BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38475High confidence

smc: Fix various oops due to inet_sock type confusion.

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

13 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-22887

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smc: Fix various oops due to inet_sock type confusion. syzbot reported weird splats [0][1] in cipso_v4_sock_setattr() while freeing inet_sk(sk)->inet_opt. The address was freed multiple times even though it was read-only memory. cipso_v4_sock_setattr() did nothing wrong, and the root cause was type confusion. The cited commit made it possible to create smc_sock as an INET socket. The issue is that struct smc_sock does not have struct inet_sock as the first member but hijacks AF_INET and AF_INET6 sk_family, which confuses various places. In this case, inet_sock.inet_opt was actually smc_sock.clcsk_data_ready(), which is an address of a function in the text segment. $ pahole -C inet_sock vmlinux struct inet_sock { ... struct ip_options_rcu * inet_opt; /* 784 8 */ $ pahole -C smc_sock vmlinux struct smc_sock { ... void (*clcsk_data_ready)(struct sock *); /* 784 8 */ The same issue for another field was reported before. [2][3] At that time, an ugly hack was suggested [4], but it makes both INET and SMC code error-prone and hard to change. Also, yet another variant was fixed by a hacky commit 98d4435efcbf3 ("net/smc: prevent NULL pointer dereference in txopt_get"). Instead of papering over the root cause by such hacks, we should not allow non-INET socket to reuse the INET infra. Let's add inet_sock as the first member of smc_sock. [0]: kvfree_call_rcu(): Double-freed call. rcu_head 000000006921da73 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6718 at mm/slab_common.c:1956 kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6718 Comm: syz.0.17 Tainted: G W 6.16.0-rc4-syzkaller-g7482bb149b9f #0 PREEMPT Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/07/2025 pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 lr : kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 sp : ffff8000a03a7730 x29: ffff8000a03a7730 x28: 00000000fffffff5 x27: 1fffe000184823d3 x26: dfff800000000000 x25: ffff0000c2411e9e x24: ffff0000dd88da00 x23: ffff8000891ac9a0 x22: 00000000ffffffea x21: ffff8000891ac9a0 x20: ffff8000891ac9a0 x19: ffff80008afc2480 x18: 00000000ffffffff x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff80008ae642c8 x15: ffff700011ede14c x14: 1ffff00011ede14c x13: 0000000000000004 x12: ffffffffffffffff x11: ffff700011ede14c x10: 0000000000ff0100 x9 : 5fa3c1ffaf0ff000 x8 : 5fa3c1ffaf0ff000 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 0000000000000001 x5 : ffff8000a03a7078 x4 : ffff80008f766c20 x3 : ffff80008054d360 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000201 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 (P) cipso_v4_sock_setattr+0x2f0/0x3f4 net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c:1914 netlbl_sock_setattr+0x240/0x334 net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c:1000 smack_netlbl_add+0xa8/0x158 security/smack/smack_lsm.c:2581 smack_inode_setsecurity+0x378/0x430 security/smack/smack_lsm.c:2912 security_inode_setsecurity+0x118/0x3c0 security/security.c:2706 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x174/0x5c4 fs/xattr.c:251 __vfs_setxattr_locked+0x1ec/0x218 fs/xattr.c:295 vfs_setxattr+0x158/0x2ac fs/xattr.c:321 do_setxattr fs/xattr.c:636 [inline] file_setxattr+0x1b8/0x294 fs/xattr.c:646 path_setxattrat+0x2ac/0x320 fs/xattr.c:711 __do_sys_fsetxattr fs/xattr.c:761 [inline] __se_sys_fsetxattr fs/xattr.c:758 [inline] __arm64_sys_fsetxattr+0xc0/0xdc fs/xattr.c:758 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:35 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:49 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:132 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:151 el0_svc+0x58/0x180 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:879 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0x12c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:898 