and ioremap to synchronize page tables. pgd_populate_kernel() looks like this: static inline void pgd_populate_kernel(unsigned long addr, pgd_t *pgd, p4d_t *p4d) { pgd_populate(&init_mm, pgd, p4d); if (ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK & PGTBL_PGD_MODIFIED) arch_sync_kernel_mappings(addr, addr); } It is worth noting that vmalloc() and apply_to_range() carefully synchronizes page tables by calling p*d_alloc_track() and arch_sync_kernel_mappings(), and thus they are not affected by ---truncated---

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: move page table sync declarations to linux/pgtable.h During our internal testing, we started observing intermittent boot failures when the machine uses 4-level paging and has a large amount of persistent memory: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffe70000000034 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI RIP: 0010:__init_single_page+0x9/0x6d Call Trace: <TASK> __init_zone_device_page+0x17/0x5d memmap_init_zone_device+0x154/0x1bb pagemap_range+0x2e0/0x40f memremap_pages+0x10b/0x2f0 devm_memremap_pages+0x1e/0x60 dev_dax_probe+0xce/0x2ec [device_dax] dax_bus_probe+0x6d/0xc9 [... snip ...] </TASK> It turns out that the kernel panics while initializing vmemmap (struct page array) when the vmemmap region spans two PGD entries, because the new PGD entry is only installed in init_mm.pgd, but not in the page tables of other tasks. And looking at __populate_section_memmap(): if (vmemmap_can_optimize(altmap, pgmap)) // does not sync top level page tables r = vmemmap_populate_compound_pages(pfn, start, end, nid, pgmap); else // sync top level page tables in x86 r = vmemmap_populate(start, end, nid, altmap); In the normal path, vmemmap_populate() in arch/x86/mm/init_64.c synchronizes the top level page table (See commit 9b861528a801 ("x86-64, mem: Update all PGDs for direct mapping and vmemmap mapping changes")) so that all tasks in the system can see the new vmemmap area. However, when vmemmap_can_optimize() returns true, the optimized path skips synchronization of top-level page tables. This is because vmemmap_populate_compound_pages() is implemented in core MM code, which does not handle synchronization of the top-level page tables. Instead, the core MM has historically relied on each architecture to perform this synchronization manually. We're not the first party to encounter a crash caused by not-sync'd top level page tables: earlier this year, Gwan-gyeong Mun attempted to address the issue [1] [2] after hitting a kernel panic when x86 code accessed the vmemmap area before the corresponding top-level entries were synced. At that time, the issue was believed to be triggered only when struct page was enlarged for debugging purposes, and the patch did not get further updates. It turns out that current approach of relying on each arch to handle the page table sync manually is fragile because 1) it's easy to forget to sync the top level page table, and 2) it's also easy to overlook that the kernel should not access the vmemmap and direct mapping areas before the sync. # The solution: Make page table sync more code robust and harder to miss To address this, Dave Hansen suggested [3] [4] introducing {pgd,p4d}_populate_kernel() for updating kernel portion of the page tables and allow each architecture to explicitly perform synchronization when installing top-level entries. With this approach, we no longer need to worry about missing the sync step, reducing the risk of future regressions. The new interface reuses existing ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK, PGTBL_P*D_MODIFIED and arch_sync_kernel_mappings() facility used by vmalloc and ioremap to synchronize page tables. pgd_populate_kernel() looks like this: static inline void pgd_populate_kernel(unsigned long addr, pgd_t *pgd, p4d_t *p4d) { pgd_populate(&init_mm, pgd, p4d); if (ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK & PGTBL_PGD_MODIFIED) arch_sync_kernel_mappings(addr, addr); } It is worth noting that vmalloc() and apply_to_range() carefully synchronizes page tables by calling p*d_alloc_track() and arch_sync_kernel_mappings(), and thus they are not affected by ---truncated---

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2099Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher beschriebene Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250924Security Bulletin 24 Sep 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 24 Sep 2025, published on 24 September 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0565Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39834 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39834 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39834 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-39831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-025027Debian等の複数ベンダの製品における不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。mmでは、ページテーブル同期の宣言をlinux/pgtable.hに移動しました。内部テスト中に、4レベルページングを使用し大量の永続メモリを搭載したマシンで断続的な起動失敗が観測されました。具体的には、ページフォルトを処理できず、カーネルモードのスーパーバイザ書き込みアクセスでクラッシュする問題が発生しました。原因は、vmemmap(struct page配列)を初期化する際、vmemmap領域が2つのPGDエントリにまたがる場合に、init_mm.pgdにのみ新しいPGDエントリをインストールし、他のタスクのページテーブルにはインストールされない点にありました。__populate_section_memmap()の中で、vmemmap_can_optimize()が真を返す場合、最適化されたパスはトップレベルのページテーブル同期をスキップします。しかしこれは、vmemmap_populate_compound_pages()がコアMMコードに実装されており、トップレベルページテーブルの同期を扱わず、代わりに各アーキテクチャ側で手動同期を行う設計によるものです。この設計は同期忘れやカーネルが同期前にvmemmapや直接マッピング領域にアクセスしてしまう問題を招きやすく、脆弱性を引き起こしました。これに対し、Dave Hansenは{pgd,p4d}_populate_kernel()を導入し、カーネル側のページテーブル更新とトップレベルエントリの同期を明示的に行えるよう提案しました。この新インターフェースは既存のARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK、PGTBL_P*D_MODIFIED、arch_sync_kernel_mappings()を利用しており、同期漏れのリスクを低減しコードの堅牢性を向上させています。pgd_populate_kernel()の実装例は、init_mmを用いてpgdを設定した後、同期フラグがセットされていればarch_sync_kernel_mappings()を呼び出します。なお、vmalloc()やapply_to_range()はp*d_alloc_track()とarch_sync_kernel_mappings()を適切に呼び出してページテーブル同期を行うため、この問題の影響を受けません。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0147Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten

Multiple security vulnerabilities affecting various Linux kernel subsystems, including AppArmor, memory management, drivers, and AMD processors, were discovered and addressed across SUSE Linux Enterprise and Micro kernels, involving privilege escalation, denial of service, and information exposure risks.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
SIMATIC CN 4100
Fixed
Linux: < 5.13, 5.15.192 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.151 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.105 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.46 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.16.6 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Sept 2025 · Last source change 12 May 2026, 12:07 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-30356
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-39844 · cve.blacktree.nl