BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-39703High confidence

net, hsr: reject HSR frame if skb can't hold tag

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-032379 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.38% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.48-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.153-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-032379 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC CN 4100
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net, hsr: reject HSR frame if skb can't hold tag Receiving HSR frame with insufficient space to hold HSR tag in the skb can result in a crash (kernel BUG): [ 45.390915] skbuff: skb_under_panic: text:ffffffff86f32cac len:26 put:14 head:ffff888042418000 data:ffff888042417ff4 tail:0xe end:0x180 dev:bridge_slave_1 [ 45.392559] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 45.392912] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:211! [ 45.393276] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC KASAN NOPTI [ 45.393809] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2496 Comm: reproducer Not tainted 6.15.0 #12 PREEMPT(undef) [ 45.394433] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 45.395273] RIP: 0010:skb_panic+0x15b/0x1d0 [ 45.402911] Call Trace: [ 45.403105] [ 45.404470] skb_push+0xcd/0xf0 [ 45.404726] br_dev_queue_push_xmit+0x7c/0x6c0 [ 45.406513] br_forward_finish+0x128/0x260 [ 45.408483] __br_forward+0x42d/0x590 [ 45.409464] maybe_deliver+0x2eb/0x420 [ 45.409763] br_flood+0x174/0x4a0 [ 45.410030] br_handle_frame_finish+0xc7c/0x1bc0 [ 45.411618] br_handle_frame+0xac3/0x1230 [ 45.413674] __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0x808/0x3df0 [ 45.422966] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xb4/0x1f0 [ 45.424478] __netif_receive_skb+0x22/0x170 [ 45.424806] process_backlog+0x242/0x6d0 [ 45.425116] __napi_poll+0xbb/0x630 [ 45.425394] net_rx_action+0x4d1/0xcc0 [ 45.427613] handle_softirqs+0x1a4/0x580 [ 45.427926] do_softirq+0x74/0x90 [ 45.428196] This issue was found by syzkaller. The panic happens in br_dev_queue_push_xmit() once it receives a corrupted skb with ETH header already pushed in linear data. When it attempts the skb_push() call, there's not enough headroom and skb_push() panics. The corrupted skb is put on the queue by HSR layer, which makes a sequence of unintended transformations when it receives a specific corrupted HSR frame (with incomplete TAG). Fix it by dropping and consuming frames that are not long enough to contain both ethernet and hsr headers. Alternative fix would be to check for enough headroom before skb_push() in br_dev_queue_push_xmit(). In the reproducer, this is injected via AF_PACKET, but I don't easily see why it couldn't be sent over the wire from adjacent network. Further Details: In the reproducer, the following network interface chain is set up: ┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ │ veth0_to_hsr ├───┤ hsr_slave0 ┼───┐ └────────────────┘ └────────────────┘ │ │ ┌──────┐ ├─┤ hsr0 ├───┐ │ └──────┘ │ ┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ │ │┌────────┐ │ veth1_to_hsr ┼───┤ hsr_slave1 ├───┘ └┤ │ └────────────────┘ └────────────────┘ ┌┼ bridge │ ││ │ │└────────┘ │ ┌───────┐ │ │ ... ├──────┘ └───────┘ To trigger the events leading up to crash, reproducer sends a corrupted HSR fr ---truncated---
Remediation
Update to V5.0 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-31523

