BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38727High confidence

netlink: avoid infinite retry looping in netlink_unicast()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 8 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

13 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 9 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.43-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.153-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

4 current
CVE-2025-38727 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 49 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-38727
2 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-obs-build
  • SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-syms
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netlink: avoid infinite retry looping in netlink_unicast() netlink_attachskb() checks for the socket's read memory allocation constraints. Firstly, it has: rmem sk_rcvbuf) to check if the just increased rmem value fits into the socket's receive buffer. If not, it proceeds and tries to wait for the memory under: rmem + skb->truesize > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) The checks don't cover the case when skb->truesize + sk->sk_rmem_alloc is equal to sk->sk_rcvbuf. Thus the function neither successfully accepts these conditions, nor manages to reschedule the task - and is called in retry loop for indefinite time which is caught as: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 0-....: (25999 ticks this GP) idle=ef2/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=262269/262269 fqs=6212 (t=26000 jiffies g=230833 q=259957) NMI backtrace for cpu 0 CPU: 0 PID: 22 Comm: kauditd Not tainted 5.10.240 #68 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-4.fc42 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:120 nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold lib/nmi_backtrace.c:105 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace lib/nmi_backtrace.c:62 rcu_dump_cpu_stacks kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:335 rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold kernel/rcu/tree.c:2590 update_process_times kernel/time/timer.c:1953 tick_sched_handle kernel/time/tick-sched.c:227 tick_sched_timer kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1399 __hrtimer_run_queues kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1652 hrtimer_interrupt kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1717 __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1113 asm_call_irq_on_stack arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:808 netlink_attachskb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1234 netlink_unicast net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1349 kauditd_send_queue kernel/audit.c:776 kauditd_thread kernel/audit.c:897 kthread kernel/kthread.c:328 ret_from_fork arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304 Restore the original behavior of the check which commit in Fixes accidentally missed when restructuring the code. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netlink: avoid infinite retry looping in netlink_unicast() netlink_attachskb() checks for the socket's read memory allocation constraints. Firstly, it has: rmem sk_rcvbuf) to check if the just increased rmem value fits into the socket's receive buffer. If not, it proceeds and tries to wait for the memory under: rmem + skb->truesize > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) The checks don't cover the case when skb->truesize + sk->sk_rmem_alloc is equal to sk->sk_rcvbuf. Thus the function neither successfully accepts these conditions, nor manages to reschedule the task - and is called in retry loop for indefinite time which is caught as: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 0-....: (25999 ticks this GP) idle=ef2/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=262269/262269 fqs=6212 (t=26000 jiffies g=230833 q=259957) NMI backtrace for cpu 0 CPU: 0 PID: 22 Comm: kauditd Not tainted 5.10.240 #68 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-4.fc42 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:120 nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold lib/nmi_backtrace.c:105 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace lib/nmi_backtrace.c:62 rcu_dump_cpu_stacks kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:335 rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold kernel/rcu/tree.c:2590 update_process_times kernel/time/timer.c:1953 tick_sched_handle kernel/time/tick-sched.c:227 tick_sched_timer kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1399 __hrtimer_run_queues kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1652 hrtimer_interrupt kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1717 __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1113 asm_call_irq_on_stack arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:808 netlink_attachskb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1234 netlink_unicast net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1349 kauditd_send_queue kernel/audit.c:776 kauditd_thread kernel/audit.c:897 kthread kernel/kthread.c:328 ret_from_fork arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304 Restore the original behavior of the check which commit in Fixes accidentally missed when restructuring the code. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netlink: avoid infinite retry looping in netlink_unicast() netlink_attachskb() checks for the socket's read memory allocation constraints. Firstly, it has: rmem sk_rcvbuf) to check if the just increased rmem value fits into the socket's receive buffer. If not, it proceeds and tries to wait for the memory under: rmem + skb->truesize > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) The checks don't cover the case when skb->truesize + sk->sk_rmem_alloc is equal to sk->sk_rcvbuf. Thus the function neither successfully accepts these conditions, nor manages to reschedule the task - and is called in retry loop for indefinite time which is caught as: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 0-....: (25999 ticks this GP) idle=ef2/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=262269/262269 fqs=6212 (t=26000 jiffies g=230833 q=259957) NMI backtrace for cpu 0 CPU: 0 PID: 22 Comm: kauditd Not tainted 5.10.240 #68 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-4.fc42 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:120 nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold lib/nmi_backtrace.c:105 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace lib/nmi_backtrace.c:62 rcu_dump_cpu_stacks kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:335 rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold kernel/rcu/tree.c:2590 update_process_times kernel/time/timer.c:1953 tick_sched_handle kernel/time/tick-sched.c:227 tick_sched_timer kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1399 __hrtimer_run_queues kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1652 hrtimer_interrupt kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1717 __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1113 asm_call_irq_on_stack arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:808 netlink_attachskb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1234 netlink_unicast net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1349 kauditd_send_queue kernel/audit.c:776 kauditd_thread kernel/audit.c:897 kthread kernel/kthread.c:328 ret_from_fork arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304 Restore the original behavior of the check which commit in Fixes accidentally missed when restructuring the code. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-032379 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC CN 4100
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netlink: avoid infinite retry looping in netlink_unicast() netlink_attachskb() checks for the socket's read memory allocation constraints. Firstly, it has: rmem sk_rcvbuf) to check if the just increased rmem value fits into the socket's receive buffer. If not, it proceeds and tries to wait for the memory under: rmem + skb->truesize > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) The checks don't cover the case when skb->truesize + sk->sk_rmem_alloc is equal to sk->sk_rcvbuf. Thus the function neither successfully accepts these conditions, nor manages to reschedule the task - and is called in retry loop for indefinite time which is caught as: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 0-....: (25999 ticks this GP) idle=ef2/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=262269/262269 fqs=6212 (t=26000 jiffies g=230833 q=259957) NMI backtrace for cpu 0 CPU: 0 PID: 22 Comm: kauditd Not tainted 5.10.240 #68 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-4.fc42 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:120 nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold lib/nmi_backtrace.c:105 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace lib/nmi_backtrace.c:62 rcu_dump_cpu_stacks kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:335 rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold kernel/rcu/tree.c:2590 update_process_times kernel/time/timer.c:1953 tick_sched_handle kernel/time/tick-sched.c:227 tick_sched_timer kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1399 __hrtimer_run_queues kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1652 hrtimer_interrupt kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1717 __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1113 asm_call_irq_on_stack arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:808 netlink_attachskb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1234 netlink_unicast net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1349 kauditd_send_queue kernel/audit.c:776 kauditd_thread kernel/audit.c:897 kthread kernel/kthread.c:328 ret_from_fork arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304 Restore the original behavior of the check which commit in Fixes accidentally missed when restructuring the code. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).
Remediation
Update to V5.0 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-26742

