BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38590High confidence

net/mlx5e: Remove skb secpath if xfrm state is not found

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 36 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.37% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 36 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 22 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.43-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-38590 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: net/mlx5e: Remove skb secpath if xfrm state is not found
14 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-abi-whitelists as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-bootwrapper as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-firmware as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-headers as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: Remove skb secpath if xfrm state is not found Hardware returns a unique identifier for a decrypted packet's xfrm state, this state is looked up in an xarray. However, the state might have been freed by the time of this lookup. Currently, if the state is not found, only a counter is incremented. The secpath (sp) extension on the skb is not removed, resulting in sp->len becoming 0. Subsequently, functions like __xfrm_policy_check() attempt to access fields such as xfrm_input_state(skb)->xso.type (which dereferences sp->xvec[sp->len - 1]) without first validating sp->len. This leads to a crash when dereferencing an invalid state pointer. This patch prevents the crash by explicitly removing the secpath extension from the skb if the xfrm state is not found after hardware decryption. This ensures downstream functions do not operate on a zero-length secpath. BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff000002c8 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 282e067 P4D 282e067 PUD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/12 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7_for_upstream_min_debug_2025_05_27_22_44 #1 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__xfrm_policy_check+0x61a/0xa30 Code: b6 77 7f 83 e6 02 74 14 4d 8b af d8 00 00 00 41 0f b6 45 05 c1 e0 03 48 98 49 01 c5 41 8b 45 00 83 e8 01 48 98 49 8b 44 c5 10 b6 80 c8 02 00 00 83 e0 0c 3c 04 0f 84 0c 02 00 00 31 ff 80 fa RSP: 0018:ffff88885fb04918 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: ffffffff00000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffffff8311af80 R08: 0000000000000020 R09: 00000000c2eda353 R10: ffff88812be2bbc8 R11: 000000001faab533 R12: ffff88885fb049c8 R13: ffff88812be2bbc8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88811896ae00 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8888dca82000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffffff000002c8 CR3: 0000000243050002 CR4: 0000000000372eb0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: ? try_to_wake_up+0x108/0x4c0 ? udp4_lib_lookup2+0xbe/0x150 ? udp_lib_lport_inuse+0x100/0x100 ? __udp4_lib_lookup+0x2b0/0x410 __xfrm_policy_check2.constprop.0+0x11e/0x130 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0x1d/0x530 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x76/0x90 __udp4_lib_rcv+0xa64/0xe90 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x20/0x130 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x75/0xa0 ip_local_deliver+0xc1/0xd0 ? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x130/0x130 ip_sublist_rcv+0x1f9/0x240 ? ip_rcv_finish_core+0x430/0x430 ip_list_rcv+0xfc/0x130 __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x181/0x1e0 netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x200/0x360 ? mlx5e_build_rx_skb+0x1bc/0xda0 [mlx5_core] gro_receive_skb+0xfd/0x210 mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe_mpwrq+0x141/0x280 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_poll_rx_cq+0xcc/0x8e0 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_handle_rx_dim+0x91/0xd0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_napi_poll+0x114/0xab0 [mlx5_core] __napi_poll+0x25/0x170 net_rx_action+0x32d/0x3a0 ? mlx5_eq_comp_int+0x8d/0x280 [mlx5_core] ? notifier_call_chain+0x33/0xa0 handle_softirqs+0xda/0x250 irq_exit_rcu+0x6d/0xc0 common_interrupt+0x81/0xa0
Remediation
To mitigate this issue, prevent module mlx5_core from being loaded. Please see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/41278 for how to blacklist a kernel module to prevent it from loading automatically.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-27919

