BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38100High confidence

x86/iopl: Cure TIF_IO_BITMAP inconsistencies

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-082556 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 26 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 14 Jul 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.21% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 26 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.35-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.147-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.35-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.35-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/iopl: Cure TIF_IO_BITMAP inconsistencies io_bitmap_exit() is invoked from exit_thread() when a task exists or when a fork fails. In the latter case the exit_thread() cleans up resources which were allocated during fork(). io_bitmap_exit() invokes task_update_io_bitmap(), which in turn ends up in tss_update_io_bitmap(). tss_update_io_bitmap() operates on the current task. If current has TIF_IO_BITMAP set, but no bitmap installed, tss_update_io_bitmap() crashes with a NULL pointer dereference. There are two issues, which lead to that problem: 1) io_bitmap_exit() should not invoke task_update_io_bitmap() when the task, which is cleaned up, is not the current task. That's a clear indicator for a cleanup after a failed fork(). 2) A task should not have TIF_IO_BITMAP set and neither a bitmap installed nor IOPL emulation level 3 activated. This happens when a kernel thread is created in the context of a user space thread, which has TIF_IO_BITMAP set as the thread flags are copied and the IO bitmap pointer is cleared. Other than in the failed fork() case this has no impact because kernel threads including IO workers never return to user space and therefore never invoke tss_update_io_bitmap(). Cure this by adding the missing cleanups and checks: 1) Prevent io_bitmap_exit() to invoke task_update_io_bitmap() if the to be cleaned up task is not the current task. 2) Clear TIF_IO_BITMAP in copy_thread() unconditionally. For user space forks it is set later, when the IO bitmap is inherited in io_bitmap_share(). For paranoia sake, add a warning into tss_update_io_bitmap() to catch the case, when that code is invoked with inconsistent state
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-19842

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 26 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/iopl: Cure TIF_IO_BITMAP inconsistencies io_bitmap_exit() is invoked from exit_thread() when a task exists or when a fork fails. In the latter case the exit_thread() cleans up resources which were allocated during fork(). io_bitmap_exit() invokes task_update_io_bitmap(), which in turn ends up in tss_update_io_bitmap(). tss_update_io_bitmap() operates on the current task. If current has TIF_IO_BITMAP set, but no bitmap installed, tss_update_io_bitmap() crashes with a NULL pointer dereference. There are two issues, which lead to that problem: 1) io_bitmap_exit() should not invoke task_update_io_bitmap() when the task, which is cleaned up, is not the current task. That's a clear indicator for a cleanup after a failed fork(). 2) A task should not have TIF_IO_BITMAP set and neither a bitmap installed nor IOPL emulation level 3 activated. This happens when a kernel thread is created in the context of a user space thread, which has TIF_IO_BITMAP set as the thread flags are copied and the IO bitmap pointer is cleared. Other than in the failed fork() case this has no impact because kernel threads including IO workers never return to user space and therefore never invoke tss_update_io_bitmap(). Cure this by adding the missing cleanups and checks: 1) Prevent io_bitmap_exit() to invoke task_update_io_bitmap() if the to be cleaned up task is not the current task. 2) Clear TIF_IO_BITMAP in copy_thread() unconditionally. For user space forks it is set later, when the IO bitmap is inherited in io_bitmap_share(). For paranoia sake, add a warning into tss_update_io_bitmap() to catch the case, when that code is invoked with inconsistent state.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/iopl: Cure TIF_IO_BITMAP inconsistencies io_bitmap_exit() is invoked from exit_thread() when a task exists or when a fork fails. In the latter case the exit_thread() cleans up resources which were allocated during fork(). io_bitmap_exit() invokes task_update_io_bitmap(), which in turn ends up in tss_update_io_bitmap(). tss_update_io_bitmap() operates on the current task. If current has TIF_IO_BITMAP set, but no bitmap installed, tss_update_io_bitmap() crashes with a NULL pointer dereference. There are two issues, which lead to that problem: 1) io_bitmap_exit() should not invoke task_update_io_bitmap() when the task, which is cleaned up, is not the current task. That's a clear indicator for a cleanup after a failed fork(). 2) A task should not have TIF_IO_BITMAP set and neither a bitmap installed nor IOPL emulation level 3 activated. This happens when a kernel thread is created in the context of a user space thread, which has TIF_IO_BITMAP set as the thread flags are copied and the IO bitmap pointer is cleared. Other than in the failed fork() case this has no impact because kernel threads including IO workers never return to user space and therefore never invoke tss_update_io_bitmap(). Cure this by adding the missing cleanups and checks: 1) Prevent io_bitmap_exit() to invoke task_update_io_bitmap() if the to be cleaned up task is not the current task. 2) Clear TIF_IO_BITMAP in copy_thread() unconditionally. For user space forks it is set later, when the IO bitmap is inherited in io_bitmap_share(). For paranoia sake, add a warning into tss_update_io_bitmap() to catch the case, when that code is invoked with inconsistent state.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/iopl: Cure TIF_IO_BITMAP inconsistencies io_bitmap_exit() is invoked from exit_thread() when a task exists or when a fork fails. In the latter case the exit_thread() cleans up resources which were allocated during fork(). io_bitmap_exit() invokes task_update_io_bitmap(), which in turn ends up in tss_update_io_bitmap(). tss_update_io_bitmap() operates on the current task. If current has TIF_IO_BITMAP set, but no bitmap installed, tss_update_io_bitmap() crashes with a NULL pointer dereference. There are two issues, which lead to that problem: 1) io_bitmap_exit() should not invoke task_update_io_bitmap() when the task, which is cleaned up, is not the current task. That's a clear indicator for a cleanup after a failed fork(). 2) A task should not have TIF_IO_BITMAP set and neither a bitmap installed nor IOPL emulation level 3 activated. This happens when a kernel thread is created in the context of a user space thread, which has TIF_IO_BITMAP set as the thread flags are copied and the IO bitmap pointer is cleared. Other than in the failed fork() case this has no impact because kernel threads including IO workers never return to user space and therefore never invoke tss_update_io_bitmap(). Cure this by adding the missing cleanups and checks: 1) Prevent io_bitmap_exit() to invoke task_update_io_bitmap() if the to be cleaned up task is not the current task. 2) Clear TIF_IO_BITMAP in copy_thread() unconditionally. For user space forks it is set later, when the IO bitmap is inherited in io_bitmap_share(). For paranoia sake, add a warning into tss_update_io_bitmap() to catch the case, when that code is invoked with inconsistent state.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1452Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und andere, nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1054Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-37958 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38074 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0859Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0843Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0828Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0759Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0745Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0698Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-38078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-022473Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品における NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品には、NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.5, 5.10.239 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.186 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.142 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.94 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.34 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.15.3 ≤ 6.15.*, 6.16 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 3 Jul 2025 · Last source change 14 Jul 2026, 12:41 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-19842
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38100 · cve.blacktree.nl