BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38472High confidence

netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.41% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.41-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.147-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-22890

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry A crash in conntrack was reported while trying to unlink the conntrack entry from the hash bucket list: [exception RIP: __nf_ct_delete_from_lists+172] [..] #7 [ff539b5a2b043aa0] nf_ct_delete at ffffffffc124d421 [nf_conntrack] #8 [ff539b5a2b043ad0] nf_ct_gc_expired at ffffffffc124d999 [nf_conntrack] #9 [ff539b5a2b043ae0] __nf_conntrack_find_get at ffffffffc124efbc [nf_conntrack] [..] The nf_conn struct is marked as allocated from slab but appears to be in a partially initialised state: ct hlist pointer is garbage; looks like the ct hash value (hence crash). ct->status is equal to IPS_CONFIRMED|IPS_DYING, which is expected ct->timeout is 30000 (=30s), which is unexpected. Everything else looks like normal udp conntrack entry. If we ignore ct->status and pretend its 0, the entry matches those that are newly allocated but not yet inserted into the hash: - ct hlist pointers are overloaded and store/cache the raw tuple hash - ct->timeout matches the relative time expected for a new udp flow rather than the absolute 'jiffies' value. If it were not for the presence of IPS_CONFIRMED, __nf_conntrack_find_get() would have skipped the entry. Theory is that we did hit following race: cpu x cpu y cpu z found entry E found entry E E is expired <preemption> nf_ct_delete() return E to rcu slab init_conntrack E is re-inited, ct->status set to 0 reply tuplehash hnnode.pprev stores hash value. cpu y found E right before it was deleted on cpu x. E is now re-inited on cpu z. cpu y was preempted before checking for expiry and/or confirm bit. ->refcnt set to 1 E now owned by skb ->timeout set to 30000 If cpu y were to resume now, it would observe E as expired but would skip E due to missing CONFIRMED bit. nf_conntrack_confirm gets called sets: ct->status |= CONFIRMED This is wrong: E is not yet added to hashtable. cpu y resumes, it observes E as expired but CONFIRMED: <resumes> nf_ct_expired() -> yes (ct->timeout is 30s) confirmed bit set. cpu y will try to delete E from the hashtable: nf_ct_delete() -> set DYING bit __nf_ct_delete_from_lists Even this scenario doesn't guarantee a crash: cpu z still holds the table bucket lock(s) so y blocks: wait for spinlock held by z CONFIRMED is set but there is no guarantee ct will be added to hash: "chaintoolong" or "clash resolution" logic both skip the insert step. reply hnnode.pprev still stores the hash value. unlocks spinlock return NF_DROP <unblocks, then crashes on hlist_nulls_del_rcu pprev> In case CPU z does insert the entry into the hashtable, cpu y will unlink E again right away but no crash occurs. Without 'cpu y' race, 'garbage' hlist is of no consequence: ct refcnt remains at 1, eventually skb will be free'd and E gets destroyed via: nf_conntrack_put -> nf_conntrack_destroy -> nf_ct_destroy. To resolve this, move the IPS_CONFIRMED assignment after the table insertion but before the unlock. Pablo points out that the confirm-bit-store could be reordered to happen before hlist add resp. the timeout fixup, so switch to set_bit and before_atomic memory barrier to prevent this. It doesn't matter if other CPUs can observe a newly inserted entry right before the CONFIRMED bit was set: Such event cannot be distinguished from above "E is the old incarnation" case: the entry will be skipped. Also change nf_ct_should_gc() to first check the confirmed bit. The gc sequence is: 1. Check if entry has expired, if not skip to next entry 2. Obtain a reference to the expired entry. 