BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-37891High confidence

ALSA: ump: Fix buffer overflow at UMP SysEx message conversion

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.29-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.29-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.29-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-15684

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: ump: Fix buffer overflow at UMP SysEx message conversion The conversion function from MIDI 1.0 to UMP packet contains an internal buffer to keep the incoming MIDI bytes, and its size is 4, as it was supposed to be the max size for a MIDI1 UMP packet data. However, the implementation overlooked that SysEx is handled in a different format, and it can be up to 6 bytes, as found in do_convert_to_ump(). It leads eventually to a buffer overflow, and may corrupt the memory when a longer SysEx message is received. The fix is simply to extend the buffer size to 6 to fit with the SysEx UMP message.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: ump: Fix buffer overflow at UMP SysEx message conversion The conversion function from MIDI 1.0 to UMP packet contains an internal buffer to keep the incoming MIDI bytes, and its size is 4, as it was supposed to be the max size for a MIDI1 UMP packet data. However, the implementation overlooked that SysEx is handled in a different format, and it can be up to 6 bytes, as found in do_convert_to_ump(). It leads eventually to a buffer overflow, and may corrupt the memory when a longer SysEx message is received. The fix is simply to extend the buffer size to 6 to fit with the SysEx UMP message.

Why

The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: ump: Fix buffer overflow at UMP SysEx message conversion The conversion function from MIDI 1.0 to UMP packet contains an internal buffer to keep the incoming MIDI bytes, and its size is 4, as it was supposed to be the max size for a MIDI1 UMP packet data. However, the implementation overlooked that SysEx is handled in a different format, and it can be up to 6 bytes, as found in do_convert_to_ump(). It leads eventually to a buffer overflow, and may corrupt the memory when a longer SysEx message is received. The fix is simply to extend the buffer size to 6 to fit with the SysEx UMP message.

Why

The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-120 ↗

CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow'). The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-120
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1098Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37878 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37879 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37886 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37887 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37891 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37892 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37897 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37899 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37900 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37901 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37878 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37879 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37886 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37887 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37891 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37892 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37897 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37899 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37900 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37901 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37878 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37879 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37886 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37887 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37891 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37892 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37897 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37900 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37901 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37909 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37878 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37879 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37886 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37887 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37891 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37892 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37897 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37900 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37901 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37909 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37878 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37879 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37886 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37887 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37891 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37892 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37897 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37900 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37901 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37909 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0107Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2023-53705 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53751 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37761 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37891 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38731 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39898 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39993 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0082Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

rata/RHSA-2026:0917 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53552 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53675 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37891 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39933 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37889 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37891 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37892 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37897 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37900 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37901 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37909 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0625Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37889 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37891 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37892 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37894 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37895 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37896 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37897 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37898 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37899 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37888 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37889 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37891 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37892 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37897 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37900 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37901 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37909 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37888 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37889 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37891 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37892 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37897 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37900 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37901 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37909 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37879 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37886 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37887 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37889 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37891 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37892 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37897 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37900 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37901 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37911 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-019540Linux の Linux Kernel における古典的バッファオーバーフローの脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、古典的バッファオーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 0b5288f5fe63eab687c14e5940b9e0d532b129f2 < ce4f77bef276e7d2eb7ab03a5d08bcbaa40710ec, 0b5288f5fe63eab687c14e5940b9e0d532b129f2 < 226beac5605afbb33f8782148d188b64396145a4, 0b5288f5fe63eab687c14e5940b9e0d532b129f2 < 42ef48dd4ebb082a1a90b5c3feeda2e68a9e32fe, 0b5288f5fe63eab687c14e5940b9e0d532b129f2 < 56f1f30e6795b890463d9b20b11e576adf5a2f77, 6.5
Fixed
Linux: < 6.5, 6.6.90 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.28 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.14.6 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 May 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC · CWE-120 · Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-15684
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-37891 · cve.blacktree.nl