BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38104High confidence

drm/amdgpu: Replace Mutex with Spinlock for RLCG register access to avoid Priority Inversion in SRIOV

Linux · Linux

4.7MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 23 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.41-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.162-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-11826

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: Replace Mutex with Spinlock for RLCG register access to avoid Priority Inversion in SRIOV RLCG Register Access is a way for virtual functions to safely access GPU registers in a virtualized environment., including TLB flushes and register reads. When multiple threads or VFs try to access the same registers simultaneously, it can lead to race conditions. By using the RLCG interface, the driver can serialize access to the registers. This means that only one thread can access the registers at a time, preventing conflicts and ensuring that operations are performed correctly. Additionally, when a low-priority task holds a mutex that a high-priority task needs, ie., If a thread holding a spinlock tries to acquire a mutex, it can lead to priority inversion. register access in amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw especially in a fast code path is critical. The call stack shows that the function amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw is being called, which attempts to acquire the mutex. This function is invoked from amdgpu_sriov_wreg, which in turn is called from gmc_v11_0_flush_gpu_tlb. The [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] indicates that a thread is trying to acquire a mutex while it is in a context that does not allow it to sleep (like holding a spinlock). Fixes the below: [ 253.013423] ============================= [ 253.013434] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 253.013446] 6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14 Tainted: G U OE [ 253.013464] ----------------------------- [ 253.013475] kworker/0:1/10 is trying to lock: [ 253.013487] ffff9f30542e3cf8 (&adev->virt.rlcg_reg_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu] [ 253.013815] other info that might help us debug this: [ 253.013827] context-{4:4} [ 253.013835] 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/10: [ 253.013847] #0: ffff9f3040050f58 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680 [ 253.013877] #1: ffffb789c008be40 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680 [ 253.013905] #2: ffff9f3054281838 (&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: gmc_v11_0_flush_gpu_tlb+0x198/0x4f0 [amdgpu] [ 253.014154] stack backtrace: [ 253.014164] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 10 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G U OE 6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14 [ 253.014189] Tainted: [U]=USER, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [ 253.014203] Hardware name: Microsoft Corporation Virtual Machine/Virtual Machine, BIOS Hyper-V UEFI Release v4.1 11/18/2024 [ 253.014224] Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn [ 253.014241] Call Trace: [ 253.014250] <TASK> [ 253.014260] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0 [ 253.014275] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 253.014287] __lock_acquire+0xa47/0x2810 [ 253.014303] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 253.014321] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 253.014333] ? amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu] [ 253.014562] ? __lock_acquire+0xa6b/0x2810 [ 253.014578] __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20 [ 253.014591] ? amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu] [ 253.014782] ? sched_clock_noinstr+0x9/0x10 [ 253.014795] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 253.014808] ? local_clock_noinstr+0xe/0xc0 [ 253.014822] ? amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu] [ 253.015012] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 253.015029] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 253.015044] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 253.015057] amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu] [ 253.015249] amdgpu_sriov_wreg+0xc5/0xd0 [amdgpu] [ 253.015435] gmc_v11_0_flush_gpu_tlb+0x44b/0x4f0 [amdgpu] [ 253.015667] gfx_v11_0_hw_init+0x499/0x29c0 [amdgpu] [ 253.015901] ? __pfx_smu_v13_0_update_pcie_parameters+0x10/0x10 [amdgpu] [ 253.016159] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 253.016173] ? smu_hw_init+0x18d/0x300 [amdgpu] [ 253.016403] amdgpu_device_init+0x29ad/0x36a0 [amdgpu] [ 253.016614] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x1a/0xc0 [amdgpu] [ 253.0170 ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: Replace Mutex with Spinlock for RLCG register access to avoid Priority Inversion in SRIOV RLCG Register Access is a way for virtual functions to safely access GPU registers in a virtualized environment., including TLB flushes and register reads. When multiple threads or VFs try to access the same registers simultaneously, it can lead to race conditions. By using the RLCG interface, the driver can serialize access to the registers. This means that only one thread can access the registers at a time, preventing conflicts and ensuring that operations are performed correctly. Additionally, when a low-priority task holds a mutex that a high-priority task needs, ie., If a thread holding a spinlock tries to acquire a mutex, it can lead to priority inversion. register access in amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw especially in a fast code path is critical. The call stack shows that the function amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw is being called, which attempts to acquire the mutex. This function is invoked from amdgpu_sriov_wreg, which in turn is called from gmc_v11_0_flush_gpu_tlb. The [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] indicates that a thread is trying to acquire a mutex while it is in a context that does not allow it to sleep (like holding a spinlock). Fixes the below: [ 253.013423] ============================= [ 253.013434] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 253.013446] 6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14 Tainted: G U OE [ 253.013464] ----------------------------- [ 253.013475] kworker/0:1/10 is trying to lock: [ 253.013487] ffff9f30542e3cf8 (&adev->virt.rlcg_reg_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu] [ 253.013815] other info that might help us debug this: [ 253.013827] context-{4:4} [ 253.013835] 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/10: [ 253.013847] #0: ffff9f3040050f58 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680 [ 253.013877] #1: ffffb789c008be40 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680 [ 253.013905] #2: ffff9f3054281838 (&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: gmc_v11_0_flush_gpu_tlb+0x198/0x4f0 [amdgpu] [ 253.014154] stack backtrace: [ 253.014164] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 10 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G U OE 6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14 [ 253.014189] Tainted: [U]=USER, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [ 253.014203] Hardware name: Microsoft Corporation Virtual Machine/Virtual Machine, BIOS Hyper-V UEFI Release v4.1 11/18/2024 [ 253.014224] Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn [ 253.014241] Call Trace: [ 253.014250] <TASK> [ 253.014260] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0 [ 253.014275] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 253.014287] __lock_acquire+0xa47/0x2810 [ 253.014303] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 253.014321] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 253.014333] ? amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu] [ 253.014562] ? __lock_acquire+0xa6b/0x2810 [ 253.014578] __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20 [ 253.014591] ? amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu] [ 253.014782] ? sched_clock_noinstr+0x9/0x10 [ 253.014795] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 253.014808] ? local_clock_noinstr+0xe/0xc0 [ 253.014822] ? amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu] [ 253.015012] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 253.015029] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 253.015044] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 253.015057] amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu] [ 253.015249] amdgpu_sriov_wreg+0xc5/0xd0 [amdgpu] [ 253.015435] gmc_v11_0_flush_gpu_tlb+0x44b/0x4f0 [amdgpu] [ 253.015667] gfx_v11_0_hw_init+0x499/0x29c0 [amdgpu] [ 253.015901] ? __pfx_smu_v13_0_update_pcie_parameters+0x10/0x10 [amdgpu] [ 253.016159] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 253.016173] ? smu_hw_init+0x18d/0x300 [amdgpu] [ 253.016403] amdgpu_device_init+0x29ad/0x36a0 [amdgpu] [ 253.016614] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x1a/0xc0 [amdgpu] [ 253.0170 ---truncated---

