BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38127High confidence

ice: fix Tx scheduler error handling in XDP callback

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.20% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 22 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.35-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.35-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.35-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-19816

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ice: fix Tx scheduler error handling in XDP callback When the XDP program is loaded, the XDP callback adds new Tx queues. This means that the callback must update the Tx scheduler with the new queue number. In the event of a Tx scheduler failure, the XDP callback should also fail and roll back any changes previously made for XDP preparation. The previous implementation had a bug that not all changes made by the XDP callback were rolled back. This caused the crash with the following call trace: [ +9.549584] ice 0000:ca:00.0: Failed VSI LAN queue config for XDP, error: -5 [ +0.382335] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x50a2250a90495525: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ +0.010710] CPU: 103 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/103 Not tainted 6.14.0-net-next-mar-31+ #14 PREEMPT(voluntary) [ +0.010175] Hardware name: Intel Corporation M50CYP2SBSTD/M50CYP2SBSTD, BIOS SE5C620.86B.01.01.0005.2202160810 02/16/2022 [ +0.010946] RIP: 0010:__ice_update_sample+0x39/0xe0 [ice] [...] [ +0.002715] Call Trace: [ +0.002452] <IRQ> [ +0.002021] ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x29 [ +0.003922] ? die_addr+0x3c/0x60 [ +0.003319] ? exc_general_protection+0x17c/0x400 [ +0.004707] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 [ +0.004879] ? __ice_update_sample+0x39/0xe0 [ice] [ +0.004835] ice_napi_poll+0x665/0x680 [ice] [ +0.004320] __napi_poll+0x28/0x190 [ +0.003500] net_rx_action+0x198/0x360 [ +0.003752] ? update_rq_clock+0x39/0x220 [ +0.004013] handle_softirqs+0xf1/0x340 [ +0.003840] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xf/0x1f0 [ +0.003925] __irq_exit_rcu+0xc2/0xe0 [ +0.003665] common_interrupt+0x85/0xa0 [ +0.003839] </IRQ> [ +0.002098] <TASK> [ +0.002106] asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 [ +0.004184] RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0xd3/0x690 Fix this by performing the missing unmapping of XDP queues from q_vectors and setting the XDP rings pointer back to NULL after all those queues are released. Also, add an immediate exit from the XDP callback in case of ring preparation failure.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ice: fix Tx scheduler error handling in XDP callback When the XDP program is loaded, the XDP callback adds new Tx queues. This means that the callback must update the Tx scheduler with the new queue number. In the event of a Tx scheduler failure, the XDP callback should also fail and roll back any changes previously made for XDP preparation. The previous implementation had a bug that not all changes made by the XDP callback were rolled back. This caused the crash with the following call trace: [ +9.549584] ice 0000:ca:00.0: Failed VSI LAN queue config for XDP, error: -5 [ +0.382335] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x50a2250a90495525: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ +0.010710] CPU: 103 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/103 Not tainted 6.14.0-net-next-mar-31+ #14 PREEMPT(voluntary) [ +0.010175] Hardware name: Intel Corporation M50CYP2SBSTD/M50CYP2SBSTD, BIOS SE5C620.86B.01.01.0005.2202160810 02/16/2022 [ +0.010946] RIP: 0010:__ice_update_sample+0x39/0xe0 [ice] [...] [ +0.002715] Call Trace: [ +0.002452] <IRQ> [ +0.002021] ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x29 [ +0.003922] ? die_addr+0x3c/0x60 [ +0.003319] ? exc_general_protection+0x17c/0x400 [ +0.004707] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 [ +0.004879] ? __ice_update_sample+0x39/0xe0 [ice] [ +0.004835] ice_napi_poll+0x665/0x680 [ice] [ +0.004320] __napi_poll+0x28/0x190 [ +0.003500] net_rx_action+0x198/0x360 [ +0.003752] ? update_rq_clock+0x39/0x220 [ +0.004013] handle_softirqs+0xf1/0x340 [ +0.003840] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xf/0x1f0 [ +0.003925] __irq_exit_rcu+0xc2/0xe0 [ +0.003665] common_interrupt+0x85/0xa0 [ +0.003839] </IRQ> [ +0.002098] <TASK> [ +0.002106] asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 [ +0.004184] RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0xd3/0x690 Fix this by performing the missing unmapping of XDP queues from q_vectors and setting the XDP rings pointer back to NULL after all those queues are released. Also, add an immediate exit from the XDP callback in case of ring preparation failure.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ice: fix Tx scheduler error handling in XDP callback When the XDP program is loaded, the XDP callback adds new Tx queues. This means that the callback must update the Tx scheduler with the new queue number. In the event of a Tx scheduler failure, the XDP callback should also fail and roll back any changes previously made for XDP preparation. The previous implementation had a bug that not all changes made by the XDP callback were rolled back. This caused the crash with the following call trace: [ +9.549584] ice 0000:ca:00.0: Failed VSI LAN queue config for XDP, error: -5 [ +0.382335] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x50a2250a90495525: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ +0.010710] CPU: 103 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/103 Not tainted 6.14.0-net-next-mar-31+ #14 PREEMPT(voluntary) [ +0.010175] Hardware name: Intel Corporation M50CYP2SBSTD/M50CYP2SBSTD, BIOS SE5C620.86B.01.01.0005.2202160810 02/16/2022 [ +0.010946] RIP: 0010:__ice_update_sample+0x39/0xe0 [ice] [...] [ +0.002715] Call Trace: [ +0.002452] <IRQ> [ +0.002021] ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x29 [ +0.003922] ? die_addr+0x3c/0x60 [ +0.003319] ? exc_general_protection+0x17c/0x400 [ +0.004707] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 [ +0.004879] ? __ice_update_sample+0x39/0xe0 [ice] [ +0.004835] ice_napi_poll+0x665/0x680 [ice] [ +0.004320] __napi_poll+0x28/0x190 [ +0.003500] net_rx_action+0x198/0x360 [ +0.003752] ? update_rq_clock+0x39/0x220 [ +0.004013] handle_softirqs+0xf1/0x340 [ +0.003840] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xf/0x1f0 [ +0.003925] __irq_exit_rcu+0xc2/0xe0 [ +0.003665] common_interrupt+0x85/0xa0 [ +0.003839] </IRQ> [ +0.002098] <TASK> [ +0.002106] asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 [ +0.004184] RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0xd3/0x690 Fix this by performing the missing unmapping of XDP queues from q_vectors and setting the XDP rings pointer back to NULL after all those queues are released. Also, add an immediate exit from the XDP callback in case of ring preparation failure.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1452Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und andere, nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38166 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38189 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38166 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38189 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0859Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0843Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0828Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0759Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0745Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-020652Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: efc2214b6047b6f5b4ca53151eba62521b9452d6 < 1d3c5d0dec6797eca3a861dab0816fa9505d9c3e, efc2214b6047b6f5b4ca53151eba62521b9452d6 < 276849954d7cbe6eec827b21fe2df43f9bf07011, efc2214b6047b6f5b4ca53151eba62521b9452d6 < 0e061abaad1498c5b76c10c594d4359ceb6b9145, efc2214b6047b6f5b4ca53151eba62521b9452d6 < 0153f36041b8e52019ebfa8629c13bf8f9b0a951, 5.5
Fixed
Linux: < 5.5, 6.6.94 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.34 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.3 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 3 Jul 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-19816
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38127 · cve.blacktree.nl