BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-39691High confidence

fs/buffer: fix use-after-free when call bh_read() helper

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 27 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 8 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 27 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.48-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.153-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/buffer: fix use-after-free when call bh_read() helper There's issue as follows: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 Read of size 8 at addr ffffc9000168f7f8 by task swapper/3/0 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 6.16.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x390 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0 end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x56/0x80 blk_update_request+0x30a/0x720 scsi_end_request+0x51/0x2b0 scsi_io_completion+0xe3/0x480 ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x11e/0x160 blk_complete_reqs+0x7b/0x90 handle_softirqs+0xef/0x370 irq_exit_rcu+0xa5/0xd0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 Above issue happens when do ntfs3 filesystem mount, issue may happens as follows: mount IRQ ntfs_fill_super read_cache_page do_read_cache_folio filemap_read_folio mpage_read_folio do_mpage_readpage ntfs_get_block_vbo bh_read submit_bh wait_on_buffer(bh); blk_complete_reqs scsi_io_completion scsi_end_request blk_update_request end_bio_bh_io_sync end_buffer_read_sync __end_buffer_read_notouch unlock_buffer wait_on_buffer(bh);--> return will return to caller put_bh --> trigger stack-out-of-bounds In the mpage_read_folio() function, the stack variable 'map_bh' is passed to ntfs_get_block_vbo(). Once unlock_buffer() unlocks and wait_on_buffer() returns to continue processing, the stack variable is likely to be reclaimed. Consequently, during the end_buffer_read_sync() process, calling put_bh() may result in stack overrun. If the bh is not allocated on the stack, it belongs to a folio. Freeing a buffer head which belongs to a folio is done by drop_buffers() which will fail to free buffers which are still locked. So it is safe to call put_bh() before __end_buffer_read_notouch().
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-032379 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC CN 4100
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/buffer: fix use-after-free when call bh_read() helper There's issue as follows: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 Read of size 8 at addr ffffc9000168f7f8 by task swapper/3/0 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 6.16.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x390 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0 end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x56/0x80 blk_update_request+0x30a/0x720 scsi_end_request+0x51/0x2b0 scsi_io_completion+0xe3/0x480 ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x11e/0x160 blk_complete_reqs+0x7b/0x90 handle_softirqs+0xef/0x370 irq_exit_rcu+0xa5/0xd0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 Above issue happens when do ntfs3 filesystem mount, issue may happens as follows: mount IRQ ntfs_fill_super read_cache_page do_read_cache_folio filemap_read_folio mpage_read_folio do_mpage_readpage ntfs_get_block_vbo bh_read submit_bh wait_on_buffer(bh); blk_complete_reqs scsi_io_completion scsi_end_request blk_update_request end_bio_bh_io_sync end_buffer_read_sync __end_buffer_read_notouch unlock_buffer wait_on_buffer(bh);--> return will return to caller put_bh --> trigger stack-out-of-bounds In the mpage_read_folio() function, the stack variable 'map_bh' is passed to ntfs_get_block_vbo(). Once unlock_buffer() unlocks and wait_on_buffer() returns to continue processing, the stack variable is likely to be reclaimed. Consequently, during the end_buffer_read_sync() process, calling put_bh() may result in stack overrun. If the bh is not allocated on the stack, it belongs to a folio. Freeing a buffer head which belongs to a folio is done by drop_buffers() which will fail to free buffers which are still locked. So it is safe to call put_bh() before __end_buffer_read_notouch().
Remediation
Update to V5.0 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-31534

