BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-37988High confidence

fix a couple of races in MNT_TREE_BENEATH handling by do_move_mount()

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.14% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.27-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.27-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.27-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-15866

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fix a couple of races in MNT_TREE_BENEATH handling by do_move_mount() Normally do_lock_mount(path, _) is locking a mountpoint pinned by *path and at the time when matching unlock_mount() unlocks that location it is still pinned by the same thing. Unfortunately, for 'beneath' case it's no longer that simple - the object being locked is not the one *path points to. It's the mountpoint of path->mnt. The thing is, without sufficient locking ->mnt_parent may change under us and none of the locks are held at that point. The rules are * mount_lock stabilizes m->mnt_parent for any mount m. * namespace_sem stabilizes m->mnt_parent, provided that m is mounted. * if either of the above holds and refcount of m is positive, we are guaranteed the same for refcount of m->mnt_parent. namespace_sem nests inside inode_lock(), so do_lock_mount() has to take inode_lock() before grabbing namespace_sem. It does recheck that path->mnt is still mounted in the same place after getting namespace_sem, and it does take care to pin the dentry. It is needed, since otherwise we might end up with racing mount --move (or umount) happening while we were getting locks; in that case dentry would no longer be a mountpoint and could've been evicted on memory pressure along with its inode - not something you want when grabbing lock on that inode. However, pinning a dentry is not enough - the matching mount is also pinned only by the fact that path->mnt is mounted on top it and at that point we are not holding any locks whatsoever, so the same kind of races could end up with all references to that mount gone just as we are about to enter inode_lock(). If that happens, we are left with filesystem being shut down while we are holding a dentry reference on it; results are not pretty. What we need to do is grab both dentry and mount at the same time; that makes inode_lock() safe *and* avoids the problem with fs getting shut down under us. After taking namespace_sem we verify that path->mnt is still mounted (which stabilizes its ->mnt_parent) and check that it's still mounted at the same place. From that point on to the matching namespace_unlock() we are guaranteed that mount/dentry pair we'd grabbed are also pinned by being the mountpoint of path->mnt, so we can quietly drop both the dentry reference (as the current code does) and mnt one - it's OK to do under namespace_sem, since we are not dropping the final refs. That solves the problem on do_lock_mount() side; unlock_mount() also has one, since dentry is guaranteed to stay pinned only until the namespace_unlock(). That's easy to fix - just have inode_unlock() done earlier, while it's still pinned by mp->m_dentry.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fix a couple of races in MNT_TREE_BENEATH handling by do_move_mount() Normally do_lock_mount(path, _) is locking a mountpoint pinned by *path and at the time when matching unlock_mount() unlocks that location it is still pinned by the same thing. Unfortunately, for 'beneath' case it's no longer that simple - the object being locked is not the one *path points to. It's the mountpoint of path->mnt. The thing is, without sufficient locking ->mnt_parent may change under us and none of the locks are held at that point. The rules are * mount_lock stabilizes m->mnt_parent for any mount m. * namespace_sem stabilizes m->mnt_parent, provided that m is mounted. * if either of the above holds and refcount of m is positive, we are guaranteed the same for refcount of m->mnt_parent. namespace_sem nests inside inode_lock(), so do_lock_mount() has to take inode_lock() before grabbing namespace_sem. It does recheck that path->mnt is still mounted in the same place after getting namespace_sem, and it does take care to pin the dentry. It is needed, since otherwise we might end up with racing mount --move (or umount) happening while we were getting locks; in that case dentry would no longer be a mountpoint and could've been evicted on memory pressure along with its inode - not something you want when grabbing lock on that inode. However, pinning a dentry is not enough - the matching mount is also pinned only by the fact that path->mnt is mounted on top it and at that point we are not holding any locks whatsoever, so the same kind of races could end up with all references to that mount gone just as we are about to enter inode_lock(). If that happens, we are left with filesystem being shut down while we are holding a dentry reference on it; results are not pretty. What we need to do is grab both dentry and mount at the same time; that makes inode_lock() safe *and* avoids the problem with fs getting shut down under us. After taking namespace_sem we verify that path->mnt is still mounted (which stabilizes its ->mnt_parent) and check that it's still mounted at the same place. From that point on to the matching namespace_unlock() we are guaranteed that mount/dentry pair we'd grabbed are also pinned by being the mountpoint of path->mnt, so we can quietly drop both the dentry reference (as the current code does) and mnt one - it's OK to do under namespace_sem, since we are not dropping the final refs. That solves the problem on do_lock_mount() side; unlock_mount() also has one, since dentry is guaranteed to stay pinned only until the namespace_unlock(). That's easy to fix - just have inode_unlock() done earlier, while it's still pinned by mp->m_dentry.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fix a couple of races in MNT_TREE_BENEATH handling by do_move_mount() Normally do_lock_mount(path, _) is locking a mountpoint pinned by *path and at the time when matching unlock_mount() unlocks that location it is still pinned by the same thing. Unfortunately, for 'beneath' case it's no longer that simple - the object being locked is not the one *path points to. It's the mountpoint of path->mnt. The thing is, without sufficient locking ->mnt_parent may change under us and none of the locks are held at that point. The rules are * mount_lock stabilizes m->mnt_parent for any mount m. * namespace_sem stabilizes m->mnt_parent, provided that m is mounted. * if either of the above holds and refcount of m is positive, we are guaranteed the same for refcount of m->mnt_parent. namespace_sem nests inside inode_lock(), so do_lock_mount() has to take inode_lock() before grabbing namespace_sem. It does recheck that path->mnt is still mounted in the same place after getting namespace_sem, and it does take care to pin the dentry. It is needed, since otherwise we might end up with racing mount --move (or umount) happening while we were getting locks; in that case dentry would no longer be a mountpoint and could've been evicted on memory pressure along with its inode - not something you want when grabbing lock on that inode. However, pinning a dentry is not enough - the matching mount is also pinned only by the fact that path->mnt is mounted on top it and at that point we are not holding any locks whatsoever, so the same kind of races could end up with all references to that mount gone just as we are about to enter inode_lock(). If that happens, we are left with filesystem being shut down while we are holding a dentry reference on it; results are not pretty. What we need to do is grab both dentry and mount at the same time; that makes inode_lock() safe *and* avoids the problem with fs getting shut down under us. After taking namespace_sem we verify that path->mnt is still mounted (which stabilizes its ->mnt_parent) and check that it's still mounted at the same place. From that point on to the matching namespace_unlock() we are guaranteed that mount/dentry pair we'd grabbed are also pinned by being the mountpoint of path->mnt, so we can quietly drop both the dentry reference (as the current code does) and mnt one - it's OK to do under namespace_sem, since we are not dropping the final refs. That solves the problem on do_lock_mount() side; unlock_mount() also has one, since dentry is guaranteed to stay pinned only until the namespace_unlock(). That's easy to fix - just have inode_unlock() done earlier, while it's still pinned by mp->m_dentry.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362 ↗

