BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38708High confidence

drbd: add missing kref_get in handle_write_conflicts

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-082556 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 27 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.38% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 27 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.43-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.153-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drbd: add missing kref_get in handle_write_conflicts With `two-primaries` enabled, DRBD tries to detect "concurrent" writes and handle write conflicts, so that even if you write to the same sector simultaneously on both nodes, they end up with the identical data once the writes are completed. In handling "superseeded" writes, we forgot a kref_get, resulting in a premature drbd_destroy_device and use after free, and further to kernel crashes with symptoms. Relevance: No one should use DRBD as a random data generator, and apparently all users of "two-primaries" handle concurrent writes correctly on layer up. That is cluster file systems use some distributed lock manager, and live migration in virtualization environments stops writes on one node before starting writes on the other node. Which means that other than for "test cases", this code path is never taken in real life. FYI, in DRBD 9, things are handled differently nowadays. We still detect "write conflicts", but no longer try to be smart about them. We decided to disconnect hard instead: upper layers must not submit concurrent writes. If they do, that's their fault.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-032379 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC CN 4100
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drbd: add missing kref_get in handle_write_conflicts With `two-primaries` enabled, DRBD tries to detect "concurrent" writes and handle write conflicts, so that even if you write to the same sector simultaneously on both nodes, they end up with the identical data once the writes are completed. In handling "superseeded" writes, we forgot a kref_get, resulting in a premature drbd_destroy_device and use after free, and further to kernel crashes with symptoms. Relevance: No one should use DRBD as a random data generator, and apparently all users of "two-primaries" handle concurrent writes correctly on layer up. That is cluster file systems use some distributed lock manager, and live migration in virtualization environments stops writes on one node before starting writes on the other node. Which means that other than for "test cases", this code path is never taken in real life. FYI, in DRBD 9, things are handled differently nowadays. We still detect "write conflicts", but no longer try to be smart about them. We decided to disconnect hard instead: upper layers must not submit concurrent writes. If they do, that's their fault.
Remediation
Update to V5.0 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-26761

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 27 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drbd: add missing kref_get in handle_write_conflicts With `two-primaries` enabled, DRBD tries to detect "concurrent" writes and handle write conflicts, so that even if you write to the same sector simultaneously on both nodes, they end up with the identical data once the writes are completed. In handling "superseeded" writes, we forgot a kref_get, resulting in a premature drbd_destroy_device and use after free, and further to kernel crashes with symptoms. Relevance: No one should use DRBD as a random data generator, and apparently all users of "two-primaries" handle concurrent writes correctly on layer up. That is cluster file systems use some distributed lock manager, and live migration in virtualization environments stops writes on one node before starting writes on the other node. Which means that other than for "test cases", this code path is never taken in real life. FYI, in DRBD 9, things are handled differently nowadays. We still detect "write conflicts", but no longer try to be smart about them. We decided to disconnect hard instead: upper layers must not submit concurrent writes. If they do, that's their fault.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drbd: add missing kref_get in handle_write_conflicts With `two-primaries` enabled, DRBD tries to detect "concurrent" writes and handle write conflicts, so that even if you write to the same sector simultaneously on both nodes, they end up with the identical data once the writes are completed. In handling "superseeded" writes, we forgot a kref_get, resulting in a premature drbd_destroy_device and use after free, and further to kernel crashes with symptoms. Relevance: No one should use DRBD as a random data generator, and apparently all users of "two-primaries" handle concurrent writes correctly on layer up. That is cluster file systems use some distributed lock manager, and live migration in virtualization environments stops writes on one node before starting writes on the other node. Which means that other than for "test cases", this code path is never taken in real life. FYI, in DRBD 9, things are handled differently nowadays. We still detect "write conflicts", but no longer try to be smart about them. We decided to disconnect hard instead: upper layers must not submit concurrent writes. If they do, that's their fault.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drbd: add missing kref_get in handle_write_conflicts With `two-primaries` enabled, DRBD tries to detect "concurrent" writes and handle write conflicts, so that even if you write to the same sector simultaneously on both nodes, they end up with the identical data once the writes are completed. In handling "superseeded" writes, we forgot a kref_get, resulting in a premature drbd_destroy_device and use after free, and further to kernel crashes with symptoms. Relevance: No one should use DRBD as a random data generator, and apparently all users of "two-primaries" handle concurrent writes correctly on layer up. That is cluster file systems use some distributed lock manager, and live migration in virtualization environments stops writes on one node before starting writes on the other node. Which means that other than for "test cases", this code path is never taken in real life. FYI, in DRBD 9, things are handled differently nowadays. We still detect "write conflicts", but no longer try to be smart about them. We decided to disconnect hard instead: upper layers must not submit concurrent writes. If they do, that's their fault.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Use After Free → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1976Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250910Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025, published on 10 September 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0565Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-025399Debian等の複数ベンダの製品における解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。drbdのhandle_write_conflictsで欠落していたkref_getが追加されました。"two-primaries"が有効な場合、DRBDは同時書き込みを検出して書き込み競合を処理し、両ノードで同じセクターに同時に書き込んでも、書き込み完了後には同一のデータにします。"superseded"書き込みの処理時にkref_getを忘れており、その結果、drbd_destroy_deviceが早期に呼び出され、解放後の使用が発生し、さらにその結果としてカーネルクラッシュが引き起こされていました。関連情報として、DRBDをランダムデータ生成器として使用すべきではありません。"two-primaries"ユーザーはすべて上位層で同時書き込みを正しく処理しています。つまり、クラスター型ファイルシステムは分散ロックマネージャーを使用し、仮想化環境のライブマイグレーションは一方のノードでの書き込みを停止してから他方のノードで書き込みを開始します。したがって、"テストケース"以外では、このコードパスは実際には通らないことを意味します。参考までに、DRBD 9では現在これらの処理が異なり、"書き込み競合"は検出するものの賢く処理せず、厳しく切断しています。上位層は同時書き込みを送信してはならず、もし送信した場合はそれは上位層の問題とみなされます。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0147Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten

A comprehensive Linux kernel update addressed multiple security vulnerabilities across various architectures and subsystems, including fixes for DRBD use-after-free, AMD CPU cache flaws, AppArmor LSM issues, and the VMSCAPE branch predictor isolation vulnerability.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.5, 5.4.297 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.241 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.190 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.149 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.103 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.43 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.11 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16.2 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Sept 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-26761
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38708 · cve.blacktree.nl