BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38527High confidence

smb: client: fix use-after-free in cifs_oplock_break

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.41% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.41-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.147-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-26114

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix use-after-free in cifs_oplock_break A race condition can occur in cifs_oplock_break() leading to a use-after-free of the cinode structure when unmounting: cifs_oplock_break() _cifsFileInfo_put(cfile) cifsFileInfo_put_final() cifs_sb_deactive() [last ref, start releasing sb] kill_sb() kill_anon_super() generic_shutdown_super() evict_inodes() dispose_list() evict() destroy_inode() call_rcu(&inode->i_rcu, i_callback) spin_lock(&cinode->open_file_lock) <- OK [later] i_callback() cifs_free_inode() kmem_cache_free(cinode) spin_unlock(&cinode->open_file_lock) <- UAF cifs_done_oplock_break(cinode) <- UAF The issue occurs when umount has already released its reference to the superblock. When _cifsFileInfo_put() calls cifs_sb_deactive(), this releases the last reference, triggering the immediate cleanup of all inodes under RCU. However, cifs_oplock_break() continues to access the cinode after this point, resulting in use-after-free. Fix this by holding an extra reference to the superblock during the entire oplock break operation. This ensures that the superblock and its inodes remain valid until the oplock break completes.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix use-after-free in cifs_oplock_break A race condition can occur in cifs_oplock_break() leading to a use-after-free of the cinode structure when unmounting: cifs_oplock_break() _cifsFileInfo_put(cfile) cifsFileInfo_put_final() cifs_sb_deactive() [last ref, start releasing sb] kill_sb() kill_anon_super() generic_shutdown_super() evict_inodes() dispose_list() evict() destroy_inode() call_rcu(&inode->i_rcu, i_callback) spin_lock(&cinode->open_file_lock) <- OK [later] i_callback() cifs_free_inode() kmem_cache_free(cinode) spin_unlock(&cinode->open_file_lock) <- UAF cifs_done_oplock_break(cinode) <- UAF The issue occurs when umount has already released its reference to the superblock. When _cifsFileInfo_put() calls cifs_sb_deactive(), this releases the last reference, triggering the immediate cleanup of all inodes under RCU. However, cifs_oplock_break() continues to access the cinode after this point, resulting in use-after-free. Fix this by holding an extra reference to the superblock during the entire oplock break operation. This ensures that the superblock and its inodes remain valid until the oplock break completes.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix use-after-free in cifs_oplock_break A race condition can occur in cifs_oplock_break() leading to a use-after-free of the cinode structure when unmounting: cifs_oplock_break() _cifsFileInfo_put(cfile) cifsFileInfo_put_final() cifs_sb_deactive() [last ref, start releasing sb] kill_sb() kill_anon_super() generic_shutdown_super() evict_inodes() dispose_list() evict() destroy_inode() call_rcu(&inode->i_rcu, i_callback) spin_lock(&cinode->open_file_lock) <- OK [later] i_callback() cifs_free_inode() kmem_cache_free(cinode) spin_unlock(&cinode->open_file_lock) <- UAF cifs_done_oplock_break(cinode) <- UAF The issue occurs when umount has already released its reference to the superblock. When _cifsFileInfo_put() calls cifs_sb_deactive(), this releases the last reference, triggering the immediate cleanup of all inodes under RCU. However, cifs_oplock_break() continues to access the cinode after this point, resulting in use-after-free. Fix this by holding an extra reference to the superblock during the entire oplock break operation. This ensures that the superblock and its inodes remain valid until the oplock break completes.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0349Dell Avamar und NetWorker: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Avamar und Dell NetWorker ausnutzen, um Angriffe zu starten, die die Integrität, Vertraulichkeit und Verfügbarkeit von Systemen beeinträchtigen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1858Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38532 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38533 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38535 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38532 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38533 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38535 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38532 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38533 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38535 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38532 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38533 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38535 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38532 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38533 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38535 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0162Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Networks Secure Analytics

d?id=CVE-2025-32988 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32990 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38392 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38461 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38498 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40928 Référence CVE CVE-2025-41244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-49630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49630 Référence CVE CVE-2025-49812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38517 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38525 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38532 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38533 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38534 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38534 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1074Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37914 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38461 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38498 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39751 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38498 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38499 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38506 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38508 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38533 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38539 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38544 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38544 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38545 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38546 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38517 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38525 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38532 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38533 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38534 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38534 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1050Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38517 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38525 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38532 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38533 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38534 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38534 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1033Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2025-38085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38498 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38614 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1013Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2025-36250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38392 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38461 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38498 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40928 Référence CVE CVE-2025-41244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4565 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38533 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38535 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38537 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38533 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38535 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38537 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38502 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38535 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38538 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38539 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38540 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0893Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2025-37810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37914 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38392 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38461 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38498 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38550 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38566 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38614 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39761 Gestion détaillée du document le 17 octobre 2025 Version initi

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0858Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0842Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2025-38200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38396 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38461 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38523 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698 Gestion détaillée du document le 03 octobre 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-024228Debian等の複数ベンダの製品における解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルには競合状態が存在し、smbクライアントのcifs_oplock_break関数でumount処理中にuse-after-freeが発生する可能性がありました。この問題は、アンマウント時にスーパーブロックへの参照が解放された後、cifs_oplock_breakが解放済みの構造体にアクセスすることで生じます。対策として、oplock解除処理の間にスーパーブロックへの参照を保持することで脆弱性が修正されました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: b98749cac4a695f084a5ff076f4510b23e353ecd < 4256a483fe58af66a46cbf3dc48ff26e580d3308, b98749cac4a695f084a5ff076f4510b23e353ecd < 0a4eec84d4d2c4085d4ed8630fd74e4b39033c1b, b98749cac4a695f084a5ff076f4510b23e353ecd < 2baaf5bbab2ac474c4f92c10fcb3310f824db995, b98749cac4a695f084a5ff076f4510b23e353ecd < 09bce2138a30ef10d8821c8c3f73a4ab7a5726bc, b98749cac4a695f084a5ff076f4510b23e353ecd < da11bd4b697b393a207f19a2ed7d382a811a3ddc, b98749cac4a695f084a5ff076f4510b23e353ecd < 705c79101ccf9edea5a00d761491a03ced314210, 2429fcf06d3cb962693868ab0a927c9038f12a2d, 1ee4f2d7cdcd4508cc3cbe3b2622d7177b89da12, 53fc31a4853e30d6e8f142b824f724da27ff3e40, 8092ecc306d81186a64cda42411121f4d35aaff4, ebac4d0adf68f8962bd82fcf483936edd6ec095b, 3.16.72 < 3.17, 4.9.171 < 4.10, 4.14.114 < 4.15, 4.19.37 < 4.20, 5.0.10 < 5.1, 5.1
Fixed
Linux: < 5.1, 5.15.190 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.147 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.100 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.40 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.8 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Aug 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-26114
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38527 · cve.blacktree.nl