BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38230High confidence

jfs: validate AG parameters in dbMount() to prevent crashes

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.19% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.37-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.147-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.37-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.37-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-38230 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: jfs: validate AG parameters in dbMount() to prevent crashes
274 known not affected

The vendor explicitly states that these products are not affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's JFS filesystem. A local attacker could exploit this vulnerability by mounting a specially crafted JFS filesystem with malformed parameters. This could lead to a system crash, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). The improper validation of these parameters could also lead to undefined behavior, potentially allowing for more severe impacts.
Remediation
No remediation text is recorded.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-20026

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: validate AG parameters in dbMount() to prevent crashes Validate db_agheight, db_agwidth, and db_agstart in dbMount to catch corrupted metadata early and avoid undefined behavior in dbAllocAG. Limits are derived from L2LPERCTL, LPERCTL/MAXAG, and CTLTREESIZE: - agheight: 0 to L2LPERCTL/2 (0 to 5) ensures shift (L2LPERCTL - 2*agheight) >= 0. - agwidth: 1 to min(LPERCTL/MAXAG, 2^(L2LPERCTL - 2*agheight)) ensures agperlev >= 1. - Ranges: 1-8 (agheight 0-3), 1-4 (agheight 4), 1 (agheight 5). - LPERCTL/MAXAG = 1024/128 = 8 limits leaves per AG; 2^(10 - 2*agheight) prevents division to 0. - agstart: 0 to CTLTREESIZE-1 - agwidth*(MAXAG-1) keeps ti within stree (size 1365). - Ranges: 0-1237 (agwidth 1), 0-348 (agwidth 8). UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:1400:9 shift exponent -335544310 is negative CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5822 Comm: syz-executor130 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/12/2025 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:231 [inline] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x3c8/0x420 lib/ubsan.c:468 dbAllocAG+0x1087/0x10b0 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:1400 dbDiscardAG+0x352/0xa20 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:1613 jfs_ioc_trim+0x45a/0x6b0 fs/jfs/jfs_discard.c:105 jfs_ioctl+0x2cd/0x3e0 fs/jfs/ioctl.c:131 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: validate AG parameters in dbMount() to prevent crashes Validate db_agheight, db_agwidth, and db_agstart in dbMount to catch corrupted metadata early and avoid undefined behavior in dbAllocAG. Limits are derived from L2LPERCTL, LPERCTL/MAXAG, and CTLTREESIZE: - agheight: 0 to L2LPERCTL/2 (0 to 5) ensures shift (L2LPERCTL - 2*agheight) >= 0. - agwidth: 1 to min(LPERCTL/MAXAG, 2^(L2LPERCTL - 2*agheight)) ensures agperlev >= 1. - Ranges: 1-8 (agheight 0-3), 1-4 (agheight 4), 1 (agheight 5). - LPERCTL/MAXAG = 1024/128 = 8 limits leaves per AG; 2^(10 - 2*agheight) prevents division to 0. - agstart: 0 to CTLTREESIZE-1 - agwidth*(MAXAG-1) keeps ti within stree (size 1365). - Ranges: 0-1237 (agwidth 1), 0-348 (agwidth 8). UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:1400:9 shift exponent -335544310 is negative CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5822 Comm: syz-executor130 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/12/2025 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:231 [inline] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x3c8/0x420 lib/ubsan.c:468 dbAllocAG+0x1087/0x10b0 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:1400 dbDiscardAG+0x352/0xa20 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:1613 jfs_ioc_trim+0x45a/0x6b0 fs/jfs/jfs_discard.c:105 jfs_ioctl+0x2cd/0x3e0 fs/jfs/ioctl.c:131 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: validate AG parameters in dbMount() to prevent crashes Validate db_agheight, db_agwidth, and db_agstart in dbMount to catch corrupted metadata early and avoid undefined behavior in dbAllocAG. Limits are derived from L2LPERCTL, LPERCTL/MAXAG, and CTLTREESIZE: - agheight: 0 to L2LPERCTL/2 (0 to 5) ensures shift (L2LPERCTL - 2*agheight) >= 0. - agwidth: 1 to min(LPERCTL/MAXAG, 2^(L2LPERCTL - 2*agheight)) ensures agperlev >= 1. - Ranges: 1-8 (agheight 0-3), 1-4 (agheight 4), 1 (agheight 5). - LPERCTL/MAXAG = 1024/128 = 8 limits leaves per AG; 2^(10 - 2*agheight) prevents division to 0. - agstart: 0 to CTLTREESIZE-1 - agwidth*(MAXAG-1) keeps ti within stree (size 1365). - Ranges: 0-1237 (agwidth 1), 0-348 (agwidth 8). UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:1400:9 shift exponent -335544310 is negative CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5822 Comm: syz-executor130 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/12/2025 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:231 [inline] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x3c8/0x420 lib/ubsan.c:468 dbAllocAG+0x1087/0x10b0 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:1400 dbDiscardAG+0x352/0xa20 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:1613 jfs_ioc_trim+0x45a/0x6b0 fs/jfs/jfs_discard.c:105 jfs_ioctl+0x2cd/0x3e0 fs/jfs/ioctl.c:131 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
UnauthenticatedDenial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1465Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38226 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38226 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38226 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38226 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38226 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1054Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38212 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38226 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0977Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38226 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38228 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38226 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0698Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38226 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-022656Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 95ae5ee6069d9a5945772625f289422ef659221a, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < a4259e72363e1ea204a97292001a9fc36c7e52fd, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < c3705c82b7406a15ef38a610d03bf6baa43d6e0c, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 9242ff6245527a3ebb693ddd175493b38ddca72f, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 0c40fa81f850556e9aa0185fede9ef1112db7b39, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 8b69608c6b6779a7ab07ce4467a56df90152cfb9, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < b62a1e59d8716bbd2e73660743fe06acc97ed7d1, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 37bfb464ddca87f203071b5bd562cd91ddc0b40a, 2.6.12
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.12, 5.4.296 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.240 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.187 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.143 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.96 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.36 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.4 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Jul 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-20026
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38230 · cve.blacktree.nl