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1114Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff und weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37982 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37983 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37985 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37986 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37987 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37988 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37990 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37991 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37992 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37994 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37995 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37998 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37982 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37983 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37985 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37986 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37987 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37988 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37990 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37991 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37992 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37994 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37995 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37998 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-37978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37982 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37983 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37985 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37986 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37987 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37988 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37990 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37991 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37992 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37994 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37995 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37998 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37982 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37983 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37985 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37986 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37987 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37988 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37990 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37991 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37992 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37994 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37995 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37998 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37982 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37983 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37985 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37986 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37987 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37988 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37990 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37991 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37992 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37994 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37995 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37998 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37981 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37982 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37983 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37985 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37986 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37987 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37988 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37997 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38000 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38049 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37981 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37982 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37983 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37985 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37986 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37987 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37988 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37997 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38000 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38049 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-020237Linux の Linux Kernel における競合状態に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、競合状態に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 6ac392815628f317fcfdca1a39df00b9cc4ebc8b < 4f435c1f4c48ff84968e2d9159f6fa41f46cf998, 6ac392815628f317fcfdca1a39df00b9cc4ebc8b < a61afd54826ac24c2c93845c4f441dbc344875b1, 6ac392815628f317fcfdca1a39df00b9cc4ebc8b < d4b21e8cd3d7efa2deb9cff534f0133e84f35086, 6ac392815628f317fcfdca1a39df00b9cc4ebc8b < 0d039eac6e5950f9d1ecc9e410c2fd1feaeab3b6, 6.5
Fixed
Linux: < 6.5, 6.6.89 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.26 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.14.5 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 20 May 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-15866
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-37988 · cve.blacktree.nl