BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38124High confidence

net: fix udp gso skb_segment after pull from frag_list

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

21 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix udp gso skb_segment after pull from frag_list Commit a1e40ac5b5e9 ("net: gso: fix udp gso fraglist segmentation after pull from frag_list") detected invalid geometry in frag_list skbs and redirects them from skb_segment_list to more robust skb_segment. But some packets with modified geometry can also hit bugs in that code
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-19819

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix udp gso skb_segment after pull from frag_list Commit a1e40ac5b5e9 ("net: gso: fix udp gso fraglist segmentation after pull from frag_list") detected invalid geometry in frag_list skbs and redirects them from skb_segment_list to more robust skb_segment. But some packets with modified geometry can also hit bugs in that code. We don't know how many such cases exist. Addressing each one by one also requires touching the complex skb_segment code, which risks introducing bugs for other types of skbs. Instead, linearize all these packets that fail the basic invariants on gso fraglist skbs. That is more robust. If only part of the fraglist payload is pulled into head_skb, it will always cause exception when splitting skbs by skb_segment. For detailed call stack information, see below. Valid SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST skbs - consist of two or more segments - the head_skb holds the protocol headers plus first gso_size - one or more frag_list skbs hold exactly one segment - all but the last must be gso_size Optional datapath hooks such as NAT and BPF (bpf_skb_pull_data) can modify fraglist skbs, breaking these invariants. In extreme cases they pull one part of data into skb linear. For UDP, this causes three payloads with lengths of (11,11,10) bytes were pulled tail to become (12,10,10) bytes. The skbs no longer meets the above SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST conditions because payload was pulled into head_skb, it needs to be linearized before pass to regular skb_segment. skb_segment+0xcd0/0xd14 __udp_gso_segment+0x334/0x5f4 udp4_ufo_fragment+0x118/0x15c inet_gso_segment+0x164/0x338 skb_mac_gso_segment+0xc4/0x13c __skb_gso_segment+0xc4/0x124 validate_xmit_skb+0x9c/0x2c0 validate_xmit_skb_list+0x4c/0x80 sch_direct_xmit+0x70/0x404 __dev_queue_xmit+0x64c/0xe5c neigh_resolve_output+0x178/0x1c4 ip_finish_output2+0x37c/0x47c __ip_finish_output+0x194/0x240 ip_finish_output+0x20/0xf4 ip_output+0x100/0x1a0 NF_HOOK+0xc4/0x16c ip_forward+0x314/0x32c ip_rcv+0x90/0x118 __netif_receive_skb+0x74/0x124 process_backlog+0xe8/0x1a4 __napi_poll+0x5c/0x1f8 net_rx_action+0x154/0x314 handle_softirqs+0x154/0x4b8 [118.376811] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:bug&]kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4278! [118.376829] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:traps&]Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [118.470774] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]Kernel Offset: 0x178cc00000 from 0xffffffc008000000 [118.470810] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]PHYS_OFFSET: 0x40000000 [118.470827] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO) [118.470848] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]pc : [0xffffffd79598aefc] skb_segment+0xcd0/0xd14 [118.470900] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]lr : [0xffffffd79598a5e8] skb_segment+0x3bc/0xd14 [118.470928] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]sp : ffffffc008013770

