BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38704High confidence

rcu/nocb: Fix possible invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer access

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 31 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 8 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 31 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.43-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rcu/nocb: Fix possible invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer access In the preparation stage of CPU online, if the corresponding the rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread does not exist, will be created, there is a situation where the rdp's rcuop kthreads creation fails, and then de-offload this CPU's rdp, does not assign this CPU's rdp->nocb_cb_kthread pointer, but this rdp's->nocb_gp_rdp and rdp's->rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread is still valid. This will cause the subsequent re-offload operation of this offline CPU, which will pass the conditional check and the kthread_unpark() will access invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer. This commit therefore use rdp's->nocb_gp_kthread instead of rdp_gp's->nocb_gp_kthread for safety check.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rcu/nocb: Fix possible invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer access In the preparation stage of CPU online, if the corresponding the rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread does not exist, will be created, there is a situation where the rdp's rcuop kthreads creation fails, and then de-offload this CPU's rdp, does not assign this CPU's rdp->nocb_cb_kthread pointer, but this rdp's->nocb_gp_rdp and rdp's->rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread is still valid. This will cause the subsequent re-offload operation of this offline CPU, which will pass the conditional check and the kthread_unpark() will access invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer. This commit therefore use rdp's->nocb_gp_kthread instead of rdp_gp's->nocb_gp_kthread for safety check.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-26765

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rcu/nocb: Fix possible invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer access In the preparation stage of CPU online, if the corresponding the rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread does not exist, will be created, there is a situation where the rdp's rcuop kthreads creation fails, and then de-offload this CPU's rdp, does not assign this CPU's rdp->nocb_cb_kthread pointer, but this rdp's->nocb_gp_rdp and rdp's->rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread is still valid. This will cause the subsequent re-offload operation of this offline CPU, which will pass the conditional check and the kthread_unpark() will access invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer. This commit therefore use rdp's->nocb_gp_kthread instead of rdp_gp's->nocb_gp_kthread for safety check.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
0.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 31 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rcu/nocb: Fix possible invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer access In the preparation stage of CPU online, if the corresponding the rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread does not exist, will be created, there is a situation where the rdp's rcuop kthreads creation fails, and then de-offload this CPU's rdp, does not assign this CPU's rdp->nocb_cb_kthread pointer, but this rdp's->nocb_gp_rdp and rdp's->rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread is still valid. This will cause the subsequent re-offload operation of this offline CPU, which will pass the conditional check and the kthread_unpark() will access invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer. This commit therefore use rdp's->nocb_gp_kthread instead of rdp_gp's->nocb_gp_kthread for safety check.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rcu/nocb: Fix possible invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer access In the preparation stage of CPU online, if the corresponding the rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread does not exist, will be created, there is a situation where the rdp's rcuop kthreads creation fails, and then de-offload this CPU's rdp, does not assign this CPU's rdp->nocb_cb_kthread pointer, but this rdp's->nocb_gp_rdp and rdp's->rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread is still valid. This will cause the subsequent re-offload operation of this offline CPU, which will pass the conditional check and the kthread_unpark() will access invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer. This commit therefore use rdp's->nocb_gp_kthread instead of rdp_gp's->nocb_gp_kthread for safety check.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rcu/nocb: Fix possible invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer access In the preparation stage of CPU online, if the corresponding the rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread does not exist, will be created, there is a situation where the rdp's rcuop kthreads creation fails, and then de-offload this CPU's rdp, does not assign this CPU's rdp->nocb_cb_kthread pointer, but this rdp's->nocb_gp_rdp and rdp's->rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread is still valid. This will cause the subsequent re-offload operation of this offline CPU, which will pass the conditional check and the kthread_unpark() will access invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer. This commit therefore use rdp's->nocb_gp_kthread instead of rdp_gp's->nocb_gp_kthread for safety check.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-26765Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rcu/nocb: Fix possible invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer access In the preparation stage of CPU online, if the corresponding the rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread does not exist, will be created, there is a situation where the rdp's rcuop kthreads creation fails, and then de-offload this CPU's rdp, does not assign this CPU's rdp->nocb_cb_kthread pointer, but this rdp's->nocb_gp_rdp and rdp's->rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread is still valid. This will cause the subsequent re-offload operation of this offline CPU, which will pass the conditional check and the kthread_unpark() will access invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer. This commit therefore use rdp's->nocb_gp_kthread instead of rdp_gp's->nocb_gp_kthread for safety check.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1976Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250910Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025, published on 10 September 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

