BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38355High confidence

drm/xe: Process deferred GGTT node removals on device unwind

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

12 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-22648

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/xe: Process deferred GGTT node removals on device unwind While we are indirectly draining our dedicated workqueue ggtt->wq that we use to complete asynchronous removal of some GGTT nodes, this happends as part of the managed-drm unwinding (ggtt_fini_early), which could be later then manage-device unwinding, where we could already unmap our MMIO/GMS mapping (mmio_fini). This was recently observed during unsuccessful VF initialization: [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: probe with driver xe failed with error -62 [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e747340 __xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e747540 __xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e747240 __xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e747040 tiles_fini (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e746840 mmio_fini (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e747f40 xe_bo_pinned_fini (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e746b40 devm_drm_dev_init_release (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm:drm_managed_release] drmres release begin [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm:drm_managed_release] REL ffff88810ef81640 __fini_relay (8 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm:drm_managed_release] REL ffff88810ef80d40 guc_ct_fini (8 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm:drm_managed_release] REL ffff88810ef80040 __drmm_mutex_release (8 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm:drm_managed_release] REL ffff88810ef80140 ggtt_fini_early (8 bytes) and this was leading to: [ ] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc900058162a0 [ ] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode [ ] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page [ ] Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ ] Tainted: [W]=WARN [ ] Workqueue: xe-ggtt-wq ggtt_node_remove_work_func [xe] [ ] RIP: 0010:xe_ggtt_set_pte+0x6d/0x350 [xe] [ ] Call Trace: [ ] <TASK> [ ] xe_ggtt_clear+0xb0/0x270 [xe] [ ] ggtt_node_remove+0xbb/0x120 [xe] [ ] ggtt_node_remove_work_func+0x30/0x50 [xe] [ ] process_one_work+0x22b/0x6f0 [ ] worker_thread+0x1e8/0x3d Add managed-device action that will explicitly drain the workqueue with all pending node removals prior to releasing MMIO/GSM mapping. (cherry picked from commit 89d2835c3680ab1938e22ad81b1c9f8c686bd391)

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/xe: Process deferred GGTT node removals on device unwind While we are indirectly draining our dedicated workqueue ggtt->wq that we use to complete asynchronous removal of some GGTT nodes, this happends as part of the managed-drm unwinding (ggtt_fini_early), which could be later then manage-device unwinding, where we could already unmap our MMIO/GMS mapping (mmio_fini). This was recently observed during unsuccessful VF initialization: [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: probe with driver xe failed with error -62 [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e747340 __xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e747540 __xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e747240 __xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e747040 tiles_fini (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e746840 mmio_fini (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e747f40 xe_bo_pinned_fini (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e746b40 devm_drm_dev_init_release (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm:drm_managed_release] drmres release begin [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm:drm_managed_release] REL ffff88810ef81640 __fini_relay (8 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm:drm_managed_release] REL ffff88810ef80d40 guc_ct_fini (8 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm:drm_managed_release] REL ffff88810ef80040 __drmm_mutex_release (8 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm:drm_managed_release] REL ffff88810ef80140 ggtt_fini_early (8 bytes) and this was leading to: [ ] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc900058162a0 [ ] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode [ ] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page [ ] Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ ] Tainted: [W]=WARN [ ] Workqueue: xe-ggtt-wq ggtt_node_remove_work_func [xe] [ ] RIP: 0010:xe_ggtt_set_pte+0x6d/0x350 [xe] [ ] Call Trace: [ ] <TASK> [ ] xe_ggtt_clear+0xb0/0x270 [xe] [ ] ggtt_node_remove+0xbb/0x120 [xe] [ ] ggtt_node_remove_work_func+0x30/0x50 [xe] [ ] process_one_work+0x22b/0x6f0 [ ] worker_thread+0x1e8/0x3d Add managed-device action that will explicitly drain the workqueue with all pending node removals prior to releasing MMIO/GSM mapping. (cherry picked from commit 89d2835c3680ab1938e22ad81b1c9f8c686bd391)

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/xe: Process deferred GGTT node removals on device unwind While we are indirectly draining our dedicated workqueue ggtt->wq that we use to complete asynchronous removal of some GGTT nodes, this happends as part of the managed-drm unwinding (ggtt_fini_early), which could be later then manage-device unwinding, where we could already unmap our MMIO/GMS mapping (mmio_fini). This was recently observed during unsuccessful VF initialization: [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: probe with driver xe failed with error -62 [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e747340 __xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e747540 __xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e747240 __xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e747040 tiles_fini (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e746840 mmio_fini (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e747f40 xe_bo_pinned_fini (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: DEVRES REL ffff88811e746b40 devm_drm_dev_init_release (16 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm:drm_managed_release] drmres release begin [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm:drm_managed_release] REL ffff88810ef81640 __fini_relay (8 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm:drm_managed_release] REL ffff88810ef80d40 guc_ct_fini (8 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm:drm_managed_release] REL ffff88810ef80040 __drmm_mutex_release (8 bytes) [ ] xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm:drm_managed_release] REL ffff88810ef80140 ggtt_fini_early (8 bytes) and this was leading to: [ ] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc900058162a0 [ ] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode [ ] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page [ ] Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ ] Tainted: [W]=WARN [ ] Workqueue: xe-ggtt-wq ggtt_node_remove_work_func [xe] [ ] RIP: 0010:xe_ggtt_set_pte+0x6d/0x350 [xe] [ ] Call Trace: [ ] <TASK> [ ] xe_ggtt_clear+0xb0/0x270 [xe] [ ] ggtt_node_remove+0xbb/0x120 [xe] [ ] ggtt_node_remove_work_func+0x30/0x50 [xe] [ ] process_one_work+0x22b/0x6f0 [ ] worker_thread+0x1e8/0x3d Add managed-device action that will explicitly drain the workqueue with all pending node removals prior to releasing MMIO/GSM mapping. (cherry picked from commit 89d2835c3680ab1938e22ad81b1c9f8c686bd391)

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-1653Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38364 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0977Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38364 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0949Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38364 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0922Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38364 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0745Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38364 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38365 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38369 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38371 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38364 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38365 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38369 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38371 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
919bb54e989c1edef87e9797be125c94c450fc65 < 1b12f8dabbb8fd7d5a2611dd7bc5982ffbc2e5df; 919bb54e989c1edef87e9797be125c94c450fc65 < 5ab4eba9b26a93605b4f2f2b688d6ba818d7331d; 919bb54e989c1edef87e9797be125c94c450fc65 < af2b588abe006bd55ddd358c4c3b87523349c475; 6.12
Fixed
< 6.12; 6.12.36 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.15.5 ≤ 6.15.*; 6.16 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 25 Jul 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:26 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-22648
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38355 · cve.blacktree.nl