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/buffer: fix use-after-free when call bh_read() helper There's issue as follows: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 Read of size 8 at addr ffffc9000168f7f8 by task swapper/3/0 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 6.16.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x390 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0 end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x56/0x80 blk_update_request+0x30a/0x720 scsi_end_request+0x51/0x2b0 scsi_io_completion+0xe3/0x480 ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x11e/0x160 blk_complete_reqs+0x7b/0x90 handle_softirqs+0xef/0x370 irq_exit_rcu+0xa5/0xd0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 </IRQ> Above issue happens when do ntfs3 filesystem mount, issue may happens as follows: mount IRQ ntfs_fill_super read_cache_page do_read_cache_folio filemap_read_folio mpage_read_folio do_mpage_readpage ntfs_get_block_vbo bh_read submit_bh wait_on_buffer(bh); blk_complete_reqs scsi_io_completion scsi_end_request blk_update_request end_bio_bh_io_sync end_buffer_read_sync __end_buffer_read_notouch unlock_buffer wait_on_buffer(bh);--> return will return to caller put_bh --> trigger stack-out-of-bounds In the mpage_read_folio() function, the stack variable 'map_bh' is passed to ntfs_get_block_vbo(). Once unlock_buffer() unlocks and wait_on_buffer() returns to continue processing, the stack variable is likely to be reclaimed. Consequently, during the end_buffer_read_sync() process, calling put_bh() may result in stack overrun. If the bh is not allocated on the stack, it belongs to a folio. Freeing a buffer head which belongs to a folio is done by drop_buffers() which will fail to free buffers which are still locked. So it is safe to call put_bh() before __end_buffer_read_notouch().

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 27 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/buffer: fix use-after-free when call bh_read() helper There's issue as follows: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 Read of size 8 at addr ffffc9000168f7f8 by task swapper/3/0 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 6.16.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x390 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0 end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x56/0x80 blk_update_request+0x30a/0x720 scsi_end_request+0x51/0x2b0 scsi_io_completion+0xe3/0x480 ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x11e/0x160 blk_complete_reqs+0x7b/0x90 handle_softirqs+0xef/0x370 irq_exit_rcu+0xa5/0xd0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 </IRQ> Above issue happens when do ntfs3 filesystem mount, issue may happens as follows: mount IRQ ntfs_fill_super read_cache_page do_read_cache_folio filemap_read_folio mpage_read_folio do_mpage_readpage ntfs_get_block_vbo bh_read submit_bh wait_on_buffer(bh); blk_complete_reqs scsi_io_completion scsi_end_request blk_update_request end_bio_bh_io_sync end_buffer_read_sync __end_buffer_read_notouch unlock_buffer wait_on_buffer(bh);--> return will return to caller put_bh --> trigger stack-out-of-bounds In the mpage_read_folio() function, the stack variable 'map_bh' is passed to ntfs_get_block_vbo(). Once unlock_buffer() unlocks and wait_on_buffer() returns to continue processing, the stack variable is likely to be reclaimed. Consequently, during the end_buffer_read_sync() process, calling put_bh() may result in stack overrun. If the bh is not allocated on the stack, it belongs to a folio. Freeing a buffer head which belongs to a folio is done by drop_buffers() which will fail to free buffers which are still locked. So it is safe to call put_bh() before __end_buffer_read_notouch().

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/buffer: fix use-after-free when call bh_read() helper There's issue as follows: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 Read of size 8 at addr ffffc9000168f7f8 by task swapper/3/0 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 6.16.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x390 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0 end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x56/0x80 blk_update_request+0x30a/0x720 scsi_end_request+0x51/0x2b0 scsi_io_completion+0xe3/0x480 ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x11e/0x160 blk_complete_reqs+0x7b/0x90 handle_softirqs+0xef/0x370 irq_exit_rcu+0xa5/0xd0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 </IRQ> Above issue happens when do ntfs3 filesystem mount, issue may happens as follows: mount IRQ ntfs_fill_super read_cache_page do_read_cache_folio filemap_read_folio mpage_read_folio do_mpage_readpage ntfs_get_block_vbo bh_read submit_bh wait_on_buffer(bh); blk_complete_reqs scsi_io_completion scsi_end_request blk_update_request end_bio_bh_io_sync end_buffer_read_sync __end_buffer_read_notouch unlock_buffer wait_on_buffer(bh);--> return will return to caller put_bh --> trigger stack-out-of-bounds In the mpage_read_folio() function, the stack variable 'map_bh' is passed to ntfs_get_block_vbo(). Once unlock_buffer() unlocks and wait_on_buffer() returns to continue processing, the stack variable is likely to be reclaimed. Consequently, during the end_buffer_read_sync() process, calling put_bh() may result in stack overrun. If the bh is not allocated on the stack, it belongs to a folio. Freeing a buffer head which belongs to a folio is done by drop_buffers() which will fail to free buffers which are still locked. So it is safe to call put_bh() before __end_buffer_read_notouch().