25-21864, CVE-2025-21867, CVE-2025-21875, CVE-2025-21887, CVE-2025-21913, CVE-2025-21919, CVE-2025-21925, CVE-2025-21926, CVE-2025-21938, CVE-2025-21959, CVE-2025-21999, CVE-2025-22005, CVE-2025-22015, CVE-2025-22055, CVE-2025-22056, CVE-2025-22060, CVE-2025-22083, CVE-2025-22090, CVE-2025-22095, CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-22111, CVE-2025-22121, CVE-2025-23136, CVE-2025-23143, CVE-2025-37785, CVE-2025-37909, CVE-2025-37917, CVE-2025-37945, CVE-2025-37959, CVE-2025-37964, CVE-2025-37972, CVE-2025-37980, CVE-2025-38125, CVE-2025-38162, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38201, CVE-2025-38232, CVE-2025-38322, CVE-2025-38591, CVE-2025-38614, CVE-2025-38681, CVE-2025-38704, CVE-2025-38721, CVE-2025-38725, CVE-2025-38727, CVE-2025-38732, CVE-2025-38736, CVE-2025-39681, CVE-2025-39691, CVE-2025-39721, CVE-2025-39748, CVE-2025-39756, CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-39770, CVE-2025-39773, CVE-2025-39782, CVE-2025-39795, CVE-2025-39826, CVE-2025-39827, CVE-2025-39845, CVE-2025-39866, CVE-2025-39871, CVE-2025-39931, CVE-2025-39953, CVE-2025-39955, CVE-2025-39964, CVE-2025-39977, CVE-2025-39978, CVE-2025-39980, CVE-2025-40022, CVE-2025-40070, CVE-2025-40078, CVE-2025-40080, CVE-2025-40105, CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40149, CVE-2025-40219, CVE-2025-40261, CVE-2025-40300, CVE-2025-61984, CVE-2025-61985, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0547Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-37980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38303 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38659 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38303 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38426 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38627 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38659 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38669 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38672 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38674 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38717 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38669 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38672 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38674 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38717 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0128Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-54242 Référence CVE CVE-2023-54243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54243 Référence CVE CVE-2023-54270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54270 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57996 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39880 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40019 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-020637Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.0, 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.43 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.11 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16.2 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Sept 2025 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:41 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-26765
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    3a5761dc025da47960755ac64d9fbf1c32e8cd80 < b097ae798298885695c339d390b48b4e39619fa7; 3a5761dc025da47960755ac64d9fbf1c32e8cd80 < 3da45ec1e485a1a5ad31fe9ddd467c7ee5ae4ef9; 3a5761dc025da47960755ac64d9fbf1c32e8cd80 < cce3d027227c69e85896af9fbc6fa9af5c68f067; 3a5761dc025da47960755ac64d9fbf1c32e8cd80 < 1c951683a720b17c9ecaad1932bc95b29044611f; 3a5761dc025da47960755ac64d9fbf1c32e8cd80 < 9b5ec8e6b31755288a07b3abeeab8cd38e9d3c9d; 3a5761dc025da47960755ac64d9fbf1c32e8cd80 < 1bba3900ca18bdae28d1b9fa10f16a8f8cb2ada1; 6.0 · Fixed: < 6.0; 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.43 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.15.11 ≤ 6.15.*; 6.16.2 ≤ 6.16.*; 6.17 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: 3a5761dc025da47960755ac64d9fbf1c32e8cd80 < b097ae798298885695c339d390b48b4e39619fa7, 3a5761dc025da47960755ac64d9fbf1c32e8cd80 < 3da45ec1e485a1a5ad31fe9ddd467c7ee5ae4ef9, 3a5761dc025da47960755ac64d9fbf1c32e8cd80 < cce3d027227c69e85896af9fbc6fa9af5c68f067, 3a5761dc025da47960755ac64d9fbf1c32e8cd80 < 1c951683a720b17c9ecaad1932bc95b29044611f, 3a5761dc025da47960755ac64d9fbf1c32e8cd80 < 9b5ec8e6b31755288a07b3abeeab8cd38e9d3c9d, 3a5761dc025da47960755ac64d9fbf1c32e8cd80 < 1bba3900ca18bdae28d1b9fa10f16a8f8cb2ada1, 6.0 · Fixed: Linux: < 6.0, 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.43 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.11 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16.2 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38704 · cve.blacktree.nl