BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-39677High confidence

net/sched: Fix backlog accounting in qdisc_dequeue_internal

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

21 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-31547

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: Fix backlog accounting in qdisc_dequeue_internal This issue applies for the following qdiscs: hhf, fq, fq_codel, and fq_pie, and occurs in their change handlers when adjusting to the new limit. The problem is the following in the values passed to the subsequent qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog call given a tbf parent: When the tbf parent runs out of tokens, skbs of these qdiscs will be placed in gso_skb. Their peek handlers are qdisc_peek_dequeued, which accounts for both qlen and backlog. However, in the case of qdisc_dequeue_internal, ONLY qlen is accounted for when pulling from gso_skb. This means that these qdiscs are missing a qdisc_qstats_backlog_dec when dropping packets to satisfy the new limit in their change handlers. One can observe this issue with the following (with tc patched to support a limit of 0): export TARGET=fq tc qdisc del dev lo root tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: tbf rate 8bit burst 100b latency 1ms tc qdisc replace dev lo handle 3: parent 1:1 $TARGET limit 1000 echo ''; echo 'add child'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo ping -I lo -f -c2 -s32 -W0.001 127.0.0.1 2>&1 >/dev/null echo ''; echo 'after ping'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo tc qdisc change dev lo handle 3: parent 1:1 $TARGET limit 0 echo ''; echo 'after limit drop'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo tc qdisc replace dev lo handle 2: parent 1:1 sfq echo ''; echo 'post graft'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo The second to last show command shows 0 packets but a positive number (74) of backlog bytes. The problem becomes clearer in the last show command, where qdisc_purge_queue triggers qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog with the positive backlog and causes an underflow in the tbf parent's backlog (4096 Mb instead of 0). To fix this issue, the codepath for all clients of qdisc_dequeue_internal has been simplified: codel, pie, hhf, fq, fq_pie, and fq_codel. qdisc_dequeue_internal handles the backlog adjustments for all cases that do not directly use the dequeue handler. The old fq_codel_change limit adjustment loop accumulated the arguments to the subsequent qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog call through the cstats field. However, this is confusing and error prone as fq_codel_dequeue could also potentially mutate this field (which qdisc_dequeue_internal calls in the non gso_skb case), so we have unified the code here with other qdiscs.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: Fix backlog accounting in qdisc_dequeue_internal This issue applies for the following qdiscs: hhf, fq, fq_codel, and fq_pie, and occurs in their change handlers when adjusting to the new limit. The problem is the following in the values passed to the subsequent qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog call given a tbf parent: When the tbf parent runs out of tokens, skbs of these qdiscs will be placed in gso_skb. Their peek handlers are qdisc_peek_dequeued, which accounts for both qlen and backlog. However, in the case of qdisc_dequeue_internal, ONLY qlen is accounted for when pulling from gso_skb. This means that these qdiscs are missing a qdisc_qstats_backlog_dec when dropping packets to satisfy the new limit in their change handlers. One can observe this issue with the following (with tc patched to support a limit of 0): export TARGET=fq tc qdisc del dev lo root tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: tbf rate 8bit burst 100b latency 1ms tc qdisc replace dev lo handle 3: parent 1:1 $TARGET limit 1000 echo ''; echo 'add child'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo ping -I lo -f -c2 -s32 -W0.001 127.0.0.1 2>&1 >/dev/null echo ''; echo 'after ping'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo tc qdisc change dev lo handle 3: parent 1:1 $TARGET limit 0 echo ''; echo 'after limit drop'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo tc qdisc replace dev lo handle 2: parent 1:1 sfq echo ''; echo 'post graft'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo The second to last show command shows 0 packets but a positive number (74) of backlog bytes. The problem becomes clearer in the last show command, where qdisc_purge_queue triggers qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog with the positive backlog and causes an underflow in the tbf parent's backlog (4096 Mb instead of 0). To fix this issue, the codepath for all clients of qdisc_dequeue_internal has been simplified: codel, pie, hhf, fq, fq_pie, and fq_codel. qdisc_dequeue_internal handles the backlog adjustments for all cases that do not directly use the dequeue handler. The old fq_codel_change limit adjustment loop accumulated the arguments to the subsequent qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog call through the cstats field. However, this is confusing and error prone as fq_codel_dequeue could also potentially mutate this field (which qdisc_dequeue_internal calls in the non gso_skb case), so we have unified the code here with other qdiscs.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: Fix backlog accounting in qdisc_dequeue_internal This issue applies for the following qdiscs: hhf, fq, fq_codel, and fq_pie, and occurs in their change handlers when adjusting to the new limit. The problem is the following in the values passed to the subsequent qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog call given a tbf parent: When the tbf parent runs out of tokens, skbs of these qdiscs will be placed in gso_skb. Their peek handlers are qdisc_peek_dequeued, which accounts for both qlen and backlog. However, in the case of qdisc_dequeue_internal, ONLY qlen is accounted for when pulling from gso_skb. This means that these qdiscs are missing a qdisc_qstats_backlog_dec when dropping packets to satisfy the new limit in their change handlers. One can observe this issue with the following (with tc patched to support a limit of 0): export TARGET=fq tc qdisc del dev lo root tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: tbf rate 8bit burst 100b latency 1ms tc qdisc replace dev lo handle 3: parent 1:1 $TARGET limit 1000 echo ''; echo 'add child'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo ping -I lo -f -c2 -s32 -W0.001 127.0.0.1 2>&1 >/dev/null echo ''; echo 'after ping'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo tc qdisc change dev lo handle 3: parent 1:1 $TARGET limit 0 echo ''; echo 'after limit drop'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo tc qdisc replace dev lo handle 2: parent 1:1 sfq echo ''; echo 'post graft'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo The second to last show command shows 0 packets but a positive number (74) of backlog bytes. The problem becomes clearer in the last show command, where qdisc_purge_queue triggers qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog with the positive backlog and causes an underflow in the tbf parent's backlog (4096 Mb instead of 0). To fix this issue, the codepath for all clients of qdisc_dequeue_internal has been simplified: codel, pie, hhf, fq, fq_pie, and fq_codel. qdisc_dequeue_internal handles the backlog adjustments for all cases that do not directly use the dequeue handler. The old fq_codel_change limit adjustment loop accumulated the arguments to the subsequent qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog call through the cstats field. However, this is confusing and error prone as fq_codel_dequeue could also potentially mutate this field (which qdisc_dequeue_internal calls in the non gso_skb case), so we have unified the code here with other qdiscs.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
Stolen credentials, tokens and legitimate administration functions may provide continued access without deploying a large custom toolset.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2026-0349Dell Avamar und NetWorker: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Avamar und Dell NetWorker ausnutzen, um Angriffe zu starten, die die Integrität, Vertraulichkeit und Verfügbarkeit von Systemen beeinträchtigen.

Official advisory
BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-1988Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38717 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39720 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38717 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39720 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
4b549a2ef4bef9965d97cbd992ba67930cd3e0fe < a225f44d84b8900d679c5f5a9ea46fe9c0cc7802; 4b549a2ef4bef9965d97cbd992ba67930cd3e0fe < 52bf272636bda69587952b35ae97690b8dc89941; 3.5
Fixed
< 3.5; 6.16.4 ≤ 6.16.*; 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 5 Sept 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-31547
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-39677 · cve.blacktree.nl