BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-39788High confidence

scsi: ufs: exynos: Fix programming of HCI_UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-032379 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 12 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.48-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.153-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-032379 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC CN 4100
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: ufs: exynos: Fix programming of HCI_UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE On Google gs101, the number of UTP transfer request slots (nutrs) is 32, and in this case the driver ends up programming the UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE incorrectly as 0. This is because the left hand side of the shift is 1, which is of type int, i.e. 31 bits wide. Shifting by more than that width results in undefined behaviour. Fix this by switching to the BIT() macro, which applies correct type casting as required. This ensures the correct value is written to UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE (0xffffffff on gs101), and it also fixes a UBSAN shift warning: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c:1113:21 shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int' For consistency, apply the same change to the nutmrs / UTMRL_NEXUS_TYPE write.
Remediation
Update to V5.0 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-28925

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: ufs: exynos: Fix programming of HCI_UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE On Google gs101, the number of UTP transfer request slots (nutrs) is 32, and in this case the driver ends up programming the UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE incorrectly as 0. This is because the left hand side of the shift is 1, which is of type int, i.e. 31 bits wide. Shifting by more than that width results in undefined behaviour. Fix this by switching to the BIT() macro, which applies correct type casting as required. This ensures the correct value is written to UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE (0xffffffff on gs101), and it also fixes a UBSAN shift warning: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c:1113:21 shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int' For consistency, apply the same change to the nutmrs / UTMRL_NEXUS_TYPE write.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: ufs: exynos: Fix programming of HCI_UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE On Google gs101, the number of UTP transfer request slots (nutrs) is 32, and in this case the driver ends up programming the UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE incorrectly as 0. This is because the left hand side of the shift is 1, which is of type int, i.e. 31 bits wide. Shifting by more than that width results in undefined behaviour. Fix this by switching to the BIT() macro, which applies correct type casting as required. This ensures the correct value is written to UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE (0xffffffff on gs101), and it also fixes a UBSAN shift warning: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c:1113:21 shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int' For consistency, apply the same change to the nutmrs / UTMRL_NEXUS_TYPE write.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: ufs: exynos: Fix programming of HCI_UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE On Google gs101, the number of UTP transfer request slots (nutrs) is 32, and in this case the driver ends up programming the UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE incorrectly as 0. This is because the left hand side of the shift is 1, which is of type int, i.e. 31 bits wide. Shifting by more than that width results in undefined behaviour. Fix this by switching to the BIT() macro, which applies correct type casting as required. This ensures the correct value is written to UTRL_NEXUS_TYPE (0xffffffff on gs101), and it also fixes a UBSAN shift warning: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c:1113:21 shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int' For consistency, apply the same change to the nutmrs / UTMRL_NEXUS_TYPE write.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Write → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-787 ↗

CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write. The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-787
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2040Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen, sowie einen Denial of Service Angriff oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250917SECURITY BULLETIN 17 SEPT 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official SECURITY BULLETIN 17 SEPT 2025, published on 17 September 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0565Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2025-39760 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38550 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38551 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38569 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38589 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39779 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38375 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38379 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38539 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38563 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38565 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39880 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39779 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-39770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39779 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39779 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39779 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0059Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37916 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38321 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39897 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39917 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1140Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53641 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37916 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1133Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

nouncement/2025/suse-su-20254393-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:4422-1 du 17 décembre 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20254422-1 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50253 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37916 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39760 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39779 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39760 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-39760 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-39772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39779 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-024962Debian等の複数ベンダの製品における境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、SCSIのUFSドライバーのexynos部分で、HCI_UTRL_NEXUS_TYPEのプログラミングに関する問題が修正されました。この問題は、Googleのgs101プラットフォームでUTP転送要求スロット数が32の場合に、ドライバーが誤ってUTRL_NEXUS_TYPEを0としてプログラムしてしまうことが原因でした。これは、シフト演算で不適切な型とシフト量が使われていたことによって発生しました。必要な型キャストを適用するBIT()マクロへの変更によって問題が修正され、gs101上で正しい値が書き込まれるようになり、シフト関連の警告も解消されました。同様の修正はUTMRL_NEXUS_TYPEの書き込みに対しても適用されています。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0147Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten

Multiple security vulnerabilities and bugs affecting various Linux kernel subsystems, including scsi: ufs: exynos driver, CPU cache initialization, AMD processor data leakage, and branch predictor isolation, were fixed across SUSE Linux Enterprise and other kernel versions.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
SIMATIC CN 4100
Fixed
Linux: < 5.9, 5.10.241 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.190 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.149 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.103 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.44 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.16.4 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 11 Sept 2025 · Last source change 12 May 2026, 12:07 UTC · CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-28925
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-39788 · cve.blacktree.nl