3. Call nf_ct_should_gc() to double-check step 1. nf_ct_should_gc() is thus called only for entries that already failed an expiry check. After this patch, once the confirmed bit check pas ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry A crash in conntrack was reported while trying to unlink the conntrack entry from the hash bucket list: [exception RIP: __nf_ct_delete_from_lists+172] [..] #7 [ff539b5a2b043aa0] nf_ct_delete at ffffffffc124d421 [nf_conntrack] #8 [ff539b5a2b043ad0] nf_ct_gc_expired at ffffffffc124d999 [nf_conntrack] #9 [ff539b5a2b043ae0] __nf_conntrack_find_get at ffffffffc124efbc [nf_conntrack] [..] The nf_conn struct is marked as allocated from slab but appears to be in a partially initialised state: ct hlist pointer is garbage; looks like the ct hash value (hence crash). ct->status is equal to IPS_CONFIRMED|IPS_DYING, which is expected ct->timeout is 30000 (=30s), which is unexpected. Everything else looks like normal udp conntrack entry. If we ignore ct->status and pretend its 0, the entry matches those that are newly allocated but not yet inserted into the hash: - ct hlist pointers are overloaded and store/cache the raw tuple hash - ct->timeout matches the relative time expected for a new udp flow rather than the absolute 'jiffies' value. If it were not for the presence of IPS_CONFIRMED, __nf_conntrack_find_get() would have skipped the entry. Theory is that we did hit following race: cpu x cpu y cpu z found entry E found entry E E is expired <preemption> nf_ct_delete() return E to rcu slab init_conntrack E is re-inited, ct->status set to 0 reply tuplehash hnnode.pprev stores hash value. cpu y found E right before it was deleted on cpu x. E is now re-inited on cpu z. cpu y was preempted before checking for expiry and/or confirm bit. ->refcnt set to 1 E now owned by skb ->timeout set to 30000 If cpu y were to resume now, it would observe E as expired but would skip E due to missing CONFIRMED bit. nf_conntrack_confirm gets called sets: ct->status |= CONFIRMED This is wrong: E is not yet added to hashtable. cpu y resumes, it observes E as expired but CONFIRMED: <resumes> nf_ct_expired() -> yes (ct->timeout is 30s) confirmed bit set. cpu y will try to delete E from the hashtable: nf_ct_delete() -> set DYING bit __nf_ct_delete_from_lists Even this scenario doesn't guarantee a crash: cpu z still holds the table bucket lock(s) so y blocks: wait for spinlock held by z CONFIRMED is set but there is no guarantee ct will be added to hash: "chaintoolong" or "clash resolution" logic both skip the insert step. reply hnnode.pprev still stores the hash value. unlocks spinlock return NF_DROP <unblocks, then crashes on hlist_nulls_del_rcu pprev> In case CPU z does insert the entry into the hashtable, cpu y will unlink E again right away but no crash occurs. Without 'cpu y' race, 'garbage' hlist is of no consequence: ct refcnt remains at 1, eventually skb will be free'd and E gets destroyed via: nf_conntrack_put -> nf_conntrack_destroy -> nf_ct_destroy. To resolve this, move the IPS_CONFIRMED assignment after the table insertion but before the unlock. Pablo points out that the confirm-bit-store could be reordered to happen before hlist add resp. the timeout fixup, so switch to set_bit and before_atomic memory barrier to prevent this. It doesn't matter if other CPUs can observe a newly inserted entry right before the CONFIRMED bit was set: Such event cannot be distinguished from above "E is the old incarnation" case: the entry will be skipped. Also change nf_ct_should_gc() to first check the confirmed bit. The gc sequence is: 1. Check if entry has expired, if not skip to next entry 2. Obtain a reference to the expired entry. 3. Call nf_ct_should_gc() to double-check step 1. nf_ct_should_gc() is thus called only for entries that already failed an expiry check. After this patch, once the confirmed bit check pas ---truncated---

