BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38040High confidence

serial: mctrl_gpio: split disable_ms into sync and no_sync APIs

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.19% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.32-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.147-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.32-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.32-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-38040 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 38 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-38040
324 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: serial: mctrl_gpio: split disable_ms into sync and no_sync APIs The following splat has been observed on a SAMA5D27 platform using atmel_serial: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/irq/manage.c:738 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, non_block: 0, pid: 27, name: kworker/u5:0 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. irq event stamp: 0 hardirqs last enabled at (0): [ ] 0x0 hardirqs last disabled at (0): [ ] copy_process+0x1c4c/0x7bec softirqs last enabled at (0): [ ] copy_process+0x1ca0/0x7bec softirqs last disabled at (0): [ ] 0x0 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 27 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7+ #74 Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5 Workqueue: hci0 hci_power_on [bluetooth] Call trace: unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x70 dump_stack_lvl from __might_resched+0x38c/0x598 __might_resched from disable_irq+0x1c/0x48 disable_irq from mctrl_gpio_disable_ms+0x74/0xc0 mctrl_gpio_disable_ms from atmel_disable_ms.part.0+0x80/0x1f4 atmel_disable_ms.part.0 from atmel_set_termios+0x764/0x11e8 atmel_set_termios from uart_change_line_settings+0x15c/0x994 uart_change_line_settings from uart_set_termios+0x2b0/0x668 uart_set_termios from tty_set_termios+0x600/0x8ec tty_set_termios from ttyport_set_flow_control+0x188/0x1e0 ttyport_set_flow_control from wilc_setup+0xd0/0x524 [hci_wilc] wilc_setup [hci_wilc] from hci_dev_open_sync+0x330/0x203c [bluetooth] hci_dev_open_sync [bluetooth] from hci_dev_do_open+0x40/0xb0 [bluetooth] hci_dev_do_open [bluetooth] from hci_power_on+0x12c/0x664 [bluetooth] hci_power_on [bluetooth] from process_one_work+0x998/0x1a38 process_one_work from worker_thread+0x6e0/0xfb4 worker_thread from kthread+0x3d4/0x484 kthread from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 This warning is emitted when trying to toggle, at the highest level, some flow control (with serdev_device_set_flow_control) in a device driver. At the lowest level, the atmel_serial driver is using serial_mctrl_gpio lib to enable/disable the corresponding IRQs accordingly. The warning emitted by CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is due to disable_irq (called in mctrl_gpio_disable_ms) being possibly called in some atomic context (some tty drivers perform modem lines configuration in regions protected by port lock). Split mctrl_gpio_disable_ms into two differents APIs, a non-blocking one and a blocking one. Replace mctrl_gpio_disable_ms calls with the relevant version depending on whether the call is protected by some port lock.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-18612