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix udp gso skb_segment after pull from frag_list Commit a1e40ac5b5e9 ("net: gso: fix udp gso fraglist segmentation after pull from frag_list") detected invalid geometry in frag_list skbs and redirects them from skb_segment_list to more robust skb_segment. But some packets with modified geometry can also hit bugs in that code. We don't know how many such cases exist. Addressing each one by one also requires touching the complex skb_segment code, which risks introducing bugs for other types of skbs. Instead, linearize all these packets that fail the basic invariants on gso fraglist skbs. That is more robust. If only part of the fraglist payload is pulled into head_skb, it will always cause exception when splitting skbs by skb_segment. For detailed call stack information, see below. Valid SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST skbs - consist of two or more segments - the head_skb holds the protocol headers plus first gso_size - one or more frag_list skbs hold exactly one segment - all but the last must be gso_size Optional datapath hooks such as NAT and BPF (bpf_skb_pull_data) can modify fraglist skbs, breaking these invariants. In extreme cases they pull one part of data into skb linear. For UDP, this causes three payloads with lengths of (11,11,10) bytes were pulled tail to become (12,10,10) bytes. The skbs no longer meets the above SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST conditions because payload was pulled into head_skb, it needs to be linearized before pass to regular skb_segment. skb_segment+0xcd0/0xd14 __udp_gso_segment+0x334/0x5f4 udp4_ufo_fragment+0x118/0x15c inet_gso_segment+0x164/0x338 skb_mac_gso_segment+0xc4/0x13c __skb_gso_segment+0xc4/0x124 validate_xmit_skb+0x9c/0x2c0 validate_xmit_skb_list+0x4c/0x80 sch_direct_xmit+0x70/0x404 __dev_queue_xmit+0x64c/0xe5c neigh_resolve_output+0x178/0x1c4 ip_finish_output2+0x37c/0x47c __ip_finish_output+0x194/0x240 ip_finish_output+0x20/0xf4 ip_output+0x100/0x1a0 NF_HOOK+0xc4/0x16c ip_forward+0x314/0x32c ip_rcv+0x90/0x118 __netif_receive_skb+0x74/0x124 process_backlog+0xe8/0x1a4 __napi_poll+0x5c/0x1f8 net_rx_action+0x154/0x314 handle_softirqs+0x154/0x4b8 [118.376811] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:bug&]kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4278! [118.376829] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:traps&]Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [118.470774] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]Kernel Offset: 0x178cc00000 from 0xffffffc008000000 [118.470810] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]PHYS_OFFSET: 0x40000000 [118.470827] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO) [118.470848] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]pc : [0xffffffd79598aefc] skb_segment+0xcd0/0xd14 [118.470900] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]lr : [0xffffffd79598a5e8] skb_segment+0x3bc/0xd14 [118.470928] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]sp : ffffffc008013770

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix udp gso skb_segment after pull from frag_list Commit a1e40ac5b5e9 ("net: gso: fix udp gso fraglist segmentation after pull from frag_list") detected invalid geometry in frag_list skbs and redirects them from skb_segment_list to more robust skb_segment. But some packets with modified geometry can also hit bugs in that code. We don't know how many such cases exist. Addressing each one by one also requires touching the complex skb_segment code, which risks introducing bugs for other types of skbs. Instead, linearize all these packets that fail the basic invariants on gso fraglist skbs. That is more robust. If only part of the fraglist payload is pulled into head_skb, it will always cause exception when splitting skbs by skb_segment. For detailed call stack information, see below. Valid SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST skbs - consist of two or more segments - the head_skb holds the protocol headers plus first gso_size - one or more frag_list skbs hold exactly one segment - all but the last must be gso_size Optional datapath hooks such as NAT and BPF (bpf_skb_pull_data) can modify fraglist skbs, breaking these invariants. In extreme cases they pull one part of data into skb linear. For UDP, this causes three payloads with lengths of (11,11,10) bytes were pulled tail to become (12,10,10) bytes. The skbs no longer meets the above SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST conditions because payload was pulled into head_skb, it needs to be linearized before pass to regular skb_segment. skb_segment+0xcd0/0xd14 __udp_gso_segment+0x334/0x5f4 udp4_ufo_fragment+0x118/0x15c inet_gso_segment+0x164/0x338 skb_mac_gso_segment+0xc4/0x13c __skb_gso_segment+0xc4/0x124 validate_xmit_skb+0x9c/0x2c0 validate_xmit_skb_list+0x4c/0x80 sch_direct_xmit+0x70/0x404 __dev_queue_xmit+0x64c/0xe5c neigh_resolve_output+0x178/0x1c4 ip_finish_output2+0x37c/0x47c __ip_finish_output+0x194/0x240 ip_finish_output+0x20/0xf4 ip_output+0x100/0x1a0 NF_HOOK+0xc4/0x16c ip_forward+0x314/0x32c ip_rcv+0x90/0x118 __netif_receive_skb+0x74/0x124 process_backlog+0xe8/0x1a4 __napi_poll+0x5c/0x1f8 net_rx_action+0x154/0x314 handle_softirqs+0x154/0x4b8 [118.376811] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:bug&]kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4278! [118.376829] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:traps&]Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [118.470774] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]Kernel Offset: 0x178cc00000 from 0xffffffc008000000 [118.470810] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]PHYS_OFFSET: 0x40000000 [118.470827] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO) [118.470848] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]pc : [0xffffffd79598aefc] skb_segment+0xcd0/0xd14 [118.470900] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]lr : [0xffffffd79598a5e8] skb_segment+0x3bc/0xd14 [118.470928] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]sp : ffffffc008013770

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1452Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und andere, nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0859Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0843Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0828Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0759Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0745Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0722Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2025-21991 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37914 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38380 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38380 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471 Gestion détaillée du document le 22 août 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.f

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0698Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.12, 6.1.142 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.94 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.34 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.3 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 3 Jul 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-19819
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38124 · cve.blacktree.nl