el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:600 [ ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smc: Fix various oops due to inet_sock type confusion. syzbot reported weird splats [0][1] in cipso_v4_sock_setattr() while freeing inet_sk(sk)->inet_opt. The address was freed multiple times even though it was read-only memory. cipso_v4_sock_setattr() did nothing wrong, and the root cause was type confusion. The cited commit made it possible to create smc_sock as an INET socket. The issue is that struct smc_sock does not have struct inet_sock as the first member but hijacks AF_INET and AF_INET6 sk_family, which confuses various places. In this case, inet_sock.inet_opt was actually smc_sock.clcsk_data_ready(), which is an address of a function in the text segment. $ pahole -C inet_sock vmlinux struct inet_sock { ... struct ip_options_rcu * inet_opt; /* 784 8 */ $ pahole -C smc_sock vmlinux struct smc_sock { ... void (*clcsk_data_ready)(struct sock *); /* 784 8 */ The same issue for another field was reported before. [2][3] At that time, an ugly hack was suggested [4], but it makes both INET and SMC code error-prone and hard to change. Also, yet another variant was fixed by a hacky commit 98d4435efcbf3 ("net/smc: prevent NULL pointer dereference in txopt_get"). Instead of papering over the root cause by such hacks, we should not allow non-INET socket to reuse the INET infra. Let's add inet_sock as the first member of smc_sock. [0]: kvfree_call_rcu(): Double-freed call. rcu_head 000000006921da73 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6718 at mm/slab_common.c:1956 kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6718 Comm: syz.0.17 Tainted: G W 6.16.0-rc4-syzkaller-g7482bb149b9f #0 PREEMPT Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/07/2025 pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 lr : kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 sp : ffff8000a03a7730 x29: ffff8000a03a7730 x28: 00000000fffffff5 x27: 1fffe000184823d3 x26: dfff800000000000 x25: ffff0000c2411e9e x24: ffff0000dd88da00 x23: ffff8000891ac9a0 x22: 00000000ffffffea x21: ffff8000891ac9a0 x20: ffff8000891ac9a0 x19: ffff80008afc2480 x18: 00000000ffffffff x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff80008ae642c8 x15: ffff700011ede14c x14: 1ffff00011ede14c x13: 0000000000000004 x12: ffffffffffffffff x11: ffff700011ede14c x10: 0000000000ff0100 x9 : 5fa3c1ffaf0ff000 x8 : 5fa3c1ffaf0ff000 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 0000000000000001 x5 : ffff8000a03a7078 x4 : ffff80008f766c20 x3 : ffff80008054d360 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000201 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 (P) cipso_v4_sock_setattr+0x2f0/0x3f4 net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c:1914 netlbl_sock_setattr+0x240/0x334 net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c:1000 smack_netlbl_add+0xa8/0x158 security/smack/smack_lsm.c:2581 smack_inode_setsecurity+0x378/0x430 security/smack/smack_lsm.c:2912 security_inode_setsecurity+0x118/0x3c0 security/security.c:2706 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x174/0x5c4 fs/xattr.c:251 __vfs_setxattr_locked+0x1ec/0x218 fs/xattr.c:295 vfs_setxattr+0x158/0x2ac fs/xattr.c:321 do_setxattr fs/xattr.c:636 [inline] file_setxattr+0x1b8/0x294 fs/xattr.c:646 path_setxattrat+0x2ac/0x320 fs/xattr.c:711 __do_sys_fsetxattr fs/xattr.c:761 [inline] __se_sys_fsetxattr fs/xattr.c:758 [inline] __arm64_sys_fsetxattr+0xc0/0xdc fs/xattr.c:758 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:35 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:49 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:132 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:151 el0_svc+0x58/0x180 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:879 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0x12c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:898 el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:600 [ ---truncated---