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netlink: avoid infinite retry looping in netlink_unicast() netlink_attachskb() checks for the socket's read memory allocation constraints. Firstly, it has: rmem < READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) to check if the just increased rmem value fits into the socket's receive buffer. If not, it proceeds and tries to wait for the memory under: rmem + skb->truesize > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) The checks don't cover the case when skb->truesize + sk->sk_rmem_alloc is equal to sk->sk_rcvbuf. Thus the function neither successfully accepts these conditions, nor manages to reschedule the task - and is called in retry loop for indefinite time which is caught as: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 0-....: (25999 ticks this GP) idle=ef2/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=262269/262269 fqs=6212 (t=26000 jiffies g=230833 q=259957) NMI backtrace for cpu 0 CPU: 0 PID: 22 Comm: kauditd Not tainted 5.10.240 #68 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-4.fc42 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:120 nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold lib/nmi_backtrace.c:105 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace lib/nmi_backtrace.c:62 rcu_dump_cpu_stacks kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:335 rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold kernel/rcu/tree.c:2590 update_process_times kernel/time/timer.c:1953 tick_sched_handle kernel/time/tick-sched.c:227 tick_sched_timer kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1399 __hrtimer_run_queues kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1652 hrtimer_interrupt kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1717 __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1113 asm_call_irq_on_stack arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:808 </IRQ> netlink_attachskb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1234 netlink_unicast net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1349 kauditd_send_queue kernel/audit.c:776 kauditd_thread kernel/audit.c:897 kthread kernel/kthread.c:328 ret_from_fork arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304 Restore the original behavior of the check which commit in Fixes accidentally missed when restructuring the code. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
0.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netlink: avoid infinite retry looping in netlink_unicast() netlink_attachskb() checks for the socket's read memory allocation constraints. Firstly, it has: rmem < READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) to check if the just increased rmem value fits into the socket's receive buffer. If not, it proceeds and tries to wait for the memory under: rmem + skb->truesize > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) The checks don't cover the case when skb->truesize + sk->sk_rmem_alloc is equal to sk->sk_rcvbuf. Thus the function neither successfully accepts these conditions, nor manages to reschedule the task - and is called in retry loop for indefinite time which is caught as: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 0-....: (25999 ticks this GP) idle=ef2/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=262269/262269 fqs=6212 (t=26000 jiffies g=230833 q=259957) NMI backtrace for cpu 0 CPU: 0 PID: 22 Comm: kauditd Not tainted 5.10.240 #68 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-4.fc42 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:120 nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold lib/nmi_backtrace.c:105 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace lib/nmi_backtrace.c:62 rcu_dump_cpu_stacks kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:335 rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold kernel/rcu/tree.c:2590 update_process_times kernel/time/timer.c:1953 tick_sched_handle kernel/time/tick-sched.c:227 tick_sched_timer kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1399 __hrtimer_run_queues kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1652 hrtimer_interrupt kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1717 __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1113 asm_call_irq_on_stack arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:808 </IRQ> netlink_attachskb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1234 netlink_unicast net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1349 kauditd_send_queue kernel/audit.c:776 kauditd_thread kernel/audit.c:897 kthread kernel/kthread.c:328 ret_from_fork arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304 Restore the original behavior of the check which commit in Fixes accidentally missed when restructuring the code. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netlink: avoid infinite retry looping in netlink_unicast() netlink_attachskb() checks for the socket's read memory allocation constraints. Firstly, it has: rmem < READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) to check if the just increased rmem value fits into the socket's receive buffer. If not, it proceeds and tries to wait for the memory under: rmem + skb->truesize > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) The checks don't cover the case when skb->truesize + sk->sk_rmem_alloc is equal to sk->sk_rcvbuf. Thus the function neither successfully accepts these conditions, nor manages to reschedule the task - and is called in retry loop for indefinite time which is caught as: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 0-....: (25999 ticks this GP) idle=ef2/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=262269/262269 fqs=6212 (t=26000 jiffies g=230833 q=259957) NMI backtrace for cpu 0 CPU: 0 PID: 22 Comm: kauditd Not tainted 5.10.240 #68 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-4.fc42 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:120 nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold lib/nmi_backtrace.c:105 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace lib/nmi_backtrace.c:62 rcu_dump_cpu_stacks kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:335 rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold kernel/rcu/tree.c:2590 update_process_times kernel/time/timer.c:1953 tick_sched_handle kernel/time/tick-sched.c:227 tick_sched_timer kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1399 __hrtimer_run_queues kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1652 hrtimer_interrupt kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1717 __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1113 asm_call_irq_on_stack arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:808 </IRQ> netlink_attachskb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1234 netlink_unicast net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1349 kauditd_send_queue kernel/audit.c:776 kauditd_thread kernel/audit.c:897 kthread kernel/kthread.c:328 ret_from_fork arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304 Restore the original behavior of the check which commit in Fixes accidentally missed when restructuring the code. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).

