BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38687High confidence

comedi: fix race between polling and detaching

Linux · Linux

7.3HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.43-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.153-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2025-38687 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 58 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-38687
393 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: comedi: fix race between polling and detaching syzbot reports a use-after-free in comedi in the below link, which is due to comedi gladly removing the allocated async area even though poll requests are still active on the wait_queue_head inside of it. This can cause a use-after-free when the poll entries are later triggered or removed, as the memory for the wait_queue_head has been freed. We need to check there are no tasks queued on any of the subdevices' wait queues before allowing the device to be detached by the `COMEDI_DEVCONFIG` ioctl. Tasks will read-lock `dev->attach_lock` before adding themselves to the subdevice wait queue, so fix the problem in the `COMEDI_DEVCONFIG` ioctl handler by write-locking `dev->attach_lock` before checking that all of the subdevices are safe to be deleted. This includes testing for any sleepers on the subdevices' wait queues. It remains locked until the device has been detached. This requires the `comedi_device_detach()` function to be refactored slightly, moving the bulk of it into new function `comedi_device_detach_locked()`. Note that the refactor of `comedi_device_detach()` results in `comedi_device_cancel_all()` now being called while `dev->attach_lock` is write-locked, which wasn't the case previously, but that does not matter. Thanks to Jens Axboe for diagnosing the problem and co-developing this patch.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
SSA-032379 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC CN 4100
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: comedi: fix race between polling and detaching syzbot reports a use-after-free in comedi in the below link, which is due to comedi gladly removing the allocated async area even though poll requests are still active on the wait_queue_head inside of it. This can cause a use-after-free when the poll entries are later triggered or removed, as the memory for the wait_queue_head has been freed. We need to check there are no tasks queued on any of the subdevices' wait queues before allowing the device to be detached by the `COMEDI_DEVCONFIG` ioctl. Tasks will read-lock `dev->attach_lock` before adding themselves to the subdevice wait queue, so fix the problem in the `COMEDI_DEVCONFIG` ioctl handler by write-locking `dev->attach_lock` before checking that all of the subdevices are safe to be deleted. This includes testing for any sleepers on the subdevices' wait queues. It remains locked until the device has been detached. This requires the `comedi_device_detach()` function to be refactored slightly, moving the bulk of it into new function `comedi_device_detach_locked()`. Note that the refactor of `comedi_device_detach()` results in `comedi_device_cancel_all()` now being called while `dev->attach_lock` is write-locked, which wasn't the case previously, but that does not matter. Thanks to Jens Axboe for diagnosing the problem and co-developing this patch.
Remediation
Update to V5.0 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-26782

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: comedi: fix race between polling and detaching syzbot reports a use-after-free in comedi in the below link, which is due to comedi gladly removing the allocated async area even though poll requests are still active on the wait_queue_head inside of it. This can cause a use-after-free when the poll entries are later triggered or removed, as the memory for the wait_queue_head has been freed. We need to check there are no tasks queued on any of the subdevices' wait queues before allowing the device to be detached by the `COMEDI_DEVCONFIG` ioctl. Tasks will read-lock `dev->attach_lock` before adding themselves to the subdevice wait queue, so fix the problem in the `COMEDI_DEVCONFIG` ioctl handler by write-locking `dev->attach_lock` before checking that all of the subdevices are safe to be deleted. This includes testing for any sleepers on the subdevices' wait queues. It remains locked until the device has been detached. This requires the `comedi_device_detach()` function to be refactored slightly, moving the bulk of it into new function `comedi_device_detach_locked()`. Note that the refactor of `comedi_device_detach()` results in `comedi_device_cancel_all()` now being called while `dev->attach_lock` is write-locked, which wasn't the case previously, but that does not matter. Thanks to Jens Axboe for diagnosing the problem and co-developing this patch.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: comedi: fix race between polling and detaching syzbot reports a use-after-free in comedi in the below link, which is due to comedi gladly removing the allocated async area even though poll requests are still active on the wait_queue_head inside of it. This can cause a use-after-free when the poll entries are later triggered or removed, as the memory for the wait_queue_head has been freed. We need to check there are no tasks queued on any of the subdevices' wait queues before allowing the device to be detached by the `COMEDI_DEVCONFIG` ioctl. Tasks will read-lock `dev->attach_lock` before adding themselves to the subdevice wait queue, so fix the problem in the `COMEDI_DEVCONFIG` ioctl handler by write-locking `dev->attach_lock` before checking that all of the subdevices are safe to be deleted. This includes testing for any sleepers on the subdevices' wait queues. It remains locked until the device has been detached. This requires the `comedi_device_detach()` function to be refactored slightly, moving the bulk of it into new function `comedi_device_detach_locked()`. Note that the refactor of `comedi_device_detach()` results in `comedi_device_cancel_all()` now being called while `dev->attach_lock` is write-locked, which wasn't the case previously, but that does not matter. Thanks to Jens Axboe for diagnosing the problem and co-developing this patch.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: comedi: fix race between polling and detaching syzbot reports a use-after-free in comedi in the below link, which is due to comedi gladly removing the allocated async area even though poll requests are still active on the wait_queue_head inside of it. This can cause a use-after-free when the poll entries are later triggered or removed, as the memory for the wait_queue_head has been freed. We need to check there are no tasks queued on any of the subdevices' wait queues before allowing the device to be detached by the `COMEDI_DEVCONFIG` ioctl. Tasks will read-lock `dev->attach_lock` before adding themselves to the subdevice wait queue, so fix the problem in the `COMEDI_DEVCONFIG` ioctl handler by write-locking `dev->attach_lock` before checking that all of the subdevices are safe to be deleted. This includes testing for any sleepers on the subdevices' wait queues. It remains locked until the device has been detached. This requires the `comedi_device_detach()` function to be refactored slightly, moving the bulk of it into new function `comedi_device_detach_locked()`. Note that the refactor of `comedi_device_detach()` results in `comedi_device_cancel_all()` now being called while `dev->attach_lock` is write-locked, which wasn't the case previously, but that does not matter. Thanks to Jens Axboe for diagnosing the problem and co-developing this patch.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362 ↗

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1976Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250910Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025, published on 10 September 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0565Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38688 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38688 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38688 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38688 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38688 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38552 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38617 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38618 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38653 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38617 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38618 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38653 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38664 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38671 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38671 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38671 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-024472Debian等の複数ベンダの製品における競合状態に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、comediデバイスのポーリングとデタッチ処理の間に競合状態が発生し、解放済みメモリの使用が生じる問題が修正されました。この脆弱性は、非同期領域のwaitキューにタスクが残っている状態でデバイスをデタッチすると発生します。修正により、デタッチ前にサブデバイスのwaitキューにスリーパーが存在しないことを確認し、適切なロック制御を行うことで安全に削除できるようになりました。また、デタッチ処理をリファクタリングした結果、全体の一貫性が強化されました。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0147Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten

Multiple security vulnerabilities affecting various Linux kernel subsystems, architectures, and AMD processors—including race conditions, use-after-free errors, CPU cache initialization flaws, and branch predictor isolation issues—were fixed across SUSE Linux Enterprise and Micro kernel versions.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Sept 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-26782
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38687 · cve.blacktree.nl