BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38734High confidence

net/smc: fix UAF on smcsk after smc_listen_out()

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.46% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 22 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.48-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-38734 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 52 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-38734
18 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-devel-azure as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0
  • kernel-source-azure as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Google
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: fix UAF on smcsk after smc_listen_out() BPF CI testing report a UAF issue: [ 16.446633] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000003 0 [ 16.447134] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mod e [ 16.447516] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present pag e [ 16.447878] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 16.448063] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPT I [ 16.448409] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G OE 6.13.0-rc3-g89e8a75fda73-dirty #4 2 [ 16.449124] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODUL E [ 16.449502] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/201 4 [ 16.450201] Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_wor k [ 16.450531] RIP: 0010:smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159 0 [ 16.452158] RSP: 0018:ffffb5ab40053d98 EFLAGS: 0001024 6 [ 16.452526] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 000000000000030 0 [ 16.452994] RDX: 0000000000000280 RSI: 00003513840053f0 RDI: 000000000000000 0 [ 16.453492] RBP: ffffa097808e3800 R08: ffffa09782dba1e0 R09: 000000000000000 5 [ 16.453987] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa0978274640 0 [ 16.454497] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffa09782d4092 0 [ 16.454996] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa097bbc00000(0000) knlGS:000000000000000 0 [ 16.455557] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003 3 [ 16.455961] CR2: 0000000000000030 CR3: 0000000102788004 CR4: 0000000000770ef 0 [ 16.456459] PKRU: 5555555 4 [ 16.456654] Call Trace : [ 16.456832] [ 16.456989] ? __die+0x23/0x7 0 [ 16.457215] ? page_fault_oops+0x180/0x4c 0 [ 16.457508] ? __lock_acquire+0x3e6/0x249 0 [ 16.457801] ? exc_page_fault+0x68/0x20 0 [ 16.458080] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x3 0 [ 16.458389] ? smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159 0 [ 16.458689] ? smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159 0 [ 16.458987] ? lock_is_held_type+0x8f/0x10 0 [ 16.459284] process_one_work+0x1ea/0x6d 0 [ 16.459570] worker_thread+0x1c3/0x38 0 [ 16.459839] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x1 0 [ 16.460144] kthread+0xe0/0x11 0 [ 16.460372] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x1 0 [ 16.460640] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x5 0 [ 16.460896] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x1 0 [ 16.461166] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x3 0 [ 16.461453] [ 16.461616] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [last unloaded: bpf_testmod(OE) ] [ 16.462134] CR2: 000000000000003 0 [ 16.462380] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 16.462710] RIP: 0010:smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x1590 The direct cause of this issue is that after smc_listen_out_connected(), newclcsock->sk may be NULL since it will releases the smcsk. Therefore, if the application closes the socket immediately after accept, newclcsock->sk can be NULL. A possible execution order could be as follows: smc_listen_work | userspace ----------------------------------------------------------------- lock_sock(sk) | smc_listen_out_connected() | | \- smc_listen_out | | | \- release_sock | | |- sk->sk_data_ready() | | fd = accept(); | close(fd); | \- socket->sk = NULL; /* newclcsock->sk is NULL now */ SMC_STAT_SERV_SUCC_INC(sock_net(newclcsock->sk)) Since smc_listen_out_connected() will not fail, simply swapping the order of the code can easily fix this issue.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-31555

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: fix UAF on smcsk after smc_listen_out() BPF CI testing report a UAF issue: [ 16.446633] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000003 0 [ 16.447134] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mod e [ 16.447516] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present pag e [ 16.447878] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 16.448063] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPT I [ 16.448409] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G OE 6.13.0-rc3-g89e8a75fda73-dirty #4 2 [ 16.449124] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODUL E [ 16.449502] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/201 4 [ 16.450201] Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_wor k [ 16.450531] RIP: 0010:smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159 0 [ 16.452158] RSP: 0018:ffffb5ab40053d98 EFLAGS: 