BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38347High confidence

f2fs: fix to do sanity check on ino and xnid

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-032379 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 12 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.35-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.153-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.35-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.35-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-032379 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC CN 4100
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to do sanity check on ino and xnid syzbot reported a f2fs bug as below: INFO: task syz-executor140:5308 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7-syzkaller-00069-g81e4f8d68c66 #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor140 state:D stack:24016 pid:5308 tgid:5308 ppid:5306 task_flags:0x400140 flags:0x00000006 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5378 [inline] __schedule+0x190e/0x4c90 kernel/sched/core.c:6765 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6842 [inline] schedule+0x14b/0x320 kernel/sched/core.c:6857 io_schedule+0x8d/0x110 kernel/sched/core.c:7690 folio_wait_bit_common+0x839/0xee0 mm/filemap.c:1317 __folio_lock mm/filemap.c:1664 [inline] folio_lock include/linux/pagemap.h:1163 [inline] __filemap_get_folio+0x147/0xb40 mm/filemap.c:1917 pagecache_get_page+0x2c/0x130 mm/folio-compat.c:87 find_get_page_flags include/linux/pagemap.h:842 [inline] f2fs_grab_cache_page+0x2b/0x320 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2776 __get_node_page+0x131/0x11b0 fs/f2fs/node.c:1463 read_xattr_block+0xfb/0x190 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:306 lookup_all_xattrs fs/f2fs/xattr.c:355 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0x676/0xf70 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:533 __f2fs_get_acl+0x52/0x870 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:375 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0xd7/0x9b0 fs/f2fs/acl.c:418 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0xa0f/0x1050 fs/f2fs/dir.c:539 f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x448/0x860 fs/f2fs/inline.c:666 f2fs_add_dentry+0xba/0x1e0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:765 f2fs_do_add_link+0x28c/0x3a0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:808 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3616 [inline] f2fs_mknod+0x2e8/0x5b0 fs/f2fs/namei.c:766 vfs_mknod+0x36d/0x3b0 fs/namei.c:4191 unix_bind_bsd net/unix/af_unix.c:1286 [inline] unix_bind+0x563/0xe30 net/unix/af_unix.c:1379 __sys_bind_socket net/socket.c:1817 [inline] __sys_bind+0x1e4/0x290 net/socket.c:1848 __do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1853 [inline] __se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1851 [inline] __x64_sys_bind+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:1851 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Let's dump and check metadata of corrupted inode, it shows its xattr_nid is the same to its i_ino. dump.f2fs -i 3 chaseyu.img.raw i_xattr_nid [0x 3 : 3] So that, during mknod in the corrupted directory, it tries to get and lock inode page twice, result in deadlock. - f2fs_mknod - f2fs_add_inline_entry - f2fs_get_inode_page --- lock dir's inode page - f2fs_init_acl - f2fs_acl_create(dir,..) - __f2fs_get_acl - f2fs_getxattr - lookup_all_xattrs - __get_node_page --- try to lock dir's inode page In order to fix this, let's add sanity check on ino and xnid.
Remediation
Update to V5.0 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-20899