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: Replace Mutex with Spinlock for RLCG register access to avoid Priority Inversion in SRIOV RLCG Register Access is a way for virtual functions to safely access GPU registers in a virtualized environment., including TLB flushes and register reads. When multiple threads or VFs try to access the same registers simultaneously, it can lead to race conditions. By using the RLCG interface, the driver can serialize access to the registers. This means that only one thread can access the registers at a time, preventing conflicts and ensuring that operations are performed correctly. Additionally, when a low-priority task holds a mutex that a high-priority task needs, ie., If a thread holding a spinlock tries to acquire a mutex, it can lead to priority inversion. register access in amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw especially in a fast code path is critical. The call stack shows that the function amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw is being called, which attempts to acquire the mutex. This function is invoked from amdgpu_sriov_wreg, which in turn is called from gmc_v11_0_flush_gpu_tlb. The [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] indicates that a thread is trying to acquire a mutex while it is in a context that does not allow it to sleep (like holding a spinlock). Fixes the below: [ 253.013423] ============================= [ 253.013434] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 253.013446] 6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14 Tainted: G U OE [ 253.013464] ----------------------------- [ 253.013475] kworker/0:1/10 is trying to lock: [ 253.013487] ffff9f30542e3cf8 (&adev->virt.rlcg_reg_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu] [ 253.013815] other info that might help us debug this: [ 253.013827] context-{4:4} [ 253.013835] 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/10: [ 253.013847] #0: ffff9f3040050f58 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680 [ 253.013877] #1: ffffb789c008be40 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680 [ 253.013905] #2: ffff9f3054281838 (&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: gmc_v11_0_flush_gpu_tlb+0x198/0x4f0 [amdgpu] [ 253.014154] stack backtrace: [ 253.014164] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 10 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G U OE 6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14 [ 253.014189] Tainted: [U]=USER, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [ 253.014203] Hardware name: Microsoft Corporation Virtual Machine/Virtual Machine, BIOS Hyper-V UEFI Release v4.1 11/18/2024 [ 253.014224] Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn [ 253.014241] Call Trace: [ 253.014250] <TASK> [ 253.014260] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0 [ 253.014275] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 253.014287] __lock_acquire+0xa47/0x2810 [ 253.014303] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 253.014321] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 253.014333] ? amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu] [ 253.014562] ? __lock_acquire+0xa6b/0x2810 [ 253.014578] __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20 [ 253.014591] ? amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu] [ 253.014782] ? sched_clock_noinstr+0x9/0x10 [ 253.014795] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 253.014808] ? local_clock_noinstr+0xe/0xc0 [ 253.014822] ? amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu] [ 253.015012] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 253.015029] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 253.015044] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 253.015057] amdgpu_virt_rlcg_reg_rw+0xf6/0x330 [amdgpu] [ 253.015249] amdgpu_sriov_wreg+0xc5/0xd0 [amdgpu] [ 253.015435] gmc_v11_0_flush_gpu_tlb+0x44b/0x4f0 [amdgpu] [ 253.015667] gfx_v11_0_hw_init+0x499/0x29c0 [amdgpu] [ 253.015901] ? __pfx_smu_v13_0_update_pcie_parameters+0x10/0x10 [amdgpu] [ 253.016159] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 253.016173] ? smu_hw_init+0x18d/0x300 [amdgpu] [ 253.016403] amdgpu_device_init+0x29ad/0x36a0 [amdgpu] [ 253.016614] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x1a/0xc0 [amdgpu] [ 253.0170 ---truncated---