0001024 6 [ 16.452526] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 000000000000030 0 [ 16.452994] RDX: 0000000000000280 RSI: 00003513840053f0 RDI: 000000000000000 0 [ 16.453492] RBP: ffffa097808e3800 R08: ffffa09782dba1e0 R09: 000000000000000 5 [ 16.453987] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa0978274640 0 [ 16.454497] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffa09782d4092 0 [ 16.454996] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa097bbc00000(0000) knlGS:000000000000000 0 [ 16.455557] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003 3 [ 16.455961] CR2: 0000000000000030 CR3: 0000000102788004 CR4: 0000000000770ef 0 [ 16.456459] PKRU: 5555555 4 [ 16.456654] Call Trace : [ 16.456832] <TASK > [ 16.456989] ? __die+0x23/0x7 0 [ 16.457215] ? page_fault_oops+0x180/0x4c 0 [ 16.457508] ? __lock_acquire+0x3e6/0x249 0 [ 16.457801] ? exc_page_fault+0x68/0x20 0 [ 16.458080] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x3 0 [ 16.458389] ? smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159 0 [ 16.458689] ? smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159 0 [ 16.458987] ? lock_is_held_type+0x8f/0x10 0 [ 16.459284] process_one_work+0x1ea/0x6d 0 [ 16.459570] worker_thread+0x1c3/0x38 0 [ 16.459839] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x1 0 [ 16.460144] kthread+0xe0/0x11 0 [ 16.460372] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x1 0 [ 16.460640] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x5 0 [ 16.460896] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x1 0 [ 16.461166] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x3 0 [ 16.461453] </TASK > [ 16.461616] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [last unloaded: bpf_testmod(OE) ] [ 16.462134] CR2: 000000000000003 0 [ 16.462380] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 16.462710] RIP: 0010:smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x1590 The direct cause of this issue is that after smc_listen_out_connected(), newclcsock->sk may be NULL since it will releases the smcsk. Therefore, if the application closes the socket immediately after accept, newclcsock->sk can be NULL. A possible execution order could be as follows: smc_listen_work | userspace ----------------------------------------------------------------- lock_sock(sk) | smc_listen_out_connected() | | \- smc_listen_out | | | \- release_sock | | |- sk->sk_data_ready() | | fd = accept(); | close(fd); | \- socket->sk = NULL; /* newclcsock->sk is NULL now */ SMC_STAT_SERV_SUCC_INC(sock_net(newclcsock->sk)) Since smc_listen_out_connected() will not fail, simply swapping the order of the code can easily fix this issue.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: fix UAF on smcsk after smc_listen_out() BPF CI testing report a UAF issue: [ 16.446633] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000003 0 [ 16.447134] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mod e [ 16.447516] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present pag e [ 16.447878] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 16.448063] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPT I [ 16.448409] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G OE 6.13.0-rc3-g89e8a75fda73-dirty #4 2 [ 16.449124] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODUL E [ 16.449502] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/201 4 [ 16.450201] Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_wor k [ 16.450531] RIP: 0010:smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159 0 [ 16.452158] RSP: 0018:ffffb5ab40053d98 EFLAGS: 0001024 6 [ 16.452526] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 000000000000030 0 [ 16.452994] RDX: 0000000000000280 RSI: 00003513840053f0 RDI: 000000000000000 0 [ 16.453492] RBP: ffffa097808e3800 R08: ffffa09782dba1e0 R09: 000000000000000 5 [ 16.453987] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa0978274640 0 [ 16.454497] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffa09782d4092 0 [ 16.454996] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa097bbc00000(0000) knlGS:000000000000000 0 [ 16.455557] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003 3 [ 16.455961] CR2: 0000000000000030 CR3: 0000000102788004 CR4: 0000000000770ef 0 [ 16.456459] PKRU: 5555555 4 [ 16.456654] Call Trace : [ 16.456832] <TASK > [ 16.456989] ? __die+0x23/0x7 0 [ 16.457215] ? page_fault_oops+0x180/0x4c 0 [ 16.457508] ? __lock_acquire+0x3e6/0x249 0 [ 16.457801] ? exc_page_fault+0x68/0x20 0 [ 16.458080] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x3 0 [ 16.458389] ? smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159 0 [ 16.458689] ? smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159 0 [ 16.458987] ? lock_is_held_type+0x8f/0x10 0 [ 16.459284] process_one_work+0x1ea/0x6d 0 [ 16.459570] worker_thread+0x1c3/0x38 0 [ 16.459839] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x1 0 [ 16.460144] kthread+0xe0/0x11 0 [ 16.460372] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x1 0 [ 16.460640] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x5 0 [ 16.460896] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x1 0 [ 16.461166] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x3 0 [ 16.461453] </TASK > [ 