Why

A malformed condition prevents a loop from making progress or terminating, allowing resource exhaustion.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netlink: avoid infinite retry looping in netlink_unicast() netlink_attachskb() checks for the socket's read memory allocation constraints. Firstly, it has: rmem < READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) to check if the just increased rmem value fits into the socket's receive buffer. If not, it proceeds and tries to wait for the memory under: rmem + skb->truesize > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) The checks don't cover the case when skb->truesize + sk->sk_rmem_alloc is equal to sk->sk_rcvbuf. Thus the function neither successfully accepts these conditions, nor manages to reschedule the task - and is called in retry loop for indefinite time which is caught as: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 0-....: (25999 ticks this GP) idle=ef2/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=262269/262269 fqs=6212 (t=26000 jiffies g=230833 q=259957) NMI backtrace for cpu 0 CPU: 0 PID: 22 Comm: kauditd Not tainted 5.10.240 #68 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-4.fc42 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:120 nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold lib/nmi_backtrace.c:105 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace lib/nmi_backtrace.c:62 rcu_dump_cpu_stacks kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:335 rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold kernel/rcu/tree.c:2590 update_process_times kernel/time/timer.c:1953 tick_sched_handle kernel/time/tick-sched.c:227 tick_sched_timer kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1399 __hrtimer_run_queues kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1652 hrtimer_interrupt kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1717 __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1113 asm_call_irq_on_stack arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:808 </IRQ> netlink_attachskb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1234 netlink_unicast net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1349 kauditd_send_queue kernel/audit.c:776 kauditd_thread kernel/audit.c:897 kthread kernel/kthread.c:328 ret_from_fork arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304 Restore the original behavior of the check which commit in Fixes accidentally missed when restructuring the code. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).

