BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38520High confidence

drm/amdkfd: Don't call mmput from MMU notifier callback

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 23 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.12% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.41-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.148-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-38520 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 50 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-38520
187 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdkfd: Don't call mmput from MMU notifier callback If the process is exiting, the mmput inside mmu notifier callback from compactd or fork or numa balancing could release the last reference of mm struct to call exit_mmap and free_pgtable, this triggers deadlock with below backtrace. The deadlock will leak kfd process as mmu notifier release is not called and cause VRAM leaking. The fix is to take mm reference mmget_non_zero when adding prange to the deferred list to pair with mmput in deferred list work. If prange split and add into pchild list, the pchild work_item.mm is not used, so remove the mm parameter from svm_range_unmap_split and svm_range_add_child. The backtrace of hung task: INFO: task python:348105 blocked for more than 64512 seconds. Call Trace: __schedule+0x1c3/0x550 schedule+0x46/0xb0 rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x24b/0x4c0 unlink_anon_vmas+0xb1/0x1c0 free_pgtables+0xa9/0x130 exit_mmap+0xbc/0x1a0 mmput+0x5a/0x140 svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x2b/0x40 [amdgpu] mn_itree_invalidate+0x72/0xc0 __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x48/0x60 try_to_unmap_one+0x10fa/0x1400 rmap_walk_anon+0x196/0x460 try_to_unmap+0xbb/0x210 migrate_page_unmap+0x54d/0x7e0 migrate_pages_batch+0x1c3/0xae0 migrate_pages_sync+0x98/0x240 migrate_pages+0x25c/0x520 compact_zone+0x29d/0x590 compact_zone_order+0xb6/0xf0 try_to_compact_pages+0xbe/0x220 __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0x96/0x1a0 __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x410/0x930 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3a9/0x3e0 do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0xd7/0x3e0 __handle_mm_fault+0x5e3/0x5f0 handle_mm_fault+0xf7/0x2e0 hmm_vma_fault.isra.0+0x4d/0xa0 walk_pmd_range.isra.0+0xa8/0x310 walk_pud_range+0x167/0x240 walk_pgd_range+0x55/0x100 __walk_page_range+0x87/0x90 walk_page_range+0xf6/0x160 hmm_range_fault+0x4f/0x90 amdgpu_hmm_range_get_pages+0x123/0x230 [amdgpu] amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages+0xb1/0x150 [amdgpu] init_user_pages+0xb1/0x2a0 [amdgpu] amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu+0x543/0x7d0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu+0x24c/0x4e0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl+0x29d/0x500 [amdgpu] (cherry picked from commit a29e067bd38946f752b0ef855f3dfff87e77bec7)
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-25078

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdkfd: Don't call mmput from MMU notifier callback If the process is exiting, the mmput inside mmu notifier callback from compactd or fork or numa balancing could release the last reference of mm struct to call exit_mmap and free_pgtable, this triggers deadlock with below backtrace. The deadlock will leak kfd process as mmu notifier release is not called and cause VRAM leaking. The fix is to take mm reference mmget_non_zero when adding prange to the deferred list to pair with mmput in deferred list work. If prange split and add into pchild list, the pchild work_item.mm is not used, so remove the mm parameter from svm_range_unmap_split and svm_range_add_child. The backtrace of hung task: INFO: task python:348105 blocked for more than 64512 seconds. Call Trace: __schedule+0x1c3/0x550 schedule+0x46/0xb0 rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x24b/0x4c0 unlink_anon_vmas+0xb1/0x1c0 free_pgtables+0xa9/0x130 exit_mmap+0xbc/0x1a0 mmput+0x5a/0x140 svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x2b/0x40 [amdgpu] mn_itree_invalidate+0x72/0xc0 __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x48/0x60 try_to_unmap_one+0x10fa/0x1400 rmap_walk_anon+0x196/0x460 try_to_unmap+0xbb/0x210 migrate_page_unmap+0x54d/0x7e0 migrate_pages_batch+0x1c3/0xae0 migrate_pages_sync+0x98/0x240 migrate_pages+0x25c/0x520 compact_zone+0x29d/0x590 compact_zone_order+0xb6/0xf0 try_to_compact_pages+0xbe/0x220 __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0x96/0x1a0 __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x410/0x930 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3a9/0x3e0 do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0xd7/0x3e0 __handle_mm_fault+0x5e3/0x5f0 handle_mm_fault+0xf7/0x2e0 hmm_vma_fault.isra.0+0x4d/0xa0 walk_pmd_range.isra.0+0xa8/0x310 walk_pud_range+0x167/0x240 walk_pgd_range+0x55/0x100 __walk_page_range+0x87/0x90 walk_page_range+0xf6/0x160 hmm_range_fault+0x4f/0x90 amdgpu_hmm_range_get_pages+0x123/0x230 [amdgpu] amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages+0xb1/0x150 [amdgpu] init_user_pages+0xb1/0x2a0 [amdgpu] amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu+0x543/0x7d0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu+0x24c/0x4e0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl+0x29d/0x500 [amdgpu] (cherry picked from commit a29e067bd38946f752b0ef855f3dfff87e77bec7)