16.461616] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [last unloaded: bpf_testmod(OE) ] [ 16.462134] CR2: 000000000000003 0 [ 16.462380] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 16.462710] RIP: 0010:smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x1590 The direct cause of this issue is that after smc_listen_out_connected(), newclcsock->sk may be NULL since it will releases the smcsk. Therefore, if the application closes the socket immediately after accept, newclcsock->sk can be NULL. A possible execution order could be as follows: smc_listen_work | userspace ----------------------------------------------------------------- lock_sock(sk) | smc_listen_out_connected() | | \- smc_listen_out | | | \- release_sock | | |- sk->sk_data_ready() | | fd = accept(); | close(fd); | \- socket->sk = NULL; /* newclcsock->sk is NULL now */ SMC_STAT_SERV_SUCC_INC(sock_net(newclcsock->sk)) Since smc_listen_out_connected() will not fail, simply swapping the order of the code can easily fix this issue.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: fix UAF on smcsk after smc_listen_out() BPF CI testing report a UAF issue: [ 16.446633] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000003 0 [ 16.447134] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mod e [ 16.447516] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present pag e [ 16.447878] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 16.448063] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPT I [ 16.448409] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G OE 6.13.0-rc3-g89e8a75fda73-dirty #4 2 [ 16.449124] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODUL E [ 16.449502] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/201 4 [ 16.450201] Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_wor k [ 16.450531] RIP: 0010:smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159 0 [ 16.452158] RSP: 0018:ffffb5ab40053d98 EFLAGS: 0001024 6 [ 16.452526] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 000000000000030 0 [ 16.452994] RDX: 0000000000000280 RSI: 00003513840053f0 RDI: 000000000000000 0 [ 16.453492] RBP: ffffa097808e3800 R08: ffffa09782dba1e0 R09: 000000000000000 5 [ 16.453987] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa0978274640 0 [ 16.454497] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffa09782d4092 0 [ 16.454996] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa097bbc00000(0000) knlGS:000000000000000 0 [ 16.455557] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003 3 [ 16.455961] CR2: 0000000000000030 CR3: 0000000102788004 CR4: 0000000000770ef 0 [ 16.456459] PKRU: 5555555 4 [ 16.456654] Call Trace : [ 16.456832] <TASK > [ 16.456989] ? __die+0x23/0x7 0 [ 16.457215] ? page_fault_oops+0x180/0x4c 0 [ 16.457508] ? __lock_acquire+0x3e6/0x249 0 [ 16.457801] ? exc_page_fault+0x68/0x20 0 [ 16.458080] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x3 0 [ 16.458389] ? smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159 0 [ 16.458689] ? smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159 0 [ 16.458987] ? lock_is_held_type+0x8f/0x10 0 [ 16.459284] process_one_work+0x1ea/0x6d 0 [ 16.459570] worker_thread+0x1c3/0x38 0 [ 16.459839] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x1 0 [ 16.460144] kthread+0xe0/0x11 0 [ 16.460372] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x1 0 [ 16.460640] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x5 0 [ 16.460896] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x1 0 [ 16.461166] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x3 0 [ 16.461453] </TASK > [ 16.461616] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [last unloaded: bpf_testmod(OE) ] [ 16.462134] CR2: 000000000000003 0 [ 16.462380] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 16.462710] RIP: 0010:smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x1590 The direct cause of this issue is that after smc_listen_out_connected(), newclcsock->sk may be NULL since it will releases the smcsk. Therefore, if the application closes the socket immediately after accept, newclcsock->sk can be NULL. A possible execution order could be as follows: smc_listen_work | userspace ----------------------------------------------------------------- lock_sock(sk) | smc_listen_out_connected() | | \- smc_listen_out | | | \- release_sock | | |- sk->sk_data_ready() | | fd = accept(); | close(fd); | \- socket->sk = NULL; /* newclcsock->sk is NULL now */ SMC_STAT_SERV_SUCC_INC(sock_net(newclcsock->sk)) Since smc_listen_out_connected() will not fail, simply swapping the order of the code can easily fix this issue.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1988Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250910Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025, published on 10 September 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38717 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38717 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38737 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-020513Linux の Linux Kernel における解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 5 Sept 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-31555
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38734 · cve.blacktree.nl