BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-37959High confidence

bpf: Scrub packet on bpf_redirect_peer

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

9.4CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 26 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.36% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 26 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.29-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.140-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.29-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.29-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Scrub packet on bpf_redirect_peer When bpf_redirect_peer is used to redirect packets to a device in another network namespace, the skb isn't scrubbed. That can lead skb information from one namespace to be "misused" in another namespace. As one example, this is causing Cilium to drop traffic when using bpf_redirect_peer to redirect packets that just went through IPsec decryption to a container namespace. The following pwru trace shows (1) the packet path from the host's XFRM layer to the container's XFRM layer where it's dropped and (2) the number of active skb extensions at each function. NETNS MARK IFACE TUPLE FUNC 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 xfrm_rcv_cb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 xfrm4_rcv_cb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 gro_cells_receive .active_extensions = (__u8)2, [...] 4026533547 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 skb_do_redirect .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 ip_rcv .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 ip_rcv_core .active_extensions = (__u8)2, [...] 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 __xfrm_policy_check .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 __xfrm_decode_session .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 security_xfrm_decode_session .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 kfree_skb_reason(SKB_DROP_REASON_XFRM_POLICY) .active_extensions = (__u8)2, In this case, there are no XFRM policies in the container's network namespace so the drop is unexpected. When we decrypt the IPsec packet, the XFRM state used for decryption is set in the skb extensions. This information is preserved across the netns switch. When we reach the XFRM policy check in the container's netns, __xfrm_policy_check drops the packet with LINUX_MIB_XFRMINNOPOLS because a (container-side) XFRM policy can't be found that matches the (host-side) XFRM state used for decryption. This patch fixes this by scrubbing the packet when using bpf_redirect_peer, as is done on typical netns switches via veth devices except skb->mark and skb->tstamp are not zeroed.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-15899

