BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-37864High confidence

net: dsa: clean up FDB, MDB, VLAN entries on unbind

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 1 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.30% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.176-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-14126

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: clean up FDB, MDB, VLAN entries on unbind As explained in many places such as commit b117e1e8a86d ("net: dsa: delete dsa_legacy_fdb_add and dsa_legacy_fdb_del"), DSA is written given the assumption that higher layers have balanced additions/deletions. As such, it only makes sense to be extremely vocal when those assumptions are violated and the driver unbinds with entries still present. But Ido Schimmel points out a very simple situation where that is wrong: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZDazSM5UsPPjQuKr@shredder/ (also briefly discussed by me in the aforementioned commit). Basically, while the bridge bypass operations are not something that DSA explicitly documents, and for the majority of DSA drivers this API simply causes them to go to promiscuous mode, that isn't the case for all drivers. Some have the necessary requirements for bridge bypass operations to do something useful - see dsa_switch_supports_uc_filtering(). Although in tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/local_termination.sh, we made an effort to popularize better mechanisms to manage address filters on DSA interfaces from user space - namely macvlan for unicast, and setsockopt(IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP) - through mtools - for multicast, the fact is that 'bridge fdb add ... self static local' also exists as kernel UAPI, and might be useful to someone, even if only for a quick hack. It seems counter-productive to block that path by implementing shim .ndo_fdb_add and .ndo_fdb_del operations which just return -EOPNOTSUPP in order to prevent the ndo_dflt_fdb_add() and ndo_dflt_fdb_del() from running, although we could do that. Accepting that cleanup is necessary seems to be the only option. Especially since we appear to be coming back at this from a different angle as well. Russell King is noticing that the WARN_ON() triggers even for VLANs: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/Z_li8Bj8bD4-BYKQ@shell.armlinux.org.uk/ What happens in the bug report above is that dsa_port_do_vlan_del() fails, then the VLAN entry lingers on, and then we warn on unbind and leak it. This is not a straight revert of the blamed commit, but we now add an informational print to the kernel log (to still have a way to see that bugs exist), and some extra comments gathered from past years' experience, to justify the logic.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: clean up FDB, MDB, VLAN entries on unbind As explained in many places such as commit b117e1e8a86d ("net: dsa: delete dsa_legacy_fdb_add and dsa_legacy_fdb_del"), DSA is written given the assumption that higher layers have balanced additions/deletions. As such, it only makes sense to be extremely vocal when those assumptions are violated and the driver unbinds with entries still present. But Ido Schimmel points out a very simple situation where that is wrong: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZDazSM5UsPPjQuKr@shredder/ (also briefly discussed by me in the aforementioned commit). Basically, while the bridge bypass operations are not something that DSA explicitly documents, and for the majority of DSA drivers this API simply causes them to go to promiscuous mode, that isn't the case for all drivers. Some have the necessary requirements for bridge bypass operations to do something useful - see dsa_switch_supports_uc_filtering(). Although in tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/local_termination.sh, we made an effort to popularize better mechanisms to manage address filters on DSA interfaces from user space - namely macvlan for unicast, and setsockopt(IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP) - through mtools - for multicast, the fact is that 'bridge fdb add ... self static local' also exists as kernel UAPI, and might be useful to someone, even if only for a quick hack. It seems counter-productive to block that path by implementing shim .ndo_fdb_add and .ndo_fdb_del operations which just return -EOPNOTSUPP in order to prevent the ndo_dflt_fdb_add() and ndo_dflt_fdb_del() from running, although we could do that. Accepting that cleanup is necessary seems to be the only option. Especially since we appear to be coming back at this from a different angle as well. Russell King is noticing that the WARN_ON() triggers even for VLANs: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/Z_li8Bj8bD4-BYKQ@shell.armlinux.org.uk/ What happens in the bug report above is that dsa_port_do_vlan_del() fails, then the VLAN entry lingers on, and then we warn on unbind and leak it. This is not a straight revert of the blamed commit, but we now add an informational print to the kernel log (to still have a way to see that bugs exist), and some extra comments gathered from past years' experience, to justify the logic.

Why

The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: clean up FDB, MDB, VLAN entries on unbind As explained in many places such as commit b117e1e8a86d ("net: dsa: delete dsa_legacy_fdb_add and dsa_legacy_fdb_del"), DSA is written given the assumption that higher layers have balanced additions/deletions. As such, it only makes sense to be extremely vocal when those assumptions are violated and the driver unbinds with entries still present. But Ido Schimmel points out a very simple situation where that is wrong: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZDazSM5UsPPjQuKr@shredder/ (also briefly discussed by me in the aforementioned commit). Basically, while the bridge bypass operations are not something that DSA explicitly documents, and for the majority of DSA drivers this API simply causes them to go to promiscuous mode, that isn't the case for all drivers. Some have the necessary requirements for bridge bypass operations to do something useful - see dsa_switch_supports_uc_filtering(). Although in tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/local_termination.sh, we made an effort to popularize better mechanisms to manage address filters on DSA interfaces from user space - namely macvlan for unicast, and setsockopt(IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP) - through mtools - for multicast, the fact is that 'bridge fdb add ... self static local' also exists as kernel UAPI, and might be useful to someone, even if only for a quick hack. It seems counter-productive to block that path by implementing shim .ndo_fdb_add and .ndo_fdb_del operations which just return -EOPNOTSUPP in order to prevent the ndo_dflt_fdb_add() and ndo_dflt_fdb_del() from running, although we could do that. Accepting that cleanup is necessary seems to be the only option. Especially since we appear to be coming back at this from a different angle as well. Russell King is noticing that the WARN_ON() triggers even for VLANs: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/Z_li8Bj8bD4-BYKQ@shell.armlinux.org.uk/ What happens in the bug report above is that dsa_port_do_vlan_del() fails, then the VLAN entry lingers on, and then we warn on unbind and leak it. This is not a straight revert of the blamed commit, but we now add an informational print to the kernel log (to still have a way to see that bugs exist), and some extra comments gathered from past years' experience, to justify the logic.

Why

The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Reachable Assertion → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-617 ↗

CWE-617: Reachable Assertion. The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-617
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1114Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff und weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-53221 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56657 Référence CVE CVE-2025-10263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38584 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38627 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39997 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38008 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38019 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0759Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-57947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37920 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0745Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56742 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37920 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-019309Linux の Linux Kernel における到達可能なアサーションに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、到達可能なアサーションに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 0832cd9f1f023226527e95002d537123061ddac4 < 5e531e71b9d21d5e985251440e0d722f71299b7a, 0832cd9f1f023226527e95002d537123061ddac4 < 86c6613a69bca815f1865ed8cedfd4b9142621ab, 0832cd9f1f023226527e95002d537123061ddac4 < 8fcc1e6f808912977caf17366c625b95dc29ba4f, 0832cd9f1f023226527e95002d537123061ddac4 < 99c50c98803425378e08a7394dc885506dc85f06, 0832cd9f1f023226527e95002d537123061ddac4 < 7afb5fb42d4950f33af2732b8147c552659f79b7, 5.18
Fixed
Linux: < 5.18, 6.1.175 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.88 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.25 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.14.4 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 9 May 2025 · Last source change 1 Jun 2026, 16:05 UTC · CWE-617 · Reachable Assertion

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-14126
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-37864 · cve.blacktree.nl