BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38359High confidence

s390/mm: Fix in_atomic() handling in do_secure_storage_access()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 23 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.11% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 23 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 23 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-22644

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 23 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s390/mm: Fix in_atomic() handling in do_secure_storage_access() Kernel user spaces accesses to not exported pages in atomic context incorrectly try to resolve the page fault. With debug options enabled call traces like this can be seen: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1523 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 419074, name: qemu-system-s39 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. Preemption disabled at: [<00000383ea47cfa2>] copy_page_from_iter_atomic+0xa2/0x8a0 CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 419074 Comm: qemu-system-s39 Tainted: G W 6.16.0-20250531.rc0.git0.69b3a602feac.63.fc42.s390x+debug #1 PREEMPT Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 703 (LPAR) Call Trace: [<00000383e990d282>] dump_stack_lvl+0xa2/0xe8 [<00000383e99bf152>] __might_resched+0x292/0x2d0 [<00000383eaa7c374>] down_read+0x34/0x2d0 [<00000383e99432f8>] do_secure_storage_access+0x108/0x360 [<00000383eaa724b0>] __do_pgm_check+0x130/0x220 [<00000383eaa842e4>] pgm_check_handler+0x114/0x160 [<00000383ea47d028>] copy_page_from_iter_atomic+0x128/0x8a0 ([<00000383ea47d016>] copy_page_from_iter_atomic+0x116/0x8a0) [<00000383e9c45eae>] generic_perform_write+0x16e/0x310 [<00000383e9eb87f4>] ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x84/0x160 [<00000383e9da0de4>] vfs_write+0x1c4/0x460 [<00000383e9da123c>] ksys_write+0x7c/0x100 [<00000383eaa7284e>] __do_syscall+0x15e/0x280 [<00000383eaa8417e>] system_call+0x6e/0x90 INFO: lockdep is turned off. It is not allowed to take the mmap_lock while in atomic context. Therefore handle such a secure storage access fault as if the accessed page is not mapped: the uaccess function will return -EFAULT, and the caller has to deal with this. Usually this means that the access is retried in process context, which allows to resolve the page fault (or in this case export the page).

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s390/mm: Fix in_atomic() handling in do_secure_storage_access() Kernel user spaces accesses to not exported pages in atomic context incorrectly try to resolve the page fault. With debug options enabled call traces like this can be seen: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1523 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 419074, name: qemu-system-s39 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. Preemption disabled at: [<00000383ea47cfa2>] copy_page_from_iter_atomic+0xa2/0x8a0 CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 419074 Comm: qemu-system-s39 Tainted: G W 6.16.0-20250531.rc0.git0.69b3a602feac.63.fc42.s390x+debug #1 PREEMPT Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 703 (LPAR) Call Trace: [<00000383e990d282>] dump_stack_lvl+0xa2/0xe8 [<00000383e99bf152>] __might_resched+0x292/0x2d0 [<00000383eaa7c374>] down_read+0x34/0x2d0 [<00000383e99432f8>] do_secure_storage_access+0x108/0x360 [<00000383eaa724b0>] __do_pgm_check+0x130/0x220 [<00000383eaa842e4>] pgm_check_handler+0x114/0x160 [<00000383ea47d028>] copy_page_from_iter_atomic+0x128/0x8a0 ([<00000383ea47d016>] copy_page_from_iter_atomic+0x116/0x8a0) [<00000383e9c45eae>] generic_perform_write+0x16e/0x310 [<00000383e9eb87f4>] ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x84/0x160 [<00000383e9da0de4>] vfs_write+0x1c4/0x460 [<00000383e9da123c>] ksys_write+0x7c/0x100 [<00000383eaa7284e>] __do_syscall+0x15e/0x280 [<00000383eaa8417e>] system_call+0x6e/0x90 INFO: lockdep is turned off. It is not allowed to take the mmap_lock while in atomic context. Therefore handle such a secure storage access fault as if the accessed page is not mapped: the uaccess function will return -EFAULT, and the caller has to deal with this. Usually this means that the access is retried in process context, which allows to resolve the page fault (or in this case export the page).

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s390/mm: Fix in_atomic() handling in do_secure_storage_access() Kernel user spaces accesses to not exported pages in atomic context incorrectly try to resolve the page fault. With debug options enabled call traces like this can be seen: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1523 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 419074, name: qemu-system-s39 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. Preemption disabled at: [<00000383ea47cfa2>] copy_page_from_iter_atomic+0xa2/0x8a0 CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 419074 Comm: qemu-system-s39 Tainted: G W 6.16.0-20250531.rc0.git0.69b3a602feac.63.fc42.s390x+debug #1 PREEMPT Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 703 (LPAR) Call Trace: [<00000383e990d282>] dump_stack_lvl+0xa2/0xe8 [<00000383e99bf152>] __might_resched+0x292/0x2d0 [<00000383eaa7c374>] down_read+0x34/0x2d0 [<00000383e99432f8>] do_secure_storage_access+0x108/0x360 [<00000383eaa724b0>] __do_pgm_check+0x130/0x220 [<00000383eaa842e4>] pgm_check_handler+0x114/0x160 [<00000383ea47d028>] copy_page_from_iter_atomic+0x128/0x8a0 ([<00000383ea47d016>] copy_page_from_iter_atomic+0x116/0x8a0) [<00000383e9c45eae>] generic_perform_write+0x16e/0x310 [<00000383e9eb87f4>] ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x84/0x160 [<00000383e9da0de4>] vfs_write+0x1c4/0x460 [<00000383e9da123c>] ksys_write+0x7c/0x100 [<00000383eaa7284e>] __do_syscall+0x15e/0x280 [<00000383eaa8417e>] system_call+0x6e/0x90 INFO: lockdep is turned off. It is not allowed to take the mmap_lock while in atomic context. Therefore handle such a secure storage access fault as if the accessed page is not mapped: the uaccess function will return -EFAULT, and the caller has to deal with this. Usually this means that the access is retried in process context, which allows to resolve the page fault (or in this case export the page).

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1653Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250730Security Bulletin 30 Jul 2025 [827KB]

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 30 Jul 2025 [827KB], published on 30 July 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38329 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38368 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38369 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38373 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38329 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38368 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38369 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38373 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38177 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38243 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38297 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38298 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38321 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38322 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38379 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38423 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38423 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38505 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38511 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38209 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38243 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38321 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38322 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38375 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38379 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38539 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38563 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38565 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0059Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-50253 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53574 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37916 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38321 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1140Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53369 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53431 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53542 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53597 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53641 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53676 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37916 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1133Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ectifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:4393-1 du 15 décembre 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20254393-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:4422-1 du 17 décembre 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20254422-1 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50253 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37916 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38364 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38365 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38368 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0977Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38364 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38365 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38368 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0949Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38364 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38365 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38368 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0922Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38364 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38365 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38368 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-020052Linux の Linux Kernel におけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、リソースのロックに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 084ea4d611a3d00ee3930400b262240e10895900 < d2e317dfd2d1fe416c77315d17c5d57dbe374915, 084ea4d611a3d00ee3930400b262240e10895900 < 11709abccf93b08adde95ef313c300b0d4bc28f1, 5.7
Fixed
Linux: < 5.7, 6.15.5 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 25 Jul 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:26 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-22644
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38359 · cve.blacktree.nl