BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38684High confidence

net/sched: ets: use old 'nbands' while purging unused classes

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-032379 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 23 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.43-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.153-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-032379 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC CN 4100
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: ets: use old 'nbands' while purging unused classes Shuang reported sch_ets test-case [1] crashing in ets_class_qlen_notify() after recent changes from Lion [2]. The problem is: in ets_qdisc_change() we purge unused DWRR queues; the value of 'q->nbands' is the new one, and the cleanup should be done with the old one. The problem is here since my first attempts to fix ets_qdisc_change(), but it surfaced again after the recent qdisc len accounting fixes. Fix it purging idle DWRR queues before assigning a new value of 'q->nbands', so that all purge operations find a consistent configuration: - old 'q->nbands' because it's needed by ets_class_find() - old 'q->nstrict' because it's needed by ets_class_is_strict() BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 62 UID: 0 PID: 39457 Comm: tc Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0-116.el10.x86_64 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R640/06DKY5, BIOS 2.12.2 07/09/2021 RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4/0x80 Code: ff 4c 39 c7 0f 84 39 19 8e ff b8 01 00 00 00 c3 cc cc cc cc 66 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 8b 17 48 8b 4f 08 48 85 d2 0f 84 56 19 8e ff 48 85 c9 0f 84 ab RSP: 0018:ffffba186009f400 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 00000000000000d6 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000004 RDX: ffff9f0fa29b69c0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffffffc12c2400 R08: 0000000000000008 R09: 0000000000000004 R10: ffffffffffffffff R11: 0000000000000004 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff9f0f8cfe0000 R14: 0000000000100005 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f2154f37480(0000) GS:ffff9f269c1c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000001530be001 CR4: 00000000007726f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: ets_class_qlen_notify+0x65/0x90 [sch_ets] qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog+0x74/0x110 ets_qdisc_change+0x630/0xa40 [sch_ets] __tc_modify_qdisc.constprop.0+0x216/0x7f0 tc_modify_qdisc+0x7c/0x120 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x145/0x3f0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x53/0x100 netlink_unicast+0x245/0x390 netlink_sendmsg+0x21b/0x470 ____sys_sendmsg+0x39d/0x3d0 ___sys_sendmsg+0x9a/0xe0 __sys_sendmsg+0x7a/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x7d/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f2155114084 Code: 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bb 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d 25 f0 0c 00 00 74 13 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 c3 0f 1f 00 48 83 ec 28 89 54 24 1c 48 89 RSP: 002b:00007fff1fd7a988 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000560ec063e5e0 RCX: 00007f2155114084 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007fff1fd7a9f0 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fff1fd7aa60 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 000000000000003f R10: 0000560ee9b3a010 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fff1fd7aae0 R13: 000000006891ccde R14: 0000560ec063e5e0 R15: 00007fff1fd7aad0 [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/e08c7f4a6882f260011909a868311c6e9b54f3e4.1639153474.git.dcaratti@redhat.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/d912cbd7-193b-4269-9857-525bee8bbb6a@gmail.com/
Remediation
Update to V5.0 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-26785

