BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38440High confidence

net/mlx5e: Fix race between DIM disable and net_dim()

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

14 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-22701

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: Fix race between DIM disable and net_dim() There's a race between disabling DIM and NAPI callbacks using the dim pointer on the RQ or SQ. If NAPI checks the DIM state bit and sees it still set, it assumes `rq->dim` or `sq->dim` is valid. But if DIM gets disabled right after that check, the pointer might already be set to NULL, leading to a NULL pointer dereference in net_dim(). Fix this by calling `synchronize_net()` before freeing the DIM context. This ensures all in-progress NAPI callbacks are finished before the pointer is cleared. Kernel log: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 ... RIP: 0010:net_dim+0x23/0x190 ... Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x20/0x60 ? page_fault_oops+0x150/0x3e0 ? common_interrupt+0xf/0xa0 ? sysvec_call_function_single+0xb/0x90 ? exc_page_fault+0x74/0x130 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? net_dim+0x23/0x190 ? mlx5e_poll_ico_cq+0x41/0x6f0 [mlx5_core] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xb/0x90 mlx5e_handle_rx_dim+0x92/0xd0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_napi_poll+0x2cd/0xac0 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_poll_ico_cq+0xe5/0x6f0 [mlx5_core] busy_poll_stop+0xa2/0x200 ? mlx5e_napi_poll+0x1d9/0xac0 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_trigger_irq+0x130/0x130 [mlx5_core] __napi_busy_loop+0x345/0x3b0 ? sysvec_call_function_single+0xb/0x90 ? asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x16/0x20 ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xb/0x90 ? pcpu_free_area+0x1e4/0x2e0 napi_busy_loop+0x11/0x20 xsk_recvmsg+0x10c/0x130 sock_recvmsg+0x44/0x70 __sys_recvfrom+0xbc/0x130 ? __schedule+0x398/0x890 __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x4c/0x100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 ... ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- ... ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt ]---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: Fix race between DIM disable and net_dim() There's a race between disabling DIM and NAPI callbacks using the dim pointer on the RQ or SQ. If NAPI checks the DIM state bit and sees it still set, it assumes `rq->dim` or `sq->dim` is valid. But if DIM gets disabled right after that check, the pointer might already be set to NULL, leading to a NULL pointer dereference in net_dim(). Fix this by calling `synchronize_net()` before freeing the DIM context. This ensures all in-progress NAPI callbacks are finished before the pointer is cleared. Kernel log: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 ... RIP: 0010:net_dim+0x23/0x190 ... Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x20/0x60 ? page_fault_oops+0x150/0x3e0 ? common_interrupt+0xf/0xa0 ? sysvec_call_function_single+0xb/0x90 ? exc_page_fault+0x74/0x130 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? net_dim+0x23/0x190 ? mlx5e_poll_ico_cq+0x41/0x6f0 [mlx5_core] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xb/0x90 mlx5e_handle_rx_dim+0x92/0xd0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_napi_poll+0x2cd/0xac0 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_poll_ico_cq+0xe5/0x6f0 [mlx5_core] busy_poll_stop+0xa2/0x200 ? mlx5e_napi_poll+0x1d9/0xac0 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_trigger_irq+0x130/0x130 [mlx5_core] __napi_busy_loop+0x345/0x3b0 ? sysvec_call_function_single+0xb/0x90 ? asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x16/0x20 ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xb/0x90 ? pcpu_free_area+0x1e4/0x2e0 napi_busy_loop+0x11/0x20 xsk_recvmsg+0x10c/0x130 sock_recvmsg+0x44/0x70 __sys_recvfrom+0xbc/0x130 ? __schedule+0x398/0x890 __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x4c/0x100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 ... ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- ... ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt ]---

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: Fix race between DIM disable and net_dim() There's a race between disabling DIM and NAPI callbacks using the dim pointer on the RQ or SQ. If NAPI checks the DIM state bit and sees it still set, it assumes `rq->dim` or `sq->dim` is valid. But if DIM gets disabled right after that check, the pointer might already be set to NULL, leading to a NULL pointer dereference in net_dim(). Fix this by calling `synchronize_net()` before freeing the DIM context. This ensures all in-progress NAPI callbacks are finished before the pointer is cleared. Kernel log: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 ... RIP: 0010:net_dim+0x23/0x190 ... Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x20/0x60 ? page_fault_oops+0x150/0x3e0 ? common_interrupt+0xf/0xa0 ? sysvec_call_function_single+0xb/0x90 ? exc_page_fault+0x74/0x130 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? net_dim+0x23/0x190 ? mlx5e_poll_ico_cq+0x41/0x6f0 [mlx5_core] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xb/0x90 mlx5e_handle_rx_dim+0x92/0xd0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_napi_poll+0x2cd/0xac0 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_poll_ico_cq+0xe5/0x6f0 [mlx5_core] busy_poll_stop+0xa2/0x200 ? mlx5e_napi_poll+0x1d9/0xac0 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_trigger_irq+0x130/0x130 [mlx5_core] __napi_busy_loop+0x345/0x3b0 ? sysvec_call_function_single+0xb/0x90 ? asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x16/0x20 ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xb/0x90 ? pcpu_free_area+0x1e4/0x2e0 napi_busy_loop+0x11/0x20 xsk_recvmsg+0x10c/0x130 sock_recvmsg+0x44/0x70 __sys_recvfrom+0xbc/0x130 ? __schedule+0x398/0x890 __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x4c/0x100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 ... ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- ... ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt ]---

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-1653Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38373 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38426 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38438 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38485 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38486 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38501 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38373 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38426 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38438 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38485 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38486 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38501 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38438 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38443 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38446 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38448 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38438 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38443 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38446 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38448 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38426 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38427 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38429 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38430 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38438 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38443 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38446 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38448 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1050Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38438 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38443 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38446 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38448 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38380 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38380 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38396 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38402 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38456 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38458 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38459 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0841Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38323 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38458 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38459 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38460 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38460 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0698Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38430 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38438 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38443 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38446 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38448 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
445a25f6e1a2f6a132b06af6ede4f3c9b5f9af68 < 7581afc051542e11ccf3ade68acd01b7fb1a3cde; 445a25f6e1a2f6a132b06af6ede4f3c9b5f9af68 < 2bc6fb90486e42dd80e660ef7a40c02b2516c6d6; 445a25f6e1a2f6a132b06af6ede4f3c9b5f9af68 < eb41a264a3a576dc040ee37c3d9d6b7e2d9be968; 6.10
Fixed
< 6.10; 6.12.39 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.15.7 ≤ 6.15.*; 6.16 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 25 Jul 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-22701
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38440 · cve.blacktree.nl