BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38255High confidence

lib/group_cpus: fix NULL pointer dereference from group_cpus_evenly()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

21 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-20806

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lib/group_cpus: fix NULL pointer dereference from group_cpus_evenly() While testing null_blk with configfs, echo 0 > poll_queues will trigger following panic: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000010 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 27 UID: 0 PID: 920 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.15.0-02023-gadbdb95c8696-dirty #1238 PREEMPT(undef) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.1-2.fc37 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__bitmap_or+0x48/0x70 Call Trace: <TASK> __group_cpus_evenly+0x822/0x8c0 group_cpus_evenly+0x2d9/0x490 blk_mq_map_queues+0x1e/0x110 null_map_queues+0xc9/0x170 [null_blk] blk_mq_update_queue_map+0xdb/0x160 blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues+0x22b/0x560 nullb_update_nr_hw_queues+0x71/0xf0 [null_blk] nullb_device_poll_queues_store+0xa4/0x130 [null_blk] configfs_write_iter+0x109/0x1d0 vfs_write+0x26e/0x6f0 ksys_write+0x79/0x180 __x64_sys_write+0x1d/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x45c4/0x45f0 do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Root cause is that numgrps is set to 0, and ZERO_SIZE_PTR is returned from kcalloc(), and later ZERO_SIZE_PTR will be deferenced. Fix the problem by checking numgrps first in group_cpus_evenly(), and return NULL directly if numgrps is zero. [yukuai3@huawei.com: also fix the non-SMP version]

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lib/group_cpus: fix NULL pointer dereference from group_cpus_evenly() While testing null_blk with configfs, echo 0 > poll_queues will trigger following panic: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000010 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 27 UID: 0 PID: 920 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.15.0-02023-gadbdb95c8696-dirty #1238 PREEMPT(undef) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.1-2.fc37 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__bitmap_or+0x48/0x70 Call Trace: <TASK> __group_cpus_evenly+0x822/0x8c0 group_cpus_evenly+0x2d9/0x490 blk_mq_map_queues+0x1e/0x110 null_map_queues+0xc9/0x170 [null_blk] blk_mq_update_queue_map+0xdb/0x160 blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues+0x22b/0x560 nullb_update_nr_hw_queues+0x71/0xf0 [null_blk] nullb_device_poll_queues_store+0xa4/0x130 [null_blk] configfs_write_iter+0x109/0x1d0 vfs_write+0x26e/0x6f0 ksys_write+0x79/0x180 __x64_sys_write+0x1d/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x45c4/0x45f0 do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Root cause is that numgrps is set to 0, and ZERO_SIZE_PTR is returned from kcalloc(), and later ZERO_SIZE_PTR will be deferenced. Fix the problem by checking numgrps first in group_cpus_evenly(), and return NULL directly if numgrps is zero. [yukuai3@huawei.com: also fix the non-SMP version]

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lib/group_cpus: fix NULL pointer dereference from group_cpus_evenly() While testing null_blk with configfs, echo 0 > poll_queues will trigger following panic: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000010 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 27 UID: 0 PID: 920 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.15.0-02023-gadbdb95c8696-dirty #1238 PREEMPT(undef) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.1-2.fc37 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__bitmap_or+0x48/0x70 Call Trace: <TASK> __group_cpus_evenly+0x822/0x8c0 group_cpus_evenly+0x2d9/0x490 blk_mq_map_queues+0x1e/0x110 null_map_queues+0xc9/0x170 [null_blk] blk_mq_update_queue_map+0xdb/0x160 blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues+0x22b/0x560 nullb_update_nr_hw_queues+0x71/0xf0 [null_blk] nullb_device_poll_queues_store+0xa4/0x130 [null_blk] configfs_write_iter+0x109/0x1d0 vfs_write+0x26e/0x6f0 ksys_write+0x79/0x180 __x64_sys_write+0x1d/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x45c4/0x45f0 do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Root cause is that numgrps is set to 0, and ZERO_SIZE_PTR is returned from kcalloc(), and later ZERO_SIZE_PTR will be deferenced. Fix the problem by checking numgrps first in group_cpus_evenly(), and return NULL directly if numgrps is zero. [yukuai3@huawei.com: also fix the non-SMP version]

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1517Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250716Security Bulletin 16 Jul 2025 [922 KB]

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 16 Jul 2025 [922 KB], published on 16 July 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38260 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38260 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38260 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38260 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38260 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38267 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0977Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38260 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0949Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38260 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38190 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38205 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38216 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38380 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38380 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38396 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38402 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0922Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38260 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38185 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38190 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38205 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38216 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38380 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38380 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38402 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-019778Linux の Linux Kernel における NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: 6a6dcae8f486c3f3298d0767d34505121c7b0b81 < 64a99eff8dcf1f951a544e6058341b2b19a8fdbd, 6a6dcae8f486c3f3298d0767d34505121c7b0b81 < 29d39e0d5f16c060e32542b2cf351c09fd22b250, 6a6dcae8f486c3f3298d0767d34505121c7b0b81 < 911ef2e8a7de5b2bae8ff11fb0bd01f699e6db65, 6a6dcae8f486c3f3298d0767d34505121c7b0b81 < df831e97739405ecbaddb85516bc7d4d1c933d6b, 6.3
Fixed
Linux: < 6.3, 6.6.96 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.36 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.5 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 9 Jul 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:24 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-20806
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38255 · cve.blacktree.nl