BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-39835High confidence

xfs: do not propagate ENODATA disk errors into xattr code

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 12 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.48-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.153-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2025-39835 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 54 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-39835
150 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfs: do not propagate ENODATA disk errors into xattr code ENODATA (aka ENOATTR) has a very specific meaning in the xfs xattr code; namely, that the requested attribute name could not be found. However, a medium error from disk may also return ENODATA. At best, this medium error may escape to userspace as "attribute not found" when in fact it's an IO (disk) error. At worst, we may oops in xfs_attr_leaf_get() when we do: error = xfs_attr_leaf_hasname(args, &bp); if (error == -ENOATTR) { xfs_trans_brelse(args->trans, bp); return error; } because an ENODATA/ENOATTR error from disk leaves us with a null bp, and the xfs_trans_brelse will then null-deref it. As discussed on the list, we really need to modify the lower level IO functions to trap all disk errors and ensure that we don't let unique errors like this leak up into higher xfs functions - many like this should be remapped to EIO. However, this patch directly addresses a reported bug in the xattr code, and should be safe to backport to stable kernels. A larger-scope patch to handle more unique errors at lower levels can follow later. (Note, prior to 07120f1abdff we did not oops, but we did return the wrong error code to userspace.)
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
SSA-032379 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC CN 4100
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfs: do not propagate ENODATA disk errors into xattr code ENODATA (aka ENOATTR) has a very specific meaning in the xfs xattr code; namely, that the requested attribute name could not be found. However, a medium error from disk may also return ENODATA. At best, this medium error may escape to userspace as "attribute not found" when in fact it's an IO (disk) error. At worst, we may oops in xfs_attr_leaf_get() when we do: error = xfs_attr_leaf_hasname(args, &bp); if (error == -ENOATTR) { xfs_trans_brelse(args->trans, bp); return error; } because an ENODATA/ENOATTR error from disk leaves us with a null bp, and the xfs_trans_brelse will then null-deref it. As discussed on the list, we really need to modify the lower level IO functions to trap all disk errors and ensure that we don't let unique errors like this leak up into higher xfs functions - many like this should be remapped to EIO. However, this patch directly addresses a reported bug in the xattr code, and should be safe to backport to stable kernels. A larger-scope patch to handle more unique errors at lower levels can follow later. (Note, prior to 07120f1abdff we did not oops, but we did return the wrong error code to userspace.)
Remediation
Update to V5.0 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-29579

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfs: do not propagate ENODATA disk errors into xattr code ENODATA (aka ENOATTR) has a very specific meaning in the xfs xattr code; namely, that the requested attribute name could not be found. However, a medium error from disk may also return ENODATA. At best, this medium error may escape to userspace as "attribute not found" when in fact it's an IO (disk) error. At worst, we may oops in xfs_attr_leaf_get() when we do: error = xfs_attr_leaf_hasname(args, &bp); if (error == -ENOATTR) { xfs_trans_brelse(args->trans, bp); return error; } because an ENODATA/ENOATTR error from disk leaves us with a null bp, and the xfs_trans_brelse will then null-deref it. As discussed on the list, we really need to modify the lower level IO functions to trap all disk errors and ensure that we don't let unique errors like this leak up into higher xfs functions - many like this should be remapped to EIO. However, this patch directly addresses a reported bug in the xattr code, and should be safe to backport to stable kernels. A larger-scope patch to handle more unique errors at lower levels can follow later. (Note, prior to 07120f1abdff we did not oops, but we did return the wrong error code to userspace.)

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfs: do not propagate ENODATA disk errors into xattr code ENODATA (aka ENOATTR) has a very specific meaning in the xfs xattr code; namely, that the requested attribute name could not be found. However, a medium error from disk may also return ENODATA. At best, this medium error may escape to userspace as "attribute not found" when in fact it's an IO (disk) error. At worst, we may oops in xfs_attr_leaf_get() when we do: error = xfs_attr_leaf_hasname(args, &bp); if (error == -ENOATTR) { xfs_trans_brelse(args->trans, bp); return error; } because an ENODATA/ENOATTR error from disk leaves us with a null bp, and the xfs_trans_brelse will then null-deref it. As discussed on the list, we really need to modify the lower level IO functions to trap all disk errors and ensure that we don't let unique errors like this leak up into higher xfs functions - many like this should be remapped to EIO. However, this patch directly addresses a reported bug in the xattr code, and should be safe to backport to stable kernels. A larger-scope patch to handle more unique errors at lower levels can follow later. (Note, prior to 07120f1abdff we did not oops, but we did return the wrong error code to userspace.)

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfs: do not propagate ENODATA disk errors into xattr code ENODATA (aka ENOATTR) has a very specific meaning in the xfs xattr code; namely, that the requested attribute name could not be found. However, a medium error from disk may also return ENODATA. At best, this medium error may escape to userspace as "attribute not found" when in fact it's an IO (disk) error. At worst, we may oops in xfs_attr_leaf_get() when we do: error = xfs_attr_leaf_hasname(args, &bp); if (error == -ENOATTR) { xfs_trans_brelse(args->trans, bp); return error; } because an ENODATA/ENOATTR error from disk leaves us with a null bp, and the xfs_trans_brelse will then null-deref it. As discussed on the list, we really need to modify the lower level IO functions to trap all disk errors and ensure that we don't let unique errors like this leak up into higher xfs functions - many like this should be remapped to EIO. However, this patch directly addresses a reported bug in the xattr code, and should be safe to backport to stable kernels. A larger-scope patch to handle more unique errors at lower levels can follow later. (Note, prior to 07120f1abdff we did not oops, but we did return the wrong error code to userspace.)

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2077Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher beschriebene Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250917SECURITY BULLETIN 17 SEPT 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official SECURITY BULLETIN 17 SEPT 2025, published on 17 September 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0565Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2025-39813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39812 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39834 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39812 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39834 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39834 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-39813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-39823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-024945Debian等の複数ベンダの製品における不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルに存在する脆弱性で、xfsの拡張属性(xattr)コードにおいて、ディスクエラーが特定のエラーコードENODATA(別名ENOATTR)として誤って伝播される問題を修正しました。ENODATAは本来、要求された属性名が存在しない場合に使用されるエラーコードですが、ディスクの中程度のエラーも同様にENODATAを返すことがあり、これがユーザースペースで誤った状態として認識されたり、最悪の場合クラッシュを引き起こす原因となっていました。問題の根本は、xfs_attr_leaf_get()関数内でディスクからのENODATAエラーをヌルポインタとして扱い、不正なメモリ解放操作を行っていることにあります。本脆弱性に対しては、下位のI/O関数でディスクエラーを適切に捕捉・変換し、誤ったエラーコードが上位のxfs関数に漏れないように対処する必要がありますが、本パッチはこの問題に直接対応し、安定版カーネルへのバックポートも安全であることを保証します。これにより、xattrコードにおけるクラッシュや誤ったエラー報告を防げます。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0147Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten

Multiple security vulnerabilities affecting various Linux kernel subsystems, including XFS filesystem, AppArmor LSM, AMD processors, and branch predictor isolation (VMSCAPE), were fixed across SUSE Linux Enterprise and Micro kernels to prevent system crashes, privilege escalation, and data exposure.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.9, 5.10.242 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.191 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.150 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.104 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.45 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.16.5 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Sept 2025 · Last source change 12 May 2026, 12:07 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-29579
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-39835 · cve.blacktree.nl