Why

The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry A crash in conntrack was reported while trying to unlink the conntrack entry from the hash bucket list: [exception RIP: __nf_ct_delete_from_lists+172] [..] #7 [ff539b5a2b043aa0] nf_ct_delete at ffffffffc124d421 [nf_conntrack] #8 [ff539b5a2b043ad0] nf_ct_gc_expired at ffffffffc124d999 [nf_conntrack] #9 [ff539b5a2b043ae0] __nf_conntrack_find_get at ffffffffc124efbc [nf_conntrack] [..] The nf_conn struct is marked as allocated from slab but appears to be in a partially initialised state: ct hlist pointer is garbage; looks like the ct hash value (hence crash). ct->status is equal to IPS_CONFIRMED|IPS_DYING, which is expected ct->timeout is 30000 (=30s), which is unexpected. Everything else looks like normal udp conntrack entry. If we ignore ct->status and pretend its 0, the entry matches those that are newly allocated but not yet inserted into the hash: - ct hlist pointers are overloaded and store/cache the raw tuple hash - ct->timeout matches the relative time expected for a new udp flow rather than the absolute 'jiffies' value. If it were not for the presence of IPS_CONFIRMED, __nf_conntrack_find_get() would have skipped the entry. Theory is that we did hit following race: cpu x cpu y cpu z found entry E found entry E E is expired <preemption> nf_ct_delete() return E to rcu slab init_conntrack E is re-inited, ct->status set to 0 reply tuplehash hnnode.pprev stores hash value. cpu y found E right before it was deleted on cpu x. E is now re-inited on cpu z. cpu y was preempted before checking for expiry and/or confirm bit. ->refcnt set to 1 E now owned by skb ->timeout set to 30000 If cpu y were to resume now, it would observe E as expired but would skip E due to missing CONFIRMED bit. nf_conntrack_confirm gets called sets: ct->status |= CONFIRMED This is wrong: E is not yet added to hashtable. cpu y resumes, it observes E as expired but CONFIRMED: <resumes> nf_ct_expired() -> yes (ct->timeout is 30s) confirmed bit set. cpu y will try to delete E from the hashtable: nf_ct_delete() -> set DYING bit __nf_ct_delete_from_lists Even this scenario doesn't guarantee a crash: cpu z still holds the table bucket lock(s) so y blocks: wait for spinlock held by z CONFIRMED is set but there is no guarantee ct will be added to hash: "chaintoolong" or "clash resolution" logic both skip the insert step. reply hnnode.pprev still stores the hash value. unlocks spinlock return NF_DROP <unblocks, then crashes on hlist_nulls_del_rcu pprev> In case CPU z does insert the entry into the hashtable, cpu y will unlink E again right away but no crash occurs. Without 'cpu y' race, 'garbage' hlist is of no consequence: ct refcnt remains at 1, eventually skb will be free'd and E gets destroyed via: nf_conntrack_put -> nf_conntrack_destroy -> nf_ct_destroy. To resolve this, move the IPS_CONFIRMED assignment after the table insertion but before the unlock. Pablo points out that the confirm-bit-store could be reordered to happen before hlist add resp. the timeout fixup, so switch to set_bit and before_atomic memory barrier to prevent this. It doesn't matter if other CPUs can observe a newly inserted entry right before the CONFIRMED bit was set: Such event cannot be distinguished from above "E is the old incarnation" case: the entry will be skipped. Also change nf_ct_should_gc() to first check the confirmed bit. The gc sequence is: 1. Check if entry has expired, if not skip to next entry 2. Obtain a reference to the expired entry. 3. Call nf_ct_should_gc() to double-check step 1. nf_ct_should_gc() is thus called only for entries that already failed an expiry check. After this patch, once the confirmed bit check pas ---truncated---

Why

The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Use of Uninitialized Resource → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-908 ↗

CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource. The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-908
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1665Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250730Security Bulletin 30 Jul 2025 [827KB]

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 30 Jul 2025 [827KB], published on 30 July 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38463 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38482 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38463 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38482 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38463 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38482 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38463 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38482 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38463 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38482 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38463 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38475 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38461 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38462 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38463 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38463 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38475 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38463 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38475 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1050Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38463 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38475 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38456 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38458 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38459 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38488 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38490 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38499 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38456 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38458 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38459 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38488 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38499 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38506 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38461 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38462 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0842Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38396 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38461 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38523 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0841Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38458 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38459 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38460 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38460 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38490 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38498 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38499 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0827Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38458 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38459 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38460 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38460 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38490 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38494 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38495 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38497 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38498 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0805Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38457 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38457 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38458 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38459 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38460 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38460 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38490 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38498 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38499 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38458 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38459 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38490 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38494 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38495 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38499 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0698Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38463 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38475 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-023348Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品における初期化されていないリソースの使用に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品には、初期化されていないリソースの使用に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 1397af5bfd7d32b0cf2adb70a78c9a9e8f11d912 < a47ef874189d47f934d0809ae738886307c0ea22, 1397af5bfd7d32b0cf2adb70a78c9a9e8f11d912 < 76179961c423cd698080b5e4d5583cf7f4fcdde9, 1397af5bfd7d32b0cf2adb70a78c9a9e8f11d912 < fc38c249c622ff5e3011b8845fd49dbfd9289afc, 1397af5bfd7d32b0cf2adb70a78c9a9e8f11d912 < 938ce0e8422d3793fe30df2ed0e37f6bc0598379, 1397af5bfd7d32b0cf2adb70a78c9a9e8f11d912 < 2d72afb340657f03f7261e9243b44457a9228ac7, 594cea2c09f7cd440d1ee1c4547d5bc6a646b0e4, 5.18.13 < 5.19, 5.19
Fixed
Linux: < 5.19, 6.1.147 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.100 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.40 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.8 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 28 Jul 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC · CWE-908 · Use of Uninitialized Resource

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-22890
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38472 · cve.blacktree.nl