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smc: Fix various oops due to inet_sock type confusion. syzbot reported weird splats [0][1] in cipso_v4_sock_setattr() while freeing inet_sk(sk)->inet_opt. The address was freed multiple times even though it was read-only memory. cipso_v4_sock_setattr() did nothing wrong, and the root cause was type confusion. The cited commit made it possible to create smc_sock as an INET socket. The issue is that struct smc_sock does not have struct inet_sock as the first member but hijacks AF_INET and AF_INET6 sk_family, which confuses various places. In this case, inet_sock.inet_opt was actually smc_sock.clcsk_data_ready(), which is an address of a function in the text segment. $ pahole -C inet_sock vmlinux struct inet_sock { ... struct ip_options_rcu * inet_opt; /* 784 8 */ $ pahole -C smc_sock vmlinux struct smc_sock { ... void (*clcsk_data_ready)(struct sock *); /* 784 8 */ The same issue for another field was reported before. [2][3] At that time, an ugly hack was suggested [4], but it makes both INET and SMC code error-prone and hard to change. Also, yet another variant was fixed by a hacky commit 98d4435efcbf3 ("net/smc: prevent NULL pointer dereference in txopt_get"). Instead of papering over the root cause by such hacks, we should not allow non-INET socket to reuse the INET infra. Let's add inet_sock as the first member of smc_sock. [0]: kvfree_call_rcu(): Double-freed call. rcu_head 000000006921da73 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6718 at mm/slab_common.c:1956 kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6718 Comm: syz.0.17 Tainted: G W 6.16.0-rc4-syzkaller-g7482bb149b9f #0 PREEMPT Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/07/2025 pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 lr : kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 sp : ffff8000a03a7730 x29: ffff8000a03a7730 x28: 00000000fffffff5 x27: 1fffe000184823d3 x26: dfff800000000000 x25: ffff0000c2411e9e x24: ffff0000dd88da00 x23: ffff8000891ac9a0 x22: 00000000ffffffea x21: ffff8000891ac9a0 x20: ffff8000891ac9a0 x19: ffff80008afc2480 x18: 00000000ffffffff x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff80008ae642c8 x15: ffff700011ede14c x14: 1ffff00011ede14c x13: 0000000000000004 x12: ffffffffffffffff x11: ffff700011ede14c x10: 0000000000ff0100 x9 : 5fa3c1ffaf0ff000 x8 : 5fa3c1ffaf0ff000 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 0000000000000001 x5 : ffff8000a03a7078 x4 : ffff80008f766c20 x3 : ffff80008054d360 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000201 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: kvfree_call_rcu+0x94/0x3f0 mm/slab_common.c:1955 (P) cipso_v4_sock_setattr+0x2f0/0x3f4 net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c:1914 netlbl_sock_setattr+0x240/0x334 net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c:1000 smack_netlbl_add+0xa8/0x158 security/smack/smack_lsm.c:2581 smack_inode_setsecurity+0x378/0x430 security/smack/smack_lsm.c:2912 security_inode_setsecurity+0x118/0x3c0 security/security.c:2706 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x174/0x5c4 fs/xattr.c:251 __vfs_setxattr_locked+0x1ec/0x218 fs/xattr.c:295 vfs_setxattr+0x158/0x2ac fs/xattr.c:321 do_setxattr fs/xattr.c:636 [inline] file_setxattr+0x1b8/0x294 fs/xattr.c:646 path_setxattrat+0x2ac/0x320 fs/xattr.c:711 __do_sys_fsetxattr fs/xattr.c:761 [inline] __se_sys_fsetxattr fs/xattr.c:758 [inline] __arm64_sys_fsetxattr+0xc0/0xdc fs/xattr.c:758 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:35 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:49 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:132 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:151 el0_svc+0x58/0x180 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:879 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0x12c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:898 el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:600 [ ---truncated---

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-1665Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38475 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38482 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38483 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38475 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38482 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38483 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38484 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38475 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38482 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38483 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1050Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38475 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38482 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38483 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38484 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0745Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38462 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38463 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38463 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38475 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38482 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38483 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38462 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38463 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38463 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38475 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38482 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38483 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0698Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38475 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38482 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38483 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
d25a92ccae6bed02327b63d138e12e7806830f78 < 5b02e397929e5b13b969ef1f8e43c7951e2864f5; d25a92ccae6bed02327b63d138e12e7806830f78 < 67a167a6b8b45607bc34aa541d1c75097d18d460; d25a92ccae6bed02327b63d138e12e7806830f78 < 60ada4fe644edaa6c2da97364184b0425e8aeaf5; 6.11
Fixed
< 6.11; 6.12.40 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.15.8 ≤ 6.15.*; 6.16 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 28 Jul 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-22887
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38475 · cve.blacktree.nl