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to do sanity check on ino and xnid syzbot reported a f2fs bug as below: INFO: task syz-executor140:5308 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7-syzkaller-00069-g81e4f8d68c66 #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor140 state:D stack:24016 pid:5308 tgid:5308 ppid:5306 task_flags:0x400140 flags:0x00000006 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5378 [inline] __schedule+0x190e/0x4c90 kernel/sched/core.c:6765 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6842 [inline] schedule+0x14b/0x320 kernel/sched/core.c:6857 io_schedule+0x8d/0x110 kernel/sched/core.c:7690 folio_wait_bit_common+0x839/0xee0 mm/filemap.c:1317 __folio_lock mm/filemap.c:1664 [inline] folio_lock include/linux/pagemap.h:1163 [inline] __filemap_get_folio+0x147/0xb40 mm/filemap.c:1917 pagecache_get_page+0x2c/0x130 mm/folio-compat.c:87 find_get_page_flags include/linux/pagemap.h:842 [inline] f2fs_grab_cache_page+0x2b/0x320 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2776 __get_node_page+0x131/0x11b0 fs/f2fs/node.c:1463 read_xattr_block+0xfb/0x190 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:306 lookup_all_xattrs fs/f2fs/xattr.c:355 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0x676/0xf70 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:533 __f2fs_get_acl+0x52/0x870 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:375 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0xd7/0x9b0 fs/f2fs/acl.c:418 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0xa0f/0x1050 fs/f2fs/dir.c:539 f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x448/0x860 fs/f2fs/inline.c:666 f2fs_add_dentry+0xba/0x1e0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:765 f2fs_do_add_link+0x28c/0x3a0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:808 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3616 [inline] f2fs_mknod+0x2e8/0x5b0 fs/f2fs/namei.c:766 vfs_mknod+0x36d/0x3b0 fs/namei.c:4191 unix_bind_bsd net/unix/af_unix.c:1286 [inline] unix_bind+0x563/0xe30 net/unix/af_unix.c:1379 __sys_bind_socket net/socket.c:1817 [inline] __sys_bind+0x1e4/0x290 net/socket.c:1848 __do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1853 [inline] __se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1851 [inline] __x64_sys_bind+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:1851 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Let's dump and check metadata of corrupted inode, it shows its xattr_nid is the same to its i_ino. dump.f2fs -i 3 chaseyu.img.raw i_xattr_nid [0x 3 : 3] So that, during mknod in the corrupted directory, it tries to get and lock inode page twice, result in deadlock. - f2fs_mknod - f2fs_add_inline_entry - f2fs_get_inode_page --- lock dir's inode page - f2fs_init_acl - f2fs_acl_create(dir,..) - __f2fs_get_acl - f2fs_getxattr - lookup_all_xattrs - __get_node_page --- try to lock dir's inode page In order to fix this, let's add sanity check on ino and xnid.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to do sanity check on ino and xnid syzbot reported a f2fs bug as below: INFO: task syz-executor140:5308 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7-syzkaller-00069-g81e4f8d68c66 #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor140 state:D stack:24016 pid:5308 tgid:5308 ppid:5306 task_flags:0x400140 flags:0x00000006 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5378 [inline] __schedule+0x190e/0x4c90 kernel/sched/core.c:6765 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6842 [inline] schedule+0x14b/0x320 kernel/sched/core.c:6857 io_schedule+0x8d/0x110 kernel/sched/core.c:7690 folio_wait_bit_common+0x839/0xee0 mm/filemap.c:1317 __folio_lock mm/filemap.c:1664 [inline] folio_lock include/linux/pagemap.h:1163 [inline] __filemap_get_folio+0x147/0xb40 mm/filemap.c:1917 pagecache_get_page+0x2c/0x130 mm/folio-compat.c:87 find_get_page_flags include/linux/pagemap.h:842 [inline] f2fs_grab_cache_page+0x2b/0x320 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2776 __get_node_page+0x131/0x11b0 fs/f2fs/node.c:1463 read_xattr_block+0xfb/0x190 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:306 lookup_all_xattrs fs/f2fs/xattr.c:355 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0x676/0xf70 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:533 __f2fs_get_acl+0x52/0x870 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:375 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0xd7/0x9b0 fs/f2fs/acl.c:418 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0xa0f/0x1050 fs/f2fs/dir.c:539 f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x448/0x860 fs/f2fs/inline.c:666 f2fs_add_dentry+0xba/0x1e0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:765 f2fs_do_add_link+0x28c/0x3a0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:808 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3616 [inline] f2fs_mknod+0x2e8/0x5b0 fs/f2fs/namei.c:766 vfs_mknod+0x36d/0x3b0 fs/namei.c:4191 unix_bind_bsd net/unix/af_unix.c:1286 [inline] unix_bind+0x563/0xe30 net/unix/af_unix.c:1379 __sys_bind_socket net/socket.c:1817 [inline] __sys_bind+0x1e4/0x290 net/socket.c:1848 __do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1853 [inline] __se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1851 [inline] __x64_sys_bind+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:1851 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Let's dump and check metadata of corrupted inode, it shows its xattr_nid is the same to its i_ino. dump.f2fs -i 3 chaseyu.img.raw i_xattr_nid [0x 3 : 3] So that, during mknod in the corrupted directory, it tries to get and lock inode page twice, result in deadlock. - f2fs_mknod - f2fs_add_inline_entry - f2fs_get_inode_page --- lock dir's inode page - f2fs_init_acl - f2fs_acl_create(dir,..) - __f2fs_get_acl - f2fs_getxattr - lookup_all_xattrs - __get_node_page --- try to lock dir's inode page In order to fix this, let's add sanity check on ino and xnid.