BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38419High confidence

remoteproc: core: Cleanup acquired resources when rproc_handle_resources() fails in rproc_attach()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.35-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.147-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.35-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.35-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-38419 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 54 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-38419
165 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: remoteproc: core: Cleanup acquired resources when rproc_handle_resources() fails in rproc_attach() When rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED and rproc_attach() is used to attach to the remote processor, if rproc_handle_resources() returns a failure, the resources allocated by imx_rproc_prepare() should be released, otherwise the following memory leak will occur. Since almost the same thing is done in imx_rproc_prepare() and rproc_resource_cleanup(), Function rproc_resource_cleanup() is able to deal with empty lists so it is better to fix the "goto" statements in rproc_attach(). replace the "unprepare_device" goto statement with "clean_up_resources" and get rid of the "unprepare_device" label. unreferenced object 0xffff0000861c5d00 (size 128): comm "kworker/u12:3", pid 59, jiffies 4294893509 (age 149.220s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 02 88 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 ............ backtrace: [ ] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x98/0x37c [ ] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x138/0x2e0 [ ] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x158 [ ] rproc_mem_entry_init+0x60/0xf8 [ ] imx_rproc_prepare+0xe0/0x180 [ ] rproc_boot+0x2ec/0x528 [ ] rproc_add+0x124/0x17c [ ] imx_rproc_probe+0x4ec/0x5d4 [ ] platform_probe+0x68/0xd8 [ ] really_probe+0x110/0x27c [ ] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x12c [ ] driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x118 [ ] __device_attach_driver+0xb8/0xf8 [ ] bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xe4 [ ] __device_attach+0xfc/0x18c [ ] device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-22667

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: remoteproc: core: Cleanup acquired resources when rproc_handle_resources() fails in rproc_attach() When rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED and rproc_attach() is used to attach to the remote processor, if rproc_handle_resources() returns a failure, the resources allocated by imx_rproc_prepare() should be released, otherwise the following memory leak will occur. Since almost the same thing is done in imx_rproc_prepare() and rproc_resource_cleanup(), Function rproc_resource_cleanup() is able to deal with empty lists so it is better to fix the "goto" statements in rproc_attach(). replace the "unprepare_device" goto statement with "clean_up_resources" and get rid of the "unprepare_device" label. unreferenced object 0xffff0000861c5d00 (size 128): comm "kworker/u12:3", pid 59, jiffies 4294893509 (age 149.220s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 02 88 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 ............ backtrace: [<00000000f949fe18>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x98/0x37c [<00000000adbfb3e7>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x138/0x2e0 [<00000000521c0345>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x158 [<000000004e330a49>] rproc_mem_entry_init+0x60/0xf8 [<000000002815755e>] imx_rproc_prepare+0xe0/0x180 [<0000000003f61b4e>] rproc_boot+0x2ec/0x528 [<00000000e7e994ac>] rproc_add+0x124/0x17c [<0000000048594076>] imx_rproc_probe+0x4ec/0x5d4 [<00000000efc298a1>] platform_probe+0x68/0xd8 [<00000000110be6fe>] really_probe+0x110/0x27c [<00000000e245c0ae>] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x12c [<00000000f61f6f5e>] driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x118 [<00000000a7874938>] __device_attach_driver+0xb8/0xf8 [<0000000065319e69>] bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xe4 [<00000000db3eb243>] __device_attach+0xfc/0x18c [<0000000072e4e1a4>] device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: remoteproc: core: Cleanup acquired resources when rproc_handle_resources() fails in rproc_attach() When rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED and rproc_attach() is used to attach to the remote processor, if rproc_handle_resources() returns a failure, the resources allocated by imx_rproc_prepare() should be released, otherwise the following memory leak will occur. Since almost the same thing is done in imx_rproc_prepare() and rproc_resource_cleanup(), Function rproc_resource_cleanup() is able to deal with empty lists so it is better to fix the "goto" statements in rproc_attach(). replace the "unprepare_device" goto statement with "clean_up_resources" and get rid of the "unprepare_device" label. unreferenced object 0xffff0000861c5d00 (size 128): comm "kworker/u12:3", pid 59, jiffies 4294893509 (age 149.220s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 02 88 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 ............ backtrace: [<00000000f949fe18>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x98/0x37c [<00000000adbfb3e7>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x138/0x2e0 [<00000000521c0345>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x158 [<000000004e330a49>] rproc_mem_entry_init+0x60/0xf8 [<000000002815755e>] imx_rproc_prepare+0xe0/0x180 [<0000000003f61b4e>] rproc_boot+0x2ec/0x528 [<00000000e7e994ac>] rproc_add+0x124/0x17c [<0000000048594076>] imx_rproc_probe+0x4ec/0x5d4 [<00000000efc298a1>] platform_probe+0x68/0xd8 [<00000000110be6fe>] really_probe+0x110/0x27c [<00000000e245c0ae>] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x12c [<00000000f61f6f5e>] driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x118 [<00000000a7874938>] __device_attach_driver+0xb8/0xf8 [<0000000065319e69>] bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xe4 [<00000000db3eb243>] __device_attach+0xfc/0x18c [<0000000072e4e1a4>] device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: remoteproc: core: Cleanup acquired resources when rproc_handle_resources() fails in rproc_attach() When rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED and rproc_attach() is used to attach to the remote processor, if rproc_handle_resources() returns a failure, the resources allocated by imx_rproc_prepare() should be released, otherwise the following memory leak will occur. Since almost the same thing is done in imx_rproc_prepare() and rproc_resource_cleanup(), Function rproc_resource_cleanup() is able to deal with empty lists so it is better to fix the "goto" statements in rproc_attach(). replace the "unprepare_device" goto statement with "clean_up_resources" and get rid of the "unprepare_device" label. unreferenced object 0xffff0000861c5d00 (size 128): comm "kworker/u12:3", pid 59, jiffies 4294893509 (age 149.220s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 02 88 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 ............ backtrace: [<00000000f949fe18>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x98/0x37c [<00000000adbfb3e7>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x138/0x2e0 [<00000000521c0345>] kmalloc_trace+0x40/0x158 [<000000004e330a49>] rproc_mem_entry_init+0x60/0xf8 [<000000002815755e>] imx_rproc_prepare+0xe0/0x180 [<0000000003f61b4e>] rproc_boot+0x2ec/0x528 [<00000000e7e994ac>] rproc_add+0x124/0x17c [<0000000048594076>] imx_rproc_probe+0x4ec/0x5d4 [<00000000efc298a1>] platform_probe+0x68/0xd8 [<00000000110be6fe>] really_probe+0x110/0x27c [<00000000e245c0ae>] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x12c [<00000000f61f6f5e>] driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x118 [<00000000a7874938>] __device_attach_driver+0xb8/0xf8 [<0000000065319e69>] bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xe4 [<00000000db3eb243>] __device_attach+0xfc/0x18c [<0000000072e4e1a4>] device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401 ↗