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdkfd: Don't call mmput from MMU notifier callback If the process is exiting, the mmput inside mmu notifier callback from compactd or fork or numa balancing could release the last reference of mm struct to call exit_mmap and free_pgtable, this triggers deadlock with below backtrace. The deadlock will leak kfd process as mmu notifier release is not called and cause VRAM leaking. The fix is to take mm reference mmget_non_zero when adding prange to the deferred list to pair with mmput in deferred list work. If prange split and add into pchild list, the pchild work_item.mm is not used, so remove the mm parameter from svm_range_unmap_split and svm_range_add_child. The backtrace of hung task: INFO: task python:348105 blocked for more than 64512 seconds. Call Trace: __schedule+0x1c3/0x550 schedule+0x46/0xb0 rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x24b/0x4c0 unlink_anon_vmas+0xb1/0x1c0 free_pgtables+0xa9/0x130 exit_mmap+0xbc/0x1a0 mmput+0x5a/0x140 svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x2b/0x40 [amdgpu] mn_itree_invalidate+0x72/0xc0 __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x48/0x60 try_to_unmap_one+0x10fa/0x1400 rmap_walk_anon+0x196/0x460 try_to_unmap+0xbb/0x210 migrate_page_unmap+0x54d/0x7e0 migrate_pages_batch+0x1c3/0xae0 migrate_pages_sync+0x98/0x240 migrate_pages+0x25c/0x520 compact_zone+0x29d/0x590 compact_zone_order+0xb6/0xf0 try_to_compact_pages+0xbe/0x220 __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0x96/0x1a0 __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x410/0x930 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3a9/0x3e0 do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0xd7/0x3e0 __handle_mm_fault+0x5e3/0x5f0 handle_mm_fault+0xf7/0x2e0 hmm_vma_fault.isra.0+0x4d/0xa0 walk_pmd_range.isra.0+0xa8/0x310 walk_pud_range+0x167/0x240 walk_pgd_range+0x55/0x100 __walk_page_range+0x87/0x90 walk_page_range+0xf6/0x160 hmm_range_fault+0x4f/0x90 amdgpu_hmm_range_get_pages+0x123/0x230 [amdgpu] amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages+0xb1/0x150 [amdgpu] init_user_pages+0xb1/0x2a0 [amdgpu] amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu+0x543/0x7d0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu+0x24c/0x4e0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl+0x29d/0x500 [amdgpu] (cherry picked from commit a29e067bd38946f752b0ef855f3dfff87e77bec7)

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdkfd: Don't call mmput from MMU notifier callback If the process is exiting, the mmput inside mmu notifier callback from compactd or fork or numa balancing could release the last reference of mm struct to call exit_mmap and free_pgtable, this triggers deadlock with below backtrace. The deadlock will leak kfd process as mmu notifier release is not called and cause VRAM leaking. The fix is to take mm reference mmget_non_zero when adding prange to the deferred list to pair with mmput in deferred list work. If prange split and add into pchild list, the pchild work_item.mm is not used, so remove the mm parameter from svm_range_unmap_split and svm_range_add_child. The backtrace of hung task: INFO: task python:348105 blocked for more than 64512 seconds. Call Trace: __schedule+0x1c3/0x550 schedule+0x46/0xb0 rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x24b/0x4c0 unlink_anon_vmas+0xb1/0x1c0 free_pgtables+0xa9/0x130 exit_mmap+0xbc/0x1a0 mmput+0x5a/0x140 svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x2b/0x40 [amdgpu] mn_itree_invalidate+0x72/0xc0 __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x48/0x60 try_to_unmap_one+0x10fa/0x1400 rmap_walk_anon+0x196/0x460 try_to_unmap+0xbb/0x210 migrate_page_unmap+0x54d/0x7e0 migrate_pages_batch+0x1c3/0xae0 migrate_pages_sync+0x98/0x240 migrate_pages+0x25c/0x520 compact_zone+0x29d/0x590 compact_zone_order+0xb6/0xf0 try_to_compact_pages+0xbe/0x220 __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0x96/0x1a0 __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x410/0x930 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3a9/0x3e0 do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0xd7/0x3e0 __handle_mm_fault+0x5e3/0x5f0 handle_mm_fault+0xf7/0x2e0 hmm_vma_fault.isra.0+0x4d/0xa0 walk_pmd_range.isra.0+0xa8/0x310 walk_pud_range+0x167/0x240 walk_pgd_range+0x55/0x100 __walk_page_range+0x87/0x90 walk_page_range+0xf6/0x160 hmm_range_fault+0x4f/0x90 amdgpu_hmm_range_get_pages+0x123/0x230 [amdgpu] amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages+0xb1/0x150 [amdgpu] init_user_pages+0xb1/0x2a0 [amdgpu] amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu+0x543/0x7d0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu+0x24c/0x4e0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl+0x29d/0x500 [amdgpu] (cherry picked from commit a29e067bd38946f752b0ef855f3dfff87e77bec7)

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1858Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38485 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38486 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38501 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38544 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38544 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38552 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38560 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38562 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38485 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38486 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38501 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38544 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38544 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38552 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38560 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38562 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38423 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38505 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38511 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38535 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38537 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38538 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38539 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38506 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38511 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38506 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38511 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38506 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38511 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38506 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38511 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38506 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38511 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38509 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38511 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38517 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38525 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38509 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38511 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38517 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38525 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1050Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38509 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38511 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38517 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38525 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38506 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38511 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38506 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38501 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38502 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38535 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38538 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38539 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0841Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38506 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38511 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38535 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0827Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38499 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38506 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38535 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38537 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0805Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38499 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38506 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38535 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38537 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38499 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38506 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38535 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38537 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-024229Debian等の複数ベンダの製品におけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルは、drm/amdkfdモジュールにおいて、MMUノーティファコールバック内からmmputを呼び出すことで発生していたデッドロックの問題を修正しました。この問題により、プロセス終了時にリソースリークやVRAMリークが生じる可能性がありましたが、修正後はdeferredリストで安全にmm参照を解放できるようになりました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Aug 2025 · Last source change 23 May 2026, 15:59 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-25078
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38520 · cve.blacktree.nl