BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38640High confidence

bpf: Disable migration in nf_hook_run_bpf().

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.43-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-25562

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Disable migration in nf_hook_run_bpf(). syzbot reported that the netfilter bpf prog can be called without migration disabled in xmit path. Then the assertion in __bpf_prog_run() fails, triggering the splat below. [0] Let's use bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() in nf_hook_run_bpf(). [0]: BUG: assuming non migratable context at ./include/linux/filter.h:703 in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, migration_disabled() 0 pid: 5829, name: sshd-session 3 locks held by sshd-session/5829: #0: ffff88807b4e4218 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1667 [inline] #0: ffff88807b4e4218 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_sendmsg+0x20/0x50 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1395 #1: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:331 [inline] #1: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:841 [inline] #1: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x69/0x26c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470 #2: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:331 [inline] #2: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:841 [inline] #2: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: nf_hook+0xb2/0x680 include/linux/netfilter.h:241 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5829 Comm: sshd-session Not tainted 6.16.0-rc6-syzkaller-00002-g155a3c003e55 #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/07/2025 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x16c/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 __cant_migrate kernel/sched/core.c:8860 [inline] __cant_migrate+0x1c7/0x250 kernel/sched/core.c:8834 __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:703 [inline] bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:725 [inline] nf_hook_run_bpf+0x83/0x1e0 net/netfilter/nf_bpf_link.c:20 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:157 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xbb/0x200 net/netfilter/core.c:623 nf_hook+0x370/0x680 include/linux/netfilter.h:272 NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:305 [inline] ip_output+0x1bc/0x2a0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433 dst_output include/net/dst.h:459 [inline] ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline] __ip_queue_xmit+0x1d7d/0x26c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:527 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x2686/0x3e90 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1479 tcp_transmit_skb net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1497 [inline] tcp_write_xmit+0x1274/0x84e0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:2838 __tcp_push_pending_frames+0xaf/0x390 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3021 tcp_push+0x225/0x700 net/ipv4/tcp.c:759 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x1870/0x42b0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1359 tcp_sendmsg+0x2e/0x50 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1396 inet_sendmsg+0xb9/0x140 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:712 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:727 [inline] sock_write_iter+0x4aa/0x5b0 net/socket.c:1131 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:593 [inline] vfs_write+0x6c7/0x1150 fs/read_write.c:686 ksys_write+0x1f8/0x250 fs/read_write.c:738 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x4c0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fe7d365d407 Code: 48 89 fa 4c 89 df e8 38 aa 00 00 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 1a 5b c3 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 8b 44 24 10 0f 05 <5b> c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 de e8 23 ff ff ff RSP:

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Disable migration in nf_hook_run_bpf(). syzbot reported that the netfilter bpf prog can be called without migration disabled in xmit path. Then the assertion in __bpf_prog_run() fails, triggering the splat below. [0] Let's use bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() in nf_hook_run_bpf(). [0]: BUG: assuming non migratable context at ./include/linux/filter.h:703 in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, migration_disabled() 0 pid: 5829, name: sshd-session 3 locks held by sshd-session/5829: #0: ffff88807b4e4218 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1667 [inline] #0: ffff88807b4e4218 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_sendmsg+0x20/0x50 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1395 #1: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:331 [inline] #1: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:841 [inline] #1: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x69/0x26c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470 #2: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:331 [inline] #2: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:841 [inline] #2: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: nf_hook+0xb2/0x680 include/linux/netfilter.h:241 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5829 Comm: sshd-session Not tainted 6.16.0-rc6-syzkaller-00002-g155a3c003e55 #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/07/2025 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x16c/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 __cant_migrate kernel/sched/core.c:8860 [inline] __cant_migrate+0x1c7/0x250 kernel/sched/core.c:8834 __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:703 [inline] bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:725 [inline] nf_hook_run_bpf+0x83/0x1e0 net/netfilter/nf_bpf_link.c:20 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:157 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xbb/0x200 net/netfilter/core.c:623 nf_hook+0x370/0x680 include/linux/netfilter.h:272 NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:305 [inline] ip_output+0x1bc/0x2a0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433 dst_output include/net/dst.h:459 [inline] ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline] __ip_queue_xmit+0x1d7d/0x26c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:527 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x2686/0x3e90 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1479 tcp_transmit_skb net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1497 [inline] tcp_write_xmit+0x1274/0x84e0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:2838 __tcp_push_pending_frames+0xaf/0x390 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3021 tcp_push+0x225/0x700 net/ipv4/tcp.c:759 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x1870/0x42b0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1359 tcp_sendmsg+0x2e/0x50 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1396 inet_sendmsg+0xb9/0x140 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:712 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:727 [inline] sock_write_iter+0x4aa/0x5b0 net/socket.c:1131 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:593 [inline] vfs_write+0x6c7/0x1150 fs/read_write.c:686 ksys_write+0x1f8/0x250 fs/read_write.c:738 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x4c0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fe7d365d407 Code: 48 89 fa 4c 89 df e8 38 aa 00 00 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 1a 5b c3 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 8b 44 24 10 0f 05 <5b> c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 de e8 23 ff ff ff RSP:

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Disable migration in nf_hook_run_bpf(). syzbot reported that the netfilter bpf prog can be called without migration disabled in xmit path. Then the assertion in __bpf_prog_run() fails, triggering the splat below. [0] Let's use bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() in nf_hook_run_bpf(). [0]: BUG: assuming non migratable context at ./include/linux/filter.h:703 in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, migration_disabled() 0 pid: 5829, name: sshd-session 3 locks held by sshd-session/5829: #0: ffff88807b4e4218 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1667 [inline] #0: ffff88807b4e4218 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_sendmsg+0x20/0x50 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1395 #1: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:331 [inline] #1: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:841 [inline] #1: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x69/0x26c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470 #2: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:331 [inline] #2: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:841 [inline] #2: ffffffff8e5c4e00 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: nf_hook+0xb2/0x680 include/linux/netfilter.h:241 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5829 Comm: sshd-session Not tainted 6.16.0-rc6-syzkaller-00002-g155a3c003e55 #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/07/2025 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x16c/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 __cant_migrate kernel/sched/core.c:8860 [inline] __cant_migrate+0x1c7/0x250 kernel/sched/core.c:8834 __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:703 [inline] bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:725 [inline] nf_hook_run_bpf+0x83/0x1e0 net/netfilter/nf_bpf_link.c:20 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:157 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xbb/0x200 net/netfilter/core.c:623 nf_hook+0x370/0x680 include/linux/netfilter.h:272 NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:305 [inline] ip_output+0x1bc/0x2a0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433 dst_output include/net/dst.h:459 [inline] ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline] __ip_queue_xmit+0x1d7d/0x26c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:527 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x2686/0x3e90 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1479 tcp_transmit_skb net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1497 [inline] tcp_write_xmit+0x1274/0x84e0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:2838 __tcp_push_pending_frames+0xaf/0x390 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3021 tcp_push+0x225/0x700 net/ipv4/tcp.c:759 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x1870/0x42b0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1359 tcp_sendmsg+0x2e/0x50 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1396 inet_sendmsg+0xb9/0x140 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:712 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:727 [inline] sock_write_iter+0x4aa/0x5b0 net/socket.c:1131 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:593 [inline] vfs_write+0x6c7/0x1150 fs/read_write.c:686 ksys_write+0x1f8/0x250 fs/read_write.c:738 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x4c0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fe7d365d407 Code: 48 89 fa 4c 89 df e8 38 aa 00 00 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 1a 5b c3 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 8b 44 24 10 0f 05 <5b> c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 de e8 23 ff ff ff RSP:

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1898Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service und Privilegieneskalation

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250828Security Bulletin 27 Aug 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 27 Aug 2025, published on 28 August 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38623 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38624 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38625 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38648 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38650 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38652 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38653 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38623 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38624 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38625 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38648 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38650 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38652 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38653 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38623 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38624 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38625 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38648 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38650 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38652 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38653 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38623 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38624 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38625 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38648 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38650 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38652 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38653 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38623 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38624 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38625 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38648 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38650 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38652 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38653 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38631 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38642 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38648 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38649 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38623 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38624 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38631 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38648 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38653 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38656 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38658 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38631 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38642 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38648 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38649 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1050Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38631 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38642 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38648 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38649 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38622 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38623 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38623 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38624 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38650 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38656 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38659 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38622 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38623 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38623 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38624 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38628 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38630 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38632 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38634 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38650 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38656 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38659 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-020519Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: fd9c663b9ad67dedfc9a3fd3429ddd3e83782b4d < ee2502485702e4398cd74dbfb288bfa111d25e62, fd9c663b9ad67dedfc9a3fd3429ddd3e83782b4d < 62f6175d145e00fc999fd2fcbffad3f59253c66a, fd9c663b9ad67dedfc9a3fd3429ddd3e83782b4d < e0199c28167a8a4adec036005a8df268b2b68529, fd9c663b9ad67dedfc9a3fd3429ddd3e83782b4d < 0a356da16fb933abbeeb7aea038c351f3342cd3f, fd9c663b9ad67dedfc9a3fd3429ddd3e83782b4d < 17ce3e5949bc37557305ad46316f41c7875d6366, 6.4
Fixed
Linux: < 6.4, 6.6.102 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.42 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.10 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16.1 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 22 Aug 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-25562
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38640 · cve.blacktree.nl