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 36 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: Remove skb secpath if xfrm state is not found Hardware returns a unique identifier for a decrypted packet's xfrm state, this state is looked up in an xarray. However, the state might have been freed by the time of this lookup. Currently, if the state is not found, only a counter is incremented. The secpath (sp) extension on the skb is not removed, resulting in sp->len becoming 0. Subsequently, functions like __xfrm_policy_check() attempt to access fields such as xfrm_input_state(skb)->xso.type (which dereferences sp->xvec[sp->len - 1]) without first validating sp->len. This leads to a crash when dereferencing an invalid state pointer. This patch prevents the crash by explicitly removing the secpath extension from the skb if the xfrm state is not found after hardware decryption. This ensures downstream functions do not operate on a zero-length secpath. BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff000002c8 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 282e067 P4D 282e067 PUD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/12 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7_for_upstream_min_debug_2025_05_27_22_44 #1 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__xfrm_policy_check+0x61a/0xa30 Code: b6 77 7f 83 e6 02 74 14 4d 8b af d8 00 00 00 41 0f b6 45 05 c1 e0 03 48 98 49 01 c5 41 8b 45 00 83 e8 01 48 98 49 8b 44 c5 10 <0f> b6 80 c8 02 00 00 83 e0 0c 3c 04 0f 84 0c 02 00 00 31 ff 80 fa RSP: 0018:ffff88885fb04918 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: ffffffff00000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffffff8311af80 R08: 0000000000000020 R09: 00000000c2eda353 R10: ffff88812be2bbc8 R11: 000000001faab533 R12: ffff88885fb049c8 R13: ffff88812be2bbc8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88811896ae00 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8888dca82000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffffff000002c8 CR3: 0000000243050002 CR4: 0000000000372eb0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <IRQ> ? try_to_wake_up+0x108/0x4c0 ? udp4_lib_lookup2+0xbe/0x150 ? udp_lib_lport_inuse+0x100/0x100 ? __udp4_lib_lookup+0x2b0/0x410 __xfrm_policy_check2.constprop.0+0x11e/0x130 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0x1d/0x530 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x76/0x90 __udp4_lib_rcv+0xa64/0xe90 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x20/0x130 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x75/0xa0 ip_local_deliver+0xc1/0xd0 ? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x130/0x130 ip_sublist_rcv+0x1f9/0x240 ? ip_rcv_finish_core+0x430/0x430 ip_list_rcv+0xfc/0x130 __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x181/0x1e0 netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x200/0x360 ? mlx5e_build_rx_skb+0x1bc/0xda0 [mlx5_core] gro_receive_skb+0xfd/0x210 mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe_mpwrq+0x141/0x280 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_poll_rx_cq+0xcc/0x8e0 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_handle_rx_dim+0x91/0xd0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_napi_poll+0x114/0xab0 [mlx5_core] __napi_poll+0x25/0x170 net_rx_action+0x32d/0x3a0 ? mlx5_eq_comp_int+0x8d/0x280 [mlx5_core] ? notifier_call_chain+0x33/0xa0 handle_softirqs+0xda/0x250 irq_exit_rcu+0x6d/0xc0 common_interrupt+0x81/0xa0 </IRQ>

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: Remove skb secpath if xfrm state is not found Hardware returns a unique identifier for a decrypted packet's xfrm state, this state is looked up in an xarray. However, the state might have been freed by the time of this lookup. Currently, if the state is not found, only a counter is incremented. The secpath (sp) extension on the skb is not removed, resulting in sp->len becoming 0. Subsequently, functions like __xfrm_policy_check() attempt to access fields such as xfrm_input_state(skb)->xso.type (which dereferences sp->xvec[sp->len - 1]) without first validating sp->len. This leads to a crash when dereferencing an invalid state pointer. This patch prevents the crash by explicitly removing the secpath extension from the skb if the xfrm state is not found after hardware decryption. This ensures downstream functions do not operate on a zero-length secpath. BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff000002c8 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 282e067 P4D 282e067 PUD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/12 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7_for_upstream_min_debug_2025_05_27_22_44 #1 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__xfrm_policy_check+0x61a/0xa30 Code: b6 77 7f 83 e6 02 74 14 4d 8b af d8 00 00 00 41 0f b6 45 05 c1 e0 03 48 98 49 01 c5 41 8b 45 00 83 e8 01 48 98 49 8b 44 c5 10 <0f> b6 80 c8 02 00 00 83 e0 0c 3c 04 0f 84 0c 02 00 00 31 ff 80 fa RSP: 0018:ffff88885fb04918 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: ffffffff00000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffffff8311af80 R08: 0000000000000020 R09: 00000000c2eda353 R10: ffff88812be2bbc8 R11: 000000001faab533 R12: ffff88885fb049c8 R13: ffff88812be2bbc8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88811896ae00 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8888dca82000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffffff000002c8 CR3: 0000000243050002 CR4: 0000000000372eb0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <IRQ> ? try_to_wake_up+0x108/0x4c0 ? udp4_lib_lookup2+0xbe/0x150 ? udp_lib_lport_inuse+0x100/0x100 ? __udp4_lib_lookup+0x2b0/0x410 __xfrm_policy_check2.constprop.0+0x11e/0x130 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0x1d/0x530 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x76/0x90 __udp4_lib_rcv+0xa64/0xe90 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x20/0x130 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x75/0xa0 ip_local_deliver+0xc1/0xd0 ? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x130/0x130 ip_sublist_rcv+0x1f9/0x240 ? ip_rcv_finish_core+0x430/0x430 ip_list_rcv+0xfc/0x130 __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x181/0x1e0 netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x200/0x360 ? mlx5e_build_rx_skb+0x1bc/0xda0 [mlx5_core] gro_receive_skb+0xfd/0x210 mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe_mpwrq+0x141/0x280 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_poll_rx_cq+0xcc/0x8e0 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_handle_rx_dim+0x91/0xd0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_napi_poll+0x114/0xab0 [mlx5_core] __napi_poll+0x25/0x170 net_rx_action+0x32d/0x3a0 ? mlx5_eq_comp_int+0x8d/0x280 [mlx5_core] ? notifier_call_chain+0x33/0xa0 handle_softirqs+0xda/0x250 irq_exit_rcu+0x6d/0xc0 common_interrupt+0x81/0xa0 </IRQ>

