BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-38008High confidence

mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling

Linux · Linux

4.7MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.14% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.30-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.30-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.30-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-27861

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling The page allocator tracks the number of zones that have unaccepted memory using static_branch_enc/dec() and uses that static branch in hot paths to determine if it needs to deal with unaccepted memory. Borislav and Thomas pointed out that the tracking is racy: operations on static_branch are not serialized against adding/removing unaccepted pages to/from the zone. Sanity checks inside static_branch machinery detects it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/jump_label.c:276 __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x8e/0xa0 The comment around the WARN() explains the problem: /* * Warn about the '-1' case though; since that means a * decrement is concurrent with a first (0->1) increment. IOW * people are trying to disable something that wasn't yet fully * enabled. This suggests an ordering problem on the user side. */ The effect of this static_branch optimization is only visible on microbenchmark. Instead of adding more complexity around it, remove it altogether.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling The page allocator tracks the number of zones that have unaccepted memory using static_branch_enc/dec() and uses that static branch in hot paths to determine if it needs to deal with unaccepted memory. Borislav and Thomas pointed out that the tracking is racy: operations on static_branch are not serialized against adding/removing unaccepted pages to/from the zone. Sanity checks inside static_branch machinery detects it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/jump_label.c:276 __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x8e/0xa0 The comment around the WARN() explains the problem: /* * Warn about the '-1' case though; since that means a * decrement is concurrent with a first (0->1) increment. IOW * people are trying to disable something that wasn't yet fully * enabled. This suggests an ordering problem on the user side. */ The effect of this static_branch optimization is only visible on microbenchmark. Instead of adding more complexity around it, remove it altogether.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling The page allocator tracks the number of zones that have unaccepted memory using static_branch_enc/dec() and uses that static branch in hot paths to determine if it needs to deal with unaccepted memory. Borislav and Thomas pointed out that the tracking is racy: operations on static_branch are not serialized against adding/removing unaccepted pages to/from the zone. Sanity checks inside static_branch machinery detects it: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/jump_label.c:276 __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x8e/0xa0 The comment around the WARN() explains the problem: /* * Warn about the '-1' case though; since that means a * decrement is concurrent with a first (0->1) increment. IOW * people are trying to disable something that wasn't yet fully * enabled. This suggests an ordering problem on the user side. */ The effect of this static_branch optimization is only visible on microbenchmark. Instead of adding more complexity around it, remove it altogether.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362 ↗

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1350Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250625Security Bulletin 25 Jun 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 25 Jun 2025, published on 25 June 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37992 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37994 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37995 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37998 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38003 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38007 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38008 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38009 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38010 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38013 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37992 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37994 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37995 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37998 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38003 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38007 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38008 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38009 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38010 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38013 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-37992 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37994 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37995 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37998 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38003 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38007 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38008 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38009 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38010 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38013 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37992 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37994 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37995 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37998 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38003 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38007 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38008 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38009 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38010 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38013 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37992 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37994 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37995 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37998 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38003 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38007 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38008 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38009 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38010 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38013 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38008 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38019 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38062 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1047Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2023-53728 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53729 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53730 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53731 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53733 Référence CVE CVE-2023-7324 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7324 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38008 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38539 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38552 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38616 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38653 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

rd?id=CVE-2024-8805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38000 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38008 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38177 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38181 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38212 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37932 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37997 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38000 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38008 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38453 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38453 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38511 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38539 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0721Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37996 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37998 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37999 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38002 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38003 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38007 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38008 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38009 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38010 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38012 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38013 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-019553Linux の Linux Kernel における競合状態に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、競合状態に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: dcdfdd40fa82b6704d2841938e5c8ec3051eb0d6 < 98fdd2f612e949c652693f6df00442c81037776d, dcdfdd40fa82b6704d2841938e5c8ec3051eb0d6 < 74953f93f47a45296cc2a3fd04e2a3202ff3fa53, dcdfdd40fa82b6704d2841938e5c8ec3051eb0d6 < 71dda1cb10702dc2859f00eb789b0502de2176a9, dcdfdd40fa82b6704d2841938e5c8ec3051eb0d6 < fefc075182275057ce607effaa3daa9e6e3bdc73, 6.5
Fixed
Linux: < 6.5, 6.6.92 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.30 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.14.8 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 18 Jun 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:19 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-27861
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-38008 · cve.blacktree.nl