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/buffer: fix use-after-free when call bh_read() helper There's issue as follows: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 Read of size 8 at addr ffffc9000168f7f8 by task swapper/3/0 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 6.16.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x390 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0 end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x56/0x80 blk_update_request+0x30a/0x720 scsi_end_request+0x51/0x2b0 scsi_io_completion+0xe3/0x480 ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x11e/0x160 blk_complete_reqs+0x7b/0x90 handle_softirqs+0xef/0x370 irq_exit_rcu+0xa5/0xd0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 </IRQ> Above issue happens when do ntfs3 filesystem mount, issue may happens as follows: mount IRQ ntfs_fill_super read_cache_page do_read_cache_folio filemap_read_folio mpage_read_folio do_mpage_readpage ntfs_get_block_vbo bh_read submit_bh wait_on_buffer(bh); blk_complete_reqs scsi_io_completion scsi_end_request blk_update_request end_bio_bh_io_sync end_buffer_read_sync __end_buffer_read_notouch unlock_buffer wait_on_buffer(bh);--> return will return to caller put_bh --> trigger stack-out-of-bounds In the mpage_read_folio() function, the stack variable 'map_bh' is passed to ntfs_get_block_vbo(). Once unlock_buffer() unlocks and wait_on_buffer() returns to continue processing, the stack variable is likely to be reclaimed. Consequently, during the end_buffer_read_sync() process, calling put_bh() may result in stack overrun. If the bh is not allocated on the stack, it belongs to a folio. Freeing a buffer head which belongs to a folio is done by drop_buffers() which will fail to free buffers which are still locked. So it is safe to call put_bh() before __end_buffer_read_notouch().

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-31534Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/buffer: fix use-after-free when call bh_read() helper There's issue as follows: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 Read of size 8 at addr ffffc9000168f7f8 by task swapper/3/0 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 6.16.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x390 print_report+0xb4/0x270 kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0 end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110 end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x56/0x80 blk_update_request+0x30a/0x720 scsi_end_request+0x51/0x2b0 scsi_io_completion+0xe3/0x480 ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x11e/0x160 blk_complete_reqs+0x7b/0x90 handle_softirqs+0xef/0x370 irq_exit_rcu+0xa5/0xd0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 </IRQ> Above issue happens when do ntfs3 filesystem mount, issue may happens as follows: mount IRQ ntfs_fill_super read_cache_page do_read_cache_folio filemap_read_folio mpage_read_folio do_mpage_readpage ntfs_get_block_vbo bh_read submit_bh wait_on_buffer(bh); blk_complete_reqs scsi_io_completion scsi_end_request blk_update_request end_bio_bh_io_sync end_buffer_read_sync __end_buffer_read_notouch unlock_buffer wait_on_buffer(bh);--> return will return to caller put_bh --> trigger stack-out-of-bounds In the mpage_read_folio() function, the stack variable 'map_bh' is passed to ntfs_get_block_vbo(). Once unlock_buffer() unlocks and wait_on_buffer() returns to continue processing, the stack variable is likely to be reclaimed. Consequently, during the end_buffer_read_sync() process, calling put_bh() may result in stack overrun. If the bh is not allocated on the stack, it belongs to a folio. Freeing a buffer head which belongs to a folio is done by drop_buffers() which will fail to free buffers which are still locked. So it is safe to call put_bh() before __end_buffer_read_notouch().

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0349Dell Avamar und NetWorker: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Avamar und Dell NetWorker ausnutzen, um Angriffe zu starten, die die Integrität, Vertraulichkeit und Verfügbarkeit von Systemen beeinträchtigen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1988Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250910Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025, published on 10 September 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