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to do sanity check on ino and xnid syzbot reported a f2fs bug as below: INFO: task syz-executor140:5308 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7-syzkaller-00069-g81e4f8d68c66 #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor140 state:D stack:24016 pid:5308 tgid:5308 ppid:5306 task_flags:0x400140 flags:0x00000006 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5378 [inline] __schedule+0x190e/0x4c90 kernel/sched/core.c:6765 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6842 [inline] schedule+0x14b/0x320 kernel/sched/core.c:6857 io_schedule+0x8d/0x110 kernel/sched/core.c:7690 folio_wait_bit_common+0x839/0xee0 mm/filemap.c:1317 __folio_lock mm/filemap.c:1664 [inline] folio_lock include/linux/pagemap.h:1163 [inline] __filemap_get_folio+0x147/0xb40 mm/filemap.c:1917 pagecache_get_page+0x2c/0x130 mm/folio-compat.c:87 find_get_page_flags include/linux/pagemap.h:842 [inline] f2fs_grab_cache_page+0x2b/0x320 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2776 __get_node_page+0x131/0x11b0 fs/f2fs/node.c:1463 read_xattr_block+0xfb/0x190 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:306 lookup_all_xattrs fs/f2fs/xattr.c:355 [inline] f2fs_getxattr+0x676/0xf70 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:533 __f2fs_get_acl+0x52/0x870 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:375 [inline] f2fs_init_acl+0xd7/0x9b0 fs/f2fs/acl.c:418 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0xa0f/0x1050 fs/f2fs/dir.c:539 f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x448/0x860 fs/f2fs/inline.c:666 f2fs_add_dentry+0xba/0x1e0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:765 f2fs_do_add_link+0x28c/0x3a0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:808 f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3616 [inline] f2fs_mknod+0x2e8/0x5b0 fs/f2fs/namei.c:766 vfs_mknod+0x36d/0x3b0 fs/namei.c:4191 unix_bind_bsd net/unix/af_unix.c:1286 [inline] unix_bind+0x563/0xe30 net/unix/af_unix.c:1379 __sys_bind_socket net/socket.c:1817 [inline] __sys_bind+0x1e4/0x290 net/socket.c:1848 __do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1853 [inline] __se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1851 [inline] __x64_sys_bind+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:1851 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Let's dump and check metadata of corrupted inode, it shows its xattr_nid is the same to its i_ino. dump.f2fs -i 3 chaseyu.img.raw i_xattr_nid [0x 3 : 3] So that, during mknod in the corrupted directory, it tries to get and lock inode page twice, result in deadlock. - f2fs_mknod - f2fs_add_inline_entry - f2fs_get_inode_page --- lock dir's inode page - f2fs_init_acl - f2fs_acl_create(dir,..) - __f2fs_get_acl - f2fs_getxattr - lookup_all_xattrs - __get_node_page --- try to lock dir's inode page In order to fix this, let's add sanity check on ino and xnid.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1522Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250716Security Bulletin 16 Jul 2025 [922 KB]

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 16 Jul 2025 [922 KB], published on 16 July 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0565Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2024-57924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-31257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38322 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38502 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38552 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38614 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38165 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38438 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37925 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37958 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38165 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38438 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0977Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0949Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0922Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38355 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38364 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-22125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38272 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38306 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38322 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38453 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38453 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38502 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38552 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38614 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-022874Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0147Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten

Multiple security vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel, including a f2fs filesystem inode sanity check fix, CPU cache initialization flaws, AMD processor data leakage, and the VMSCAPE branch predictor isolation issue, were addressed across various subsystems and architectures.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
SIMATIC CN 4100
Fixed
Linux: < 3.8, 5.4.297 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.241 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.190 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.149 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.95 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.35 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.4 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 10 Jul 2025 · Last source change 12 May 2026, 12:04 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-20899
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38347 · cve.blacktree.nl