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: ets: use old 'nbands' while purging unused classes Shuang reported sch_ets test-case [1] crashing in ets_class_qlen_notify() after recent changes from Lion [2]. The problem is: in ets_qdisc_change() we purge unused DWRR queues; the value of 'q->nbands' is the new one, and the cleanup should be done with the old one. The problem is here since my first attempts to fix ets_qdisc_change(), but it surfaced again after the recent qdisc len accounting fixes. Fix it purging idle DWRR queues before assigning a new value of 'q->nbands', so that all purge operations find a consistent configuration: - old 'q->nbands' because it's needed by ets_class_find() - old 'q->nstrict' because it's needed by ets_class_is_strict() BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 62 UID: 0 PID: 39457 Comm: tc Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0-116.el10.x86_64 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R640/06DKY5, BIOS 2.12.2 07/09/2021 RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4/0x80 Code: ff 4c 39 c7 0f 84 39 19 8e ff b8 01 00 00 00 c3 cc cc cc cc 66 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa <48> 8b 17 48 8b 4f 08 48 85 d2 0f 84 56 19 8e ff 48 85 c9 0f 84 ab RSP: 0018:ffffba186009f400 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 00000000000000d6 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000004 RDX: ffff9f0fa29b69c0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffffffc12c2400 R08: 0000000000000008 R09: 0000000000000004 R10: ffffffffffffffff R11: 0000000000000004 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff9f0f8cfe0000 R14: 0000000000100005 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f2154f37480(0000) GS:ffff9f269c1c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000001530be001 CR4: 00000000007726f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ets_class_qlen_notify+0x65/0x90 [sch_ets] qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog+0x74/0x110 ets_qdisc_change+0x630/0xa40 [sch_ets] __tc_modify_qdisc.constprop.0+0x216/0x7f0 tc_modify_qdisc+0x7c/0x120 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x145/0x3f0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x53/0x100 netlink_unicast+0x245/0x390 netlink_sendmsg+0x21b/0x470 ____sys_sendmsg+0x39d/0x3d0 ___sys_sendmsg+0x9a/0xe0 __sys_sendmsg+0x7a/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x7d/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f2155114084 Code: 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bb 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d 25 f0 0c 00 00 74 13 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 c3 0f 1f 00 48 83 ec 28 89 54 24 1c 48 89 RSP: 002b:00007fff1fd7a988 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000560ec063e5e0 RCX: 00007f2155114084 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007fff1fd7a9f0 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fff1fd7aa60 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 000000000000003f R10: 0000560ee9b3a010 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fff1fd7aae0 R13: 000000006891ccde R14: 0000560ec063e5e0 R15: 00007fff1fd7aad0 </TASK> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/e08c7f4a6882f260011909a868311c6e9b54f3e4.1639153474.git.dcaratti@redhat.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/d912cbd7-193b-4269-9857-525bee8bbb6a@gmail.com/

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: ets: use old 'nbands' while purging unused classes Shuang reported sch_ets test-case [1] crashing in ets_class_qlen_notify() after recent changes from Lion [2]. The problem is: in ets_qdisc_change() we purge unused DWRR queues; the value of 'q->nbands' is the new one, and the cleanup should be done with the old one. The problem is here since my first attempts to fix ets_qdisc_change(), but it surfaced again after the recent qdisc len accounting fixes. Fix it purging idle DWRR queues before assigning a new value of 'q->nbands', so that all purge operations find a consistent configuration: - old 'q->nbands' because it's needed by ets_class_find() - old 'q->nstrict' because it's needed by ets_class_is_strict() BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 62 UID: 0 PID: 39457 Comm: tc Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0-116.el10.x86_64 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R640/06DKY5, BIOS 2.12.2 07/09/2021 RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4/0x80 Code: ff 4c 39 c7 0f 84 39 19 8e ff b8 01 00 00 00 c3 cc cc cc cc 66 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa <48> 8b 17 48 8b 4f 08 48 85 d2 0f 84 56 19 8e ff 48 85 c9 0f 84 ab RSP: 0018:ffffba186009f400 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 00000000000000d6 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000004 RDX: ffff9f0fa29b69c0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffffffc12c2400 R08: 0000000000000008 R09: 0000000000000004 R10: ffffffffffffffff R11: 0000000000000004 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff9f0f8cfe0000 R14: 0000000000100005 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f2154f37480(0000) GS:ffff9f269c1c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000001530be001 CR4: 00000000007726f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ets_class_qlen_notify+0x65/0x90 [sch_ets] qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog+0x74/0x110 ets_qdisc_change+0x630/0xa40 [sch_ets] __tc_modify_qdisc.constprop.0+0x216/0x7f0 tc_modify_qdisc+0x7c/0x120 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x145/0x3f0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x53/0x100 netlink_unicast+0x245/0x390 netlink_sendmsg+0x21b/0x470 ____sys_sendmsg+0x39d/0x3d0 ___sys_sendmsg+0x9a/0xe0 __sys_sendmsg+0x7a/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x7d/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f2155114084 Code: 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bb 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d 25 f0 0c 00 00 74 13 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 c3 0f 1f 00 48 83 ec 28 89 54 24 1c 48 89 RSP: 002b:00007fff1fd7a988 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000560ec063e5e0 RCX: 00007f2155114084 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007fff1fd7a9f0 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fff1fd7aa60 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 000000000000003f R10: 0000560ee9b3a010 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fff1fd7aae0 R13: 000000006891ccde R14: 0000560ec063e5e0 R15: 00007fff1fd7aad0 </TASK> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/e08c7f4a6882f260011909a868311c6e9b54f3e4.1639153474.git.dcaratti@redhat.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/d912cbd7-193b-4269-9857-525bee8bbb6a@gmail.com/