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Scrub packet on bpf_redirect_peer When bpf_redirect_peer is used to redirect packets to a device in another network namespace, the skb isn't scrubbed. That can lead skb information from one namespace to be "misused" in another namespace. As one example, this is causing Cilium to drop traffic when using bpf_redirect_peer to redirect packets that just went through IPsec decryption to a container namespace. The following pwru trace shows (1) the packet path from the host's XFRM layer to the container's XFRM layer where it's dropped and (2) the number of active skb extensions at each function. NETNS MARK IFACE TUPLE FUNC 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 xfrm_rcv_cb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 xfrm4_rcv_cb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 gro_cells_receive .active_extensions = (__u8)2, [...] 4026533547 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 skb_do_redirect .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 ip_rcv .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 ip_rcv_core .active_extensions = (__u8)2, [...] 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 __xfrm_policy_check .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 __xfrm_decode_session .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 security_xfrm_decode_session .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 kfree_skb_reason(SKB_DROP_REASON_XFRM_POLICY) .active_extensions = (__u8)2, In this case, there are no XFRM policies in the container's network namespace so the drop is unexpected. When we decrypt the IPsec packet, the XFRM state used for decryption is set in the skb extensions. This information is preserved across the netns switch. When we reach the XFRM policy check in the container's netns, __xfrm_policy_check drops the packet with LINUX_MIB_XFRMINNOPOLS because a (container-side) XFRM policy can't be found that matches the (host-side) XFRM state used for decryption. This patch fixes this by scrubbing the packet when using bpf_redirect_peer, as is done on typical netns switches via veth devices except skb->mark and skb->tstamp are not zeroed.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
9.4 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 26 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Scrub packet on bpf_redirect_peer When bpf_redirect_peer is used to redirect packets to a device in another network namespace, the skb isn't scrubbed. That can lead skb information from one namespace to be "misused" in another namespace. As one example, this is causing Cilium to drop traffic when using bpf_redirect_peer to redirect packets that just went through IPsec decryption to a container namespace. The following pwru trace shows (1) the packet path from the host's XFRM layer to the container's XFRM layer where it's dropped and (2) the number of active skb extensions at each function. NETNS MARK IFACE TUPLE FUNC 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 xfrm_rcv_cb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 xfrm4_rcv_cb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 gro_cells_receive .active_extensions = (__u8)2, [...] 4026533547 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 skb_do_redirect .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 ip_rcv .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 ip_rcv_core .active_extensions = (__u8)2, [...] 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 __xfrm_policy_check .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 __xfrm_decode_session .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 security_xfrm_decode_session .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 kfree_skb_reason(SKB_DROP_REASON_XFRM_POLICY) .active_extensions = (__u8)2, In this case, there are no XFRM policies in the container's network namespace so the drop is unexpected. When we decrypt the IPsec packet, the XFRM state used for decryption is set in the skb extensions. This information is preserved across the netns switch. When we reach the XFRM policy check in the container's netns, __xfrm_policy_check drops the packet with LINUX_MIB_XFRMINNOPOLS because a (container-side) XFRM policy can't be found that matches the (host-side) XFRM state used for decryption. This patch fixes this by scrubbing the packet when using bpf_redirect_peer, as is done on typical netns switches via veth devices except skb->mark and skb->tstamp are not zeroed.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Scrub packet on bpf_redirect_peer When bpf_redirect_peer is used to redirect packets to a device in another network namespace, the skb isn't scrubbed. That can lead skb information from one namespace to be "misused" in another namespace. As one example, this is causing Cilium to drop traffic when using bpf_redirect_peer to redirect packets that just went through IPsec decryption to a container namespace. The following pwru trace shows (1) the packet path from the host's XFRM layer to the container's XFRM layer where it's dropped and (2) the number of active skb extensions at each function. NETNS MARK IFACE TUPLE FUNC 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 xfrm_rcv_cb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 xfrm4_rcv_cb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 gro_cells_receive .active_extensions = (__u8)2, [...] 4026533547 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 skb_do_redirect .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 ip_rcv .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 ip_rcv_core .active_extensions = (__u8)2, [...] 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 __xfrm_policy_check .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 __xfrm_decode_session .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 security_xfrm_decode_session .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 kfree_skb_reason(SKB_DROP_REASON_XFRM_POLICY) .active_extensions = (__u8)2, In this case, there are no XFRM policies in the container's network namespace so the drop is unexpected. When we decrypt the IPsec packet, the XFRM state used for decryption is set in the skb extensions. This information is preserved across the netns switch. When we reach the XFRM policy check in the container's netns, __xfrm_policy_check drops the packet with LINUX_MIB_XFRMINNOPOLS because a (container-side) XFRM policy can't be found that matches the (host-side) XFRM state used for decryption. This patch fixes this by scrubbing the packet when using bpf_redirect_peer, as is done on typical netns switches via veth devices except skb->mark and skb->tstamp are not zeroed.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Scrub packet on bpf_redirect_peer When bpf_redirect_peer is used to redirect packets to a device in another network namespace, the skb isn't scrubbed. That can lead skb information from one namespace to be "misused" in another namespace. As one example, this is causing Cilium to drop traffic when using bpf_redirect_peer to redirect packets that just went through IPsec decryption to a container namespace. The following pwru trace shows (1) the packet path from the host's XFRM layer to the container's XFRM layer where it's dropped and (2) the number of active skb extensions at each function. NETNS MARK IFACE TUPLE FUNC 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 xfrm_rcv_cb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 xfrm4_rcv_cb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 gro_cells_receive .active_extensions = (__u8)2, [...] 4026533547 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 skb_do_redirect .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 ip_rcv .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 ip_rcv_core .active_extensions = (__u8)2, [...] 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 __xfrm_policy_check .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 __xfrm_decode_session .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 security_xfrm_decode_session .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 kfree_skb_reason(SKB_DROP_REASON_XFRM_POLICY) .active_extensions = (__u8)2, In this case, there are no XFRM policies in the container's network namespace so the drop is unexpected. When we decrypt the IPsec packet, the XFRM state used for decryption is set in the skb extensions. This information is preserved across the netns switch. When we reach the XFRM policy check in the container's netns, __xfrm_policy_check drops the packet with LINUX_MIB_XFRMINNOPOLS because a (container-side) XFRM policy can't be found that matches the (host-side) XFRM state used for decryption. This patch fixes this by scrubbing the packet when using bpf_redirect_peer, as is done on typical netns switches via veth devices except skb->mark and skb->tstamp are not zeroed.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-15899Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Scrub packet on bpf_redirect_peer When bpf_redirect_peer is used to redirect packets to a device in another network namespace, the skb isn't scrubbed. That can lead skb information from one namespace to be "misused" in another namespace. As one example, this is causing Cilium to drop traffic when using bpf_redirect_peer to redirect packets that just went through IPsec decryption to a container namespace. The following pwru trace shows (1) the packet path from the host's XFRM layer to the container's XFRM layer where it's dropped and (2) the number of active skb extensions at each function. NETNS MARK IFACE TUPLE FUNC 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 xfrm_rcv_cb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 xfrm4_rcv_cb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026533547 d00 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 gro_cells_receive .active_extensions = (__u8)2, [...] 4026533547 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 skb_do_redirect .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 ip_rcv .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 ip_rcv_core .active_extensions = (__u8)2, [...] 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 __xfrm_policy_check .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 __xfrm_decode_session .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 security_xfrm_decode_session .active_extensions = (__u8)2, 4026534999 0 eth0 10.244.3.124:35473->10.244.2.158:53 kfree_skb_reason(SKB_DROP_REASON_XFRM_POLICY) .active_extensions = (__u8)2, In this case, there are no XFRM policies in the container's network namespace so the drop is unexpected. When we decrypt the IPsec packet, the XFRM state used for decryption is set in the skb extensions. This information is preserved across the netns switch. When we reach the XFRM policy check in the container's netns, __xfrm_policy_check drops the packet with LINUX_MIB_XFRMINNOPOLS because a (container-side) XFRM policy can't be found that matches the (host-side) XFRM state used for decryption. This patch fixes this by scrubbing the packet when using bpf_redirect_peer, as is done on typical netns switches via veth devices except skb->mark and skb->tstamp are not zeroed.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1114Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff und weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