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net, hsr: reject HSR frame if skb can't hold tag Receiving HSR frame with insufficient space to hold HSR tag in the skb can result in a crash (kernel BUG): [ 45.390915] skbuff: skb_under_panic: text:ffffffff86f32cac len:26 put:14 head:ffff888042418000 data:ffff888042417ff4 tail:0xe end:0x180 dev:bridge_slave_1 [ 45.392559] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 45.392912] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:211! [ 45.393276] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC KASAN NOPTI [ 45.393809] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2496 Comm: reproducer Not tainted 6.15.0 #12 PREEMPT(undef) [ 45.394433] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 45.395273] RIP: 0010:skb_panic+0x15b/0x1d0 <snip registers, remove unreliable trace> [ 45.402911] Call Trace: [ 45.403105] <IRQ> [ 45.404470] skb_push+0xcd/0xf0 [ 45.404726] br_dev_queue_push_xmit+0x7c/0x6c0 [ 45.406513] br_forward_finish+0x128/0x260 [ 45.408483] __br_forward+0x42d/0x590 [ 45.409464] maybe_deliver+0x2eb/0x420 [ 45.409763] br_flood+0x174/0x4a0 [ 45.410030] br_handle_frame_finish+0xc7c/0x1bc0 [ 45.411618] br_handle_frame+0xac3/0x1230 [ 45.413674] __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0x808/0x3df0 [ 45.422966] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xb4/0x1f0 [ 45.424478] __netif_receive_skb+0x22/0x170 [ 45.424806] process_backlog+0x242/0x6d0 [ 45.425116] __napi_poll+0xbb/0x630 [ 45.425394] net_rx_action+0x4d1/0xcc0 [ 45.427613] handle_softirqs+0x1a4/0x580 [ 45.427926] do_softirq+0x74/0x90 [ 45.428196] </IRQ> This issue was found by syzkaller. The panic happens in br_dev_queue_push_xmit() once it receives a corrupted skb with ETH header already pushed in linear data. When it attempts the skb_push() call, there's not enough headroom and skb_push() panics. The corrupted skb is put on the queue by HSR layer, which makes a sequence of unintended transformations when it receives a specific corrupted HSR frame (with incomplete TAG). Fix it by dropping and consuming frames that are not long enough to contain both ethernet and hsr headers. Alternative fix would be to check for enough headroom before skb_push() in br_dev_queue_push_xmit(). In the reproducer, this is injected via AF_PACKET, but I don't easily see why it couldn't be sent over the wire from adjacent network. Further Details: In the reproducer, the following network interface chain is set up: ┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ │ veth0_to_hsr ├───┤ hsr_slave0 ┼───┐ └────────────────┘ └────────────────┘ │ │ ┌──────┐ ├─┤ hsr0 ├───┐ │ └──────┘ │ ┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ │ │┌────────┐ │ veth1_to_hsr ┼───┤ hsr_slave1 ├───┘ └┤ │ └────────────────┘ └────────────────┘ ┌┼ bridge │ ││ │ │└────────┘ │ ┌───────┐ │ │ ... ├──────┘ └───────┘ To trigger the events leading up to crash, reproducer sends a corrupted HSR fr ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net, hsr: reject HSR frame if skb can't hold tag Receiving HSR frame with insufficient space to hold HSR tag in the skb can result in a crash (kernel BUG): [ 45.390915] skbuff: skb_under_panic: text:ffffffff86f32cac len:26 put:14 head:ffff888042418000 data:ffff888042417ff4 tail:0xe end:0x180 dev:bridge_slave_1 [ 45.392559] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 45.392912] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:211! [ 45.393276] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC KASAN NOPTI [ 45.393809] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2496 Comm: reproducer Not tainted 6.15.0 #12 PREEMPT(undef) [ 45.394433] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 45.395273] RIP: 0010:skb_panic+0x15b/0x1d0 <snip registers, remove unreliable trace> [ 45.402911] Call Trace: [ 45.403105] <IRQ> [ 45.404470] skb_push+0xcd/0xf0 [ 45.404726] br_dev_queue_push_xmit+0x7c/0x6c0 [ 45.406513] br_forward_finish+0x128/0x260 [ 45.408483] __br_forward+0x42d/0x590 [ 45.409464] maybe_deliver+0x2eb/0x420 [ 45.409763] br_flood+0x174/0x4a0 [ 45.410030] br_handle_frame_finish+0xc7c/0x1bc0 [ 45.411618] br_handle_frame+0xac3/0x1230 [ 45.413674] __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0x808/0x3df0 [ 45.422966] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xb4/0x1f0 [ 45.424478] __netif_receive_skb+0x22/0x170 [ 45.424806] process_backlog+0x242/0x6d0 [ 45.425116] __napi_poll+0xbb/0x630 [ 45.425394] net_rx_action+0x4d1/0xcc0 [ 45.427613] handle_softirqs+0x1a4/0x580 [ 45.427926] do_softirq+0x74/0x90 [ 45.428196] </IRQ> This issue was found by syzkaller. The panic happens in br_dev_queue_push_xmit() once it receives a corrupted skb with ETH header already pushed in linear data. When it attempts the skb_push() call, there's not enough headroom and skb_push() panics. The corrupted skb is put on the queue by HSR layer, which makes a sequence of unintended transformations when it receives a specific corrupted HSR frame (with incomplete TAG). Fix it by dropping and consuming frames that are not long enough to contain both ethernet and hsr headers. Alternative fix would be to check for enough headroom before skb_push() in br_dev_queue_push_xmit(). In the reproducer, this is injected via AF_PACKET, but I don't easily see why it couldn't be sent over the wire from adjacent network. Further Details: In the reproducer, the following network interface chain is set up: ┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ │ veth0_to_hsr ├───┤ hsr_slave0 ┼───┐ └────────────────┘ └────────────────┘ │ │ ┌──────┐ ├─┤ hsr0 ├───┐ │ └──────┘ │ ┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ │ │┌────────┐ │ veth1_to_hsr ┼───┤ hsr_slave1 ├───┘ └┤ │ └────────────────┘ └────────────────┘ ┌┼ bridge │ ││ │ │└────────┘ │ ┌───────┐ │ │ ... ├──────┘ └───────┘ To trigger the events leading up to crash, reproducer sends a corrupted HSR fr ---truncated---