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: ets: use old 'nbands' while purging unused classes Shuang reported sch_ets test-case [1] crashing in ets_class_qlen_notify() after recent changes from Lion [2]. The problem is: in ets_qdisc_change() we purge unused DWRR queues; the value of 'q->nbands' is the new one, and the cleanup should be done with the old one. The problem is here since my first attempts to fix ets_qdisc_change(), but it surfaced again after the recent qdisc len accounting fixes. Fix it purging idle DWRR queues before assigning a new value of 'q->nbands', so that all purge operations find a consistent configuration: - old 'q->nbands' because it's needed by ets_class_find() - old 'q->nstrict' because it's needed by ets_class_is_strict() BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 62 UID: 0 PID: 39457 Comm: tc Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0-116.el10.x86_64 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R640/06DKY5, BIOS 2.12.2 07/09/2021 RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4/0x80 Code: ff 4c 39 c7 0f 84 39 19 8e ff b8 01 00 00 00 c3 cc cc cc cc 66 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa <48> 8b 17 48 8b 4f 08 48 85 d2 0f 84 56 19 8e ff 48 85 c9 0f 84 ab RSP: 0018:ffffba186009f400 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 00000000000000d6 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000004 RDX: ffff9f0fa29b69c0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffffffc12c2400 R08: 0000000000000008 R09: 0000000000000004 R10: ffffffffffffffff R11: 0000000000000004 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff9f0f8cfe0000 R14: 0000000000100005 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f2154f37480(0000) GS:ffff9f269c1c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000001530be001 CR4: 00000000007726f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ets_class_qlen_notify+0x65/0x90 [sch_ets] qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog+0x74/0x110 ets_qdisc_change+0x630/0xa40 [sch_ets] __tc_modify_qdisc.constprop.0+0x216/0x7f0 tc_modify_qdisc+0x7c/0x120 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x145/0x3f0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x53/0x100 netlink_unicast+0x245/0x390 netlink_sendmsg+0x21b/0x470 ____sys_sendmsg+0x39d/0x3d0 ___sys_sendmsg+0x9a/0xe0 __sys_sendmsg+0x7a/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x7d/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f2155114084 Code: 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bb 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d 25 f0 0c 00 00 74 13 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 c3 0f 1f 00 48 83 ec 28 89 54 24 1c 48 89 RSP: 002b:00007fff1fd7a988 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000560ec063e5e0 RCX: 00007f2155114084 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007fff1fd7a9f0 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fff1fd7aa60 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 000000000000003f R10: 0000560ee9b3a010 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fff1fd7aae0 R13: 000000006891ccde R14: 0000560ec063e5e0 R15: 00007fff1fd7aad0 </TASK> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/e08c7f4a6882f260011909a868311c6e9b54f3e4.1639153474.git.dcaratti@redhat.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/d912cbd7-193b-4269-9857-525bee8bbb6a@gmail.com/

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1976Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250910Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025, published on 10 September 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0565Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2025-38552 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38614 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0398Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21760 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38488 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38563 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38565 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40297 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38668 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38671 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38688 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38322 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38375 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38379 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38539 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38563 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38565 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38671 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38688 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38671 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38688 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38671 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38688 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0195Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38375 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38563 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38565 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38588 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40186 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40300 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0170Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38322 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38375 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38379 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38539 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38563 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38565 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38602 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38656 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39880 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39913 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38671 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38688 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38671 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38668 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38671 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38686 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38671 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38675 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38668 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38671 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38668 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38671 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38668 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38671 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38614 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-024414Debian等の複数ベンダの製品におけるNULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルのnet/schedにおいて、etsで未使用クラスのパージ時に古い帯域数(nbands)を使用する問題が修正されました。この問題は、キューのパラメータが変更された際に、古い値を使ってクラスのクリーンアップ処理が正常に行われず、結果としてクラッシュが発生する可能性がありました。修正により、新しい値に更新する前にアイドル状態のDWRRキューをパージし、一貫した構成で安全に操作できるようになりました。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0147Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten

Multiple security vulnerabilities affecting various Linux kernel architectures and subsystems, including a NULL pointer dereference in net/sched ets, CPU cache initialization flaws, AMD processor data leakage, and the VMSCAPE branch predictor isolation issue, were fixed across SUSE Linux Enterprise and Micro kernel versions.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
SIMATIC CN 4100
Fixed
Linux: < 5.6, 5.10.241 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.190 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.149 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.103 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.43 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.11 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16.2 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Sept 2025 · Last source change 23 May 2026, 16:00 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-26785
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38684 · cve.blacktree.nl