25-21745, CVE-2025-21758, CVE-2025-21760, CVE-2025-21764, CVE-2025-21765, CVE-2025-21780, CVE-2025-21795, CVE-2025-21796, CVE-2025-21802, CVE-2025-21814, CVE-2025-21846, CVE-2025-21853, CVE-2025-21861, CVE-2025-21864, CVE-2025-21867, CVE-2025-21875, CVE-2025-21887, CVE-2025-21913, CVE-2025-21919, CVE-2025-21925, CVE-2025-21926, CVE-2025-21938, CVE-2025-21959, CVE-2025-21999, CVE-2025-22005, CVE-2025-22015, CVE-2025-22055, CVE-2025-22056, CVE-2025-22060, CVE-2025-22083, CVE-2025-22090, CVE-2025-22095, CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-22111, CVE-2025-22121, CVE-2025-23136, CVE-2025-23143, CVE-2025-37785, CVE-2025-37909, CVE-2025-37917, CVE-2025-37945, CVE-2025-37959, CVE-2025-37964, CVE-2025-37972, CVE-2025-37980, CVE-2025-38125, CVE-2025-38162, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38201, CVE-2025-38232, CVE-2025-38322, CVE-2025-38591, CVE-2025-38614, CVE-2025-38681, CVE-2025-38704, CVE-2025-38721, CVE-2025-38725, CVE-2025-38727, CVE-2025-38732, CVE-2025-38736, CVE-2025-39681, CVE-2025-39691, CVE-2025-39721, CVE-2025-39748, CVE-2025-39756, CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-39770, CVE-2025-39773, CVE-2025-39782, CVE-2025-39795, CVE-2025-39826, CVE-2025-39827, CVE-2025-39845, CVE-2025-39866, CVE-2025-39871, CVE-2025-39931, CVE-2025-39953, CVE-2025-39955, CVE-2025-39964, CVE-2025-39977, CVE-2025-39978, CVE-2025-39980, CVE-2025

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-37943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-37943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-37945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0721Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37952 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37958 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0697Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-37929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37930 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37932 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37936 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37958 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0464Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-37929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37930 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37932 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37936 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37949 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-022495Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.10, 6.1.139 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.91 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.29 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.14.7 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 20 May 2025 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:41 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-15899
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    9aa1206e8f48222f35a0c809f33b2f4aaa1e2661 < de1067cc8cf0e8c11ae20cbe5c467aef19d04ded; 9aa1206e8f48222f35a0c809f33b2f4aaa1e2661 < 355b0526336c0bf2bf7feaca033568ede524f763; 9aa1206e8f48222f35a0c809f33b2f4aaa1e2661 < b37e54259cab4f78b53953d6f6268b85f07bef3e; 9aa1206e8f48222f35a0c809f33b2f4aaa1e2661 < 9e15ef33ba39fb6d9d1f51445957f16983a9437a; 9aa1206e8f48222f35a0c809f33b2f4aaa1e2661 < c4327229948879814229b46aa26a750718888503; 5.10 · Fixed: < 5.10; 6.1.139 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.91 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.29 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.14.7 ≤ 6.14.*; 6.15 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: 9aa1206e8f48222f35a0c809f33b2f4aaa1e2661 < de1067cc8cf0e8c11ae20cbe5c467aef19d04ded, 9aa1206e8f48222f35a0c809f33b2f4aaa1e2661 < 355b0526336c0bf2bf7feaca033568ede524f763, 9aa1206e8f48222f35a0c809f33b2f4aaa1e2661 < b37e54259cab4f78b53953d6f6268b85f07bef3e, 9aa1206e8f48222f35a0c809f33b2f4aaa1e2661 < 9e15ef33ba39fb6d9d1f51445957f16983a9437a, 9aa1206e8f48222f35a0c809f33b2f4aaa1e2661 < c4327229948879814229b46aa26a750718888503, 5.10 · Fixed: Linux: < 5.10, 6.1.139 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.91 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.29 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.14.7 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-37959 · cve.blacktree.nl