25-21926, CVE-2025-21938, CVE-2025-21959, CVE-2025-21999, CVE-2025-22005, CVE-2025-22015, CVE-2025-22055, CVE-2025-22056, CVE-2025-22060, CVE-2025-22083, CVE-2025-22090, CVE-2025-22095, CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-22111, CVE-2025-22121, CVE-2025-23136, CVE-2025-23143, CVE-2025-37785, CVE-2025-37909, CVE-2025-37917, CVE-2025-37945, CVE-2025-37959, CVE-2025-37964, CVE-2025-37972, CVE-2025-37980, CVE-2025-38125, CVE-2025-38162, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38201, CVE-2025-38232, CVE-2025-38322, CVE-2025-38591, CVE-2025-38614, CVE-2025-38681, CVE-2025-38704, CVE-2025-38721, CVE-2025-38725, CVE-2025-38727, CVE-2025-38732, CVE-2025-38736, CVE-2025-39681, CVE-2025-39691, CVE-2025-39721, CVE-2025-39748, CVE-2025-39756, CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-39770, CVE-2025-39773, CVE-2025-39782, CVE-2025-39795, CVE-2025-39826, CVE-2025-39827, CVE-2025-39845, CVE-2025-39866, CVE-2025-39871, CVE-2025-39931, CVE-2025-39953, CVE-2025-39955, CVE-2025-39964, CVE-2025-39977, CVE-2025-39978, CVE-2025-39980, CVE-2025-40022, CVE-2025-40070, CVE-2025-40078, CVE-2025-40080, CVE-2025-40105, CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40149, CVE-2025-40219, CVE-2025-40261, CVE-2025-40300, CVE-2025-61984, CVE-2025-61985, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68261, CVE-2025-68264, CVE-2025-68265, CVE-2025-68266, CVE-2025-68291, CVE-2025-68337, CVE-2025-68349, CVE-2025

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0565Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-024398Debian等の複数ベンダの製品における解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルのfs/bufferにおいて、bh_read()ヘルパー呼び出し時にUse-After-Freeが発生する問題が修正されました。この脆弱性はntfs3ファイルシステムのマウント時に発生し、wait_on_buffer()から復帰したあと、スタック変数のバッファヘッドが解放されてスタックオーバーランが起きる可能性がありました。これは、mpage_read_folio()関数でスタック変数'map_bh'をntfs_get_block_vbo()に渡し、unlock_buffer()で解放した後に再利用するために発生します。バッファヘッドがスタック上で管理されていない場合は安全に解放されます。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0147Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten

Multiple security vulnerabilities, including use-after-free bugs, branch predictor isolation flaws (VMSCAPE), and CPU cache initialization issues, were fixed across various Linux kernel subsystems and architectures, affecting SUSE Linux Enterprise and Micro products.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.12, 5.4.297 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.241 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.190 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.149 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.103 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.44 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.16.4 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 5 Sept 2025 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:42 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-31534
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 70a09115da586bf662c3bae9c0c4a1b99251fad9; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 3169edb8945c295cf89120fc6b2c35cfe3ad4c9e; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 03b40bf5d0389ca23ae6857ee25789f0e0b47ce8; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < c58c6b532b7b69537cfd9ef701c7e37cdcf79dc4; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < c5aa6ba1127307ab5dc3773eaf40d73a3423841f; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 042cf48ecf67f72c8b3846c7fac678f472712ff3; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 90b5193edb323fefbee0e4e5bc39ed89dcc37719; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 7375f22495e7cd1c5b3b5af9dcc4f6dffe34ce49 · Fixed: < 2.6.12; 5.4.297 ≤ 5.4.*; 5.10.241 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.190 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.149 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.103 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.44 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.16.4 ≤ 6.16.*
    After
    Linux: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 70a09115da586bf662c3bae9c0c4a1b99251fad9, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 3169edb8945c295cf89120fc6b2c35cfe3ad4c9e, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 03b40bf5d0389ca23ae6857ee25789f0e0b47ce8, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < c58c6b532b7b69537cfd9ef701c7e37cdcf79dc4, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < c5aa6ba1127307ab5dc3773eaf40d73a3423841f, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 042cf48ecf67f72c8b3846c7fac678f472712ff3, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 90b5193edb323fefbee0e4e5bc39ed89dcc37719, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 7375f22495e7cd1c5b3b5af9dcc4f6dffe34ce49, 2.6.12 · Fixed: Linux: < 2.6.12, 5.4.297 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.241 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.190 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.149 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.103 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.44 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.16.4 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-39691 · cve.blacktree.nl