Why

A malformed condition prevents a loop from making progress or terminating, allowing resource exhaustion.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-835 ↗

CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop'). The product contains an iteration or loop with an exit condition that cannot be reached, i.e., an infinite loop.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-835
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-26742Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netlink: avoid infinite retry looping in netlink_unicast() netlink_attachskb() checks for the socket's read memory allocation constraints. Firstly, it has: rmem < READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) to check if the just increased rmem value fits into the socket's receive buffer. If not, it proceeds and tries to wait for the memory under: rmem + skb->truesize > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) The checks don't cover the case when skb->truesize + sk->sk_rmem_alloc is equal to sk->sk_rcvbuf. Thus the function neither successfully accepts these conditions, nor manages to reschedule the task - and is called in retry loop for indefinite time which is caught as: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 0-....: (25999 ticks this GP) idle=ef2/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=262269/262269 fqs=6212 (t=26000 jiffies g=230833 q=259957) NMI backtrace for cpu 0 CPU: 0 PID: 22 Comm: kauditd Not tainted 5.10.240 #68 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-4.fc42 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:120 nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold lib/nmi_backtrace.c:105 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace lib/nmi_backtrace.c:62 rcu_dump_cpu_stacks kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:335 rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold kernel/rcu/tree.c:2590 update_process_times kernel/time/timer.c:1953 tick_sched_handle kernel/time/tick-sched.c:227 tick_sched_timer kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1399 __hrtimer_run_queues kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1652 hrtimer_interrupt kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1717 __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1113 asm_call_irq_on_stack arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:808 </IRQ> netlink_attachskb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1234 netlink_unicast net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1349 kauditd_send_queue kernel/audit.c:776 kauditd_thread kernel/audit.c:897 kthread kernel/kthread.c:328 ret_from_fork arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304 Restore the original behavior of the check which commit in Fixes accidentally missed when restructuring the code. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0349Dell Avamar und NetWorker: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Avamar und Dell NetWorker ausnutzen, um Angriffe zu starten, die die Integrität, Vertraulichkeit und Verfügbarkeit von Systemen beeinträchtigen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1976Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250910Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025, published on 10 September 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

25-21887, CVE-2025-21913, CVE-2025-21919, CVE-2025-21925, CVE-2025-21926, CVE-2025-21938, CVE-2025-21959, CVE-2025-21999, CVE-2025-22005, CVE-2025-22015, CVE-2025-22055, CVE-2025-22056, CVE-2025-22060, CVE-2025-22083, CVE-2025-22090, CVE-2025-22095, CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-22111, CVE-2025-22121, CVE-2025-23136, CVE-2025-23143, CVE-2025-37785, CVE-2025-37909, CVE-2025-37917, CVE-2025-37945, CVE-2025-37959, CVE-2025-37964, CVE-2025-37972, CVE-2025-37980, CVE-2025-38125, CVE-2025-38162, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38201, CVE-2025-38232, CVE-2025-38322, CVE-2025-38591, CVE-2025-38614, CVE-2025-38681, CVE-2025-38704, CVE-2025-38721, CVE-2025-38725, CVE-2025-38727, CVE-2025-38732, CVE-2025-38736, CVE-2025-39681, CVE-2025-39691, CVE-2025-39721, CVE-2025-39748, CVE-2025-39756, CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-39770, CVE-2025-39773, CVE-2025-39782, CVE-2025-39795, CVE-2025-39826, CVE-2025-39827, CVE-2025-39845, CVE-2025-39866, CVE-2025-39871, CVE-2025-39931, CVE-2025-39953, CVE-2025-39955, CVE-2025-39964, CVE-2025-39977, CVE-2025-39978, CVE-2025-39980, CVE-2025-40022, CVE-2025-40070, CVE-2025-40078, CVE-2025-40080, CVE-2025-40105, CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40149, CVE-2025-40219, CVE-2025-40261, CVE-2025-40300, CVE-2025-61984, CVE-2025-61985, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68261, CVE-2025-68264, CVE-2025-68265, CVE-2025

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0565Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38717 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1054Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38540 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38542 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38546 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38617 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38618 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40300 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4435 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4517 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6297

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0977Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38435 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38523 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38541 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38541 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38575 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38617 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38618 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40300 Gestion détaillée du document le 07 novembre 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.go