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: serial: mctrl_gpio: split disable_ms into sync and no_sync APIs The following splat has been observed on a SAMA5D27 platform using atmel_serial: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/irq/manage.c:738 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, non_block: 0, pid: 27, name: kworker/u5:0 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. irq event stamp: 0 hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<00000000>] 0x0 hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<c01588f0>] copy_process+0x1c4c/0x7bec softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c0158944>] copy_process+0x1ca0/0x7bec softirqs last disabled at (0): [<00000000>] 0x0 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 27 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7+ #74 Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5 Workqueue: hci0 hci_power_on [bluetooth] Call trace: unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x70 dump_stack_lvl from __might_resched+0x38c/0x598 __might_resched from disable_irq+0x1c/0x48 disable_irq from mctrl_gpio_disable_ms+0x74/0xc0 mctrl_gpio_disable_ms from atmel_disable_ms.part.0+0x80/0x1f4 atmel_disable_ms.part.0 from atmel_set_termios+0x764/0x11e8 atmel_set_termios from uart_change_line_settings+0x15c/0x994 uart_change_line_settings from uart_set_termios+0x2b0/0x668 uart_set_termios from tty_set_termios+0x600/0x8ec tty_set_termios from ttyport_set_flow_control+0x188/0x1e0 ttyport_set_flow_control from wilc_setup+0xd0/0x524 [hci_wilc] wilc_setup [hci_wilc] from hci_dev_open_sync+0x330/0x203c [bluetooth] hci_dev_open_sync [bluetooth] from hci_dev_do_open+0x40/0xb0 [bluetooth] hci_dev_do_open [bluetooth] from hci_power_on+0x12c/0x664 [bluetooth] hci_power_on [bluetooth] from process_one_work+0x998/0x1a38 process_one_work from worker_thread+0x6e0/0xfb4 worker_thread from kthread+0x3d4/0x484 kthread from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 This warning is emitted when trying to toggle, at the highest level, some flow control (with serdev_device_set_flow_control) in a device driver. At the lowest level, the atmel_serial driver is using serial_mctrl_gpio lib to enable/disable the corresponding IRQs accordingly. The warning emitted by CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is due to disable_irq (called in mctrl_gpio_disable_ms) being possibly called in some atomic context (some tty drivers perform modem lines configuration in regions protected by port lock). Split mctrl_gpio_disable_ms into two differents APIs, a non-blocking one and a blocking one. Replace mctrl_gpio_disable_ms calls with the relevant version depending on whether the call is protected by some port lock.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: serial: mctrl_gpio: split disable_ms into sync and no_sync APIs The following splat has been observed on a SAMA5D27 platform using atmel_serial: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/irq/manage.c:738 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, non_block: 0, pid: 27, name: kworker/u5:0 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. irq event stamp: 0 hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<00000000>] 0x0 hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<c01588f0>] copy_process+0x1c4c/0x7bec softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c0158944>] copy_process+0x1ca0/0x7bec softirqs last disabled at (0): [<00000000>] 0x0 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 27 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7+ #74 Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5 Workqueue: hci0 hci_power_on [bluetooth] Call trace: unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x70 dump_stack_lvl from __might_resched+0x38c/0x598 __might_resched from disable_irq+0x1c/0x48 disable_irq from mctrl_gpio_disable_ms+0x74/0xc0 mctrl_gpio_disable_ms from atmel_disable_ms.part.0+0x80/0x1f4 atmel_disable_ms.part.0 from atmel_set_termios+0x764/0x11e8 atmel_set_termios from uart_change_line_settings+0x15c/0x994 uart_change_line_settings from uart_set_termios+0x2b0/0x668 uart_set_termios from tty_set_termios+0x600/0x8ec tty_set_termios from ttyport_set_flow_control+0x188/0x1e0 ttyport_set_flow_control from wilc_setup+0xd0/0x524 [hci_wilc] wilc_setup [hci_wilc] from hci_dev_open_sync+0x330/0x203c [bluetooth] hci_dev_open_sync [bluetooth] from hci_dev_do_open+0x40/0xb0 [bluetooth] hci_dev_do_open [bluetooth] from hci_power_on+0x12c/0x664 [bluetooth] hci_power_on [bluetooth] from process_one_work+0x998/0x1a38 process_one_work from worker_thread+0x6e0/0xfb4 worker_thread from kthread+0x3d4/0x484 kthread from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 This warning is emitted when trying to toggle, at the highest level, some flow control (with serdev_device_set_flow_control) in a device driver. At the lowest level, the atmel_serial driver is using serial_mctrl_gpio lib to enable/disable the corresponding IRQs accordingly. The warning emitted by CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is due to disable_irq (called in mctrl_gpio_disable_ms) being possibly called in some atomic context (some tty drivers perform modem lines configuration in regions protected by port lock). Split mctrl_gpio_disable_ms into two differents APIs, a non-blocking one and a blocking one. Replace mctrl_gpio_disable_ms calls with the relevant version depending on whether the call is protected by some port lock.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: serial: mctrl_gpio: split disable_ms into sync and no_sync APIs The following splat has been observed on a SAMA5D27 platform using atmel_serial: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/irq/manage.c:738 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, non_block: 0, pid: 27, name: kworker/u5:0 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 INFO: lockdep is turned off. irq event stamp: 0 hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<00000000>] 0x0 hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<c01588f0>] copy_process+0x1c4c/0x7bec softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c0158944>] copy_process+0x1ca0/0x7bec softirqs last disabled at (0): [<00000000>] 0x0 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 27 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7+ #74 Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5 Workqueue: hci0 hci_power_on [bluetooth] Call trace: unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x70 dump_stack_lvl from __might_resched+0x38c/0x598 __might_resched from disable_irq+0x1c/0x48 disable_irq from mctrl_gpio_disable_ms+0x74/0xc0 mctrl_gpio_disable_ms from atmel_disable_ms.part.0+0x80/0x1f4 atmel_disable_ms.part.0 from atmel_set_termios+0x764/0x11e8 atmel_set_termios from uart_change_line_settings+0x15c/0x994 uart_change_line_settings from uart_set_termios+0x2b0/0x668 uart_set_termios from tty_set_termios+0x600/0x8ec tty_set_termios from ttyport_set_flow_control+0x188/0x1e0 ttyport_set_flow_control from wilc_setup+0xd0/0x524 [hci_wilc] wilc_setup [hci_wilc] from hci_dev_open_sync+0x330/0x203c [bluetooth] hci_dev_open_sync [bluetooth] from hci_dev_do_open+0x40/0xb0 [bluetooth] hci_dev_do_open [bluetooth] from hci_power_on+0x12c/0x664 [bluetooth] hci_power_on [bluetooth] from process_one_work+0x998/0x1a38 process_one_work from worker_thread+0x6e0/0xfb4 worker_thread from kthread+0x3d4/0x484 kthread from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 This warning is emitted when trying to toggle, at the highest level, some flow control (with serdev_device_set_flow_control) in a device driver. At the lowest level, the atmel_serial driver is using serial_mctrl_gpio lib to enable/disable the corresponding IRQs accordingly. The warning emitted by CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is due to disable_irq (called in mctrl_gpio_disable_ms) being possibly called in some atomic context (some tty drivers perform modem lines configuration in regions protected by port lock). Split mctrl_gpio_disable_ms into two differents APIs, a non-blocking one and a blocking one. Replace mctrl_gpio_disable_ms calls with the relevant version depending on whether the call is protected by some port lock.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1350Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250625Security Bulletin 25 Jun 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 25 Jun 2025, published on 25 June 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38029 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38059 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38029 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38059 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38023 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38023 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-38020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38023 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38023 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38023 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38009 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38023 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38061 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0859Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0843Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0828Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38023 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0698Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-37984 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38000 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38003 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38061 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0649Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38023 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38059 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38023 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38055 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38059 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38023 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38055 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38059 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-022905Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.4, 6.1.141 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.93 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.31 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.14.9 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 18 Jun 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:20 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-18612
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38040 · cve.blacktree.nl