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net, hsr: reject HSR frame if skb can't hold tag Receiving HSR frame with insufficient space to hold HSR tag in the skb can result in a crash (kernel BUG): [ 45.390915] skbuff: skb_under_panic: text:ffffffff86f32cac len:26 put:14 head:ffff888042418000 data:ffff888042417ff4 tail:0xe end:0x180 dev:bridge_slave_1 [ 45.392559] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 45.392912] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:211! [ 45.393276] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC KASAN NOPTI [ 45.393809] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2496 Comm: reproducer Not tainted 6.15.0 #12 PREEMPT(undef) [ 45.394433] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 45.395273] RIP: 0010:skb_panic+0x15b/0x1d0 <snip registers, remove unreliable trace> [ 45.402911] Call Trace: [ 45.403105] <IRQ> [ 45.404470] skb_push+0xcd/0xf0 [ 45.404726] br_dev_queue_push_xmit+0x7c/0x6c0 [ 45.406513] br_forward_finish+0x128/0x260 [ 45.408483] __br_forward+0x42d/0x590 [ 45.409464] maybe_deliver+0x2eb/0x420 [ 45.409763] br_flood+0x174/0x4a0 [ 45.410030] br_handle_frame_finish+0xc7c/0x1bc0 [ 45.411618] br_handle_frame+0xac3/0x1230 [ 45.413674] __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0x808/0x3df0 [ 45.422966] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xb4/0x1f0 [ 45.424478] __netif_receive_skb+0x22/0x170 [ 45.424806] process_backlog+0x242/0x6d0 [ 45.425116] __napi_poll+0xbb/0x630 [ 45.425394] net_rx_action+0x4d1/0xcc0 [ 45.427613] handle_softirqs+0x1a4/0x580 [ 45.427926] do_softirq+0x74/0x90 [ 45.428196] </IRQ> This issue was found by syzkaller. The panic happens in br_dev_queue_push_xmit() once it receives a corrupted skb with ETH header already pushed in linear data. When it attempts the skb_push() call, there's not enough headroom and skb_push() panics. The corrupted skb is put on the queue by HSR layer, which makes a sequence of unintended transformations when it receives a specific corrupted HSR frame (with incomplete TAG). Fix it by dropping and consuming frames that are not long enough to contain both ethernet and hsr headers. Alternative fix would be to check for enough headroom before skb_push() in br_dev_queue_push_xmit(). In the reproducer, this is injected via AF_PACKET, but I don't easily see why it couldn't be sent over the wire from adjacent network. Further Details: In the reproducer, the following network interface chain is set up: ┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ │ veth0_to_hsr ├───┤ hsr_slave0 ┼───┐ └────────────────┘ └────────────────┘ │ │ ┌──────┐ ├─┤ hsr0 ├───┐ │ └──────┘ │ ┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ │ │┌────────┐ │ veth1_to_hsr ┼───┤ hsr_slave1 ├───┘ └┤ │ └────────────────┘ └────────────────┘ ┌┼ bridge │ ││ │ │└────────┘ │ ┌───────┐ │ │ ... ├──────┘ └───────┘ To trigger the events leading up to crash, reproducer sends a corrupted HSR fr ---truncated---

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → NULL Pointer Dereference → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1988Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250910Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025, published on 10 September 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0565Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-024393Debian等の複数ベンダの製品におけるNULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルには、スキルバッファ(skb)にHSRタグを保持する十分なスペースがない場合にHSRフレームを拒否しない問題があり、その結果カーネルがクラッシュ(kernel BUG)することがあります。この脆弱性は、特定の破損したHSRフレームを受信した際にトリガーされ、通信経路上で長さが不十分なフレームが処理されることで引き起こされます。この問題は、イーサネットヘッダーとHSRヘッダーの両方を保持できないフレームを破棄するよう修正されました。HSRプロトコルを有効にしたLinuxカーネルを利用する環境が影響を受けます。攻撃者がこの問題を悪用すると、カーネルがパニックを引き起こす可能性があります。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0147Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten

Multiple security vulnerabilities affecting various Linux kernel subsystems, including HSR network protocol, CPU cache initialization, AMD processor data leakage, and branch predictor isolation (VMSCAPE), were fixed across SUSE Linux Enterprise and Micro kernels with extensive updates.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
SIMATIC CN 4100
Fixed
Linux: < 5.13, 5.10.241 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.190 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.149 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.103 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.44 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.16.4 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 5 Sept 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-31523
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-39703 · cve.blacktree.nl