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38540 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38542 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38569 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38617 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38618 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3933 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40002 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40007 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40017 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0949Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38431 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38434 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38435 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38523 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38541 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38541 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38617 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38618 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40300 Gestion détaillée du document le 31 octobre 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0922Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38436 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38523 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38541 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38541 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38575 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38617 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38618 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40114 Gestion détaillée du document le 24 octobre 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-024409Debian等の複数ベンダの製品における無限ループに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルで修正された脆弱性では、netlink_unicast()内の無限リトライループの問題が解消されました。netlink_attachskb()関数はソケットの受信バッファ制約を確認しますが、特定条件下では適切に処理できず、リトライが無限に繰り返されてCPUスタールが発生する可能性がありました。本修正は見落とされていた元のチェック機能を復元し、不具合の発生を防ぎます。この脆弱性はLinux Verification Center(linuxtesting.org)によって発見されました。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0147Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten

Multiple security vulnerabilities and bugs affecting Linux kernel components including netlink, schedulers, drivers, memory management, and GPU subsystems were fixed across various SUSE Linux Enterprise and Micro kernel versions.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.16, 5.4.297 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.241 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.190 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.149 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.103 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.43 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.11 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16.2 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Sept 2025 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:42 UTC · CWE-835 · Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-26742
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    Fixed: kernel-obs-build-6.12.0-160000.6.1 as component of SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2; kernel-syms-6.12.0-160000.6.1 as component of SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2
    After
    SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-obs-build; SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-syms
    SUSE Product Security Team ↗
  2. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    9da025150b7c14a8390fc06aea314c0a4011e82c < 47d49fd07f86d1f55ea1083287303d237e9e0922; c4ceaac5c5ba0b992ee1dc88e2a02421549e5c98 < 6bee383ff83352a693d03efdf27cdd80742f71b2; fd69af06101090eaa60b3d216ae715f9c0a58e5b < f324959ad47e62e3cadaffa65d3cff790fb48529; 76602d8e13864524382b0687dc32cd8f19164d5a < d42b71a34f6b8a2d5c53df81169b03b8d8b5cf4e; 55baecb9eb90238f60a8350660d6762046ebd3bd < 346c820ef5135cf062fa3473da955ef8c5fb6929; 4b8e18af7bea92f8b7fb92d40aeae729209db250 < 44ddd7b1ae0b7edb2c832eb16798c827a05e58f0; cd7ff61bfffd7000143c42bbffb85eeb792466d6 < 78fcd69d55c5f11d7694c547eca767a1cfd38ec4; ae8f160e7eb24240a2a79fc4c815c6a0d4ee16cc < e8edc7de688791a337c068693f22e8d8b869df71 · Fixed: < 6.16; 5.4.297 ≤ 5.4.*; 5.10.241 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.190 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.149 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.103 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.43 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.15.11 ≤ 6.15.*
    After
    Linux: 9da025150b7c14a8390fc06aea314c0a4011e82c < 47d49fd07f86d1f55ea1083287303d237e9e0922, c4ceaac5c5ba0b992ee1dc88e2a02421549e5c98 < 6bee383ff83352a693d03efdf27cdd80742f71b2, fd69af06101090eaa60b3d216ae715f9c0a58e5b < f324959ad47e62e3cadaffa65d3cff790fb48529, 76602d8e13864524382b0687dc32cd8f19164d5a < d42b71a34f6b8a2d5c53df81169b03b8d8b5cf4e, 55baecb9eb90238f60a8350660d6762046ebd3bd < 346c820ef5135cf062fa3473da955ef8c5fb6929, 4b8e18af7bea92f8b7fb92d40aeae729209db250 < 44ddd7b1ae0b7edb2c832eb16798c827a05e58f0, cd7ff61bfffd7000143c42bbffb85eeb792466d6 < 78fcd69d55c5f11d7694c547eca767a1cfd38ec4, ae8f160e7eb24240a2a79fc4c815c6a0d4ee16cc < e8edc7de688791a337c068693f22e8d8b869df71, ae8f160e7eb24240a2a79fc4c815c6a0d4ee16cc < 759dfc7d04bab1b0b86113f1164dc1fec192b859, 5.4.296 < 5.4.297, 5.10.240 < 5.10.241, 5.15.189 < 5.15.190, 6.1.146 < 6.1.149, 6.6.99 < 6.6.103, 6.12.39 < 6.12.43, 6.15.7 < 6.15.11, 6.16 · Fixed: Linux: < 6.16, 5.4.297 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.241 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.190 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.149 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.103 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.43 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.11 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16.2 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38727 · cve.blacktree.nl