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: Remove skb secpath if xfrm state is not found Hardware returns a unique identifier for a decrypted packet's xfrm state, this state is looked up in an xarray. However, the state might have been freed by the time of this lookup. Currently, if the state is not found, only a counter is incremented. The secpath (sp) extension on the skb is not removed, resulting in sp->len becoming 0. Subsequently, functions like __xfrm_policy_check() attempt to access fields such as xfrm_input_state(skb)->xso.type (which dereferences sp->xvec[sp->len - 1]) without first validating sp->len. This leads to a crash when dereferencing an invalid state pointer. This patch prevents the crash by explicitly removing the secpath extension from the skb if the xfrm state is not found after hardware decryption. This ensures downstream functions do not operate on a zero-length secpath. BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff000002c8 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 282e067 P4D 282e067 PUD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/12 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7_for_upstream_min_debug_2025_05_27_22_44 #1 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__xfrm_policy_check+0x61a/0xa30 Code: b6 77 7f 83 e6 02 74 14 4d 8b af d8 00 00 00 41 0f b6 45 05 c1 e0 03 48 98 49 01 c5 41 8b 45 00 83 e8 01 48 98 49 8b 44 c5 10 <0f> b6 80 c8 02 00 00 83 e0 0c 3c 04 0f 84 0c 02 00 00 31 ff 80 fa RSP: 0018:ffff88885fb04918 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: ffffffff00000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffffff8311af80 R08: 0000000000000020 R09: 00000000c2eda353 R10: ffff88812be2bbc8 R11: 000000001faab533 R12: ffff88885fb049c8 R13: ffff88812be2bbc8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88811896ae00 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8888dca82000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffffff000002c8 CR3: 0000000243050002 CR4: 0000000000372eb0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <IRQ> ? try_to_wake_up+0x108/0x4c0 ? udp4_lib_lookup2+0xbe/0x150 ? udp_lib_lport_inuse+0x100/0x100 ? __udp4_lib_lookup+0x2b0/0x410 __xfrm_policy_check2.constprop.0+0x11e/0x130 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0x1d/0x530 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x76/0x90 __udp4_lib_rcv+0xa64/0xe90 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x20/0x130 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x75/0xa0 ip_local_deliver+0xc1/0xd0 ? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x130/0x130 ip_sublist_rcv+0x1f9/0x240 ? ip_rcv_finish_core+0x430/0x430 ip_list_rcv+0xfc/0x130 __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x181/0x1e0 netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x200/0x360 ? mlx5e_build_rx_skb+0x1bc/0xda0 [mlx5_core] gro_receive_skb+0xfd/0x210 mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe_mpwrq+0x141/0x280 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_poll_rx_cq+0xcc/0x8e0 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_handle_rx_dim+0x91/0xd0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_napi_poll+0x114/0xab0 [mlx5_core] __napi_poll+0x25/0x170 net_rx_action+0x32d/0x3a0 ? mlx5_eq_comp_int+0x8d/0x280 [mlx5_core] ? notifier_call_chain+0x33/0xa0 handle_softirqs+0xda/0x250 irq_exit_rcu+0x6d/0xc0 common_interrupt+0x81/0xa0 </IRQ>

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401 ↗

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1869Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38544 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38544 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38552 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38560 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38562 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38615 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38621 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38621 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38544 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38544 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38552 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38560 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38562 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38615 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38621 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38621 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38540 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38541 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38541 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38543 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38543 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38547 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38548 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38550 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38551 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38569 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38589 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38578 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38579 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38581 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38582 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38583 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38584 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38585 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38587 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38588 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38593 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38602 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38608 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38609 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38578 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38579 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38581 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38582 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38583 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38584 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38585 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38587 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38588 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38593 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38602 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38608 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38609 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38578 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38579 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38581 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38582 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38583 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38584 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38585 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38587 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38588 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38593 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38602 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38608 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38609 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38578 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38579 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38581 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38582 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38583 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38584 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38585 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38587 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38588 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38593 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38602 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38608 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38609 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38578 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38579 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38581 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38582 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38583 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38584 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38585 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38587 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38588 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38593 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38602 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38608 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38609 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38581 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38582 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38583 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38584 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38585 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38586 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38587 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38588 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38589 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38593 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38602 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38605 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38581 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38582 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38583 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38584 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38585 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38586 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38587 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38588 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38589 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38593 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38602 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38605 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1050Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38581 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38582 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38583 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38584 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38585 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38586 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38587 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38588 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38589 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38593 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38602 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38605 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38606 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38574 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38576 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38581 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38582 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38583 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38584 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38585 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38587 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38588 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38593 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38597 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38602 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38574 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38576 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38581 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38582 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38583 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38584 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38585 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38587 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38588 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38593 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38597 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38602 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-020693Linux の Linux Kernel における有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.9, 6.6.102 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.42 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.10 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16.1 ≤ 6.16.*, 6.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
To mitigate this issue, prevent module mlx5_core from being loaded. Please see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/41278 for how to blacklist a kernel module to prevent it from loading automatically.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Aug 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-27919
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38590 · cve.blacktree.nl