BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38147High confidence

calipso: Don't call calipso functions for AF_INET sk.

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

21 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-19796

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: calipso: Don't call calipso functions for AF_INET sk. syzkaller reported a null-ptr-deref in txopt_get(). [0] The offset 0x70 was of struct ipv6_txoptions in struct ipv6_pinfo, so struct ipv6_pinfo was NULL there. However, this never happens for IPv6 sockets as inet_sk(sk)->pinet6 is always set in inet6_create(), meaning the socket was not IPv6 one. The root cause is missing validation in netlbl_conn_setattr(). netlbl_conn_setattr() switches branches based on struct sockaddr.sa_family, which is passed from userspace. However, netlbl_conn_setattr() does not check if the address family matches the socket. The syzkaller must have called connect() for an IPv6 address on an IPv4 socket. We have a proper validation in tcp_v[46]_connect(), but security_socket_connect() is called in the earlier stage. Let's copy the validation to netlbl_conn_setattr(). [0]: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc000000000e: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000070-0x0000000000000077] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 12928 Comm: syz.9.1677 Not tainted 6.12.0 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:txopt_get include/net/ipv6.h:390 [inline] RIP: 0010: Code: 02 00 00 49 8b ac 24 f8 02 00 00 e8 84 69 2a fd e8 ff 00 16 fd 48 8d 7d 70 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 53 02 00 00 48 8b 6d 70 48 85 ed 0f 84 ab 01 00 RSP: 0018:ffff88811b8afc48 EFLAGS: 00010212 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 1ffff11023715f8a RCX: ffffffff841ab00c RDX: 000000000000000e RSI: ffffc90007d9e000 RDI: 0000000000000070 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffed1023715f9d R09: ffffed1023715f9e R10: ffffed1023715f9d R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff888123075f00 R13: ffff88810245bd80 R14: ffff888113646780 R15: ffff888100578a80 FS: 00007f9019bd7640(0000) GS:ffff8882d2d00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f901b927bac CR3: 0000000104788003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 80000000 Call Trace: <TASK> calipso_sock_setattr+0x56/0x80 net/netlabel/netlabel_calipso.c:557 netlbl_conn_setattr+0x10c/0x280 net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c:1177 selinux_netlbl_socket_connect_helper+0xd3/0x1b0 security/selinux/netlabel.c:569 selinux_netlbl_socket_connect_locked security/selinux/netlabel.c:597 [inline] selinux_netlbl_socket_connect+0xb6/0x100 security/selinux/netlabel.c:615 selinux_socket_connect+0x5f/0x80 security/selinux/hooks.c:4931 security_socket_connect+0x50/0xa0 security/security.c:4598 __sys_connect_file+0xa4/0x190 net/socket.c:2067 __sys_connect+0x12c/0x170 net/socket.c:2088 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2098 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2095 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:2095 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xaa/0x1b0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f901b61a12d Code: 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f9019bd6fa8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002a RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f901b925fa0 RCX: 00007f901b61a12d RDX: 000000000000001c RSI: 0000200000000140 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007f901b701505 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f901b5b62a0 R15: 00007f9019bb7000 </TASK> Modules linked in:

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: calipso: Don't call calipso functions for AF_INET sk. syzkaller reported a null-ptr-deref in txopt_get(). [0] The offset 0x70 was of struct ipv6_txoptions in struct ipv6_pinfo, so struct ipv6_pinfo was NULL there. However, this never happens for IPv6 sockets as inet_sk(sk)->pinet6 is always set in inet6_create(), meaning the socket was not IPv6 one. The root cause is missing validation in netlbl_conn_setattr(). netlbl_conn_setattr() switches branches based on struct sockaddr.sa_family, which is passed from userspace. However, netlbl_conn_setattr() does not check if the address family matches the socket. The syzkaller must have called connect() for an IPv6 address on an IPv4 socket. We have a proper validation in tcp_v[46]_connect(), but security_socket_connect() is called in the earlier stage. Let's copy the validation to netlbl_conn_setattr(). [0]: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc000000000e: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000070-0x0000000000000077] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 12928 Comm: syz.9.1677 Not tainted 6.12.0 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:txopt_get include/net/ipv6.h:390 [inline] RIP: 0010: Code: 02 00 00 49 8b ac 24 f8 02 00 00 e8 84 69 2a fd e8 ff 00 16 fd 48 8d 7d 70 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 53 02 00 00 48 8b 6d 70 48 85 ed 0f 84 ab 01 00 RSP: 0018:ffff88811b8afc48 EFLAGS: 00010212 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 1ffff11023715f8a RCX: ffffffff841ab00c RDX: 000000000000000e RSI: ffffc90007d9e000 RDI: 0000000000000070 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffed1023715f9d R09: ffffed1023715f9e R10: ffffed1023715f9d R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff888123075f00 R13: ffff88810245bd80 R14: ffff888113646780 R15: ffff888100578a80 FS: 00007f9019bd7640(0000) GS:ffff8882d2d00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f901b927bac CR3: 0000000104788003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 80000000 Call Trace: <TASK> calipso_sock_setattr+0x56/0x80 net/netlabel/netlabel_calipso.c:557 netlbl_conn_setattr+0x10c/0x280 net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c:1177 selinux_netlbl_socket_connect_helper+0xd3/0x1b0 security/selinux/netlabel.c:569 selinux_netlbl_socket_connect_locked security/selinux/netlabel.c:597 [inline] selinux_netlbl_socket_connect+0xb6/0x100 security/selinux/netlabel.c:615 selinux_socket_connect+0x5f/0x80 security/selinux/hooks.c:4931 security_socket_connect+0x50/0xa0 security/security.c:4598 __sys_connect_file+0xa4/0x190 net/socket.c:2067 __sys_connect+0x12c/0x170 net/socket.c:2088 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2098 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2095 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:2095 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xaa/0x1b0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f901b61a12d Code: 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f9019bd6fa8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002a RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f901b925fa0 RCX: 00007f901b61a12d RDX: 000000000000001c RSI: 0000200000000140 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007f901b701505 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f901b5b62a0 R15: 00007f9019bb7000 </TASK> Modules linked in:

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: calipso: Don't call calipso functions for AF_INET sk. syzkaller reported a null-ptr-deref in txopt_get(). [0] The offset 0x70 was of struct ipv6_txoptions in struct ipv6_pinfo, so struct ipv6_pinfo was NULL there. However, this never happens for IPv6 sockets as inet_sk(sk)->pinet6 is always set in inet6_create(), meaning the socket was not IPv6 one. The root cause is missing validation in netlbl_conn_setattr(). netlbl_conn_setattr() switches branches based on struct sockaddr.sa_family, which is passed from userspace. However, netlbl_conn_setattr() does not check if the address family matches the socket. The syzkaller must have called connect() for an IPv6 address on an IPv4 socket. We have a proper validation in tcp_v[46]_connect(), but security_socket_connect() is called in the earlier stage. Let's copy the validation to netlbl_conn_setattr(). [0]: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc000000000e: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000070-0x0000000000000077] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 12928 Comm: syz.9.1677 Not tainted 6.12.0 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:txopt_get include/net/ipv6.h:390 [inline] RIP: 0010: Code: 02 00 00 49 8b ac 24 f8 02 00 00 e8 84 69 2a fd e8 ff 00 16 fd 48 8d 7d 70 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 53 02 00 00 48 8b 6d 70 48 85 ed 0f 84 ab 01 00 RSP: 0018:ffff88811b8afc48 EFLAGS: 00010212 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 1ffff11023715f8a RCX: ffffffff841ab00c RDX: 000000000000000e RSI: ffffc90007d9e000 RDI: 0000000000000070 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffed1023715f9d R09: ffffed1023715f9e R10: ffffed1023715f9d R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff888123075f00 R13: ffff88810245bd80 R14: ffff888113646780 R15: ffff888100578a80 FS: 00007f9019bd7640(0000) GS:ffff8882d2d00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f901b927bac CR3: 0000000104788003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 80000000 Call Trace: <TASK> calipso_sock_setattr+0x56/0x80 net/netlabel/netlabel_calipso.c:557 netlbl_conn_setattr+0x10c/0x280 net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c:1177 selinux_netlbl_socket_connect_helper+0xd3/0x1b0 security/selinux/netlabel.c:569 selinux_netlbl_socket_connect_locked security/selinux/netlabel.c:597 [inline] selinux_netlbl_socket_connect+0xb6/0x100 security/selinux/netlabel.c:615 selinux_socket_connect+0x5f/0x80 security/selinux/hooks.c:4931 security_socket_connect+0x50/0xa0 security/security.c:4598 __sys_connect_file+0xa4/0x190 net/socket.c:2067 __sys_connect+0x12c/0x170 net/socket.c:2088 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2098 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2095 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:2095 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xaa/0x1b0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f901b61a12d Code: 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f9019bd6fa8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002a RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f901b925fa0 RCX: 00007f901b61a12d RDX: 000000000000001c RSI: 0000200000000140 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007f901b701505 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f901b5b62a0 R15: 00007f9019bb7000 </TASK> Modules linked in:

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-1452Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und andere, nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1054Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0859Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0843Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0828Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0759Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0745Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0698Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
ceba1832b1b2da0149c51de62a847c00bca1677a < fc2da88411470480b8b7e9177e930cedd893cf56; ceba1832b1b2da0149c51de62a847c00bca1677a < 0c813dbc851dbf418fdc6dc883fd0592d6c555cd; ceba1832b1b2da0149c51de62a847c00bca1677a < 26ce90f1ce60b0ff587de8d6aec399aa55cab28e; ceba1832b1b2da0149c51de62a847c00bca1677a < c32ebe33626335a536dbbdd09571c06dd9bc1729; ceba1832b1b2da0149c51de62a847c00bca1677a < 946bfdfcb76ac2bac5b8526447035885ff41c598; ceba1832b1b2da0149c51de62a847c00bca1677a < dd8928897594931d6912ef2f7a43e110b4958d3d; ceba1832b1b2da0149c51de62a847c00bca1677a < e2ec310c7a50271843c585e27ef14e48c66ce649; ceba1832b1b2da0149c51de62a847c00bca1677a < 6e9f2df1c550ead7cecb3e450af1105735020c92
Fixed
< 4.8; 5.4.295 ≤ 5.4.*; 5.10.239 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.186 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.142 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.94 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.34 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.15.3 ≤ 6.15.*
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 3 Jul 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:22 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-19796
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38147 · cve.blacktree.nl