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1653Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250730Security Bulletin 30 Jul 2025 [827KB]

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 30 Jul 2025 [827KB], published on 30 July 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38407 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38414 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38427 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38429 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38407 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38414 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38427 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38429 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38414 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38417 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38427 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38429 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38407 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38414 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38427 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38429 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38407 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38414 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38427 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38429 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38409 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38413 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38414 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38417 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38421 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38421 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38426 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38427 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1054Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38400 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38401 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38403 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38406 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38430 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38443 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0977Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38411 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38413 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38417 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38421 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38421 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38423 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38423 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38426 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38400 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38401 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38403 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38406 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38430 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38443 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0949Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38411 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38413 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38417 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38421 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38421 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38423 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38423 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38426 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38380 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38380 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38396 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38402 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38456 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38458 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0922Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38411 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38413 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38417 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38421 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38421 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38423 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38423 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38426 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38380 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38380 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38402 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38456 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38458 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38459 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38403 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38404 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38404 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38406 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38430 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0859Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38401 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38403 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38406 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38414 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38430 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38443 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0843Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38401 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38403 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38406 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38414 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38430 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38443 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0828Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38401 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38403 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38406 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38414 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38430 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38443 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0698Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38403 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38404 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38404 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38406 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38430 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-023189Debian等の複数ベンダの製品における有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルのremoteprocコアモジュールにおいて、rproc_attach関数でrproc_handle_resources関数が失敗した場合、取得したリソースがクリーンアップされずメモリリークが発生する問題がありました。エラーハンドリング部分が修正され、rproc_resource_cleanup関数によってリソースが正しく解放されるようになりました。これにより、リモートプロセッサへのアタッチ中にリソースのクリーンアップ漏れが発生せず、システムの安定性が向上します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.13, 5.15.186 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.142 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.95 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.35 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.4 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 25 Jul 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:27 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-22667
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38419 · cve.blacktree.nl