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362 ↗

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0861Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Zustand oder nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250430Security Bulletin 30 Apr 2020

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 30 Apr 2020, published on 30 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250423Security Bulletin 23 Apr 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 23 Apr 2025, published on 23 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0167Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-22022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37926 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-21946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37926 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0698Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40014 Gestion détaillée du document le 18 juillet 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37985 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37986 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37987 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37988 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37997 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38000 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38049 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38479 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38575 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39688 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40014 Gestion détaillée du document le 11 juillet 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37985 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37986 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37987 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37988 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37997 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38000 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38049 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38479 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38575 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39688 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37982 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37983 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37985 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37986 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37987 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37990 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37998 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-018840Linux の Linux Kernel における競合状態に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、競合状態に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: f39a3bc42815a7016a915f6cb35e9a1448788f06 < dd450b513718dfeb4c637c9335d51a55ebcd4320, 1adb5ebe205e96af77a93512e2d5b8c437548787 < d1bda2ab0cf956a16dd369a473a6c43dfbed5855, e864180ee49b4d30e640fd1e1d852b86411420c9 < 07ed75bfa7ede8bfcfa303fd6efc85db1c8684c7, e864180ee49b4d30e640fd1e1d852b86411420c9 < 1c0378830e42c98acd69e0289882c8637d92f285, e864180ee49b4d30e640fd1e1d852b86411420c9 < 5c1741a0c176ae11675a64cb7f2dd21d72db6b91, e864180ee49b4d30e640fd1e1d852b86411420c9 < dc0297f3198bd60108ccbd167ee5d9fa4af31ed0, e1ab38e99d1607f80a1670a399511a56464c0253, 6.1.105 < 6.1.162, 6.6.46 < 6.6.123, 6.10.5 < 6.11, 6.11
Fixed
Linux: < 6.11, 6.1.162 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.123 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.39 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.11 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14.2 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 18 Apr 2025 · Last source change 23 May 2026, 15:59 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-11826
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38104 · cve.blacktree.nl